- há 2 dias
13-Vidas Passadas
Uma das questões mais relevantes da Humanidade é a da existência de vida depois da morte. Em várias partes do mundo, crianças pequenas recordam espontaneamente, e por vezes de forma extremamente emotiva, supostas vidas passadas. Para além das memórias, algumas crianças também têm comportamentos ou capacidades invulgares para a sua idade, aparentemente relacionados com essas supostas vidas passadas. Nas últimas décadas, diversos cientistas concentraram a sua investigação nos relatos dessas crianças e conseguiram confirmar, através do cruzamento de múltiplas fontes de informação, a existência da suposta personalidade prévia, com as características descritas pela criança. Todavia, a investigação científica continua, para procurar explicar na totalidade este fenômeno.
11 ago. 2025
Uma das questões mais relevantes da Humanidade é a da existência de vida depois da morte. Em várias partes do mundo, crianças pequenas recordam espontaneamente, e por vezes de forma extremamente emotiva, supostas vidas passadas. Para além das memórias, algumas crianças também têm comportamentos ou capacidades invulgares para a sua idade, aparentemente relacionados com essas supostas vidas passadas. Nas últimas décadas, diversos cientistas concentraram a sua investigação nos relatos dessas crianças e conseguiram confirmar, através do cruzamento de múltiplas fontes de informação, a existência da suposta personalidade prévia, com as características descritas pela criança. Todavia, a investigação científica continua, para procurar explicar na totalidade este fenômeno.
11 ago. 2025
Categoria
📚
AprendizadoTranscrição
00:00.
00:02.
00:04.
00:06.
00:08.
00:10.
00:12.
00:14.
00:16.
00:18.
00:20.
00:22.
00:24.
00:26.
00:28.
00:30.
00:30.
00:33.
00:38.
00:39.
00:40.
00:41.
00:43.
00:44.
00:57consistent with the idea
00:59of life after death.
01:01But they're not necessarily
01:03quote, proof of life after death.
01:27Thank you.
01:57The most important question is whether or not there is life after death.
02:15Well, religions try to find answers to this, but there is no consensus.
02:20Most religions admit the existence of life after death.
02:25And the majority admit even the theory of life sucessivas.
02:30But the esclarecimiento of these areas seems to have, in fact, with science.
02:34In the last decades, divers scientists studied, a little bit of the world,
02:40children between 2 and 7 years old,
02:43that, for themselves, evocated,
02:47educaram supostas vidas passadas.
02:50Só na Universidade da Virgínia foram estudadas mais de 2.500 crianças
02:55e, em 68% dos casos, foi confirmada a existência da personalidade prévia
03:02com as características referidas para a criança.
03:05Então quer isso dizer que nós regressamos à Terra várias vezes em corpos físicos diferentes?
03:12As crianças estudadas são crianças normais, têm um bom funcionamento intelectual.
03:17O método científico utilizado é do rigor, do máximo rigor.
03:24As crianças são ouvidas de uma forma aberta,
03:27depois são entrevistadas familiares, vizinhos, amigos
03:33e, de seguida, os investigadores deslocam-se ao país e ao local
03:39onde a criança diz ter vivido anteriormente,
03:42estudam todos os registros disponíveis
03:45e entrevistam familiares, amigos, conhecidos.
03:51Até à confirmação da existência dessa personalidade prévia
03:56com as características referidas pela criança.
03:59Mas esses relatos e essas descrições podem ser a prova cabal
04:04de que realmente existe vida depois da morte?
04:06Considera-se que aquelas crianças conhecem supostas vidas passadas
04:13que poderão ter sido suas.
04:16Não se considera demonstrada a teoria das vidas sucessivas.
04:21Agora, torna-se imperioso investir mais na investigação científica
04:25nestas áreas que poderá contribuir decisivamente
04:30para uma alteração do entendimento da presença do ser humano na Terra.
04:35Cases são mais fáciles de encontrar em lugares com a credência de reivindicação.
04:54So, we've got a lot of cases from places like India, Thailand.
