- 3 hours ago
Tribunal Justice - Season 3 - Episode 02: Whose Bike is it Anyway?
Category
📺
TVTranscript
00:00You are stalking him.
00:02I did not do that.
00:04Really?
00:04You committed a crime against him.
00:07The property damage, the rants in public, threatening to take away his children.
00:13He had blocked me on text and social media had no way to contact him.
00:16He just doesn't want anything to do with you.
00:18Now on Tribunal Justice.
00:43Today's case was filed in Mojave, California.
00:46Yeah, this is case number 3001 on the count in the matter of Simpson versus Oliver.
00:52Thank you, Bert.
00:53You're welcome, Judge.
00:53Parties have been sworn in.
00:55You may be seated, ma'am.
00:56Have a seat, please.
00:56Ms. Simpson and Mr. Oliver, the two of you were in a three-year relationship, but you
01:03did not live together.
01:04And Ms. Simpson, you allege that the defendant bought your son a bike.
01:08He kept the bike at his home because you didn't have enough space.
01:12At one point, you gave him the bike for some repairs.
01:16He takes the bike to get it fixed.
01:19At some point shortly thereafter, the two of you break up.
01:22He does not return the bike.
01:23And you are suing him now for either the return of the bike, which is here, or for $383.89
01:31so you can buy your son a new bike.
01:34Mr. Oliver, you say this wasn't a gift to her son.
01:37It was a bike that you actually bought for your daughter.
01:40And so while he was allowed to use the bike, the bike was never a gift to him.
01:45And you maintain that you owe her nothing.
01:47This case is about so much more than just the bike.
01:50I've read the text messages, restraining orders, but you're suing for a bike and that's the
01:56legal issue.
01:57I'd like to take a look at the evidence that the plaintiff submitted, the plaintiff's video
02:02of her son riding the bike.
02:04May we see that, please?
02:08When was that taken, ma'am?
02:11Sorry, I don't know the exact date.
02:13They were opening a new freeway.
02:14So when they did a grand opening for the freeway, everyone could ride their bikes on it before
02:18it was open to the public for cars.
02:19Now I'd like to see the video that the defendant submitted of his daughter riding the bike.
02:30When was that video taken?
02:33That was pretty recently, about a month ago.
02:36After a lawsuit's filed and there have been multiple allegations about who actually owns
02:41the bike.
02:42But I'd like to point out another piece of evidence.
02:44Can we please put up on the screen exhibit number three?
02:49Ma'am, just for the record.
02:50That is you saying to the defendant, thank you for getting Bray a new bike.
02:54Do you ever say, well, not so fast.
02:57It's not so much a gift.
02:58You know, you don't really clarify her on this point.
03:00You kind of let it go.
03:01Yeah?
03:01Right.
03:02Yeah.
03:02So actually, it's always been known, like, whenever anybody's at my house, they always
03:07have something extra to ride.
03:08I have lots of mountain bikes.
03:10And it's always been smart for me to buy one bike at a time, rather two at a time, so
03:16that one could grow into it.
03:17How many children do you have?
03:19Two.
03:19It made it pretty clear that the bikes always stay at my house.
03:22These are for my children to grow into.
03:24I don't know that I saw that clarity.
03:26What was clear to me is that the bikes, at least this bike, was at your house.
03:30Correct.
03:31Because she didn't have room for it.
03:32And in fact, that became sort of a bone of contention.
03:35Like, I saw some of the relationship texts.
03:37It's like, wasn't he upset that you were looking for a bigger place and thought you weren't
03:40serious about him?
03:41And so there was all of that drama.
03:44But here's the other drama.
03:46You became friends with the ex-wife.
03:47And he got really annoyed by that.
03:49I did.
03:50Yes.
03:50And I know that she submitted a statement, but she didn't want to show up because she
03:55didn't want to be a part of it.
03:56So just so you know, for my purposes, I'm not considering that statement.
03:59Because if you don't want to be a part of it, don't write something that an ex-husband
04:03can't challenge in court.
04:04Yes.
04:05But your position is you became friends with the kids that she shared with the defendant.
04:09So you guys hung out.
04:11Yeah.
04:11You say that she was hanging out with your ex to try to wrest information about you and
04:16your new life from your children.
04:17Yeah.
04:17It would bother you, too, if your kids didn't ask you any questions.
04:19Honestly.
04:20It would totally bother me if I had two exes who all of a sudden started hanging out.
