- 3 weeks ago
How did the explosion of climate-related cases come about, what is the legal and social framework surrounding them, and what are the main conclusions from the case KlimaSeniorinnen v. Switzerland?
Why does the European Central Bank consider this decision to be pivotal, what risks does it identify for its own policy and for the central banks in the eurozone, and how does it interpret this new “climate” legal reality?
How does this case affect institutions such as the Bulgarian National Bank, and what legal and economic consequences could it have for our country upon joining the eurozone?
Explanation of the German model in managing the assets of “Rosneft Germany” – how did the country manage to circumvent the sanctions restrictions without formally violating them?
Critical analysis of the Bulgarian approach toward “Lukoil” and what it reveals about the effectiveness of sanction and energy policy in Bulgaria.
If you wish to support me, you may do so at:
paypal.me/marialazarova1981 – marialazarova1981@gmail.com
Why does the European Central Bank consider this decision to be pivotal, what risks does it identify for its own policy and for the central banks in the eurozone, and how does it interpret this new “climate” legal reality?
How does this case affect institutions such as the Bulgarian National Bank, and what legal and economic consequences could it have for our country upon joining the eurozone?
Explanation of the German model in managing the assets of “Rosneft Germany” – how did the country manage to circumvent the sanctions restrictions without formally violating them?
Critical analysis of the Bulgarian approach toward “Lukoil” and what it reveals about the effectiveness of sanction and energy policy in Bulgaria.
If you wish to support me, you may do so at:
paypal.me/marialazarova1981 – marialazarova1981@gmail.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00My friends, I am Maria Lazarova. Thank you very much for sharing and sharing my videos.
00:17Today, my guest is Mr. Stevcho Stanev, an expert on European and international law
00:27from the organization Equip.
00:32Hello, Mr. Stevcho Stanev. How are you?
00:36Hello, thank you for your invitation. Good to be your guest.
00:43Mr. Stevcho Stanev, I have given you a question related to the European Central Bank
00:54and the first question is, tell me how exactly the explosion of things related to the climate?
01:06What is the right and social framework around it?
01:11And what are the main issues related to the climate?
01:23Yes, this is a topic that is not the most discussed in the future.
01:30I have a question about the climate.
01:32I have a question about the future.
01:34I have a question about the climate change.
01:36The global climate change is a way to the world.
01:38I have a question about the future and the future.
01:40I'm going to talk about the question in a wider and wider context,
01:46maybe if we look at 5-10 years ago,
01:50because you know that the idea of the yellow movement
01:55is from the 70s to the 20th century,
02:00especially in the West Germany.
02:03That was spread out in the 21st century,
02:08in all the political movements, in all the countries in Europe.
02:13Maybe one of these ideas was between the 2010 and 2020
02:20before COVID-19,
02:23when even more serious problems for общество
02:27were identified as a theme.
02:29And the result of the idea of the yellow idea
02:33and the movement of the movement,
02:35we are going to experience it,
02:37because the idea of the mainstream politics
02:39is not going to take care of.
02:42We know that the idea of the idea is
02:45that the idea of a wide variety of organizations
02:49in different countries,
02:52which have great strategies
02:55provide in particular,
02:58which are related to the analysis.
03:00And so it's better for the success of the last part
03:03in the European countries,
03:04which does the opposite Comerciate
03:07and take care of the ideas.
03:09And so that's how
03:11an idea of an artificial intelligence
03:13is similar,
03:14which is one of the most independent organizations
03:19which is present in the past of the world of Shvetsaria,
03:24present in the past of the years,
03:27from the past of 64 years in Shvetsaria.
03:31They are part of the organization
03:34who is working with the climate change.
03:38They have managed to go to Shvetsaria
03:42in Strasbourg
03:44for the violation of the European Convention for the Humanity.
03:50But before this deal has its success for this organization,
03:56there are other things like Portugal,
03:59where people are trying to try to get the country,
04:04which is not enough for the climate change,
04:07but it is not allowed to be allowed.
04:11In France, there is a place to go,
04:14on a little bit,
04:17a place to go,
04:20and a citizen,
04:23but he has no success.
