Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
The Washington Commanders' offense would benefit greatly from adding another top end wide receiver, but is Brandon Aiyuk the best option? Kevin Sheehan defends his stance on wanting the Commanders to sign Brandon Aiyuk this NFL offseason despite the red flags and controversy surrounding him.
Transcript
00:00This from DKC. DKC writes, this is no knock on you personally, but last summer I thought
00:09nothing could be possibly more annoying than every show on every station spending half
00:15of the airtime on Terry's contract. But I think the IU talk is already neck and neck
00:23and it's already April. Yeah, I've gotten a lot of this from many of you, that you are
00:30already sick to your stomach with all of the Brandon-Iyuk discussion. And with respect
00:39to that discussion, man, a lot of you completely disagree with me, which is fine. This from
00:44Wizard's sixth man, my take on IU, who I do, let me just repeat my take. If he's physically
00:56ready to go, and from a medical standpoint, if he is psychologically fit and you can get
01:05him for no compensation in terms of draft picks and a heavily incentivized deal, which is what
01:13Nikki Javala and Matt Barrows from The Athletic reported, is the only way Washington would
01:18do a deal, then I'm absolutely on board because there's literally no risk. You know, you can
01:25cut him loose without any pain. That's how I would view it. I'm not up for spending real
01:31money on this guy in year one and definitely not up for spending any, you know, meaningful
01:37draft compensation. The problem with the draft compensation, as I've mentioned, is that if
01:42you trade for him, you inherit his contract, nobody's going to do that. We've talked about
01:47that now for months. Nobody's inheriting that contract unless somehow you were able to work
01:53out a restructure beforehand or simultaneous with. I also, you know, do have in my mind a
02:02feeling of, you know, if they don't release him, you know, anytime soon, you know, there is
02:08a time where you move on and you look at others, you know, whether it's a Diggs or whether it's
02:14a Keenan Allen or somebody else that's out there, Juwan Jennings, um, et cetera. Um, or
02:19you decide, Hey, we're going to roll with what we have, uh, because it's somewhat comparable
02:23to what they had in 2024. Um, but wizard sixth man writes, uh, this is such a lazy take, uh,
02:32by Kevin Sheehan DC, who I love. This guy has a talking about IU. This guy has a five to
02:3910%
02:40chance of returning to elite status ever. And then he writes in capital letters, E V E R ever,
02:48uh, I'd say 55% chance he's done and a team cancer 35% chance. He's okay. Not the same,
02:56but a contributor. Um, yeah, I don't know. I have zero ability to guess, uh, on what kind
03:06of player he could potentially be. You don't know anything about his physical or mental
03:11status. There is certainly a trail of bad judgment. There is no doubt about that, but
03:17a five to 10% chance of returning to elite status at 28 years old, that doesn't even sound
03:23in the realm of possibility or of knowing, um, from, uh, skins fan AZ. Ha ha. I'd run from
03:31IU. Why would watch Washington want to add a player that acted like that out of pocket need
03:37a vet, get digs, hard pass on IU. My two cents. Um, yes. Back to the original email that I
03:47read
03:47from DKC about the, the situation has become annoying and you know, uh, comparable to the Terry
03:54situation and the annoyance of talking about that all the time. I do agree. And I do feel a little
04:01bit of the, Oh God, another Brandon Iuke report. Uh, yesterday it was the, you know, Nikki Jabala,
04:10Matt Barrows story, uh, where the team says, you know, multiple sources with knowledge of the
04:16situation. Say the team is not going to trade compensation for him and would only do a highly
04:21incentivized short-term deal. Um, which is the only way I'd be in favor of them doing it. And I
04:28think
04:28many of you as well, even if you aren't a big Brandon Iuke fan, but I feel the, you know,
04:34every
04:35other day or every day recently, certainly since the draft, but look, this is the guy that most people
04:44around the league believe is going to end up playing for Washington next year. And this isn't,
04:50you know, just a waiver wire pickup of some aging vet. This is a guy who was the last time
04:57he played
04:57a full season in 2023 was an elite wide receiver elite finished as the second best receiver in the
05:06league per pro football focus for whatever that's worth averaged 18 yards per reception. And he was
05:13ascending, ascending, ascending. This is not really, in my opinion, comparable to the Terry discussion.
05:22They both can be annoying, but, uh, I don't think they're, they're the same story. You know,
05:28the Terry story last summer was about a contract extension and whether he got it or not, he was
05:34going to play because he was under contract. You know, it would have been insanity for Terry to hold
05:41out. Once the season began, that would have worked against him. So he was always going to play. He was
05:48under contract with the team. Iuke is a total wild card whose presence could be, could be certainly no
05:59guarantee, but the reason you do this is that he could be an absolute game changer, a season changer.
06:07If he's the player or even remotely close to the player that he was in 2023, it could also turn
06:15out
06:15to be a dud. You know what? It won't turn out to be if they handle it the right way,
06:21a disaster,
06:22because if there's little risk in terms of contract salary cap, giving up draft picks,
06:30and you can turn them loose if he becomes a problem, or if he just sucks and he's not any
06:36good,
06:38it can't be a disaster. I mean, what's he going to do in, you know, a month or two? Is
06:44he really going
06:45to ruin a pretty solid locker room? If he really is nuts, is he going to ruin Jaden? You know,
06:51there's a lot
06:52that could happen that would be negative, but once it becomes negative, they can turn away from him
06:59and say goodbye if they structure it the right way going in. I would view this as, you know, if
07:05they
07:05do this deal that they, you know, reportedly would be interested in doing, is extremely low risk
07:12and extremely high reward potential. Totally different from Terry and the annoyance of talking
07:20about Terry every day last summer, in my opinion. That was something in which we were following the
07:27back and forth on a contract extension for a guy who was under contract heading into 2025 and was
07:35never going to sit. You know, it did get painted and it did get presented by many. And some of
07:42you
07:43brought that to the air with me, that essentially you thought this was about Terry playing or not
07:49playing for the team. It was never about that. He was under contract for 2025 and it would have been
07:57personally devastating to his chances to ever getting a big payday had he held out of actual
08:04regular season games. So that was never going to happen. He was always going to play. It wasn't,
08:10you know, Terry or no Terry. It was Terry under a new contract or Terry in the last year of
08:17his contract.
08:19Ayuk isn't with the team. He's a total wild card as to whether or not he'll be with us or
08:24not.
08:25There's a heavy lean towards him being with us. And the upside is very high in my, in my view,
08:35because I believe that he was an elite receiver and descending to, you know, top five kind of
08:42territory over the next few years after 2023, he was that kind of a receiver. And I think if you
08:48get
08:49that, that's a major season changing, you know, event because now you've got him and Terry,
08:59but it could also not work out. But again, that's why you go in super low risk as a team
09:05so that if it doesn't work out, see ya. And there's no pain.
Comments

Recommended