04:24Now, I'm going to talk about an incident that resulted in your filing a restraining order
04:29against the plaintiff.
04:31Can we put up exhibit 14?
04:33Because you allege that, I think it was in May, she showed up at your home causing a scene.
04:39What happened when she showed up?
04:41So a few times before this, she had showed up at my house unannounced.
04:45And this time she showed up at my house, standing in front of my door.
04:48Eventually, I opened my door and she was asking like who my new girlfriend was and just with
04:54my decision making and stuff like that.
04:56May 24th, you go to his house.
04:58What do you say happened?
04:59I came for the bike.
05:00And you were like, where's the bike?
05:02So you had to smash a bunch of stuff?
05:04No.
05:04So on April 27th, he said Brayson's bike won't be ready for a couple of days.
05:08So it was three weeks later.
05:10He had blocked me on text and social media had no way to contact him.
05:13So I went to his house to ask for the bike.
05:15This is what really struck me.
05:17How old is Brayson?
05:18He's 10.
05:18So Brayson is 10.
05:20The bike is a subject of contention.
05:22There are competing restraining orders.
05:24Nothing happened with either of them.
05:25No.
05:26Did you go to court?
05:27No.
05:27It got dismissed.
05:28The two of you just decided to mutually dismiss?
05:31Correct.
05:32So this bike, which has become an incredible bone of contention, the defendant, your ex-boyfriend,
05:38has purchased it.
05:39He has it.
05:40He doesn't want to give it back.
05:41But didn't you buy Brayson a new bike?
05:44I did.
05:44So now, ma'am, you buy your son a new bike.
05:47And then he said that he cried and said he missed his old bike.
05:53Really?
05:53Yeah.
05:54After that incident where I came to the house, he didn't give the bike back.
05:58I went and purchased him a new bike from Walmart.
06:00It's a cheap bike.
06:01I think it was around $100.
06:03We went for a bike ride and it was uncomfortable.
06:05He said his butt was hurting.
06:07He just, he was crying about it and said he missed his old bike.
06:11And that just bothered me as a mom.
06:13It's not fair.
06:14It was gifted to him.
06:15There's no reason that he shouldn't have it.
06:17I'm wondering, just didn't it occur to you to maybe like, look, we got to cut our losses.
06:20This bike is making mommy very angry.
06:23It's making mommy's ex very angry.
06:24And sometimes adults have to know when to stop acting like children and to tell children we have to move
06:30on.
06:31Yeah, I could have just let it go and let it be.
06:34But I was just upset because I saw my son crying over it.
06:37And that makes me sad for him.
06:39Thank you.
06:40Judge Domingo.
06:41Oh, please.
06:43Really?
06:44That's not what this is about.
06:46You want to see him.
06:48Coming up on Tribunal Justice.
06:51He grabbed your wrists according to what you said.
06:53Pushed me three weeks after my back surgery in front of all of the children.
06:57In front of all the children.
06:58Yeah.
07:02Rachel Simpson is suing ex-boyfriend Stephen Oliver for a bike she says he gave to her son or $383
07:09to buy a new one.
07:11But Stephen says the bike was no gift.
07:13It belongs to his daughter and that Rachel is just using any excuse to stalk him.
07:18What kind of person goes calling his ex-wife?
07:21Somebody's like stalking him.
07:22You call his ex-wife because your kids need to be friends?
07:26Yes.
07:26No, give me a break.
07:28The reason I became friends with her was because my son was having a birthday.
07:30But the point I want to make is that here you are, you go back, the bike is damaged February
07:3610th if I'm not mistaken.
07:37Correct?
07:38You break up February 27th or 28th.
07:41Correct?
07:4124th.
07:4224th.
07:43Boy, you got that down.
07:44February 24th.
07:45She still has the bike at this point.
07:47She then decides a month after the breakup in March to bring you this bike so that you could then
07:54bring it to be fixed.
07:55So, this is about you seeing him.
07:58I watched you so carefully in this courtroom.
08:00Most people come in here, they look straight on.
08:03You know the way you looked?
08:05This direction.
08:06All catching him.
08:07That's what you did.
08:08Because when I see cases like this with individuals hooking up with ex-girlfriends, bringing their kids together,
08:14making a ridiculous statement like my son was going to cry over some bicycle that was two years old when
08:20I could have gotten him a brand new one,
08:21you know what I know?
