I delitti del mostro di Firenze, una serie di sette duplici omicidi avvenuti fra il 1974 e il 1985 nella provincia toscana, hanno terrorizzato il Paese e ridisegnato una pagina della storia contemporanea italiana. Soggetto e sceneggiatura di Luciano Palmerino e Giuseppe Rinaldi. Regia: Alessandro Galluzzi
2021 Italia
Prima Parte:
https://dai.ly/xa37icg
Seconda Parte:
https://dai.ly/xa3b0jk
#MostroDiFirenze #Pacciani #CompagniDiMerende #Vanni #PietroPacciani #Crime #TrueCrime #Delitti #Misteri #Killer #SerialKiller #ColdCase #Cronaca #CronacaNera #Mistero #Delitto #Documentari #Documentario #Docu #Doc #DivinumCrime
2021 Italia
Prima Parte:
https://dai.ly/xa37icg
Seconda Parte:
https://dai.ly/xa3b0jk
#MostroDiFirenze #Pacciani #CompagniDiMerende #Vanni #PietroPacciani #Crime #TrueCrime #Delitti #Misteri #Killer #SerialKiller #ColdCase #Cronaca #CronacaNera #Mistero #Delitto #Documentari #Documentario #Docu #Doc #DivinumCrime
Categoria
📺
TVTrascrizione
00:00:06Who are the four classified witnesses accusing Panni and Pacciani?
00:00:13So let's start from the first one, from Alfa, his name is Ferdinando Pucci, at 65 years old, he is oligophrenic,
00:00:21that is, suffering from mental retardation.
00:00:23This status is formalized by the disability pension he receives.
00:00:30Beta is Giancarlo Lotti, an orphan, an alcoholic and on the verge of dementia and mental retardation.
00:00:43Gamma is a woman, her name is Gabriella Gribelli, she is a prostitute, also an alcoholic.
00:00:51I went out on the street with shame, I then started drinking.
00:00:56And Delta is Norberto Galli, he is the pimp of another prostitute called Filippa Nicoletti.
00:01:05Well, this court of miracles is the heavy artillery with which the prosecution wants to overturn the outcome of the trial.
00:01:17We had an eyewitness present at the latest double homicide.
00:01:22The structure went to Mercatone, to Pietro, to get this women's stuff.
00:01:34The three of them had an agreement to hand over the excised findings to a doctor.
00:01:43The mythomaniac Otio.
00:01:45They called me from Perugia and said, look, the monster of Florence is here in Perugia.
00:01:51Francesco Narducci's death has turned into a real mystery.
00:02:04We had an eyewitness present at the last double homicide,
00:02:09he saw how things unfolded and told them.
00:02:14He told them by providing elements that were not known
00:02:18and that only those who were actually present on site could have known.
00:02:30The main accuser of Vanni and Pacciani is the beta test Giancarlo Lotti.
00:02:36Michele Giuttari arrives at Giancarlo Lotti through Gabriella Ghiribelli, gamma heads,
00:02:44who tells during a telephone interception with Giancarlo Lotti
00:02:53I saw your red 128 in front of three of the places where the crimes took place
00:03:01and for this reason Michele Giuttari then goes to get Lotti.
00:03:12Giancarlo Lotti, known as Catanga, a character who was decisive in the trials of Merende's companions,
00:03:21surely with serious mental problems, he accused himself, he said that he was the one who shot Giogoli,
00:03:30he told a whole series of things about the gang.
00:03:34Lotti is the excellent mythomaniac, he is the classic mythomaniac, a person who is drawn into the investigation
00:03:46he seizes the opportunity to praise himself, the opportunity to become an important figure arises
00:04:01and he catches it all over the roof.
00:04:08He doesn't have enough brain cells to play scopa.
00:04:11I can't say one thing, the ball is written.
00:04:17A pure fool.
00:04:20I remember that in town, after going to dinner,
00:04:23they sent him to the sports field to see the Martians,
00:04:26he made a living doing odd jobs.
00:04:31Lotti is considered so important
00:04:34to be admitted to the program for collaborators of justice,
00:04:39a situation that is not easy to manage even for his lawyers.
00:04:43I remember that he was a very simple person,
00:04:46he had a complicated life,
00:04:49he had no home, he had no job.
00:04:51The relationship with him was not easy because he was evidently a collaborator of justice
00:04:57he had had an apartment placed at his disposal,
00:05:02he was driven around in the car, he was taken to the restaurant,
00:05:05that is, he essentially had a relationship of trust
00:05:09much more with the people who were around her as justice workers,
00:05:13as judicial police, as police headquarters staff,
00:05:16than with his defender.
00:05:18With regards to the interrogation and especially the last one, I would like to say
00:05:22that nobody read anything,
00:05:24It is not that any written statements by Lotti were reported.
00:05:28He was remembered in Lotti by those who followed him
00:05:32and who was doing the investigation at the time,
00:05:35that in previous interviews held without the assistance of counsel
00:05:39he had made a whole series of statements,
00:05:43statements that were then somehow contested by Lotti
00:05:47who nodded the content of the interrogation was this.
00:05:51It seemed to me to be a questionable interrogation method, to say the least.
00:05:55or at least did not guarantee the defender
00:05:57full awareness of what Lotti was saying.
00:06:01These difficulties then led me to ask to be replaced.
00:06:09After the resignation of lawyer Pinucci, he takes over Lotti's defense.
00:06:13lawyer Falciani.
00:06:15The main difficulty for him is the leaks.
00:06:19Even though Lotti's most important interrogations are classified,
00:06:23the press is always well informed.
00:06:27I received a phone call from the press about the fact that Lotti
00:06:34he had essentially confessed to the murder of the German boys.
00:06:43I said, but I don't think so at all.
00:06:46They inform me that they are in possession of, I don't know if the report
00:06:50or at least some excerpts where it appeared that Lotti
00:06:55he had declared that he had shot.
00:06:59I give my decision by resigning from the position.
00:07:02I don't know from which part of the world these excerpts of the minutes
00:07:07they have come out, but these are the famous secrets of Pulcinella.
00:07:10I mean, we're at an interrogation, there's a public prosecutor,
00:07:15a replacement, those of the escort.
00:07:18It's not like there's any need to carry out any particular investigations to understand
00:07:21whether these reports were provided by the newsagent rather than the bartender.
00:07:27That is, the tour ends there.
00:07:30Meanwhile, the Florence prosecutor's office has made another important point.
00:07:37The Court of Cassation overturned the acquittal pronounced on appeal
00:07:42against Pietro Pacciani, ordering a new trial.
00:07:47A new trial, however, has not yet been scheduled.
00:07:50when Pacciani was found dead in his home in February 1998.
00:08:02Everyone knew that Pacciani was ill; he had a heart condition.
00:08:07However, from the very beginning, some doubts about his death arose,
00:08:12in particular to the police, to Giuttari.
00:08:16I am convinced that he was killed
00:08:20because he had been breathing down his throat for too long.
00:08:25I have often heard that Pacciani probably in recent years
00:08:30and in the last months of his life he didn't want to pay for everything
00:08:34and that therefore he probably would have a new truth to reveal.
00:08:38Honestly, during the whole period in which Pietro Pacciani
00:08:42he's been under investigation, he's been in the press spotlight,
00:08:45he had no shortage of opportunities at all
00:08:48to be able to tell the truth of the facts.
00:08:50Therefore, the fact that in the last month of life
00:08:53he might not have told the truth
00:08:56it seems quite unlikely, if not improbable.
00:09:05Meanwhile, the trial of the drinking buddies
00:09:08which is being held before the Assize Court of Florence continues.
00:09:12The main defendant is Mario Vanni,
00:09:14while Lotti plays the dual role of witness and accused.
00:09:18Was Vanni there?
00:09:21Yes.
00:09:22And whose side was he on?
00:09:23Of the part over there.
00:09:24Then when they saw him they were two men,
00:09:26after we go open the door.
00:09:28Lotti's statements opened the doors to convictions,
00:09:33even though Vanni has always claimed to be innocent and not involved.
00:09:40It's about the monster of Florence,
00:09:42I have nothing to do with it, I'm innocent.
00:09:44Believe me, Mr. President, this is the truth.
00:09:51Lotti's statements were questionable in certain respects.
00:09:57Some of his memories conflicted with findings,
00:10:02for example, autopsies or the state of the premises.
00:10:06However, the substance of his statements
00:10:10it was considered well-founded by the judges,
00:10:13both at first instance and on appeal.
00:10:18Article 530 and following said it,
00:10:21he knows by criminal jury, conviction.
00:10:24But they get to the penalty of gastro with the day servant for years 1
00:10:29and Lotti Giancarlo to a sentence of 30 years of imprisonment.
00:10:35At the investigative level, not even the sentences of Merende's companions
00:10:40complete the picture.
00:10:43Even the investigators are convinced
00:10:45that these three material executors
00:10:48could not at the same time be the supreme executors of all this.
00:10:53At some point during the protection program,
00:11:00Lotti finally eats, drinks, and sleeps peacefully at our expense.