04:26But with the success of these successes,
04:30the pensioners have a good strategy
04:35and in 2024,
04:38they have a good strategy,
04:41and they have a good strategy,
04:43and they have a good strategy.
04:45They choose the instruments.
04:47First of all,
04:48they are a organization that has the goal
04:52with the climate change,
04:54and second of all,
04:55they are a good strategy.
04:57and we know that, in principle, the people who are growing up when the time is
05:05hot, they have more infarcts and so on, so they have a group that is
05:17a bit more interesting time, which is a part of the country, because
05:31for the first time, the people who are growing up in the country,
05:37the people who are growing up in the country,
05:41they will stimulate the 100% community and the same they can
05:54stop the climate.
05:57The Transfer of the Strasbourg will be called
06:00Matter-to- explosions, which is collected and so on,
06:06with climate change.
06:08These are in practice
06:10whether the countries have
06:12specific goals and plans
06:14for the amount of money
06:16and the methods
06:18for the national budget
06:20,
06:22whether the plan
06:24is to complete,
06:26whether the measures are adapted
06:28to the results
06:29and whether
06:30they take a look at the
06:32activities.
06:34In this case,
06:36it is really
06:38to say,
06:40maybe,
06:42because
06:44it is
06:46because
06:48it is
06:50right
06:52to
06:54make
06:56the
06:58rights
07:00and
07:01they
07:02in
07:04the
07:06group.
07:08It
07:10was
07:12to
07:14have
07:16to
07:18to
07:20have
07:22to
07:24have
07:26to
07:28have
07:30to
07:32have
07:34to
07:36to
07:38have
07:40to
07:42have
07:44to
07:46have
07:48to
07:50have
07:52to
07:54and
07:56to
07:58have
08:00to
08:02have
08:04to
08:06have
08:08to
08:10to
08:12to
08:14have
08:16to
08:18have
08:20to
08:22have
08:24to
08:26have
08:28to
08:30have
08:32to
08:34to
08:36have
08:50to
08:52have
08:54to
08:56to
08:58have
09:00to
09:02have
09:04to
09:06have
09:08to
09:10have
09:12to
09:14have
09:16to
09:18so
09:20that
09:22we
09:24have to
09:26have
09:28to
09:30have
09:32to
09:34have
09:36to
09:38have
09:40to
09:42have
09:44to
09:46to
09:48that
09:50that
09:52are
09:54to
09:56to
09:57keep
09:58your
09:59thinking
10:00why
10:02the
10:03central bank
10:05see
10:06this
10:07decision
10:08and
10:09what
10:10identify
10:11for
10:12their
10:13policy
10:14and
10:15the central banks in Eurozone and how is the new climatic reality?
10:27The Central Bank in its own research
10:32The Central Bank in its own research
10:50is that it is possible for the European Central Bank
10:55and that it is possible for the economic politics in the market.
11:02The economic politics in the bank is actually tied to the economy
11:07in the financial system,
11:10which is the economic system of inflation
11:13and the economic stability of the world.
11:16We have a crisis about the climate
11:19and the climate of the economic system
11:22and there is a level of inflation, which society needs to be able to get.
11:31The ECB thinks that the decision on the European Union is to put in the budget as an instrument.
11:42The ECB also says that it is more than a priority for climate protection
11:48and economic support for the decision.
11:51So, here we have a balance between the climate,
11:56which is the priority to be in the economy.
12:01This means that the European Union Bank
12:04is not able to take the climate
12:07as an important factor.
12:10The political factor is to put it
12:13together with other economic factors,
12:17when it comes to the decision.
12:21At the third point,
12:25this is the possibility for the United States,
12:27whether it is National or SEDA in Strasburg,
12:29to be able to evaluate the state
12:31of the government, bank and financial institutions
12:34in terms of the European Union
12:36and the European Union,
12:38whether it is the financial sector
12:41or the financial sector
12:45or the financial sector,
12:47which is the financial sector,
12:49which is the financial sector.
12:51It is the financial sector,
12:53because the European Union Bank
12:55is the financial sector,
12:57which is the financial sector,
12:59which has been established in the EU.
