Skip to playerSkip to main content
Is Obsidian really returning to Fallout? According to recent rumors, the studio is reportedly working on an early Fallout project, but that doesn't necessarily mean we're getting New Vegas 2.

Would you trust Obsidian with a new Fallout game, or should Bethesda remain the only studio developing the series?

#fallout #falloutnewvegas #obsidian #bethesda #xbox #gaming #rpg #gamingnews #theelderscrolls #newvegas

Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

Source: https://wccftech.com/obsidian-returns-fallout-xbox-studio-restructuring/

For more content check me out at https://www.youtube.com/@realcsomm
Transcript
00:00I stumbled upon an interesting news today and it's all about how Obsidian might make fallout
00:05after 15 years but also how Xbox might consider to close them. Now the second part of this news
00:13has been debunked but as far as I'm concerned I'm more interested in the first part that is that we
00:19are going to see another fallout from Obsidian. Now this is an interesting one and I actually
00:25think there are good arguments on both sides as in they should or they shouldn't make the next
00:30fallout game. Also the key question isn't can Obsidian make another fallout it's mostly is
00:37today's Obsidian the same studio that made New Vegas. Spoiler alert it isn't but this is where
00:44the debate gets interesting. So if we are considering why it could be a great idea I can sort of
00:51give you
00:52couple reasons. The first reason would be that they understand fallout's RPG DNA. Even people
00:58who don't like modern Obsidian generally agree that the studio still prioritizes player choice,
01:04dialogue, faction politics and role playing. And these are exactly the things I feel have been
01:10de-emphasized since Fallout 4. So if Xbox wants a fallout that is closer to New Vegas than Fallout 4
01:17Obsidian could be the obvious candidate. The second reason is all about Bethesda being busy and I can
01:24say this is probably my strongest argument for this. If Bethesda doesn't make another fallout until after
01:30The Elder Scrolls 6 we are realistically talking about the early or even mid-2030s for the next
01:37fallout game. And I don't know about you but this is an enormous gap. I mean Microsoft has one of
01:44gaming's biggest franchises sitting idle while interest is at its highest thanks to the tv show.
01:51So giving another studio a fallout project makes perfect sense if you ask me. And as my final point
01:58I would say that they already proved they can do it. Whether people love or hate New Vegas today
02:03it has one of the strongest reputations in the series. Hell I would even say it is one of if
02:09not
02:10the best RPG ever made. Obviously this point is actually more nuanced than it first appears
02:16because there are really two different ways to look at Obsidian's history with Fallout.
02:21Which basically brings me to why this could be a terrible idea. And number one reason like I
02:28mentioned before is that this isn't the same Obsidian. I mean let's think about it. It has been
02:34over 15 years. Many senior developers have left. Writers have changed. Designers have changed.
02:41Leadership has probably evolved. And the studio has nearly doubled in size. So when people say that
02:48the new Vegas developers are making another fallout. I mean are they really? Because the logo is still
02:54the same but the people largely aren't. And this is true across the industry. Modern studios often share
03:00a name with a team that made their classics but not necessarily the same talent. Which brings me to
03:06my second point. It is fair to say recent Obsidian games haven't reached New Vegas reputation.
03:13And I'm mostly talking about The Wild and The Outer Worlds 2. For example the criticism that I would
03:19mention for these two games are as follows. Shallow exploration, safe quest design, limited player
03:26freedom compared to expectations. Writing that leans heavily on humor and combat that feels competent
03:32rather than exceptional. If those same design philosophies carried over to Fallout I can safely
03:39say without a shadow of a doubt that New Vegas would be disappointing as fuck. So if you want to
03:47see
03:47Fallout with Avowed and The Outer Worlds stuff I mean sure you can. But the question is especially since
03:55there is this huge restructuring at Xbox. If you don't make a game that sells like hotcakes
04:02that essentially means your corporate overlords will probably shut you down. So yeah like I said by all
04:08means experiment as much as you want. But if I was the head of Xbox I would probably say to
04:14them
04:14something along the lines of make the game that people like based on what you have in Fallout New Vegas
04:22and don't put any other bullshit that you normally put in your games. Because if you don't do that
04:27it's not going to be a party time for either Xbox or Obsidian for that matter. Now next point kinda
04:34goes
04:34together with the previous one and it's all about nostalgia being a dangerous benchmark. You see New