00:11:06Among the many things he says, he says one that Dr. Giuttari believes is right.
00:11:12and which has the true basis of the true investigation into the monsters of Florence.
00:11:18That is, he says that the three of them had an agreement.
00:11:25to hand over the evidence removed during the crimes to a doctor.
00:11:34He calls him doctor.
00:11:35He told me that this doctor went to the market, to Peter
00:11:39to take this women stuff.
00:11:41Did he give him something in return?
00:11:44He says he paid for it.
00:11:46The?
00:11:46He says he paid for this stuff here.
00:11:50Did he pay in the sense that he gave the money?
00:11:51Yes.
00:11:56The thong said that we did odd jobs for that doctor.
00:12:01But what did the jobs consist of?
00:12:03And we went to see the couples and then someone would cut and the other would kill.
00:12:14and then they recovered this material.
00:12:17These finds were preserved in transparent containers with liquid
00:12:25and buried in agreed areas where this doctor would then pass by and collect them.
00:12:35According to Lotti's version, the monster's crimes were not maniacal.
00:12:40but simply contract killings.
00:12:47Michele Giuntari writes that this was Lotti's revelation
00:12:52to put a flea in his ear and make him investigate the Pacciani family's assets.
00:13:04The total quantified by investigators in the mid-90s was around one billion lire.
00:13:12And these movements occurred between '81, shortly before the first double homicide began
00:13:24and January 1986, so a few months after the last double homicide occurred.
00:13:31If you look at this correlation, it doesn't exist, I'll just say one.
00:13:37Pacciani bought his first house in 79 and in 79 there had been no excision.
00:13:43So who gave him this money?
00:13:46Were they a pre-emptive measure by the sect for future excision?
00:13:49Evidently he had raised them by saving hard.
00:13:52Pacciani got angry when the money story was discussed.
00:13:55because they said they had found Pacciani's treasure.
00:13:57In reality they said that it was little savings, they said that he bought the houses.
00:14:02But in reality, what did he use to obtain this money?
00:14:05He had pocketed his father's money, he had pocketed his mother's money,
00:14:09he had also pocketed Angiolina's money, he had also pocketed his daughters' money,
00:14:14I think the pensions, the good kind, had put it all together.
00:14:16He had invested this money in postal savings bonds.
00:14:19These postal bonds, he said, are reinforced.
00:14:22So they actually multiplied, he didn't spend anything,
00:14:25he left it there and this money multiplied and this is documented
00:14:29and it can be verified by anyone.
00:14:32But how does Pacciani manage to reduce all the money?
00:14:40Pacciani was a terrible miser who spent nothing.
00:14:48Michele Giuttari thinks instead that Pacciani accumulated that money
00:14:53because he would have sold the fetishes to someone.
00:14:56According to Lotti's testimony, this someone would have been a doctor.
00:15:07The investigators thought they had found the doctor in Dr. Francesco Calamandrei,
00:15:12former pharmacist from San Casciano,
00:15:14who had already been accused in 1988 by his wife, Mariella Ciulli,
00:15:18of being the monster of Florence.
00:15:23His wife, Ciulli, was a person that everyone considered paranoid.
00:15:28and not worthy of the slightest credibility.
00:15:33Ciulli had gone to the police saying
00:15:35look, you have to do some investigations because these monster rights
00:15:38They are the work of my husband and Dr. Vigna,
00:15:40who are friends to make it clear what level of credibility this woman had.
00:15:47There is an expert report by Dr. Traverso, which is decidedly conclusive,
00:15:52in fact it reports from the psychopathological point of view
00:15:55that Ciulli has been suffering from the disease for a long time
00:15:58from a chronic delusional and hallucinatory syndrome.
00:16:02My mother is behind this accusation,
00:16:05who is seriously ill,
00:16:07and so perhaps we have two sufferings.
00:16:10According to the prosecution's hypothesis,
00:16:12Francesco Calamandrei would have been the trade union
00:16:15among the monovalence, therefore Pacciani, Vanni and Lotti
00:16:19and the so-called happy instigators.
00:16:22Dr. Calamandrei on May 21, 2008
00:16:25he was acquitted because the fact did not exist, not only that.
00:16:28The sentence was never appealed by the prosecution.
00:16:32We are anesthetized.
00:16:33Then as this pain goes down,
00:16:37then I'll start crying.
00:16:39Who is looking for the masterminds of this evil clan?
00:16:44but he doesn't intend to stop.
00:16:46On the other hand, the magistrates themselves
00:16:49who had condemned their companions
00:16:51necessarily required the presence of a second level
00:16:56why the psychological profiles of Vanni, Lotti and Pacciani
00:17:00they could not have given birth to those crimes.
00:17:04Who wonders, but how is it possible?
00:17:07who together with his companions, Pacciani, Vanni and Lotti
00:17:12were there characters of a certain level?
00:17:16Well, the answer is very simple.
00:17:19It was an organization.
00:17:20Of this organization, for those who investigate,
00:17:23a doctor from Perugia would also be part of it.
00:17:26The investigation into him
00:17:28It arises from rather unusual assumptions.
00:17:33I personally went to Perugia in 1990
00:17:39sent by my director
00:17:40because they called me from Perugia
00:17:42telling me, look, the monster of Florence is here in Perugia.
00:17:47The source from which this investigation was born
00:17:50It's perhaps sad to say, from local gossip.
00:17:57Obviously I didn't write anything.
00:17:59because it's not like I had proof.
00:18:02He reported this trip of mine to Perugia
00:18:05to Doctor Giuttari when I met him
00:18:07and then he took note of it afterwards
00:18:10and I think it also started from my report.
00:18:15Francesco Narducci was a well-known gastroenterologist from Perugia
00:18:19disappeared on October 8, 1985.
00:18:23That day he had reached the dock of San Feliciano
00:18:26on Lake Trasimeno
00:18:27and on board his vessel
00:18:29he had headed towards the island of Polvese.
00:18:32All traces of him had been lost.
00:18:35Five days later
00:18:36his body was found in the waters of the lake.
00:18:40The death of Francesco Narducci
00:18:42many years after his death
00:18:46it turned into a real thriller.
00:18:53The questions that investigators are asking themselves
00:18:57there are basically two.
00:19:00The man fished out of the lake
00:19:02it was Francesco Narducci
00:19:04or someone else.
00:19:07Narducci
00:19:08he had been killed
00:19:11either he died from an accident or by suicide.
00:19:15For Mignini and Giuttari
00:19:18Francesco Narducci
00:19:19he would have been killed.
00:19:24Because he was one of the masterminds of the monster
00:19:27and had been killed by the other masterminds of the monster
00:19:32but since they didn't want to let it be known
00:19:34they would have killed him
00:19:36but simulating a drowning
00:19:38and thus procuring
00:19:41another corpse
00:19:43that they would have sold
00:19:45for that of Narducci
00:19:47but that instead it wasn't Narducci
00:19:48but it was someone else.
00:19:51From this moment on
00:19:53it begins
00:19:53between the two parties
00:19:56the prosecution and the defense
00:19:58a war
00:20:00made by expert reports.
00:20:03The expert reports to establish
00:20:05the height of the corpse
00:20:07are carried out
00:20:08on the photographs taken
00:20:09the day of the discovery
00:20:11calculating distances
00:20:12across the length
00:20:14some tiles
00:20:14of the Sant'Arcangelo pier
00:20:16where the man's body
00:20:18he had been laid down.
00:20:20The expertise
00:20:22of the prosecution
00:20:23comes to a conclusion
00:20:25that body
00:20:26it's long
00:20:27one meter and sixty
00:20:29while Francesco Narducci
00:20:31he was tall
00:20:32six feet tall.
00:20:34A counter-expertise
00:20:35of the defense
00:20:36he says
00:20:36which is not the case.
00:20:40The corpse
00:20:41which resulted
00:20:42depicted
00:20:43in the photographic image
00:20:45it was a corpse
00:20:46who had a height
00:20:47of approximately
00:20:47six feet tall
00:20:48one meter and eighty-one
00:20:49which was corresponding
00:20:50to that of Francesco Narducci.
00:20:53The expertise
00:20:55of the prosecution
00:20:56he says that
00:20:57Francesco Narducci
00:20:59he was strangled
00:21:01and it would prove it
00:21:02the fracture
00:21:03of the hyoid bone.
00:21:05For the defense
00:21:06that fracture
00:21:08would have been caused
00:21:10not from strangulation
00:21:12from the strangulation
00:21:13but from other events.
00:21:16The data
00:21:17that you will want to remember
00:21:19it's practically
00:21:21the climate
00:21:22hunting
00:21:23to the witches
00:21:24that during
00:21:24those years
00:21:25you could breathe
00:21:26in Perugia.
00:21:28At a distance
00:21:29over 15 years old
00:21:31from death
00:21:31by Narducci
00:21:32the public prosecutor
00:21:33Julian Mignini
00:21:34requires
00:21:35the exhumation
00:21:36of the corpse.