13:01in the Eurozone,
13:02that it is a 2%,
13:05which is written in the EU,
13:08and the European Union for the European Union.
13:12That is, the mandate on the European Central Bank
13:14is completely clear.
13:16It is a stability.
13:18But now, after this type of deal,
13:20this mandate is going to be a problem
13:22with the climate climate.
13:25That is, we can say that we can see
13:26one of the topics on the договорs
13:28without any kind of democratic sanctions.
13:31It is an obligation,
13:33maybe, to the дух of the negotiations,
13:37not only on the details,
13:38but only on the details.
13:41Except for the stability,
13:43we have to take advantage of the climate.
13:46And so,
13:48the important risk,
13:50which ECEB
13:52sees this decision,
13:54is a transition
13:57or a risk.
13:59If it is a risk,
14:00if it is a risk of the climate,
14:02or a risk of the countries,
14:04or a risk of the EU,
14:06or a risk of the EU,
14:07that can be caused by the climate.
14:09This can be a shock
14:12in the financial system.
14:14Because,
14:15for, like to say,
14:17to be able to get the climate,
14:18that may be a risk of the regulation,
14:21to be able to get the capital
14:22from certain sectors,
14:24or to not allow new capital
14:25in certain sectors,
14:26which will be considered
14:27for, so to say,
14:28for a high level of energy,
14:30and, of course,
14:32and, of course,
14:33the issue of the economy,
14:34which is the issue of the economy,
14:36which is the energy of the economy,
14:39which is the energy of the oil,
14:40the gas,
14:42the gas,
14:43the gas,
14:44the investment in the infrastructure,
14:46which can lead to the capital
14:49to the stability of the credit
14:51and the corporate sector
14:53in this sphere.
14:55and, of course,
14:57this is a risk
14:59that it is a risk
15:00that it is a tremendous
15:01transformation
15:02and it is a threat
15:03and it is a threat
15:04to the economy
15:05and the bank sector.
15:11In conclusion,
15:12I can say that
15:13the ECB
15:14that it is not a mandate
15:16to be able to do
15:17the climate policy,
15:18but,
15:19the decision
15:20to be able
15:21to be able
15:22to be able
15:23to be able
15:24for the main rights
15:26of the human rights
15:27and to be able
15:28to be able
15:29to be able
15:31to be able
15:32to be able
15:33to be able
15:34to bring the climate
15:35to the economy.
15:37Mr. Klein,
15:38I will say
15:39I will repeat
15:40to Bulgaria.
15:41It is a lot
15:42to answer
15:43how can this
15:44be able
15:45to be able
15:46to be able
15:47for the days
15:48and how
15:49the economic
15:51and economic
15:52consequences
15:53such
15:54can be for our country
15:57to join the European Union for the European Union.
16:04To this point, we have to do it for the people who listen to us and listen to some details.
16:10The first thing is that the Strasburg
16:13that the European Union for the Human Rights Union,
16:19which is not only the European Union and the European Union,
16:23but almost all the Europe without Russia and Belarus.
16:29So, it is like the Balkans, the Azerbaijan, the Azerbaijan, the Turkey and so on.
16:35All these countries, the European Union for the European Union
16:42are with the European Union and the European Union and the European Union.
16:47The European Union, the European Union,
16:53is not a member of the European Union.
16:57This means that the European Union,
16:59the European Union, the European Union,
17:01the European Union,
17:03is not a member of the European Union,
17:05is not a member of the European Union.
17:07The European Union, the European Union,
17:09is not a member of the European Union,
17:11is not a member of the European Union.
17:13It is a member of the European Union,
17:15and, of course,
17:17the European Union,
17:19has said that the European Union and the European Union
17:23are part of the European Union.
17:25They may be part of the European Union, which is part of the European Union and the European Union of Strasbourg.
17:37What does it mean?
17:39It means that the Central Bank, if it is a part of the political policy and the European Central Bank,
17:48it is a part of the policy of the BNB.
17:55It can be attacked as a threat for climate,
18:01and it can be a part of the European Central Bank.
