- 2 days ago
Are there health risks associated with wireless technologies like cellular telephones, 5G, and cell towers? A peer-reviewed study analyzing nationally representative survey data found that approximately one in eight adults in the United States report experiencing health effects they attribute to wireless radiation, and about one in six adults in Australia and one in thirteen in Canada also reported negative health effects tied to wireless exposure. Negative effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life. Are there any prophetic ramifications? Are there any steps you can take to help yourself? What may such steps include? Steve Dupuie and Dr. Thiel discuss these issues in this video.
A written article of related interest is also available and is titled 'Wireless radiation linked to health symptoms' URL: https://www.cogwriter.com/news/other-news/wireless-radiation-linked-to-health-symptoms/
A written article of related interest is also available and is titled 'Wireless radiation linked to health symptoms' URL: https://www.cogwriter.com/news/other-news/wireless-radiation-linked-to-health-symptoms/
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:04Greetings, friends. This is Steve Dupuis for the Bible News Prophecy Program with Dr. Bob Thiel,
00:09bringing you news and analysis of world events in light of Bible prophecy. Dr. Thiel, are there
00:15really any risks with the use of cell phones and other forms of wireless communication?
00:21Absolutely. For quite a few years, I've raised concerns about health risks associated with
00:25different wireless technologies. A peer-reviewed study came out that says millions have health
00:32symptoms because of them. And it found, get this, one out of eight adults in the United States
00:38experienced health effects they attribute to wireless radiation. One out of six adults in
00:43Australia. One out of 13 in Canada are reporting the same kind of thing. Dr. Ann Steinemann,
00:51who co-authored the study, said that frequent symptoms are being near electromagnetic radiation,
01:01including cell towers, cell phones, and wireless networks. And she actually has a name for this
01:06condition, the EMR syndrome, which stands for electromagnetic radiation syndrome. So I looked
01:14to study up. And its abstract says that wireless radiation, such as from cell phones, Wi-Fi, smart
01:21meters, laptops, and cell towers, is pervasive in society. And wireless sensitivity is a condition
01:28of adverse health effects from exposure to wireless radiation. And amongst all genders and categories,
01:36males between 25 and 34 seem to be the biggest group that's affected. Anyway, it says, given these results,
01:46across three countries, over 26 million adults experienced health problems from wireless radiation.
01:51Results underscore the need for further research on ways to prevent and reduce exposure and associated effects,
01:59adverse effects. Well, cell phones have been around for decades. Why are they just now starting to
02:08study the effects of radiation? Well, the realization that there's health risk isn't new. Back in the
02:15summer of 2024, Dr. Mercola put out an article saying, look, several studies between 2022 and 2024
02:24underscore the health risks posed by 5G technology. This research contradicts the International
02:32Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Guidelines. Studies reveal that 5G's potential to
02:39induce neurological damage and psychiatric problems include increased risk of conditions like dementia.
02:47A December 2023 study found the detrimental effects of this type of radiation on rat sperm, showing it to have
02:57an
02:57effect on reproduction here. And he says in February 2024, research indicates significant changes in fecal
03:06microbone profiles from getting in effect, which also can affect the immune system as well as mental well-being.
03:13So Mercola says that the wireless industry is built on the premise that the only type of radiation
03:22capable of causing harm is ionizing like x-rays. So researchers for a long time warned that
03:28even non-ionizing and non-heating radiation can jeopardize your health. This includes not only human health,
03:35but also that of plants and animals. Well, the 11th chapter of the book of Revelation,
03:43in it, the Bible says that when Jesus comes, he's going to destroy those who destroy the earth.
03:48Well, that will perhaps mainly because of warfare and radiation associated with warfare,
03:53possible that radiation from wireless sources may also be a factor.
03:59One of the functions of a nation's government is to research the adverse effects of new technologies.
04:06Didn't any of these governments research 5G radiation?
04:11Yeah. Dr. McCollin mentioned there was some paper that he helped write and he subtitled a part called
04:20Great Plans, Great Promises with False Claims. And it says that the EU in its own potential health risks,
04:29it was in their report, but they just ignored what their own report said.
04:35So, you know, there are risks. You know, and many of us have long had some health concerns related to
04:45wireless radiation.
04:48How long ago was there any telephone radiation research done?
04:54Well, for example, back in 2019, Scientific American put out the following quote.
05:01Here's the headline. We have no reason to believe 5G is safe.
05:07Okay. Then it says the telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists to
05:14research the effect of cell phone radiation as, quote, fear mongering over the advent of wireless technologies, 5G.
05:22Since much of our research is publicly funded, we believe it's our ethical responsibility to inform the public
05:28about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.
05:34More than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on biological and health effects of
05:41non-ionizing electromagnetic fields signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits.
05:50The appeal makes a bunch of assertions, including, quote,
05:55Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below
06:03both international and national guidelines.
06:07Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular risk,
06:11increase in harmful pre-radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system,
06:18learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans.
06:25Damage goes well beyond the human race as there's growing evidence of the harmful effects on both plant and animal
06:32life.
06:34The scientists who signed the appeal arguably constitute a majority of experts
06:41on the effects of non-ionizing radiation.
06:44They published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.
06:52And the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer
06:57classifies this radiation as possibly carcinogenic to humans.
07:03And in the past, there was a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program.