00:21:38The opening
00:21:39of that float
00:21:40is accompanied
00:21:41from great expectations.
00:21:42When they opened
00:21:43the launch
00:21:44or there wasn't
00:21:45it was this
00:21:46Pia's head
00:21:46probably
00:21:47there wasn't
00:21:48which was all
00:21:48a fiction.
00:21:50If there was
00:21:50era
00:21:51let's say so
00:21:52a body
00:21:54it wasn't him
00:21:55if it had been him
00:21:57Surely
00:21:57would have had
00:21:58of fractures
00:21:58of the injuries
00:21:59which demonstrated
00:22:00in a clear manner
00:22:01that he had been
00:22:02object
00:22:03of violence.
00:22:03The DNA test
00:22:05he confirms
00:22:06that the body
00:22:06in the coffin
00:22:07that's it
00:22:07by Francesco Narducci
00:22:09but for what reason
00:22:10the PM
00:22:11he had decided
00:22:12to open
00:22:12that tomb?
00:22:14To convince him
00:22:15they had been
00:22:16some phone calls
00:22:17anonymous
00:22:17where we spoke
00:22:18of satanic sects
00:22:19of deaths
00:22:20violent
00:22:21by Narducci
00:22:22and of Pacciani
00:22:23and information
00:22:24that Mignini
00:22:25had had
00:22:25from a journalist
00:22:26Gabriella Carlizzi
00:22:28which reported
00:22:29the presence
00:22:29in Perugia
00:22:30of Masonic lodges
00:22:31very powerful
00:22:32and secret
00:22:33and it was her
00:22:33first
00:22:34to hypothesize
00:22:35that the body
00:22:36fished out
00:22:36in the lake
00:22:37Trasimeno
00:22:37it wasn't
00:22:38that
00:22:39of the doctor
00:22:39Perugian.
00:22:40The Carlizzi
00:22:41he said
00:22:41his
00:22:42in death
00:22:43by Diana
00:22:43in death
00:22:44of all
00:22:45the prince
00:22:46of the Cata
00:22:46of all people
00:22:47most important
00:22:48she was arriving
00:22:49that gave
00:22:49his version.
00:22:52Manifestly
00:22:52for one person
00:22:53on average
00:22:54experience
00:22:55like me
00:22:55manifestly
00:22:56she was a mythomaniac
00:22:57it was a
00:22:59what he had said
00:23:00that the fetishes
00:23:01they served
00:23:01to put them
00:23:02in bed
00:23:02of the Pope.
00:23:05when it comes
00:23:06reopened
00:23:07the bar
00:23:07by Narducci
00:23:08the experts
00:23:09of the prosecution
00:23:11they realize
00:23:13what's there
00:23:14a cloth
00:23:15up to par
00:23:16of the belly
00:23:17of this
00:23:18corpse.
00:23:21Minini
00:23:21at that point
00:23:22involves
00:23:22one of the greatest
00:23:24experts
00:23:25of esotericism
00:23:26that we have
00:23:27in Italy
00:23:27is called
00:23:28Maximum
00:23:28Introvigne
00:23:29which
00:23:30carries out
00:23:32an expert opinion
00:23:33and says
00:23:33The cloth
00:23:34found
00:23:35on the body
00:23:36by Francesco
00:23:36Narducci
00:23:37would be
00:23:38expression
00:23:38Of
00:23:39a ritual
00:23:40archaicizing
00:23:41with references
00:23:43Egyptians
00:23:43typical
00:23:44of environments
00:23:45Masonic
00:23:45and would have
00:23:46a meaning
00:23:47punitive
00:23:48that is, he would do
00:23:49reference
00:23:50to one
00:23:50person
00:23:51which is
00:23:51regressed
00:23:52that is to say
00:23:53to a person
00:23:54that would have
00:23:55even betrayed.
00:23:58Speaking
00:23:59with
00:23:59the father
00:24:01pending
00:24:02that they arrived
00:24:02the clothes
00:24:03from Perugia
00:24:04he had put it
00:24:05on the bed
00:24:05all naked
00:24:06and for a matter
00:24:08what I think
00:24:08anyone would do it
00:24:09he had taken
00:24:09a towel
00:24:10of the bathroom
00:24:11and he had put it on him
00:24:13here at the height
00:24:13of the belly
00:24:14For
00:24:15that little towel
00:24:17remained below
00:24:18when they dressed him
00:24:19he left it under him
00:24:20as if they were
00:24:22some underwear
00:24:22This
00:24:23over the years
00:24:24ten years
00:24:25has
00:24:26crushing them
00:24:27he created
00:24:27this plot
00:24:28Therefore
00:24:29I'm not alone
00:24:29I gave him
00:24:30this explanation
00:24:30but I found it again
00:24:31Also
00:24:32the towel
00:24:33which was part
00:24:34of a set
00:24:35of six towels
00:24:36one was missing
00:24:37but that was exactly it
00:24:41the investigation
00:24:42for death
00:24:43by Francesco Narducci
00:24:44it was an investigation
00:24:46against unknown persons
00:24:47with a motive
00:24:48that has never been
00:24:49included
00:24:50and with
00:24:52investigations
00:24:53which have induced
00:24:54the same audience
00:24:55mystery
00:24:56to request
00:24:56the archiving
00:24:57there was
00:24:59an acquittal
00:25:00of merit
00:25:00full
00:25:01confirmed
00:25:02moreover
00:25:03from the Supreme Court
00:25:04of Cassation
00:25:05who rejected
00:25:05the appeal
00:25:06of the public
00:25:06mystery
00:25:07of the civil party
00:25:08the results
00:25:09procedural
00:25:10in both cases
00:25:12and for Francesco
00:25:13Narducci
00:25:14and for Francesco
00:25:15Calamandrei
00:25:16they don't carry
00:25:17to nothing
00:25:18they are not here
00:25:21the evidence
00:25:21or
00:25:22as claimed
00:25:24from Giuttari
00:25:25someone
00:25:26prevented
00:25:28and blocked
00:25:29this investigation
00:25:30they didn't give us
00:25:33allowed
00:25:33to carry out
00:25:35further
00:25:35insights
00:25:36also because
00:25:37as you know
00:25:39to have it for you
00:25:40already reported
00:25:42the investigation
00:25:43it was blocked
00:25:47what I
00:25:49I think
00:25:50is that
00:25:51the prerequisites
00:25:52of this investigation
00:25:55were
00:25:56totally
00:25:56wrong
00:25:58Why
00:25:59illogical
00:26:00Why
00:26:01unlikely
00:26:02Why
00:26:03no yes
00:26:04they were holding up
00:26:05from all points of view
00:26:08from one point of view
00:26:09criminal
00:26:09from one point of view
00:26:10even esoteric
00:26:11but if one
00:26:12he wants to kill
00:26:14if one
00:26:15wants to carry out
00:26:16a ritual
00:26:17the weapon used
00:26:19and the action
00:26:21murderer
00:26:22and the excision
00:26:24these parts
00:26:25of the body
00:26:25I am
00:26:26the limbs
00:26:27most important
00:26:29and what do you do?
00:26:30you have to have it done
00:26:31to
00:26:32appacciani bathrooms
00:26:33and then
00:26:35these
00:26:37fetishes
00:26:39what for?
00:26:40do they have to serve?
00:26:41It has been said
00:26:42of everything
00:26:43come on
00:26:44rituals
00:26:46of the ancient
00:26:48masonry
00:26:49Egyptian
00:26:50to bring
00:26:51fertility
00:26:53Where
00:26:54this fertility
00:26:55it wasn't possible
00:26:56for example
00:26:57it was said
00:26:57this of
00:26:58Narducci
00:26:59he simply has
00:27:01a connection
00:27:02perverse
00:27:03Between
00:27:06a class
00:27:07of another company
00:27:09That
00:27:09dominates
00:27:10with evil
00:27:11Who goes into detail
00:27:13to explain
00:27:14the use
00:27:14that was done
00:27:15of these fetishes
00:27:16It's Gabriella Ghiribelli
00:27:18the gamma test
00:27:20There in San Casciano
00:27:22he says there is a villa
00:27:23there is a Swiss
00:27:24and to this Swiss
00:27:26it would seem
00:27:26if she were dead
00:27:27the daughter
00:27:28and then
00:27:29he had succeeded
00:27:30to find
00:27:31of the papyrus
00:27:33strange
00:27:33of the papyrus
00:27:35strange
00:27:36Egyptian type
00:27:37No?
