Skip to playerSkip to main content
A redrawing of Sarawak’s electoral map is underway but it’s the politics happening before the map is even finalised that’s raising eyebrows. Allegations that new seats are already being divided among parties have put the spotlight on whether the redelineation process is truly independent. On this episode of #ConsiderThis Melisa Idris speaks with Geoffrey Tang, President of the civil action group, Persatuan Pemangkin Daya Masyarakat (ROSE).

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:10Hi, welcome back to Consider This. Sarawak is set to increase its number of state seats
00:17from 82 to 99, but scrutiny is growing over how the process is unfolding amid claims of
00:24political parties already positioning themselves for the new seats.
00:28So what safeguards are needed to ensure that electoral boundaries are drawn in the public
00:34interest? Joining me on the show to discuss this further is Geoffrey Tung, who is President
00:39of the Civil Action Group Persatuan Pemankin Daya Masyarakat, better known as ROSE. Geoffrey,
00:44thank you so much for being on the show with me today. What are the main concerns that civil
00:49society groups have, like ROSE? What concerns do you have about the way this redelineation
00:55process is unfolding?
00:58First of all, we need to take notice that Sarawak is growing and fair representation is important.
01:06But for us as a civil society, the main important part is the process. So the Election Commission,
01:15EC, must be independent in that sense. So we cannot be seen, we hope and we want EC cannot
01:23be seen as following instruction from any state authority or anybody with political interest.
01:32So because for us, once the process lack of transparency, it creates risk. So risk can be risk of corruption,
01:42risk of undue influence, even from powerful or corporate links, you know, like corporate mafia nowadays,
01:49that may not reflect what ordinary Sarawakian needs. So there is also a growing perception that decision may already
01:59been shaped before proper consultation, like now. So once the perception is there, trust starts to erode.
02:08So at Sarawak NGO, we love Sarawak so much, we should be first to say, our future must be shaped
02:16by fair
02:17system and not by hidden influence. Yeah.
02:21Okay. So right now, the Sarawak State Assembly has agreed to the new seats. But what you're saying is that
02:29nothing is confirmed until the EC releases its report of any new constituencies. Can I get a better
02:37understanding of what you'll be watching? When the EC eventually releases its report, what are you going to be
02:44looking out for in those proposed maps?
02:49I wouldn't say any specific area or constituency. We have been waiting and waiting ever since the sudden
02:59call for Dune sitting on 7th of July, 2025. And we have numerous of elections and we will have
03:09Sabah election, then we have New Year, we have Christmas, then we have a lot of holidays, we have Chinese
03:15New Year.
03:17Our main concern, our main area, when the maps are released, we don't know when, hopefully it's very soon
03:24because after Hariaya, after Easter, then we do not have much holiday. So we hope the map will be released
03:31soon.
03:32So we are looking at a few key areas, a few key things. Number one is the fairness, fairness in
03:40voter size.
03:41Because constituencies should be not extremely unequal, without strong justification.
03:49Meaning to say they need to be more or less the same number of voters. Secondly, due to our Sarawak
04:00ethical group, we need to respect for local ties and communities.
04:04Boundaries should reflect real communities, especially in rural and in both indigenous areas.
04:15And the third is the most important, which is the transparency.
04:19So we hope EC will come in and explain clearly and be transparent on how they come with the decision
04:30of how they draw the boundaries.
04:33Importantly, we also need to look where the voters actually are because election is all basically all about voters.
04:41So we are not talking about land size and non-electorals.
04:47So today, we have about 2 million voters, 2 million plus. It depends when is the role.
04:542 million plus voters. So at the current status, we have about 58% of our voters staying and living
05:06in urban,
05:10like Puching, Sibu, Miri and Bintulu. These are major ones in Sarawak.
05:16So naturally, a question arises, when you have 58% of the voters based or staying in urban,
05:22does that mean that 58% of the seats should be urban as well?
05:27So the answer is not that simple, Melissa.
05:29So we recognize that Sarawak geography is big, like it's huge.