04:58But they're found wherever anybody looks for them.
05:03And they've been found on all the continents.
05:06We used to think that they were very rare in the United States.
05:12But it may just be that they're harder to find here
05:15because parents generally do not spread the word
05:19that their child is remembering a past life here
05:21because people may think that it's weird.
05:23Fortunately, we don't have to find cases here because they find us.
05:29We get reports all the time from American parents
05:32saying that their children are describing memories of a past life.
05:36So, we've had well over 100 cases a year recently.
05:41And we continue to get more and more.
05:43Typically, a child forgets their past life memories
05:54that they have when they're young.
05:56You know, they stop talking about them
05:59by the time they're, you know, five or six.
06:01And so, if someone has written down what they've said,
06:06then it's much more possible to see
06:10whether it matches any person that existed then
06:13if there's no record made.
06:22The children tend to be very young
06:24when they start talking about a past life.
06:26At the average age, when they start talking, it's 35 months.
06:29So, it's usually like a two- or a three-year-old.
06:31It's very young children who start coming out with these things.
06:35But it also has the advantage of we know
06:39that they have not been exposed
06:42to various kinds of things in the environment.
06:45That as adults, you know,
06:47we all accumulate a lot of information over our lives.
06:50But a two-year-old, not so much.
06:52So, it's good that they are the ones
06:54who sometimes in vivid detail
06:57are describing a past life.
06:58It really varies very much.
07:10A child may begin spontaneously talking about experiences
07:16that either the child or the parent
07:19come to associate with a past life.
07:22The parents might actually inquire about it
07:26in the process of imagining and talking about any topic.
07:32The child might begin talking about experiences
07:38as another person in another time.
07:42The child may be traveling with parents
07:44and there may be reminders or memories
07:48that the child attributes to a past life.
07:51So, there can be different ways
07:53these spontaneous experiences arise.
07:58There's no one profile
08:00that covers the whole gamut of experiences
08:03and reports of past life experiences.
08:11Sometimes, just slowly, tidbits that come out
08:16where they'll say,
08:17oh, when I was big, I used to do this.
08:20Sometimes, it starts very emotionally
08:24where they will suddenly start talking
08:27about previous parents
08:28or bad things that happened to them.
08:31And then, there are times where it starts
08:33where something seems to stimulate the memory.
08:35They will see something and say,
08:37oh, I did that in my last life.
08:40But they will add to the story
08:43and there are various details that will come out,
08:46usually focused on things
08:48from near the end of the previous life,
08:50including how the previous person died.
08:53So, in three-quarters of the cases,
08:56the child talks about
08:57how they died in the past life.
09:00And it's often violent
09:02or sudden kind of death.
09:05And they'll also describe people
09:06from near the end of the past life.
09:08So, it's as if their memories
09:10have just kind of picked up
09:12and carried on from where they ended
09:13in the last life.
09:18When we get the reports,
09:19what we focus on is,
09:22has the child said things
09:24that can be verified
09:25to be accurate for somebody
09:27who actually lived before?
09:29And also, looking at the question,
09:31could they have learned this information
09:32through some sort of ordinary means?
09:34We had an American case,
09:42a little boy named Ryan,
09:43where his mom sent us a letter
09:46because he had talked about
09:50a life in Hollywood
09:51on a daily basis for a year.
09:54And she eventually got some books
09:56about Hollywood
09:57to try to help him process it.
09:59When they were looking through one one day,
10:01they came to a picture
10:03from an old movie.
10:05And he pointed at one of the men
10:06and said that's who he had been
10:08in his past life.
10:09And it was an extra in the movie
10:12who had no lines.
10:13So, she couldn't identify
10:14who that was.
10:16And it took us a lot of effort
10:18to identify.
10:19Eventually, with the help
10:20of a Hollywood archivist,
10:21we were able to do that.
10:23And Ryan made a lot of statements.
10:27And over 50 of them
10:30matched this guy's life.
10:31And he was someone
10:32who was completely obscure,
10:33who had died 40 years
10:35before Ryan was born.