04:41Vegas is almost mythical game so people don't just want another Fallout they want to feel exactly how
04:49they felt in 2010. Now I could argue that this is not that hard to make but in today's gaming
04:56industry
04:57this is almost impossible to pull out. Even if a new game scored 9 out of 10, which by the
05:03way is
05:03meaningless, people will probably compare every quest, every faction, every dialogue choice to New Vegas.
05:09And like I said based on the state of the gaming industry that's an incredibly high bar. I mean it's
05:16still doable and I would argue you can replicate what made New Vegas amazing. But the main question
05:23is this, do people who are now in Obsidian even know what made New Vegas amazing? Because as far as
05:30I'm concerned judging from the games they released recently I don't think they do. Now I talked about
05:35nostalgia but I would say the bigger problem from nostalgia is actually expectations because I mean
05:42it's Fallout New Vegas 2. People are going to jump on hype train like there's no tomorrow. Hell even I
05:49would do that maybe 10-15 years ago if I didn't know better. But just think about this. If New
05:55Vegas 2
05:56actually happens. I bet you that people will immediately expect stuff like Kaisar's Legion,
06:02NCR, Mr. House, the Mojave, same level of writing, same freedom, same atmosphere. And to be honest
06:10that's perfectly normal. I mean you are making New Vegas 2 right? So what we had in the first game
06:17you need to have in the second game and then some. So in that sense if the game delivers anything
06:23less
06:23you could say the backlash could be enormous. I should point out when I talk about these things
06:29that the biggest concern for me isn't gameplay, it's actually writing. Because let's be real,
06:34New Vegas' greatest strength wasn't its combat or graphics. That was basically there because it has
06:40to be there. The real reason why New Vegas was or rather is still amazing is that nearly
06:46every faction had believable motivations. There wasn't a clear good guy. And we are still seeing
06:53people arguing over Reddit about NCR, Legion, House, Yes Man and the choices that follow after you pick
07:01one of these factions. And the debate is still going on 15 years later. And that dear listener is called
07:08exceptional writing. So in that sense I don't think recent Obsidian games have consistently reached the
07:15level of moral complexity. And the recent writing of these games would be something along lines of
07:20more straightforward or more comedic. And if that tone carried into Fallout it could lose some of what
07:27made New Vegas memorable. But you know what's interesting here? Ironically my biggest fear isn't
07:33that Obsidian will make Fallout. It's that Microsoft told them that people love New Vegas so go make another
07:40one. And that is extremely detrimental. Especially if they don't understand that people who made Fallout
07:46New Vegas what it is now are not in your company anymore. And if you are trying to emulate the
07:51success
07:51that happened 15 years ago without the most important element which is human resources. And not to mention
07:58if people don't have a clue what made Fallout New Vegas special. Then you are basically going towards a cliff
08:05which
08:05you will never recuperate from. Because you will end up flying off that cliff like Wild Coyote. And then
08:12soon gravity will take over and you will probably make one impressive human pancake because you forgot
08:18to pack your bloody parachute. Now New Fallout or rather Fallout New Vegas 2 can spend all its time
08:25referencing the first game and bringing back old characters if that's possible given the fact what
08:31happened in the first game and the lore and all that stuff. And you can probably get certain points
08:36from fan service in that sense. But if the core design philosophy is lacking which is deep role-playing,
08:44meaningful choices, moral complexity, factions and player agency then you're not gonna make a good game
08:50that's 100% certain. So if you see Fallout New Vegas 2 being made by Obsidian or any announcement happens
08:59where Fallout New Vegas 2 is accompanied by Obsidian Entertainment logo. Know this. That is not the
09:07same studio that made the original Fallout New Vegas and that logo is just there for marketing purposes
09:13and to attract people who know nothing about first game or to kinda I would say bamboozle most of the
09:23people into hyping themselves without actually using their brain to figure out that things are
09:29widely different than they were 15 years ago. Because as far as I'm concerned Obsidian is definitely not
09:36capable of making Fallout New Vegas 2 and I will gladly eat my words if this thing ever becomes a
09:43reality
09:44but somehow I don't think that's ever gonna happen. And that's basically my take on this news. Thanks very
09:50much for watching and as always like, share, subscribe, comment all that good stuff. And that's it from me until
09:57the next one.
Comments

Recommended