18:07It is a risk for BNB,
18:14because you know how limited role it has BNB,
18:20the BNB, when it is a part of the European Union of the EU,
18:24when it comes to the EU,
18:26when it comes to the EU,
18:28when it comes to the EU,
18:31when it comes to the EU,
18:34when it comes to the EU,
18:36when it comes to the EU,
18:50That means that the way that the BNB is a very minimal and limited.
19:01But on the other hand, no matter whether we can see it or not,
19:06the BNB has a risk to carry out the decision of the ECB in Strasbourg.
19:14So here we see one balance between the right and the right and the right,
19:21which is not talking about it, but it exists and can carry out negative financial consequences for the ECB.
19:33The ECB was a bit of a recent recent president,
19:36where the Central Bank has been a part of a company, Client Earth,
19:45because when the Central Bank is implemented on the ECB for corporate obligations,
19:55she doesn't take attention to corporate obligations,
20:00or corporate corporations, which are related to businesses and businesses,
20:06which are related to the loss of the rights of life.
20:10If they are buying obligations,
20:16which are developing new petrol, gas, and so on,
20:20and so on,
20:22and that the government has to do it,
20:24which is the way that the Central Bank
20:26has to do it
20:28to do it
20:30to do it
20:32with the climate
20:34towards the trade
20:36which is what we have to do
20:38in our conversation.
20:40This is a way to do it
20:42to the way that the Central Bank
20:44is to do it
20:46because
20:48the ECB
20:50I would like to say, the yellow one, on which the politics of it, and not only the national and central banks,
21:02he decided to make changes in their key decisions and policies, so that the climate is as one of the main factors,
21:18which has to be taken by the decision.
21:21So that's why the organization of the practice
21:26can achieve it even without the official end of the deal.
21:33The ECEB says that they may be able to do this in the future,
21:38because the state should be able to prove that the bank
21:42that they have to do this 5-stress test
21:45in the way of climate seniority
21:47and in the way of Sweden,
21:49so that they take a look at the climate effects
21:53from these things
21:55and that they may be
21:58changing so that they will save the climate.
22:05So,
22:06the ECB even though it is
22:07that these climatic criteria,
22:09so that we have to take a look at everything
22:12in the decision of the political system
22:15and Bank of the National Council.
22:19In conclusion, I would say that
22:23at least from all the publications
22:27and the discourse of the BNB
22:31or the BNB government
22:35have not spoken about this risk,
22:39but we see that the discussion,
22:41the discussion of the BNB,
22:45and when we decided to enter the European Union
22:49and the BNB,
22:53the risk of the BNB,
22:55the risk of the BNB.
22:59If we are outside the BNB,
23:03the risk of the BNB would be
23:05and it was definitely
23:07a little bit,
23:09to say,
23:11for example,
23:13if the BNB is part of the BNB,
23:17the BNB is part of the BNB
23:19and the BNB is part of the BNB
23:21and the BNB is part of the BNB.
23:23And the BNB is the risk of the BNB.
23:24So,
23:29the risk of the BNB is the risk of the BNB
23:37that is the risk of the BNB
23:39the other thing, or maybe BNB, which is what it represents,
23:47is to be in the case of the SED in Estrasburg,
23:53which can be just a solid goal, a solid goal,
23:59for an organization, and to be able to make specific measures,
24:06which Bulgaria and BNB should be able to fight with climate change.
24:14Mr. Stanif, let me take a little bit to the topic of the UK.
24:20Explain how the German model,
24:24with the control of the activities of Rosneft, Germany,
24:30how the country can manage the sanctions without them being formal?
24:42It's been a long time ago,
24:46that Bulgaria is trying to create a new model,
24:50but we saw how in half a minute to one day
24:56in the UK.
24:58In the UK, there is a new model,
25:02which is quite a bit more and more advanced,
25:06so that it will be able to maintain the function of the rafiner,
25:12which are in the case of Rosneft.
25:16In the UK, there are a big part of the rafiner that are
25:24a part of the rafiner of the rafineress that is a part of the rafineress
25:28that are in the UK.
