Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 hours ago
Government is seeking to amend the DNA Act to have mandatory DNA samples taken from terrorist fighters and returnees from "Terrorist Zones."

This, it says, is to address a serious loophole in the present legislation.

But the Opposition is challenging part of the amendment giving power to the Minister of Defence, saying it raises serious Constitutional red flags.

Alicia Boucher has the details from the Senate.
Transcript
00:00Government wants to add people returning from terrorism or conflict zones like Syria and Iraq
00:06to the DNA bill for mandatory non-evasive collection of DNA.
00:10According to Minister in the Office of the Prime Minister, Senator Darrell Allaha,
00:14this includes three categories, those deemed foreign terrorist fighters
00:18and returnees, for which there are two classifications.
00:22One application is the definition from a previously drafted returnee bill
00:27referring to those who are entering from conflict or terrorist zones
00:31or those who are detained in camps in those zones.
00:35And two...
00:36Under Clause 3b, and I will read the clause,
00:40who the minister with responsibility for the Anti-Terrorism Act, i.e. the Minister of Defense,
00:47has reasonable grounds to believe poses a threat or risk of committing a terrorist act
00:52and who is not a foreign terrorist fighter.
00:54We are looking at non-intimate samples
00:58and we are looking at taking those samples when they arrive at the border.
01:05According to Allaha, present legislation captures deportees, but not these categories,
01:10even amid the possibility of radicalization, exposure to terrorist groups
01:14and the potential national security risk they may pose.
01:17Over the past two years, six persons have returned to this country from conflict zones,
01:27two of which were adults and the remaining were children.
01:32And those persons, therefore, were therefore permitted to reintegrate into society
01:40without any biological record being obtained.
01:44The minister says the term foreign terrorist fighter maintains the same context
01:49as in the Anti-Terrorism Act, in that they would have either knowingly traveled to plan,
01:55commit, support or facilitate acts of terrorism.
01:58But opposition Senator Sanjeev Boudou signals a vast difference, saying
02:02that act requires a person to first be convicted by a court of law before being labeled as such.
02:08It is not sufficient to say that we are not prosecuting the person as a terrorist.
02:14And even if you wish to mount that argument, then the question arises,
02:17if you're not necessarily chasing a prosecution,
02:20why deem someone a foreign terrorist fighter with that term, with that definition, Mr. President,
02:26for the sole purpose of obtaining a DNA sample at all?
02:30As it stands, Boudou objects to the government's claim
02:33that the amendment only requires a simple majority.
02:36These powers are simply and plainly excessive, unconstitutional,
02:42and they are downright dangerous, Mr. President.
02:45He adds that in all categories currently mandated to give a DNA sample,
02:49namely suspects, detainees and accused and deportees, police intervention is necessary.
02:55This, he states, creates independence in the administration of justice under the law.
03:00Boudou suggests that if a minister has reasonable grounds to deem a person a risk,
03:06it should be dealt with judicially.
03:08Let an independent judicial officer, specifically a high court judge,
03:14determine whether the threshold is met,
03:16and permit the subject of that order, the person,
03:20the opportunity to challenge and present their case as appropriate.
03:24Independent Senator Dr. Desiree Murray agrees with the spirit of the legislation,
03:30acknowledging the risk facing the country from people returning from terrorist zones.
03:34However, she too has serious concerns.
03:38Constitutional rights are in fact being breached,
03:41and that should be acknowledged by seeking the support of three-fifths
03:45of all members of the Senate for passage of the bill.
03:48Dr. Desiree Murray is also troubled by what she says are systemic inadequacies
03:52which may result in those retaining, inclusive of children,
03:57being placed at a serious disadvantage.
Comments