07:11They found, quote, clear evidence that two years after exposure to cell phone radiation,
07:16this increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice to both sexes.
07:24And again, I'm reading from Scientific American.
07:28As a society, we should invest, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G
07:33in cellular technology that requires installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites
07:41in the U.S. close to where we live, work, and play.
07:46So, we have over 2,000 papers published on the effects of EMFs.
07:51A $30 million study proving cell phone radiation increases the risk of cancer
07:58and the installation of 800,000 new cell towers across the United States.
08:03Tell me there's not any more.
08:05Yeah, there's more.
08:07Even back in 2019, a paper said, quote,
08:11the 5G danger can't be overrated.
08:1420,000 satellites for 5G were to be launched,
08:19sending focused beams of these intense microwave radiation over the entire Earth.
08:25There's only 20,000 satellites?
08:28The government will certainly protect me from that focused radiation, won't it?
08:33No.
08:35Here's something that Activist Post published like seven years ago.
08:40This 5G research has already proven that exposure is harmful to people, animals, and nature.
08:48In the U.S. and elsewhere, outdated legislation and guidelines protect all sources of wireless
08:54radiation, but not the public or the environment.
08:57And that includes 5G.
08:59Just because these things are legal doesn't mean they're safe.
09:04The fat substitute Olestra is legal too.
09:07It doesn't mean you want to risk intestinal mayhem and eat anything made with it.
09:16Here's some more stuff about all this.
09:19Environmental effects on existing radiation have been ignored.
09:24And then with 5G, you've increased it substantially.
09:27Risks include things like damage to the eyes, cataracts, retinal damage, severe sweat, sweating,
09:34skin damage, immune system disruption, metabolic disruption, neurological disturbances,
09:40leakage of the blood-brain barrier, damage to sperm, increased risk of cancer,
09:45collapse of insect populations, the base of food for birds and bats, rise in bacterial resistance and
09:52bacterial shifts, and damage to plants and trees.
09:57And when we finish this one article, it says millimeter wavelengths at high intensity have been used in
10:04military applications in active denial systems for crowd control.
10:10And out of Ireland, something was published that said some research on non-dermal effects have shown that these millimeter
10:19wavelengths target cell membranes and have adverse biological effects, as well as clinical effects,
10:26such as cataracts, immune systems, and physiological effects on the heart and on blood pressure.
10:35Well, why is the government not protecting me from being hooked in a giant microwave of tens of thousands of
10:42satellites?
10:43Well, another report that I read says that the rollout of 5G was just another great example of how our
10:50federal
10:50health regulatory agencies have been greatly compromised by big, powerful corporations.
10:57You'd think with all these thousands of peer-reviewed studies showing clear danger with regard to electromagnetic
11:02radiation overdose, something our planet is experiencing, these technologies would be required to go through
11:09some safety tests. The truth is, if they went through any type of safety testing, there's no way they'd be
11:14approved.
11:15Well, that's not quite true. They go through some kind, but not enough.
11:21And then it says studies are already published, show neuropsychiatric disorders to do sperm count,
11:29brain damage, cancer, amongst other things. And Dr. Sharon Goldberg, internal medicine physician
11:36professor, gave testimony on this. She said, wireless radiation has biological effects, period.
11:45And the reality is, humans don't actually know all the possible effects of 5G networks,
11:53or that of the 6G or 7G, which are all, they're also kind of working along this.
11:58Now, officially, and I went to the FCC's website a while back, and they say these things are safe.
12:04Okay? And it says they closely monitor the health results. But in this report, it doesn't say it's
12:12proved it's totally safe. There's a reason they don't do that, because they can't. There simply
12:18aren't enough sufficient studies, and they couldn't do them anyway, because it's all, it's everywhere now.
12:25So you can't have a control group that doesn't have any effect on this. Okay? So, you know,
12:33you can't, you can't left the bag kind of a kind of thing. So it would take a long time
12:39to figure this
12:40out, quite not even more, but we already know that this is an issue. So yes, there are certainly health
12:46risks.
12:48Is there anything we can do to protect ourselves?
12:52Yes. A couple of different things. One, you can eat fruits and vegetables. That helps.
12:58Two, try not to eat foods with a lot of pesticides and toxins, because that just makes the batters worse.
13:07Also, if you use cell phones much, try not to have them close to your head very often.
13:13And in my case, my cell phone is almost always off. But if you do have it on, don't carry
13:19it, you know,
13:20next to you so close all the time, because that's at least something you can control.
13:26Now, this will sound strange. I had an EMF reading once done at a house a long time ago. I
13:33found that
13:34my clock radio generated a lot. So instead of having it so close to my head when I sleep, I
13:40moved it.
13:40And that actually greatly reduced that. So anyway, eating more fruits and vegetables helps prevent
13:50oxidative damage, because fruits and vegetables are high in antioxidants. And in Isaiah 55 too,
13:57we're told to eat what's good. And doing that can reduce health risks associated with wireless and
14:02other forms of technology. Anyway, wireless radiation has health risks that I don't think they can test for.
14:10And there's a lot of reports about damage from it. Anyway, just about all of us have
14:15exposure to it and should try to actually minimize it.
14:19Thank you, Dr. Thiel. For more interviews with Dr. Thielen, in addition to written as well as audio
14:24articles, visit our website at BibleNewsProphecy.net. This is Steve Dupuis for the Bible News Prophecy Program.
14:36You