00:27:38At that time
00:27:38he was able
00:27:39to mummify
00:27:40the person
00:27:41less
00:27:41that the parties
00:27:43soft
00:27:43did you understand
00:27:45because the parts
00:27:45soft
00:27:46they go away
00:27:47away
00:27:47to decompose
00:27:49there was a rumor
00:27:50that he ordered
00:27:51the parts
00:27:52soft
00:27:53and feminine
00:27:54of the breast
00:27:56and of the vagina
00:27:56Certain
00:27:57so as to put them
00:27:59in place
00:27:59to the little girl
00:28:00to his daughter
00:28:01to his daughter
00:28:04shortly before dying
00:28:05Vineyard
00:28:06he wrote
00:28:07on this matter
00:28:08of the monster
00:28:09saying that
00:28:10of the principals
00:28:11there was no trace
00:28:13the most labile
00:28:14and that therefore
00:28:15he didn't believe
00:28:16absolutely
00:28:16that there were
00:28:17of the principals
00:28:17while instead
00:28:18in the sentence
00:28:19first degree
00:28:20first degree
00:28:21against his companions
00:28:22as a snack
00:28:24we're talking
00:28:25of this
00:28:25doctor
00:28:27if Vigna
00:28:28he doesn't believe
00:28:29on the second level
00:28:30I don't believe it
00:28:30not even at first
00:28:31but a reflection
00:28:33I want to do it
00:28:34when Lotti
00:28:36he says that
00:28:37Pacciani
00:28:38he was talking to a doctor
00:28:40which
00:28:40he ordered
00:28:41the excisions
00:28:42and so on
00:28:44At that time
00:28:45it would be all of it
00:28:46an invention
00:28:47if there is not
00:28:48the second level
00:28:49at this point
00:28:50I wonder
00:28:51given that
00:28:52Lots
00:28:53of things
00:28:54he said a lot
00:28:56they were
00:28:57verified
00:28:58the others too
00:28:59Lots
00:29:00he stated
00:29:01of having participated
00:29:02only to the last ones
00:29:03four crimes
00:29:04of the monster
00:29:04let's start then
00:29:06from that
00:29:06of 1982
00:29:07in Baccaiano
00:29:08where Lotti
00:29:09would have done
00:29:10from pole
00:29:11first of all
00:29:12Lots
00:29:13in the accident
00:29:13evidentiary
00:29:14he supports
00:29:15that that evening
00:29:16of June 19
00:29:171982
00:29:18they went
00:29:20on site
00:29:20of the crime
00:29:21with two cars
00:29:22Vanni
00:29:22and Pacciani
00:29:23in the first car
00:29:24a white 500
00:29:25and Lotti
00:29:26behind
00:29:27on his
00:29:27124
00:29:33she stopped
00:29:34Before
00:29:34of the stain
00:29:36region
00:29:36on the left
00:29:37of the road
00:29:38and the Pacciano
00:29:39he stopped
00:29:39beyond the stain
00:29:40of the two days
00:29:41yes it's a little further ahead
00:29:42further ahead
00:29:45and the clearing
00:29:46where they put it
00:29:47Pacciano
00:29:48and Vanni
00:29:48it was on the opposite side
00:29:50of the road
00:29:50or on the same side
00:29:52on the side
00:29:52of the machine
00:29:53stop
00:29:54on the same side
00:29:55So lots
00:29:57says one thing first
00:29:58very important
00:29:59and that is that he
00:30:00and Pacciani
00:30:01they parked
00:30:02along the road
00:30:03where it was located
00:30:05the Fiat 127
00:30:06White
00:30:06by Paolo Mainardi
00:30:08which was still
00:30:09in a clearing
00:30:09so at the moment
00:30:11of the murder
00:30:12according to Lotti
00:30:12the parked cars
00:30:14there were three
00:30:15now I ask you
00:30:16one thing
00:30:17the machine
00:30:19some boys
00:30:19it moves
00:30:20before or after
00:30:22the shots
00:30:22After
00:30:27the sequence
00:30:28of the murder
00:30:29is this
00:30:30the two boys
00:30:31they are in their car
00:30:32when the monster
00:30:33attack
00:30:34and start shooting
00:30:35the boy
00:30:37at the wheel
00:30:37has the reflection
00:30:38to reverse
00:30:39and the car
00:30:40crosses
00:30:41the roadway
00:30:42but it ends
00:30:43with wheels
00:30:43in a ditch
00:30:44and there
00:30:45the monster
00:30:46shoot again
00:30:51the certain fact
00:30:53is that in the moment
00:30:54in which
00:30:54the victims' car
00:30:56cross the street
00:30:57it's already here
00:30:58committing the murder
00:30:59well
00:31:00in the moments
00:31:01that precede
00:31:02and follow
00:31:02the crossing
00:31:03of the entire roadway
00:31:04of the 127
00:31:05led by Paolo Mainardi
00:31:07two pass
00:31:09cars
00:31:10the first
00:31:11at 11.45pm
00:31:12is driven
00:31:13by Francesco Carletti
00:31:15that note
00:31:15the machine
00:31:16of the two fiancés
00:31:17so I
00:31:18I was coming from Baccaiano
00:31:19so it was
00:31:20on the right
00:31:20in a narrow street
00:31:23with the part
00:31:25in front of
00:31:25of the machine
00:31:26revolt
00:31:26towards the field
00:31:27and what time was it?
00:31:28they will have been
00:31:29half past eleven
00:31:30a quarter past midnight
00:31:30more or less
00:31:32there was internal light
00:31:33lit
00:31:33and that's it
00:31:34when it passes
00:31:35Francesco Carletti
00:31:37he only sees
00:31:37the car
00:31:38of the two victims
00:31:39and not known
00:31:40no other machine
00:31:41parked
00:31:42at that moment
00:31:43the crime
00:31:43it hasn't happened yet
00:31:44consumed
00:31:45a few hundred
00:31:47of meters
00:31:47After
00:31:48Francesco Carletti
00:31:49crosses
00:31:50another car
00:31:50which proceeds
00:31:51in the opposite direction
00:31:52that's it
00:31:53with on board
00:31:54Stefano Calamandrei
00:31:55at 11.47pm
00:31:58when the car
00:31:59by Calamandrei
00:32:00reaches
00:32:00the place
00:32:01of the crime
00:32:02the machine
00:32:03with the two victims
00:32:04he already has
00:32:04crossed
00:32:05the roadway
00:32:06and it's in the ditch
00:32:08so
00:32:09in those two minutes
00:32:10about
00:32:11maybe less
00:32:12it was consumed
00:32:13the murder
00:32:13also Stefano Calamandrei
00:32:16he only sees
00:32:16the machine
00:32:17of the victims
00:32:17nevertheless
00:32:18according to Giancarlo Lotti
00:32:20his
00:32:21and that of Pacciani
00:32:22they should have been
00:32:23be there
00:32:24and not only
00:32:25even a third
00:32:26witness
00:32:27Graziano Marini
00:32:28he passed by there
00:32:29right in those same places
00:32:31moments
00:32:31so much so that he heard
00:32:32even the gunshots
00:32:34he saw cars
00:32:35parked
00:32:36on the roadside
00:32:37this
00:32:38it's his answer
00:32:42long
00:32:43the road
00:32:44where it happened
00:32:45the fact
00:32:46we don't notice
00:32:47tips of stationary machines
00:32:48nor on the right
00:32:49nor on the sleep
00:32:51it was dark
00:32:52but
00:32:52the machines
00:32:53if they were on the shore
00:32:54we see them well
00:32:58when I found myself
00:33:00to hear again
00:33:01to reread
00:33:02the cards
00:33:02the question
00:33:04that I have always
00:33:05place
00:33:06era
00:33:06but Lotti
00:33:08in this specific case
00:33:11in Baccaiano
00:33:12there was
00:33:14or there wasn't
00:33:15Why
00:33:16the boys
00:33:18with the car
00:33:19say completely
00:33:20what Lotti
00:33:22he said
00:33:23during the process
00:33:25during the accident
00:33:26evidentiary
00:33:31always coming
00:33:33to reliability
00:33:34of Lotti
00:33:35let's go and see
00:33:36what he says
00:33:37of the murder
00:33:38by Giogoli
00:33:41and he is asked
00:33:43to tell
00:33:44what he saw
00:33:45and he says
00:33:45that the bodies
00:33:46they were
00:33:47in the part
00:33:48front
00:33:50practically
00:33:50in place
00:33:52of the guide
00:33:52to which
00:33:53Obviously
00:33:54the Public Prosecutor
00:33:55try to straighten out
00:33:57the shot
00:34:01and in fact
00:34:02he tells him
00:34:02but
00:34:03towards the back
00:34:05of the van
00:34:06towards the back
00:34:07of the van
00:34:07No
00:34:08on the side
00:34:09pulled
00:34:09of the part
00:34:10of the flywheel
00:34:14on the side
00:34:15of the van
00:34:15where is the flywheel
00:34:16but behind
00:34:17or on site
00:34:18driving
00:34:18No
00:34:19on the side
00:34:19of the guide
00:34:23behind in the van
00:34:24he always says
00:34:25Dr. Canessa
00:34:26to induce
00:34:27to say
00:34:28that they were
00:34:29in the back part
00:34:30and he continues
00:34:31and insists
00:34:32to say
00:34:32that in the front
00:34:33own
00:34:34clearly
00:34:35in the front
00:34:36on the side
00:34:37of the guide
00:34:37yes but I say
00:34:38in the back
00:34:40of the van
00:34:40or in the front
00:34:41of the van
00:34:41in the front
00:34:42these two people
00:34:44she says