08:23That you are stalking him.
08:25And your T.O.P. wasn't dismissed.
08:27Didn't you agree to reduce it to just a stay-away order or something?
08:31Yep.
08:32So, I reduced it to a stay-away order after my...
08:34So, yours was granted and then you agreed to reduce it after the lawyer spoke to you.
08:38Correct.
08:39And said you don't want to be with her anyway.
08:40So, just go along with this so she doesn't have to deal with this.
08:43Correct.
08:44Yours was dismissed, not his.
08:46This is about you.
08:48You go to his house unsolicited, it's about you.
08:51I went to his house because he has blocked me.
08:52Because he cut you off, he blocked you.
08:54Yes.
08:54And you had to have this bike.
08:56After we split up, I gave the bike to him in April to get fixed.
09:00Yeah, right.
09:01That's my point.
09:02Why don't you just keep it and bring it to be fixed and lay out $127?
09:05Because he had an REI...
09:06Bring it someplace else.
09:07Don't you see?
09:08Yes, but he had an REI membership.
09:10Oh, so you would have paid more.
09:11It was under the warranty.
09:12Ma'am, it was not under the warranty.
09:14You had the bike two years.
09:15You ride bikes.
09:17You know.
09:17You laid out $100 for a bike, and then you were going to give him $127 to fix the bike
09:23that you were going to go get.
09:25So, for $227, you could have bought him the identical bike.
09:29Do you hear yourself?
09:30So, what did you and his ex-wife talk about?
09:33Yes.
09:33Well, we became friends.
09:35You've made a friend.
09:36You see, you keep your friends close.
09:38You keep your enemies closer.
09:40Yes.
09:40You're the kind of person...
09:41I mean, my friend's, March is my son's birthday.
09:44He was having a birthday party, and he really wanted the kids to come.
09:46And, of course, he really wanted the kids to come.
09:48He really wanted that bike.
09:49He was crying because the other bike car is behind.
09:52He's an only child that he considered...
09:52He would call them his brothers and sisters.
09:54So, I reached out to his ex-wife, and I said,
09:56I know that we're not friends, and we never have.
09:59Honestly, I thought she didn't like me at the beginning.
10:01She probably didn't.
10:02Probably not.
10:03And so I said, Brayson's having a birthday party,
10:05and he really wants the kids to come.
10:06If you're up to that, he would really like it.
10:09If not, I understand.
10:10And then you all became best friends.
10:11Judge Levy.
10:12The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
10:15That's it.
10:15That was a better one than mine.
10:17That's exactly right.
10:18Can we please put up photos 13 and 14, please?
10:23This is the May 15th incident.
10:25Is that right, sir?
10:26Yes, sir.
10:26And that's right, Ms. Simpson?
10:28Yes.
10:28Photograph on the right, Ms. Simpson.
10:30Mm-hmm.
10:30What'd you do to there?
10:31I kicked over the bricks.
10:33I was upset because I asked for the bike back,
10:35which he stated would be ready in a couple days,
10:36and three weeks later, he said that he didn't have the bike.
10:39Can we go to the next one, please?
10:41I think number 14.
10:43That's the damage on the right there.
10:44That's a pot that you knocked over, ma'am?
10:46Yes, that was my pot.
10:47He was giving back to me.
10:49Yeah, and you were just mad,
10:50and you let your anger get the better of you?
10:52Yes, our whole relationship was very volatile.
10:54I could see.
10:55Yeah.
10:55And what about on the left?
10:57Not something I'm proud of.
10:57What damage was it that you did there?
10:58I don't know what that is.
10:59Why don't you tell us there, Mr. Oliver, what did you do?
11:02I thought it was a kick to my security door
11:03where she was standing behind when that happened.
11:06Mm-hmm.
11:06So here's a question I have for you,
11:08and having done a fair share of these domestic violence requests,
11:13both for battered women
11:15and also for members of the Fathers' Rights Association
11:17where they got accused of stuff that they didn't do,
11:19my question is, when you went to the domestic violence court
11:23and you made your application for an order of protection against him,
11:27that was on what day?
11:28May 22nd?
11:29Yes.
11:29By the way, you provided this to us, correct?
11:32All allegations, how terrible he is.
11:35He's bipolar.
11:36He's violent around the kids.
11:38That's what you said, right?
11:40Absolutely, yes.
11:40Right.
11:41And when you said that, he wasn't in court to defend himself.