10:36I mean, there was no chance
10:37that he learned about this guy
10:40by accident.
10:40And yet, there were all
10:41these details that fit.
10:44So, that's the kind of case
10:46that we really look for
10:48because there's so much
10:50that can be verified.
10:51Scientists are reluctant
11:08to accept those data as proof
11:11is because there are
11:13alternative explanations
11:14which could also potentially
11:17explain the data.
11:18And I don't mean
11:19the simple interpretation
11:22such as, well,
11:24they overheard a conversation
11:26or they're some sort of,
11:29you know,
11:30it's part of their culture
11:31and so they fantasize
11:33and every now and again
11:34they get a hit by chance.
11:36Yes, those kinds of things
11:37are possible,
11:38but they do not explain
11:40the totality of the data.
11:42In the violent death cases,
12:0235% of those children
12:05show phobias toward the mode
12:07of death.
12:08So, for instance,
12:10there was a little girl
12:11who basically from the time
12:13she was born
12:14hated being in water.
12:16When she was an infant,
12:17it would take three adults
12:18to hold her down
12:19to give her a bath.
12:20And then once she got
12:21old enough to talk,
12:22describe the life of a girl
12:24in another village
12:26who had drowned
12:26in an accident.
12:27That's an example
12:28of where a fear
12:29or an anxiety
12:30certainly seems to be
12:32connected with these memories
12:34that they have.
12:35There are other children
12:36who will show a connection
12:38in their play.
12:40They will act out themes
12:42that seem connected
12:43to the past life.
12:44The most common
12:45would be acting out
12:46of the previous occupation.
12:48And it can be ones
12:48that no one in the family
12:50has any connection with.
12:52There are also children
12:53who will show
12:54a particular like
12:56or dislike
12:56that seems connected
12:58with the past life,
13:00unfortunately,
13:00including addictive substances.
13:03So if the previous person
13:04was a heavy smoker
13:05or a heavy drinker,
13:08the child,
13:09sometimes a very young child
13:10would be trying
13:10to sneak cigarettes
13:11or even sneak shots
13:13of liquor,
13:13that kind of thing.
13:15And then there are
13:16some children
13:17that show skills
13:20that surprises
13:21the people around them
13:22how good they are
13:23at something.
13:24So there's an American case
13:27where a little boy
13:28talked about being
13:31a golfer
13:32from the 1920s.
13:35And his parents,
13:38they didn't golf
13:39and they didn't know
13:39much about it.
13:40But from the time
13:42he was three years old,
13:44he was showing
13:46a lot of ability.
13:48And I've had periodic
13:50follow-up from the family.
13:51and he went
13:52dozens of golf tournaments.
13:55So he,
13:55I mean,
13:56wasn't necessarily
13:57a Tiger Woods
13:58kind of prodigy,
13:59but he was extremely
14:00gifted in golf
14:02from a very early age
14:03and that connected
14:04with the memories
14:05that he reported.
14:09Para além dos relatos
14:11e comportamentos específicos,
14:13surgem por vezes
14:14marcas e defeitos
14:15de nascença
14:16associados à suposta
14:18personalidade prévia evocada.
14:21In a number of cases,
14:23the child is born
14:25with birth marks
14:27or even full birth defects
14:29that match wounds,
14:30usually the fatal wounds,
14:32on the body
14:32of the previous person.
14:34And some of these
14:35can be quite striking.
14:37For instance,
14:37there was a little boy
14:39who remembered the life
14:40of a boy in another village
14:42who had lost the fingers
14:43of his right hand
14:44in a fodder chopping machine.
14:46And then this,
14:47the second boy,
14:48was born with no fingers
14:49on his right hand.
14:50And there are a lot
14:51of cases like that,
14:52including gunshot victims.
14:57When a child talks about it
14:59and talks about the bullet
15:01going in and out,
15:02and if they name who they were,
15:05sometimes then you can find
15:06the autopsy for the person
15:10that they were
15:10in their previous life.