00:34:45it seemed to her
00:34:45they were
00:34:46correct
00:34:46one on one side
00:34:47and one from the other
00:34:48she saw them well
00:34:49Yes
00:34:54to which
00:34:55you want to know
00:34:56what happened
00:34:57the hearing
00:34:58after a little while
00:34:58is suspended
00:34:59and then after
00:35:01subsequently
00:35:02him
00:35:03the lots
00:35:03will change version
00:35:04he will fix it
00:35:05and he will say
00:35:05what is right
00:35:07Lots then
00:35:08he also stated
00:35:10of having done
00:35:10from pole
00:35:11in the crime
00:35:11of 1984
00:35:13in Vicchio del Mugello
00:35:14where they were killed
00:35:16by gunshots
00:35:17two boyfriends
00:35:18this time
00:35:19who is questioning him
00:35:20reread the statements
00:35:22that the lot itself
00:35:23had made
00:35:24during the accident
00:35:25evidentiary
00:35:29she in the accident
00:35:31evidentiary
00:35:32he says
00:35:32he shot the man
00:35:33and that's it
00:35:35she was not hit
00:35:36to the head
00:35:37with one blow
00:35:37of gun
00:35:38this is exactly
00:35:38suggested
00:35:39and he
00:35:40No
00:35:42and to the woman
00:35:43when they shot
00:35:44No
00:35:45she insists
00:35:45very confidently
00:35:47he says
00:35:48No
00:35:48to the girl
00:35:49No
00:35:49how it shot
00:35:50to the girl
00:35:51and they
00:35:51they tell him
00:35:52Yes
00:35:52and he doesn't
00:35:53the lawyer says
00:35:55and they shot her
00:35:56After
00:35:58but maybe
00:35:59at a later time
00:36:00suggest to him
00:36:01No
00:36:01No
00:36:02it began
00:36:03with the knife
00:36:04to cut
00:36:04I don't know
00:36:06so she
00:36:07he doesn't remember
00:36:08if they shot
00:36:08to the woman
00:36:09fourth no
00:36:10No
00:36:10to the woman
00:36:11No
00:36:12and we are at 5
00:36:14there wasn't
00:36:15no shot
00:36:15of gun
00:36:16towards the girl
00:36:17No
00:36:18she was killed
00:36:18with a knife
00:36:19in essence
00:36:20Yes
00:36:21final question
00:36:22of the lawyer
00:36:23Franchetti
00:36:23then they killed her
00:36:24with knife
00:36:25his answer
00:36:26Yes
00:36:30Vicchio
00:36:31Surely
00:36:32was
00:36:32one of the crimes
00:36:33ugliest
00:36:34which we witnessed
00:36:35he killed
00:36:36Before
00:36:37the boy
00:36:37and then
00:36:38he shot
00:36:39to the girl
00:36:40he dragged her
00:36:41out of the car
00:36:42and there
00:36:44he accomplished
00:36:44the mutilations
00:36:45rituals
00:36:52after Baccagliano
00:36:54after Giogoli
00:36:56Lots
00:36:57in reporting
00:36:58what happens
00:37:00in crimes
00:37:00it is more and more
00:37:02Safe
00:37:04And
00:37:04he is more and more of a liar
00:37:08the autopsy
00:37:10reveals
00:37:10a fact
00:37:12Very
00:37:12very raw
00:37:13that Rontini
00:37:15he was killed
00:37:16with one blow
00:37:16of gun
00:37:23but
00:37:24in a glass
00:37:25he doesn't say
00:37:26simply
00:37:27this thing
00:37:28he says about it
00:37:29another one
00:37:30That
00:37:30it makes him think
00:37:32to a movie
00:37:32by Bergman
00:37:33whispers
00:37:34and screams
00:37:41the Lotti
00:37:42essentially
00:37:44tells
00:37:45of having seen
00:37:46and heard
00:37:47the girl
00:37:47that was coming
00:37:48dragged out
00:37:49from the car
00:37:50and he screamed
00:37:51and he shouted
00:37:52and he screamed
00:37:53and then after
00:37:54was
00:37:55stabbed
00:37:59he took out
00:38:00to the car
00:38:01the girl
00:38:01it was still
00:38:02Viva
00:38:03because he was screaming
00:38:07I don't believe it
00:38:09that this
00:38:09could
00:38:10issue
00:38:11a scream
00:38:11after receiving
00:38:13the lessons
00:38:14firearm
00:38:14to the skull
00:38:15in the version
00:38:16which makes
00:38:17Then
00:38:18to the accident
00:38:19evidentiary
00:38:20essentially
00:38:21will deny
00:38:22the fact
00:38:23of screams
00:38:24but he will say
00:38:24that there have been
00:38:26some moans
00:38:26that he felt
00:38:27some moans
00:38:28but anyway
00:38:29something
00:38:29much more
00:38:31soft
00:38:32I said
00:38:33lament
00:38:33I didn't say
00:38:34scream
00:38:34own
00:38:35she doesn't speak
00:38:36never complaining
00:38:36he says he screamed
00:38:38and he said
00:38:38he was screaming
00:38:39so also
00:38:40the colleague
00:38:41that came out
00:38:42from the lament
00:38:42Please
00:38:43it binds itself
00:38:44of the bar
00:38:48as I believe
00:38:49that this
00:38:50it must have been
00:38:50a noise
00:38:51very deaf
00:38:52a noise
00:38:53Perhaps
00:38:53from edema
00:38:54pulmonary
00:38:54incoming
00:38:55and so on
00:38:55he couldn't
00:38:56that being heard
00:38:57from people
00:38:58very close
00:38:59to the subject
00:39:00likely
00:39:01Perhaps
00:39:02in the machine itself
00:39:03in intensive care
00:39:04when there is edema
00:39:05that mounts
00:39:06but you can feel it
00:39:07no more than 20 cm
00:39:08distance
00:39:09from 20 cm
00:39:13how far away
00:39:14And
00:39:16at a distance
00:39:17of that
00:39:17now I would always be
00:39:18at distances
00:39:19of that
00:39:19there is
00:39:19a cat
00:39:2010 cm
00:39:22it's just
00:39:23I'm black
00:39:23that I was moved
00:39:25not exactly to the other one
00:39:27a bit
00:39:28further inside
00:39:30but
00:39:30Now
00:39:30if he succeeded
00:39:31you oppose the field
00:39:32you grow up
00:39:32a bit
00:39:32away
00:39:34I would know
00:39:35how many months
00:39:36they would be
00:39:37the optics
00:39:37difficulty
00:39:38to express
00:39:39anything
00:39:40he can't do it
00:39:41almost speaking
00:39:42underlines
00:39:43the difference
00:39:43between screams
00:39:44and moan
00:39:45but nobody
00:39:46he got up
00:39:47to say
00:39:47gentlemen
00:39:48but what are you doing?
00:39:49doing
00:39:49lots
00:39:51corrects
00:39:51Italian
00:39:52to the lawyer
00:39:53that questions him
00:39:54and tells him
00:39:55it's not a scream
00:39:56but a moan
00:39:57lots
00:39:58that fails
00:39:59to express
00:40:02Nothing
00:40:02what happens
00:40:04in 1984
00:40:05in Bicchio
00:40:06it's just
00:40:07an advance
00:40:08because the best
00:40:09he will give it
00:40:11when he will tell
00:40:13the facts
00:40:13happened
00:40:14in the square
00:40:15of the brooms
00:40:16and that time
00:40:17it's not alone
00:40:18but it's coming
00:40:19in company
00:40:20he carries it with him
00:40:21another
00:40:23poor wretch
00:40:24what is called
00:40:25Ferdinand Pucci
00:40:26and that
00:40:27the Florence prosecutor's office
00:40:29in the person
00:40:30by Pierluigi Vigna
00:40:31and the boss
00:40:33of the mobile squad
00:40:33in the person
00:40:34by Michele Giuttari
00:40:35they define
00:40:37Ferdinand Pucci
00:40:38as
00:40:38the witness
00:40:39alpha
00:40:55second batch
00:40:56and Pucci
00:40:56we are
00:40:57in a situation
00:40:58of a partial darkness
00:41:00why the moon
00:41:00illuminate from above
00:41:02and creates
00:41:03a ghostly light
00:41:04across the entire pitch
00:41:06actually
00:41:07we know
00:41:07that the moon
00:41:07there wasn't
00:41:09second batch
00:41:10and Pucci
00:41:11they go to this area
00:41:12near the tent
00:41:14when Pacciani
00:41:15start shooting
00:41:15Pacciani practically
00:41:17shooting from this position
00:41:18it could hit Vanni
00:41:19but it doesn't matter
00:41:21they are found
00:41:23indicatively
00:41:23Neighbor
00:41:24to the car
00:41:25of the French
00:41:33the French boy
00:41:34he goes out
00:41:35from the tent
00:41:35and would travel
00:41:36this path
00:41:38Pacciani
00:41:39chases
00:41:39the French boy
00:41:41arrives in this area
00:41:43and with the knife
00:41:45hits him
00:41:45the boy
00:41:46falls to the ground
00:41:47at that point
00:41:49Lots
00:41:50sees Vanni
00:41:51who enters the tent
00:41:52from the rear entrance
00:41:54and sees Pacciani
00:41:54that returns
00:41:55and it also enters
00:41:56in the tent
00:41:56inside the tent
00:41:58they practice excision
00:41:59about the girl
00:42:00and after
00:42:00what it would seem
00:42:02an interminable time
00:42:03that is, ten minutes
00:42:03they go out
00:42:04they both come out
00:42:05and they go towards the area
00:42:06where the body is
00:42:07of the French boy
00:42:13one of the two
00:42:14he bows
00:42:15and it seems
00:42:15to hide something
00:42:16when they came out
00:42:17from the tent
00:42:18they had in their hands
00:42:19a kind of bundle
00:42:20What?
