Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 37 minutes ago
In an interview with India Today, senior Congress MP Manish Tewari questioned India's foreign policy conduct regarding the West Asia war. He raised concerns about India's silence on coercive regime change, targeted assassinations, and abductions of functionaries of sovereign governments.
Transcript
00:00So, will we see a broad national consensus now emerge on the West Asia war?
00:08Joining me now is Manish Tiwari, Senior Congress MP and someone who's been speaking out on the war.
00:15Appreciate your joining us, Manish Tiwari.
00:18Has the Prime Minister assuaged all the concerns that the opposition had
00:22or does the opposition still want a full debate inside Parliament on the West Asia war?
00:30Rajdeep, first of all, thank you very much for inviting me.
00:34It's always a pleasure to have a conversation with you.
00:37The Prime Minister essentially tried to sensitize Parliament and the nation with regard to the gravity of the crisis,
00:48given that Hormuz is blocked, 3,000 ships are idling in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.
00:56It's not only about crude oil and natural gas, but fertilizers, food, essential life-saving drugs.
01:08There is a lot which is in play, given that India's most critical supply line has been disrupted.
01:18But however, the crisis in West Asia or the war in West Asia has raised certain very serious questions
01:27with regard to the conduct of Indian foreign policy.
01:31And that is why the opposition had given a notice under Rule 193,
01:37even before the Prime Minister made a statement on the floor of the House,
01:42demanding that there should be a full discussion on the evolving situation,
01:48which fortunately now seems to be dialing down a bit,
01:53given that President Trump has put out on Truth Social that they are having some back-channel negotiations with the
02:02Iranians.
02:03But these serious questions that I allude to, Rajdeep, are as follows.
02:09Should India really be accepting and staying silent on the doctrine of coercive regime change?
02:19Should India be accepting the targeted assassination and abduction of functionaries of sovereign governments?
02:33Should India not have criticized the assassination of a sitting president,
02:39as also condoled the deaths of 196 innocent school children,
02:46who, going by the New York Times report, were ostensibly killed by a U.S. missile strike.
02:55Similarly, there has been damage all around West Asia.
03:01And we have a very large diaspora, and the Prime Minister alluded to that,
03:06that 10 million people live and work there.
03:09So, given the fact that we have human security concerns, energy security concerns,
03:15food and fertilizer security concerns, our dependence on crude oil in the past 12 years,
03:22import dependence has increased from 77% to almost 86%.
03:28LNG dependence has gone up from 30% to 47%.
03:32Why refining capacities and upstream exploration wasn't really energized?
03:38So, therefore, there are a lot of very, very vital questions connected with India's economy,
03:47India's national security, India's foreign policy,
03:50which need to be debated in a very mature and in a very restrained manner.
03:56This is what the government claims, that the Congress party is determined to oppose the government at every stage,
04:02whatever the government does.
04:03Your leader, Rahul Gandhi, according to the government,
04:07is determined to oppose Prime Minister Modi at every stage, saying,
04:10Narendra surrender.
04:11So, once you set the terms in Narendra surrender,
04:14then the government says, where is the scope for any kind of bipartisan consensus?
04:19So, therefore, it needs two hands to clap.
04:22It does not need one hand to clap.
04:25And if I may remind you, the responsibility of running the House
04:30is that of the government primarily and not the opposition.
04:35Having said that, I do not want to get into a he said, she said
04:39about how two parliament sessions were completely wiped out in the November of 2010
04:45and the monsoon session of 2012, when the current gentlemen were in opposition.
04:51So, therefore, I do not want to get into that, he said, she said.
04:54The fact is that this parliament has had extremely mature and restrained debates
05:01on foreign policy and national security,
05:04going back to the seven-day debate between the 7th of November and the 16th of November 1962,
05:12when the border war with China was actually at its zenith.
05:16There was fighting going on in the Northeast,
05:19and 163 MPs spoke in the Lok Sabha and in the Raj Sabha,
05:24and the government replied to that debate.
05:28In 1965, when the war was going on with Pakistan,
05:32Prime Minister Shansh Sri kept parliament abreast of what was happening.
05:38In 1971, when we were liberating East Pakistan, which is now Bangladesh,
05:44the winter session of parliament was on,
05:47and Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, Defence Minister Jagjeevan Ram,
05:51other senior ministers like Swaran Singh regularly kept parliament briefed.
05:56So, therefore, to say that because there is a crisis,
06:00parliament should suspend its functioning,
06:03and therefore, there is only one voice which should be heard,
06:08I do not think is the correct characterization of how a democracy should function.
06:14Maybe at the end of it, there will be a resolution.
06:18After all, this parliament passed a resolution on Jammu and Kashmir being an alienable part of India,
06:24and the only unfinished business of partition being the reclaim of the areas occupied by Pakistan,
06:32namely Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and northern areas in 1994.
06:37This same parliament retreated that resolution in 2012.
06:41Okay.
06:43Will there be, though, that debate that takes place in parliament,
06:47or will all the debates only take place in TV studios on issues of national importance?
Comments

Recommended