11:44You went alone.
11:45Yes.
11:46You filed it on May 22nd?
11:48Yes.
11:48And the most recent incident was the May 15th incident
11:52that you committed a crime against him.
11:54Did you tell the judge that you did that?
11:57No, because we never got to that point.
11:59Yes, it does.
12:00It says here, when were the acts of violence?
12:02When were the acts of crimes that were committed?
12:03Oh, that was the acts of violence from him.
12:05I didn't take that as acts of violence from me.
12:08You got to read your application better.
12:10The judge wanted to know what the history between the two of you was.
12:14Okay, then I misunderstood that.
12:16And that's why I just wrote...
12:17I get it.
12:17Because he wrote what I did wrong, I wrote what he did wrong.
12:19By the way, you go to court because you felt afraid, right?
12:23Mm-hmm.
12:23He had threatened you on multiple occasions in the past.
12:26Mm-hmm.
12:26He grabbed your wrists according to what you said.
12:29And pushed me three weeks after my back surgery in front of all of the children.
12:32In front of all the children.
12:33Yes.
12:33We're going to get to that in a second.
12:34Very traumatic.
12:35I know.
12:36So traumatic and so afraid were you that you went to his house, you committed that crime,
12:42that criminal mischief, without any fear that he would grab you, throw you on the ground,
12:47bop you over the head.
12:48Because at this point in time, we were still on good terms.
12:52Coming up on Tribunal Justice.
12:55Your demeanor here is so out of line.
12:59Are you in counseling?
13:05Rachel Simpson is suing her ex, Stephen Oliver, for the return of a bike she says he gave to
13:10her son, or $383, the cost of a new one.
13:14But Stephen claims the bike is his daughter's, and Rachel is using it as an excuse to remain
13:19in his life.
13:20You committed that crime, that criminal mischief, without any fear that he would grab you.
13:25Because at this point in time, we were still on good terms up until the incident.
13:29From what I understand, you told my colleagues, the judge didn't even grant you a temporary
13:34order of protection after reading all these nasty allegations.
13:39Because they were from in the past.
13:40No, that's not why.
13:41Judges do that all the time.
13:43I suspect that the reason the judge didn't grant you order of protection based upon the
13:47allegations is because he didn't believe you.
13:48Well, that's what it had noted.
13:50They had noted that it was too far in the past.
13:52So in here, you talk about threatening texts, in which you claim the defendant sent you texts
13:58saying, I'll tear you both apart.
14:00You will both find out what happens when you take away my kids.
14:03That's what you claim he said.
14:06Yes.
14:07We have no context in that.
14:08Why don't you tell her what the context is of those texts that you told her about, you
14:13will both find out what happens when you take away my kids.
14:16So this incident here, I was walking into Walmart and I was minding my own business.
14:21And she had come up behind me and got right into my face, harassing me.
14:26And I pushed my cart away.
14:28I exited Walmart.
14:30And in the parking lot, she was saying that she's in a team up with the mother of my children
14:35and try to get the kids taken away from me in court.
14:38That's when I was like, oh, I will tear both of you apart in court if you try to take
14:42away
14:42my children.
14:43That's exactly right.
14:44You just harassed me the entire time.
14:46Hold on.
14:46You admit that you saw him in the Walmart.
14:48Yes.
14:48And when he walked away from you, you followed him into the parking lot.
14:51Yes.
14:52And you exchanged words at his car.
14:53I did not say those words, but yes.
14:56Yeah.
14:56Because you're not going to admit that you said those words.
14:58No.
14:58I mean, I admit it.
14:59And do you have reason to believe that that's what she did?
15:02That she spoke to your ex-wife, told your ex-wife stuff that interfered with your relationship
15:07with your kids.
15:08Absolutely.
15:08Because your wife filed a modification of your custody and visitation petition, didn't
15:13she?
15:14That's what you did.
15:15You chirp in his ex-wife's ear about stuff that-
15:18No, that's not true.
15:19Oh, it's not?
15:20That's not true.
15:20So let me ask you this.
15:21It's all public record.
15:23Now, your ex-wife goes to court and files a modification of the visitation order seeking
15:28to suspend your contact with your kids unless you went to forced mediation.
15:33Yes, sir.
15:33And it was denied.
15:34I remember that.
15:34Yes, it was.
15:35The judge didn't buy her story either.
15:37My sense is that the judge knew that you guys were in cahoots.