00:42:21the fetishes
00:42:36the story
00:42:37what is done to us
00:42:38from Lotti and Pucci
00:42:39has some feedback
00:42:40effective
00:42:41at the crime scene
00:42:42the answer is no
00:42:44the crime scene
00:42:45tell us something
00:42:46completely different
00:42:47from what we are told
00:42:49from Lotti and Pucci
00:42:55let's look at reality
00:42:56so of this tent
00:42:57the tent has an exit hole
00:42:58marked with the letter S
00:42:59on the right rear corner
00:43:01and five holes
00:43:02of entrance
00:43:07joining
00:43:07this point
00:43:08exit
00:43:09with any one
00:43:10of these holes
00:43:11in the horizontal plane
00:43:12we identify a trajectory
00:43:13this is the trajectory
00:43:14on which it is placed
00:43:15the axis of the barrel
00:43:16it means that
00:43:17the shooter
00:43:18he had the gun
00:43:18positioned
00:43:19on this trajectory
00:43:23shoot
00:43:23a from the right
00:43:24through the dancer
00:43:26he brooded
00:43:27at height
00:43:28of the dancer
00:43:29and takes full advantage
00:43:30the girl
00:43:31the problem
00:43:32that the version
00:43:33of Lotti
00:43:34leave unsolved
00:43:35it is the presence
00:43:36of the shells
00:43:36in front of the tent
00:43:37and consequently
00:43:39the quantity
00:43:39shots fired
00:43:41and the different phases
00:43:42of the fire action
00:43:43generally
00:43:45the weapons
00:43:45semi-automatic
00:43:46they expel
00:43:47To the right
00:43:48and backwards
00:43:50respect
00:43:50to the management
00:43:51of shooting
00:43:52the shells
00:43:53they are expelled
00:43:55from the weapon
00:43:56and they do
00:43:57a trajectory
00:43:59which is parabolic
00:44:00these shots
00:44:01if the person
00:44:03had been here
00:44:04to shoot
00:44:04they would have produced
00:44:05of the shells
00:44:06that expelled
00:44:07they would have fallen
00:44:08in this area
00:44:10that is 45 degrees
00:44:12towards the outside
00:44:13not in front of the tent
00:44:14but in this area
00:44:15they were not searched
00:44:17the shells
00:44:18so they could
00:44:19theoretically
00:44:19still be there
00:44:20so the presence
00:44:22of these shells
00:44:23it is not justifiable
00:44:25with the shots fired
00:44:26towards the tent
00:44:32can you tell us
00:44:33how many shots
00:44:34he heard
00:44:35different
00:44:36how does he do it?
00:44:36different
00:44:36there are 4 or 5
00:44:37more than 4
00:44:38or 5
00:44:39or less than 4
00:44:40or 5
00:44:412 or 4
00:44:42yes yes she was born
00:44:43even more
00:44:43how does he do it?
00:44:44there are 9 shells
00:44:47Surely
00:44:47but there are 5 holes
00:44:49then the shots fired
00:44:50I am definitely
00:44:51at least 14
00:44:5214 shots
00:44:54it means
00:44:54have used
00:44:55two magazines
00:44:57the presence
00:44:58of the 9 shells
00:44:59in front of the tent
00:45:00plus the 5 holes
00:45:01on the mosquito net
00:45:03they mean
00:45:04that the monster
00:45:04he would have shot
00:45:05in two phases
00:45:06very distinct
00:45:07and this
00:45:08in stark contrast
00:45:09with the version
00:45:10of the super witness
00:45:12to the light
00:45:13of these evidences
00:45:14ballistics
00:45:15how it went
00:45:16the dynamics
00:45:17of the crime
00:45:19the French girl
00:45:20she gets hit
00:45:21can't move
00:45:22it's probably
00:45:23already in a coma
00:45:24stay inside
00:45:24of the tent
00:45:25and it's still
00:45:26the French boy
00:45:27he manages to get out
00:45:28if he gets hurt
00:45:29probably
00:45:30on the left hand
00:45:31and travels
00:45:32this movement
00:45:33the monster
00:45:33sees the boy
00:45:34in this area
00:45:35and it is positioned
00:45:37in such a way
00:45:38to be able to frame it
00:45:39in the crosshairs
00:45:44staying still
00:45:45in this position
00:45:46follow the target
00:45:47that moves
00:45:48making a rotation
00:45:49and little by little
00:45:51that fires shots
00:45:53towards this target
00:45:54the shells
00:45:54they go towards the back
00:45:5645 degrees
00:45:58following the parable
00:45:59of expulsion
00:46:00the shells
00:46:01they are going to fall
00:46:02going beyond
00:46:03the tent
00:46:04Exactly
00:46:05in the area in front
00:46:06the main entrance
00:46:07of the tent itself
00:46:08it is clear proof
00:46:10of this second
00:46:11fire action
00:46:12that the monster
00:46:13that night
00:46:14he accomplished
00:46:14the first
00:46:16when he shoots
00:46:16against the curtain
00:46:17crouched
00:46:18in the ditch in front
00:46:20the second
00:46:21when it is found
00:46:22between the curtain
00:46:22and the car
00:46:23in an attempt
00:46:24to kill
00:46:24the French boy
00:46:26who is running away
00:46:31we know that
00:46:32on the upright
00:46:32left
00:46:33of the golf
00:46:33there is a trace
00:46:34of blood
00:46:35blood type
00:46:36of the boy
00:46:36the boy
00:46:37it was definitely
00:46:38wound
00:46:39probably
00:46:40a projection
00:46:41of a splash
00:46:41of blood
00:46:42of a sudden
00:46:42that hit him
00:46:43has generated
00:46:45this stain
00:46:46the boy
00:46:48and he didn't have
00:46:49a large lesion
00:46:50he only had
00:46:51of the injuries
00:46:52at the level
00:46:53of the superior act
00:46:54right-wing
00:46:54who were entering
00:46:56and they went out
00:46:56of the act
00:46:57superior
00:46:58left
00:46:59the optics
00:47:06indicatively
00:47:06in this area
00:47:07so exactly
00:47:08in the area
00:47:09where he would go
00:47:10the French boy
00:47:11she saw
00:47:13hit the young man
00:47:14While
00:47:14for a shore
00:47:15No
00:47:16half an hour
00:47:17No
00:47:18it's safe
00:47:19Yes
00:47:20the traces of blood
00:47:22present
00:47:22on the scene
00:47:23of the crime
00:47:23they tell us
00:47:24that the boy
00:47:25French
00:47:26running away
00:47:27it would have passed
00:47:28own
00:47:28in front of the golf
00:47:30where Lotti
00:47:30he declared
00:47:31to find oneself
00:47:31but Lotti
00:47:32he wouldn't have seen it
00:47:34on the contrary
00:47:35he says he saw
00:47:36Pacciani
00:47:36stab
00:47:37the French boy
00:47:39on the opposite side
00:47:40of the square
00:47:41at that point
00:47:42Pacciani
00:47:43go back to the tent
00:47:44Vanni has already entered
00:47:45he cut
00:47:46with a knife
00:47:47kitchen
00:47:48the rear cover
00:47:49and he entered
00:47:49in the tent
00:47:51did you hear it?
00:47:52I heard
00:47:53the tear
00:47:53when he cut
00:47:54the tent
00:47:55Yes
00:47:56but did he even see it?
00:47:59I saw yes
00:47:59then he saw it
00:48:01and he heard it
00:48:02I heard
00:48:03the details
00:48:03Vanni
00:48:04oh very well
00:48:10the question
00:48:11precise
00:48:12is asked
00:48:13from a lawyer
00:48:13defender
00:48:14but how did they do it?
00:48:15to enter
00:48:15in this tent
00:48:16Lotti says
00:48:17walking
00:48:22I wanted to know
00:48:23how they entered
00:48:24inside this tent
00:48:25how
00:48:26walking
00:48:27but I don't know
00:48:28walking
00:48:29normally
00:48:30yes or no?