15:11I personally think that
15:25what was most likely
15:26to be going on there
15:40is that the marks
15:42on the body
15:43are what initially
15:44is leading people
15:45to speculate
15:46about who the reincarnation
15:48might be.
15:49So if you have a child
15:51that's born with a big mark
15:52across their chest
15:53and you know
15:54that somebody
15:54in the next village
15:55was run over
15:55by a truck,
15:57then you think,
15:59oh, perhaps it's
16:00the reincarnation
16:00of so-and-so.
16:01And then that sets
16:02the whole process
16:03in flow
16:05of asking questions
16:07with that assumption,
16:08trying to get evidence,
16:10trying to,
16:10perfectly understandably,
16:11if you believe
16:12in reincarnation,
16:13to say,
16:14oh, well,
16:14we know that he worked
16:15in such and such
16:16a shop.
16:18Do you have any memories
16:19of that shop?
16:20You know,
16:20so you take them
16:20to the shop
16:21and they kind of
16:22maybe walk in
16:23and look around
16:24and initially not much,
16:25but eventually
16:26a rich false memory
16:28can develop
16:29which seems to actually
16:31kind of correspond
16:32to the marks,
16:34but actually it's the marks
16:35that have triggered
16:35the whole process
16:36in the first place,
16:37not the other way around.
16:43Not all cases
16:44can be explained
16:46as easily as that one,
16:47I accept that.
16:48And, yeah,
16:49again,
16:49it's a really
16:50intriguing phenomenon,
16:51but at the moment
16:52my money would be
16:53on an explanation
16:54in terms of
16:55spontaneous false memories.
16:57And by the way,
16:58we all have false memories,
16:59you know,
17:00not usually as interesting
17:01and as rich
17:02as what these kids
17:02are coming up with,
17:03but we all have false memories.
17:09With these cases,
17:10I mean,
17:11when we get them,
17:11we certainly try
17:12to verify
17:13that the child's birth
17:14marks or birth defects
17:15actually do match
17:17with the previous person,
17:18so we try to get
17:19autopsies reports
17:20or police reports
17:22or whatever
17:22that detail
17:24what the body look like.
17:26These are examples
17:27that it goes beyond
17:29just memories,
17:30that there's this
17:30physical component
17:32that appears
17:33to have carried over
17:34and, you know,
17:36it gets rather hard
17:38to explain.
17:38How to do,
17:43for more than 2,500
17:45cases of apparent
17:46reincarnation
17:47investigated
17:48by the Division
17:49of Perceptual Studies
17:51from the University
17:51of Virginia,
17:53founded by
17:53the psychiatrist
17:54Ian Stevenson,
17:56precursor
17:56of these studies
17:57that continue
17:58to follow
17:59the methodology
18:00for them.
18:00Establecida
18:01His methods
18:04were very careful.
18:05He was a very,
18:06very sophisticated
18:07thinker
18:10and examiner
18:13of cases
18:13of reincarnation.
18:14So he documents
18:16all the things
18:18that the child says
18:20about who they were
18:22and then he researches
18:24to see if there's
18:26anybody that matches that.
18:27He would record
18:28what a child was saying.
18:31Sometimes the child
18:31would give the name,
18:33the city,
18:35you see,
18:35where they lived
18:35and then he would
18:37search to see
18:38if there were records
18:39of such a person
18:40and often he would find them.
18:44One thing we did
18:47was to develop
18:48a strength of case scale
18:50where the computer
18:52assigns points
18:53to each case
18:54based on a number
18:55of things
18:56that we code for.
18:57So verified statements
18:59are a big part of it.
19:01Birth marks
19:02or birth defects
19:03that match wounds
19:04on the previous person,
19:06behaviors that the children
19:08show, unusual behaviors
19:09that seem linked
19:10to the past life
19:11and how much distance
19:13there is between
19:13the child
19:14and the previous person
19:16and the previous family.
19:18That then arrives
19:19at a score
19:20and we can look
19:20to see what correlates
19:22with a stronger case
19:24versus a weaker case.