15:40I've seen it all too often.
15:41And it's disgusting because you couldn't give him up.
15:45You know what it's like-
15:46I don't want him.
15:46No.
15:46Yeah, I know you don't want him.
15:47The relationship was horrific.
15:48You knew exactly what going to his ex-wife was going to do.
15:51I didn't tell her that.
15:51We're going to cause her to go to court.
15:53We were planning on going on a trip together.
15:55And I was supposed to pick up his kids from school.
15:57And that day, he filed the restraining order.
15:59And then he was like, I can't pick up the kids.
16:01I'm so sorry.
16:02So-
16:02So that's what started all of this.
16:04Okay.
16:04Now, would you agree with me, Ms. Simpson?
16:07That it would be inherently unfair for a litigant to go to one court and make a request for some
16:14relief.
16:15Have that judge deny the relief that's requested and then decide to go to another court and make that same
16:22request.
16:23I did not do that.
16:24In your application to the judge on May 22nd, the one that you just admitted, was dismissed.
16:30Mm-hmm.
16:31What was it that you asked the judge in court for?
16:35For possession of my son's bike.
16:36And the judge denied and dismissed your complaint.
16:39Right?
16:40Yes.
16:40Everything was dismissed.
16:41And now here you are in front of us wanting the same bike back.
16:45By the way, I believe you bought the bike as a gift for her son, but that's okay.
16:48I have nothing further.
16:50I have a few more questions.
16:51May I hear from your witness, please?
16:53Could you state your name for the record, please?
16:55Jenna Jacobson.
16:56What's your relationship to the plaintiff?
16:58She's one of my best friends.
17:00Okay.
17:00I'm going to take your testimony with a grain of salt because, frankly, you're not impartial.
17:06That doesn't mean that I think you're a liar.
17:08So now, what evidence do you have to offer Ms. Jacobson that this was, in fact, a gift from the
17:14defendant?
17:16I've been friends with her, and they were in a relationship for the majority of our friendship.
17:22And we would go on bike rides, and then once his bike was getting fixed, I knew that it was
17:27with Stephen.
17:28And then when he wouldn't give it back, then Brayson had no bike.
17:32Thank you.
17:33You can take your seat.
17:34Okay.
17:34And Ms. Simpson, I took some time at the outset of my examination to go over some text messages that
17:41were sent between the two of you.
17:43There's a later one that I think is pretty instructive from my perspective.
17:48This was submitted by the defendant.
17:50It looks like the date was May 2024, after the breakup when things are really messy.
17:56And you're mad at her.
17:57You say priorities were debit card info, which you harassed me about, and an a** bike, and then slander, and
18:04talk, S word, and stalk me, and now you're kind of, you're mad.
18:09And in response to his anger, you say, by giving you a bike back because I bought a new one.
18:17What that text message says to me is that you gave him the bike back, you bought Brayson a new
18:23bike, that you had no intention of making this bike a big issue.
18:27He's the big issue, Judge.
18:29But he had the bike at his house because it needed repairs, and then I came back to pick up
18:34the bike.
18:35So I didn't have the bike, so I'm not sure why that text said to give it back to him.
18:39You had the bike.
18:41Mm-hmm.
18:41I know you went through this REI thing that he belonged to, but you would think, with all the turmoil
18:47and angst in this relationship, and the alleged aggravation and fear that you felt,
18:53that you would have kept the bike, because you bought it, it was yours, and brought it to be fixed.
18:58Instead of continuing to rely on the man who you don't want to be in a relationship with any longer.
19:04Yes.
19:04There's also something, your demeanor here is so out of line with what the things we've been saying to you
19:12and the allegations that we are putting out there about your behavior with him.
19:18It's just incongruous.
19:19Are you in counseling?
19:21Huh?
19:21Are you in counseling therapy?
19:23Yes.
19:23Good.
19:24I don't have any other questions.
19:25No.
19:25We're going to retire to deliberate.
19:27Thank you, Wolf.
19:29Court now stands in recess.
19:31I think there are different types of gifts.
19:40When you're in a relationship and your kids are playing together, it is perfectly comprehensible to me that you'd say,
19:48oh, yeah, it's his to use while he's here, while the kids are biking.
19:51He never really had possession of the bike, Brayson.
19:54I do not believe Brayson had such emotional attachment to this bike that after she buys him a new bike,
20:00after she essentially, in my view, relinquishes ownership in this text message to the defendant that, oh, no, my boy
20:07is so sad.