00:48:32Yes
00:48:33it's not my race
00:48:34and she's saying
00:48:35a fandomia
00:48:38so it's not possible
00:48:39think
00:48:40that one can enter
00:48:40in the tent
00:48:41walking
00:48:42should have
00:48:43at least say
00:48:43that these have
00:48:45lower yourself
00:48:45and they entered
00:48:46you enter it
00:48:47on all fours
00:48:48inside that tent
00:48:49I do not know
00:48:49because I
00:48:50I didn't get in
00:48:51in the tent
00:48:51I don't know how you did it
00:48:52but he saw it
00:48:53she enters
00:48:54walking normally
00:48:55both people
00:49:00at this point
00:49:01they stop
00:49:01within
00:49:02of the tent
00:49:02according to the story
00:49:03for about ten minutes
00:49:04inside this tent
00:49:06would have been practiced
00:49:08the excision
00:49:09both of the Pubis
00:49:09why the breast
00:49:15why this
00:49:16it couldn't happen
00:49:18inside
00:49:18of the tent
00:49:19why the tent
00:49:20it's tall
00:49:211.40 cm
00:49:26it's safe
00:49:27both
00:49:28inside the tent
00:49:29for 10 minutes
00:49:31I said it
00:49:32but he didn't look at me
00:49:33Today
00:49:33and if I had you
00:49:33he didn't look at me
00:49:39if I ask myself
00:49:40on your knees
00:49:41inside
00:49:42of a tent
00:49:43I am definitely
00:49:44taller
00:49:451.40 cm
00:49:46I have extreme difficulty
00:49:48to operate
00:49:49in a small room
00:49:501.40 cm
00:49:51so the girl
00:49:52is pulled out
00:49:54from the tent
00:49:54to accomplish
00:49:55this act
00:49:58according to Lotti
00:49:59he the French girl
00:50:00he would never have seen it
00:50:02why the excision
00:50:03it would have happened
00:50:04within
00:50:05of the tent
00:50:06but is it really like that?
00:50:08in their story
00:50:09are completely missing
00:50:11the references
00:50:12to all that
00:50:13what would have happened
00:50:14to the woman's body
00:50:15outside the tent
00:50:16and the woman's body
00:50:17we are sure
00:50:18who came out of the tent
00:50:19Why?
00:50:20because the woman's body
00:50:21presents a whole series
00:50:22of traces of blood
00:50:23that they tell us
00:50:24of movements
00:50:25which he suffered
00:50:25but they also tell us
00:50:27of the presence
00:50:28of soil
00:50:28on the left roll
00:50:30of small abrasions
00:50:33due to contact
00:50:33with a hard surface
00:50:35he speaks to us for example
00:50:37in the position
00:50:38where it is found
00:50:39the body
00:50:39under the body
00:50:41of pine needles
00:50:43and dry weapon wires
00:50:45Now
00:50:46how is it possible
00:50:48think
00:50:49that the excision
00:50:49happened
00:50:50within
00:50:51of the tent
00:50:51without justifying
00:50:53all this evidence
00:50:54that the crime scene
00:50:55instead it presents itself
00:51:01to the light
00:51:02of these objective elements
00:51:03how can it be rebuilt
00:51:05the dynamics
00:51:06of the murder?
00:51:09At that time
00:51:09the girl
00:51:10is extracted
00:51:10from the tent
00:51:11at this point
00:51:12is dragged
00:51:14and on the lower part
00:51:16of the entrance
00:51:16of the tent
00:51:17traces remain
00:51:18of blood
00:51:18within
00:51:19of the tent
00:51:23the monster
00:51:24has always acted
00:51:24in this way
00:51:25has always positioned
00:51:26the female victim
00:51:27what will be
00:51:28the one on which
00:51:29it focuses
00:51:29to practice
00:51:30the excisions
00:51:31in one position
00:51:32such as to be able to
00:51:32check
00:51:33the access routes
00:51:34to the scene
00:51:35of the crime
00:51:38practice excisions
00:51:40the monster
00:51:41must hide
00:51:42the bodies
00:51:43this one too
00:51:44it's an anomaly
00:51:45in the crime
00:51:45by Scopetti
00:51:46both the body
00:51:47of the French boy
00:51:48both the body
00:51:48of the girl
00:51:49they were hidden
00:51:50it never happened
00:51:51Before
00:51:51Why?
00:51:53we don't know
00:51:54Lots
00:51:55and Pucci
00:51:56they don't tell us
00:52:02to reinsert
00:52:03the body
00:52:03of the girl
00:52:04within
00:52:04of the tent
00:52:05the useful entrance
00:52:06it's just
00:52:06half
00:52:06of the front wall
00:52:08it is necessary
00:52:08to let in
00:52:09legs first
00:52:10and then place
00:52:11the body
00:52:12of the girl
00:52:13but then
00:52:14he can't do it
00:52:15push
00:52:16inside
00:52:16why the corpse
00:52:17it's not rigid
00:52:19at this stage
00:52:20the corpse
00:52:20it is absolutely
00:52:21soft
00:52:22so it must
00:52:23continue
00:52:24to pull it
00:52:25and how does it do it
00:52:26to do it
00:52:27enter
00:52:27in the tent
00:52:28the monster
00:52:30go behind
00:52:31with a slash
00:52:32opens the curtain
00:52:33external
00:52:34it happens like this
00:52:35to the area
00:52:36of the entrance
00:52:37secondary
00:52:38open the zipper
00:52:39and then
00:52:40enter
00:52:41in turn
00:52:42on all fours
00:52:42in the tent
00:52:43bloody
00:52:44he grabs her
00:52:45from the armpits
00:52:46and he pulls it
00:52:47in
00:52:47and only in this way
00:52:49it is possible
00:52:49justify
00:52:50both the opening
00:52:52in the portion
00:52:52front
00:52:53both the opening
00:52:54in the region
00:52:55rear
00:52:55Where
00:52:56in correspondence
00:52:57of the surface
00:52:58side
00:52:58is present
00:52:59a cut
00:53:03at this point
00:53:04the monster
00:53:06enter
00:53:07takes
00:53:08the duvet
00:53:09he takes the girl
00:53:10for the hips
00:53:11and imposes
00:53:12a rotation
00:53:13in such a way
00:53:14that the belly
00:53:15of the girl
00:53:15look at the ground
00:53:16and goes to place
00:53:18the girl
00:53:18from the right side
00:53:19on the left side
00:53:20the one in which
00:53:21will be found
00:53:22in this way
00:53:23on the back
00:53:24they are produced
00:53:25of the drippings
00:53:25in the opposite direction
00:53:26to those who
00:53:27they had been created
00:53:27when the girl
00:53:28it was on this side
00:53:36the pouring
00:53:37it is a typology
00:53:37of blood stain
00:53:39which originates
00:53:40precisely
00:53:40from an accumulation
00:53:41of blood
00:53:42which then
00:53:42flows out
00:53:43along a surface
00:53:44on the way
00:53:45of strength
00:53:46of gravity
00:53:48let's suppose
00:53:49what's there
00:53:49this outflow
00:53:50of blood
00:53:51long
00:53:51one side
00:53:52of the back
00:53:54if then
00:53:54we find
00:53:55Also
00:53:56the same outflow
00:53:57on the other side
00:53:58of the back
00:53:58this can be
00:54:00index
00:54:00of a move
00:54:01of the corpse
00:54:02on one side
00:54:03to another
00:54:04these drips
00:54:06of blood
00:54:07they don't find
00:54:07justification
00:54:09in the story
00:54:09of Lotti
00:54:10Pacciani and Vanni
00:54:11they would not have had
00:54:12no need
00:54:13to turn over
00:54:14the body
00:54:14of the girl
00:54:15on one side
00:54:16to the other
00:54:16to carry out
00:54:17the excisions
00:54:18on the contrary
00:54:20the body
00:54:20by Nadine
00:54:21it should have been
00:54:22to remain still
00:54:23in position
00:54:24supine
00:54:25but by the way
00:54:27of the parts
00:54:27excised
00:54:28according to the version
00:54:29of Lotti
00:54:30what an end
00:54:31they would have done
00:54:32according to the story
00:54:34of Lotti
00:54:34they go exactly
00:54:36where he had seen
00:54:37hit the boy
00:54:38French
00:54:38and sees
00:54:39one of the two
00:54:39that is lowering
00:54:41and probably
00:54:41dig
00:54:42a hole
00:54:42something
00:54:43in hand
00:54:44they had a burden
00:54:44the fetishes
00:54:46the oranges
00:54:46fetishes
00:54:46torn
00:54:47to the victim
00:54:47female
00:54:48and they are hidden
00:54:49it is not clear
00:54:49Why
00:54:50in a hole
00:54:51in this area
00:54:56and I see
00:54:56some stuff
00:54:58at your doorstep
00:54:58but
00:54:59I don't know what
00:54:59who was
00:54:59and they went
00:55:00towards
00:55:00of pain
00:55:01to fall