19:26So for instance,
19:27we looked at
19:28does the parent's
19:30initial enthusiasm
19:32about the child's statements,
19:33does that correlate
19:34with how strong
19:35the case eventually
19:36looked to be?
19:38The concern being
19:39an enthusiastic parent
19:41may build up the case
19:43so it ends up looking
19:43stronger than it really was.
19:46But what we see
19:46there's no correlation.
19:47So it doesn't seem
19:48that the parent's
19:50attitude toward it
19:52affects how much
19:53evidence there is
19:54of this link
19:55to the past life.
19:56And then we looked
19:57at other factors as well.
20:00It seems that
20:01in the stronger cases
20:03the children start talking
20:04about the past life
20:05at an earlier age
20:06and also show more emotion
20:08as they talk about it.
20:10So it seems that
20:11there's just more
20:12kind of past life residue
20:15that has come through
20:16that the child
20:17is experiencing.
20:18As far as we can tell
20:20that the belief
20:21in reincarnation
20:22among the family
20:24or the people
20:25that the child knows
20:25does not correlate
20:27with how strong
20:28cases can be.
20:29So we have some
20:31very strong American cases
20:32where the family
20:33never given reincarnation
20:34and a second thought.
20:36And some of them
20:36where the parents
20:37were actively opposed
20:39to the idea
20:39of reincarnation
20:40and yet they eventually
20:41became persuaded
20:42that their child
20:44was in fact
20:44remembering a past life.
20:53There's a distinction
20:54between consistent with
20:55and proof.
20:57The consistent with
20:58makes perfect sense.
21:00I mean,
21:00because if you think
21:02these are,
21:04quote,
21:04your memories
21:05and you experience
21:06them as if they
21:07are your memories
21:08and then they turn
21:09out to be true,
21:10one of the ways
21:11that we explain that
21:12is that you are
21:14living again.
21:15So if there can be
21:16incarnation,
21:17there can be
21:17reincarnation.
21:18Okay?
21:19But,
21:20for example,
21:21it is possible
21:22and there are theories
21:23in parapsychology
21:24that the memories
21:25of people who have lived
21:27and the engrams
21:29of people who have lived
21:31exist in the,
21:33quote,
21:33vacuum of space.
21:34And so one argument
21:35is,
21:36yes,
21:37this person is connecting
21:39to past life information,
21:41but that life is over.
21:43So they're misinterpreting
21:45it as being their memory,
21:47but instead they are,
21:49they're just connecting
21:51with a real memory
21:53that happened to be
21:54localized in a place,
21:55for example,
21:56where their genetics
21:57allowed them to connect
21:58with it,
21:59but it's not proof
22:00that it was them.
22:04There are also
22:05alternative interpretations
22:07where it is evidence
22:10of life after death,
22:11but it's not reincarnation.
22:14So there is,
22:15the argument's been made
22:16that what a young child
22:18is doing is connecting
22:20or resonating
22:21with the surviving consciousness
22:23and so it's not
22:26their memories
22:27that they're experiencing,
22:29but they're experiencing
22:31a previous person's memories
22:34and that person is,
22:36quote,
22:37alive in the greater reality.
22:48About 20% of the children,
22:50in addition to talking
22:52about a past life,
22:53will also report memories
22:55of events that took place
22:56between lives.
22:58So after the previous person
23:00died and before they were born.
23:02And there are different kinds
23:03of details that they give.
23:06Some of them essentially
23:08describe a near-death experience,
23:09of when they died,
23:11floating above the body,
23:12often encountering other beings
23:14or angels or that sort of thing.
23:16others will talk about
23:19staying near the previous family
23:23or where the previous person died
23:24and will report seeing
23:26events happening.
23:28So some of them will describe
23:29the funeral of the previous person,
23:31sometimes giving
23:32verifiable details.
23:35So for instance,
23:36there's a little girl in Thailand
23:37that made a lot of statements
23:41about the past life,
23:42but one thing that she said,
23:44she complained that her ashes
23:45had been scattered
23:46rather than buried
23:48the way she wanted them to be.