20:07I got to go get him.
20:08Oh, he had a meltdown.
20:09Yeah, I don't buy that.
20:10I don't see any basis for either ordering him to return it or pay her.
20:14I agree with you.
20:15But I think if you would listen to what she was saying, like when you were asking, did you break
20:20that planter?
20:21Yeah, I broke that.
20:22Did you kick that wall down?
20:23Yeah, I kicked that wall down.
20:24Did you do, it's almost as though acting out is acceptable to her and on the same level, her son
20:30acts out.
20:30You know, he cries, he cries and she says, okay.
20:33I mean, it's like they're perpetuating that type of inappropriate behavior.
20:38I am appalled by the idea that she made friends with the wife.
20:42Appalled.
20:43I mean, you see that so often in these situations where they're trying to insert themselves in the person's life.
20:49They can't get into them directly, so they become friends with their friends.
20:52That was weird.
20:53Yeah, friends with their friends, friends with the ex-wife, friends.
20:56And I've heard people say, oh, yeah, those used to be his friends, but they're all mine now.
20:59And it's like connecting to the person any way you can.
21:03Stalking him in the store.
21:04Yeah, did you stalk him?
21:05Yeah, I did.
21:05I mean, there was no end to her abuse of him.
21:08So I think she's entitled to nothing.
21:10I almost wish he counterclaimed for harassment.
21:13I agree with both of you, and I believe that her case should be dismissed.
21:16And the other reason is that she filed the same request regarding the bike with the case in the domestic
21:23violence court that the judge dismissed.
21:25And she turns around and still can't let it go.
21:28You all know how rare it is for a judge in an ex parte domestic violence petition to deny a
21:36temporary order of protection.
21:38It's usually, give it to her on a temporary basis, better safe than sorry.
21:43Because, as the judges will say to themselves, because if he or she ends up dead, I don't want it
21:49on me.
21:50So what they do is they're just more inclined to grant it.
21:53Luckily for him, the judge saw through her nonsense when he denied her request.
21:59So if you didn't do anything wrong and someone's manipulating the system, stick to your guns and hope, pray, that
22:07you get a smart enough judge who can see through it.
22:09Sounds to me like we're unanimous.
22:11Yeah, and it's not a good situation at all.
22:13Thanks.
22:17Court is back in session.
22:19Parties are reminded you're still under oath.
22:21Thank you, Byrd.
22:22We have deliberated and we've reached a unanimous verdict.
22:25And I'm going to tell you this, Ms. Simpson.
22:27You caught a break.
22:29And the break is that the defendant did not countersue you for harassment.
22:33The property damage, the rants in public, threatening to take away his children.
22:39These are things that had you asserted a counterclaim against her, you very well might have prevailed.
22:46And the fact that he didn't is also further evidence that he just doesn't want anything to do with you.
22:51You are suing him over a bike that, one, you already replaced, over which you relinquished ownership that was the
22:59subject of a claim you raised in another court, and you still can't get enough.
23:05Court's a real thing.
23:06People wait in line to have their cases heard.
23:09Not heard and re-heard and re-heard and I've already handled the property, but my son is really sad.
23:15So even though you allegedly have beaten me while I'm chasing you down in Walmart and showing up at your
23:20house and breaking your stuff, you just got to give me the bike back.
23:24I mean, it just rings hollow.
23:26Your case is most certainly dismissed.
23:29Good luck to you, sir, and good luck with your family.
23:31Thank you, ma'am.
23:32This case is now concluded.
23:33Parties are excused.
23:34You may step out.
23:39I'm a little bit upset because, sorry, I feel like the characters, they got it all right.
23:45It's just another attempt to harass, to be honest with you.
23:48The bike was a gift to my son.
23:50He loved that bike.
23:52My children will grow out of that one.
23:53I'll sell that one.
23:54They'll have new ones, so.
23:55She's crazy, but really, he's crazy.
23:58I just go separate ways.
23:59I don't give any energy to her and just wish her the best.
24:04It's okay.
24:04I'll just, I'm going to buy the same bike.
24:07It's just sad that I have to fork over the money myself.
24:10Got family drama?
24:12Let Tribunal Justice decide your case.
24:15Find us on social media at Tribunal Justice.
24:48We'll be right back.
24:48We'll be right back.
Comments