00:55:02the boy
00:55:03and I see
00:55:04a
00:55:04of the two
00:55:05sarchina
00:55:05there
00:55:06a hole
00:55:07I don't know
00:55:07because I
00:55:08I didn't see
00:55:08the hole
00:55:09there
00:55:09and I saw
00:55:10to put
00:55:11something there
00:55:13Lotti tells
00:55:14that in the crime
00:55:15from Vicchio
00:55:16and in the crime
00:55:16of the brooms
00:55:17the fetishes
00:55:18they are hidden
00:55:20underground
00:55:21in a little hole
00:55:22not far away
00:55:23from the bodies
00:55:24after which
00:55:25the three
00:55:26they're leaving
00:55:28taking it
00:55:29for good
00:55:30but you
00:55:32you see it
00:55:33a Paccianico
00:55:35let it be launched
00:55:35That
00:55:36the object
00:55:39that could be
00:55:40bring
00:55:41of money
00:55:41as he claims
00:55:43Giuttari
00:55:43hide it
00:55:45underground
00:55:46for what reason
00:55:47and with the risk
00:55:50that a wild boar
00:55:51suddenly
00:55:52Arrivals
00:55:53and take it away
00:55:54and then
00:55:56regard
00:55:57the speech
00:55:57of fetishes
00:55:58the fetishes
00:56:00to Pacciani
00:56:01they are ordered
00:56:02and the night
00:56:03of the crime
00:56:04of 1985
00:56:05what he would have done
00:56:07Pacciani
00:56:07would have taken
00:56:09part
00:56:09of the breast
00:56:11excised
00:56:12the poor
00:56:12French girl
00:56:13and shipped
00:56:14to the prosecutor's office
00:56:15of the Republic
00:56:16with a B
00:56:17only
00:56:18of Florence
00:56:18in the person
00:56:19by Silvia
00:56:20of the Wife
00:56:21that he
00:56:21he didn't know
00:56:22not even who he was
00:56:23always according to
00:56:24the version
00:56:25of Lotti
00:56:25and of Pucci
00:56:26as told
00:56:27would have been seen
00:56:28from the two witnesses
00:56:30just thank you
00:56:31to the light
00:56:31of the moon
00:56:32that that night
00:56:33illuminated the square
00:56:34of the brooms
00:56:35the certain fact
00:56:36is that that night
00:56:37the moon
00:56:38at the indicated time
00:56:39from the two
00:56:39it wasn't yet
00:56:40kind
00:56:41would have appeared
00:56:42on the horizon
00:56:43only at midnight
00:56:44and a quarter
00:56:45and not between 11
00:56:46and 11:30
00:56:47when the companions
00:56:49of Snacks
00:56:49they would have killed
00:56:50the two Frenchmen
00:56:52it is not clear
00:56:53like Lotti
00:56:54which defines itself
00:56:55near the car
00:56:56of the French
00:56:57may have seen
00:56:57the action that happened
00:56:59in this part
00:57:01of Piazzola
00:57:02which all the more reason
00:57:04was in the area
00:57:05in the shade
00:57:06So lots
00:57:08in complete darkness
00:57:09he would have seen
00:57:10Pacciani and Banni
00:57:11not only
00:57:12enter the tent
00:57:14but even
00:57:15hide fetishes
00:57:16on the other side
00:57:17of the square
00:57:23upon specific request
00:57:24if there was a source
00:57:26of lighting
00:57:27Lots
00:57:28he mumbles something
00:57:29Speaking of which
00:57:30of a little light
00:57:31within
00:57:31of the tent
00:57:32as if inside
00:57:33of the tent
00:57:34if there had been
00:57:34a light
00:57:36lit
00:57:36of which there is no
00:57:37trace
00:57:41all these things
00:57:42she
00:57:42he saw them
00:57:43in what light
00:57:45there was a light
00:57:47and it seemed to me
00:57:48a small light
00:57:48inside the tent
00:57:50but she
00:57:50had access
00:57:51the headlights
00:57:53as access
00:57:54the headlights
00:57:54I the car
00:57:55Surely
00:57:56No
00:57:56I turned you off
00:58:01a pubic excision
00:58:03of that kind
00:58:04of that precision
00:58:06implies the necessity
00:58:08to have light
00:58:09otherwise
00:58:10it is not done
00:58:13Now
00:58:13I don't want to fall
00:58:14in the gloomy
00:58:15but the flap
00:58:17of skin
00:58:17it must be pulled
00:58:18and cut
00:58:20from below
00:58:20so it is necessary
00:58:21two hands
00:58:22the light
00:58:23the subject
00:58:23where did he get it from?
00:58:26the monster's signature
00:58:27it's just one
00:58:28they are the shells
00:58:29the shells with the H
00:58:30on the case back
00:58:32before closing
00:58:33the tent
00:58:34and leave
00:58:34picks up a shell casing
00:58:35from here forward
00:58:36and places it
00:58:37on the cloth
00:58:39white
00:58:39near a stain
00:58:41of blood
00:58:41that's his signature
00:58:42a bullet casing
00:58:44that someone will call
00:58:44H series
00:58:45which has always characterized
00:58:47the signature
00:58:47of the Monster of Florence
00:58:48this is the ultimate crime
00:58:50of the Monster of Florence
00:58:56at this point
00:58:57the doubt
00:58:58what remains
00:58:58it is but
00:58:59the witnesses
00:59:00they told
00:59:01the real one
00:59:01they got confused
00:59:04or they invented it
00:59:05All
00:59:08but of all
00:59:09these contradictions
00:59:10what we said
00:59:11up to now
00:59:11Then
00:59:12in judgment
00:59:13there is none
00:59:14not even one reported
00:59:16and then
00:59:16what
00:59:17it clearly emerges
00:59:19is that here
00:59:19there essentially
00:59:21there was one
00:59:22will
00:59:23to arrive
00:59:24by force
00:59:25to that one
00:59:26determined
00:59:27procedural truth
00:59:28Meaning what
00:59:29it was a sentence
00:59:30essentially
00:59:31already written
00:59:35we have an investigation
00:59:37that when it is done
00:59:39on elements
00:59:40on some evidence
00:59:42there is no evidence
00:59:44there are not even any clues
00:59:46and at that point
00:59:48it is used
00:59:50the figure
00:59:51of a witness
00:59:53that tells
00:59:55and on which
00:59:56it is built
00:59:57all of it
00:59:58the accusation
01:00:00without a doubt
01:00:02Lots
01:00:03sometimes
01:00:04he contradicted himself
01:00:05on some events
01:00:07there are two
01:00:08Three
01:00:08four
01:00:09minutes
01:00:09of interrogation
01:00:11on the same story
01:00:12in which he says
01:00:13different things
01:00:14and then
01:00:14this was
01:00:16a good game
01:00:17for the detractors
01:00:19to say
01:00:20that Lotti
01:00:21it was a test
01:00:21unreliable
01:00:23I
01:00:23I tend
01:00:25to think
01:00:27that it is
01:00:28unfair
01:00:29define
01:00:30Lots
01:00:31a witness
01:00:32unreliable
01:00:36me personally
01:00:37I do not believe
01:00:37to that
01:00:37who said
01:00:38Lots
01:00:38for me
01:00:39Lots
01:00:39he said
01:00:39a series
01:00:39of lies
01:00:41and then
01:00:42I am trying to say
01:00:43that
01:00:43which was
01:00:44Done
01:00:45I don't judge him
01:00:47and from the point
01:00:48of sight
01:00:49legal
01:00:49and from the point
01:00:50of sight
01:00:51moral
01:00:52one thing
01:00:53serious
01:00:59Which
01:01:00the image
01:01:00of justice
01:01:01Italian
01:01:01after this
01:01:02story
01:01:02I believe
01:01:04that it is
01:01:04a
01:01:07some
01:01:08What
01:01:09of terrible
01:01:09and let it be
01:01:10some
01:01:11What
01:01:11which in my opinion
01:01:12should do
01:01:13to be ashamed
01:01:14so many people
01:01:16it won't be possible
01:01:17never know
01:01:18who is
01:01:19Truly
01:01:20the monster
01:01:20of Florence
01:01:21was
01:01:22a mistake
01:01:23don't follow
01:01:24the events
01:01:26of the gun
01:01:27and projectors
01:01:2822 caliber
01:01:29when he abandoned himself
01:01:31that track
01:01:32we entered
01:01:33on a track
01:01:34fantastic
01:01:35on a track
01:01:37fairytale
01:01:40the monster
01:01:42represents
01:01:42a wound
01:01:43indelible
01:01:44that is precisely
01:01:46you can't imagine it again
01:01:51it's an account
01:01:53with the past
01:01:54Not yet
01:01:55Not yet
01:01:56welded
01:01:59Today
01:02:00even if precisely
01:02:02they have passed
01:02:03many years
01:02:03from the last
01:02:05double homicide
01:02:06it's still
01:02:07something
01:02:08very much alive
01:02:09moreover
01:02:10moreover
01:02:24Thank you all.
01:02:55Thank you all.
01:03:18Thank you all.
Commenti