23:50Well, the previous person
23:51was a woman who,
23:54when she died,
23:55she wanted her ashes buried
23:57under the bow tree
23:58of the temple complex
23:59where she studied.
24:01But when her daughter
24:04went to bury the ashes,
24:05the root system of the tree
24:06was so extensive
24:07that she couldn't bury them.
24:08So she scattered them instead.
24:10So that was a verified detail
24:13from between lives.
24:15Some of the children
24:16will also talk about
24:17going to other realms
24:18like heaven.
24:19The American kids
24:20may use the word heaven.
24:21And then some of them
24:22will also talk about
24:23sort of coming back
24:24to this life,
24:26either seeing their parents
24:28before they were born
24:30or sometimes choosing
24:31their parents.
24:33There's one case in the U.S.,
24:36a well-known case,
24:37where the little boy
24:39talked about choosing
24:41his parents
24:41when he saw them
24:43eating on the beach
24:46in Hawaii
24:47in front of a big pink hotel.
24:51And it turned out
24:52that his parents
24:54had in fact gone to Hawaii,
24:56stayed in a pink hotel,
24:57and on their last night
24:59they had dinner on the beach.
25:01And it was during this trip
25:02that the parents
25:03started trying to conceive.
25:06They didn't actually
25:07get pregnant then,
25:08but that was when
25:09the intention started,
25:10and the child seemed
25:11to have knowledge
25:13about this event.
25:18What it suggests
25:20is that there is
25:22a continuation of experience
25:25and a continuation
25:26of something
25:28that is not just
25:30you have one life
25:33and then you have another,
25:34but there is this continuation.
25:36So one might use
25:38the term spirit
25:39or soul
25:39or consciousness,
25:40but something
25:41that has continued on
25:42and even gathered
25:44new knowledge.
25:50Now whether
25:51that's a product
25:53of coincidence,
25:55a product
25:56of self-fulfilling prophecy,
25:59you have this idea
26:01and set of characteristics,
26:02you go out
26:03and you match somebody,
26:05it may be the case
26:08that you are simply
26:10confirming
26:11the reports
26:13associated with
26:14the past life
26:16through a match
26:17that may be
26:19coincidence,
26:21there may be many
26:23explanations
26:24for why there is
26:25a match
26:26other than
26:27the reincarnation
26:28hypothesis.
26:30But that's
26:31one scenario
26:32that is quite
26:33a common scenario
26:35in terms of
26:36getting the report,
26:38believing
26:38in the report,
26:41attaching a lot
26:42of credibility
26:42to it,
26:43and then finding
26:44individuals
26:46in circumstances
26:47that confirm,
26:49I shouldn't say,
26:50confirm,
26:51they match
26:52those reports
26:53and then we say
26:54that the case is out.
26:55it still leaves open
26:57the question
26:57of whether
26:58the cause
27:00of the match
27:01is due to
27:02reincarnation
27:03or any number
27:05of other explanations.
27:14There's no
27:15perfect case
27:16just like there's
27:17no perfect
27:17medical study.
27:18I mean,
27:18there are always
27:19potential issues
27:20that could
27:23make it
27:25not what it
27:26appears.
27:26So I think
27:27we can now say
27:28we have good
27:29evidence
27:29that some young
27:30children have
27:31memories of a
27:32life from the
27:32past,
27:33but that's not
27:35the same as
27:35saying that we've
27:36proven that they
27:37remember a past
27:38life that they
27:39had.
27:39I think
27:41that's
27:41what it
27:42is.
27:42I think
27:43that's
27:43what it
27:44is.
27:44I think
27:44that's
27:45what it
27:45is.
27:45Amém.
28:15Amém.
Recomendado
28:45
|
A Seguir
45:45
41:35
28:06
3:25
53:27
53:25
53:32
53:27
26:02
25:57
29:13
28:40
31:03
28:06
29:17
29:29
29:43
31:51
27:19
28:54
30:37