05:35So rural area needs representation, but due to size, accessibility and service delivery challenges.
05:46At the same time, urban voter, this is very important for fair representation.
05:51Urban voters must not be underrepresented to the point where their votes carry significant less weight.
06:00Yeah. So what we need is a balance, you know, it should be largely reflect population,
06:06but not to be stretched too far from fairness.
06:12So that's why we are suggesting EC need to set a clear standard.
06:19We have been talking about this, a clear standard, and that is very important.
06:24Because for the past few delineations, we do not see election commission EC setting any standards.
06:33So let's start with this Sarawak delineation.
06:35For this Sarawak delineation, we hope, Rose's perspective, is we propose that EC should start putting a standard of,
06:46let's start with something more practical.
06:49Start with plus minus 33% deviation guidelines.
06:53Because without a clear standard, fairness becomes subjective.
06:57Right.
06:58We do not want to.
06:59Yeah.
06:59Sorry to interrupt.
07:00I'm just going to ask you what happens if the EC comes out with their proposed map,
07:08and it's very similar to the leaked map that has been circulating amongst political parties.
07:17Is there any recourse for Sarawak voters to challenge the EC proposed boundaries?
07:26Of course, if the final map, if the final map turns to be very similar or somehow similar to what
07:32had been leaked or circulated viral around,
07:35people will naturally ask a simple question.
07:37It may give an impression that consultation is just a formality only.
07:43No, when that happens, people start wondering who really benefit all these things.
07:47So we must avoid any perception that boundaries with alienation are shaped by political convenience or even by corporate linked
07:55interests.
07:56So we need to make sure that it's fair to Sarawakian.
08:00So that's how, because even a technical, very technical sound map can lose legitimacy if the process is not trusted.
08:12So we still go back to the process.
08:14Can Sarawak voters, do Sarawak voters have a say in the process?
08:22Can Sarawak voters be more actively involved in the process?
08:27Is there anything they should be doing now?
08:28So what Rose has been evocating out is that we believe that a lot of people, a lot of voters,
08:36do not realise that the public or the voters themselves has a role to play in this.
08:41So when the map are published, when the map is published, there will be a formal objection period.
08:48So what do Sarawak can, what can Sarawak can do?
08:51So they need to pay attention when it comes out.
08:54Look carefully at the constituency, what have moved, what have shift, what have changed.
08:58So there's a, there's a thing called review process.
09:02So the review process include two rounds of public hearing, public notice and submission of objection.
09:09So public can actually go to, register to our social media, to our Rose Facebook or TikTok or IG, sign
09:17up as an objector.
09:19So we will form a group of 100 people to submit an objection, ideally together as a community of that
09:25particular affected community, affected room or constituency.
09:30So each objector of 100 can send in representatives to present the local inquiry for 30 minutes.
09:37Yeah. So this is one of the very few moments where public participation directly shapes representation.
09:44But even if you cannot get 100 people or objectives to sign up, you can still send in representation, but
09:51you do not have the opportunity.
09:52The only thing is you do not have the opportunity for the local inquiry, but it still can be done,
09:57still can be heard.
09:58And all these things will be recorded and easy had to do explanation and, and, and give an explanation thereafter.
10:05Remember, if we stay silent, if we leave the, we will leave the space for decision to be made without
10:12enough scrutiny.
10:13So that's when system become vulnerable to influence. Yeah.
10:17So it's very important that, uh, we believe Sarawak deserve the best standards of governance.
10:23Uh, we want to, to have Sarawak, um, to help Sarawak and we demand Sarawak to have fair, transparent and,
10:32uh, good for our state.
10:34Yeah.
10:35Jeffrey, thank you so much for being on the show with me and sharing those perspectives on behalf of many
10:41throughout voters.
10:41I'm sure are concerned, uh, about the issues that you've raised tonight.
10:45That was Jeffrey Tang from Persatuan Pemakindaya Masyarakat, better known as ROSE, wrapping up this episode of Consider This.
10:52I'm Melissa Idris signing off for the evening. Thank you so much for watching and good night.
Comments

Recommended