25:30That the rafineress of the rafineress and energy on Germany
25:36and that rafineress is a 90% of the rafineress that are in Berlin and Brandenburg.
25:42Brandenburg.
25:43That is, Germany will make everything possible,
25:45without being able to reduce the sanctions,
25:46without being able to use the function of these
25:48.
25:50But this is not in the last few days,
25:53or in the last few days.
25:55Germany began in September 2022,
26:00about half a year after the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine.
26:08And then,
26:10Rosneft was sanctioned by the government
26:12and Germany decided to establish
26:14the regime
26:15for the government of Rosneft,
26:18in Germany,
26:19which is the union of Rosneft.
26:22What does this
26:24mean?
26:26It is,
26:28it is,
26:29for sure,
26:30not the concept for the
26:32government of Rosneft,
26:34but it is well established in
26:36and the government of Rosneft,
26:39in Britain,
26:41in the United States.
26:43And so,
26:45that,
26:46in general,
26:47that,
26:48that,
26:49that,
26:50that,
26:51that,
26:52that,
26:53that,
26:54that,
26:56that,
26:57that,
26:59that,
27:00that,
27:01that,
27:02that,
27:03of the authorities in the United States,
27:08the European Union,
27:10which in practice have made the sanctions.
27:13How do you think this is the government?
27:18The government has to do control
27:23from the practice of the operational level.
27:27The control of the government
27:29in Germany, it is a national regulator
27:34through special changes in the government.
27:39So, it is possible that the state can
27:44to one of the agencies
27:46should be responsible for Germany.
27:50However, this is not happening
27:53with such changes and changes
27:56in Bulgaria.
27:58It is possible that the state of Germany is
28:01quite well developed.
28:03First, it is possible to be
28:06valid in this scheme,
28:09to be informed by the
28:12registries
28:15and to be approved by the
28:17government.
28:18The decision is to be
28:19approved by the
28:21economy of Germany
28:23and to have
28:24every three months
28:26of the government.
28:27So,
28:29how it is
28:30that the
28:31critical infrastructure in Germany
28:32will be
28:33not
28:34for the citizens.
28:35and
28:36it is
28:37a great
28:38level of
28:39interest.
28:40and
28:41it is
28:42that
28:43it is
28:44possible to
28:45for the
28:47government
28:48to be
28:50Russian company Rosneft, and that was made by Rosneft.
28:58They, according to them, in Germany,
29:02they had the rights of the Constitution,
29:04which was in their constitution.
29:07According to them, it was not proportional to Germany
29:11and it was in the procedure.
29:15But the administration in Germany
29:18in Germany, I think,
29:21in the beginning of 2023,
29:23they had the job.
29:25The control control,
29:27which was established
29:29in the United States,
29:32is to check,
29:33that the government is legal
29:36and are required
29:38with the protection of the energy and the security of the country.
29:43And if we compare this model
29:46with what was done in Bulgaria,
29:49first, that in Bulgaria,
29:50that in Bulgaria,
29:51it was not used,
29:54and, in principle,
29:55it was not popular in the United States.
29:57such a way,
29:59which was not responsible for the rules
30:00and the government it is not supposed to be
30:02as well.
30:05The second thing is that he is not allowed to do that.
30:09That's what we are going to do with the government.
30:12It is not allowed to do that.
30:15The most important thing is that the government is not allowed to do that.
30:20It is not allowed to do that.
30:27and it is very important that it is a very important point in Germany,
30:33while it is a method for the nationalization or expropriation of the Russian activities.
30:48And, as a juridic, there is also a political nuance on these actions.
30:57Germany, as a result, has worked actively with the European Union and the European Union
31:05and the other side of the Atlantic,
31:08so that they have to provide the necessary exclusions from the sanctions,
31:13the necessary speciality,
31:15so that they can make the bank and the rest of the United States,
31:19who work with Rosneft in Germany
31:24to be sure that they may be able to do it,
31:27so that they have to provide the taxes,
31:30and so on in Germany,
31:32without falling under the sanctions regime of the United States and the United States.
31:42It shows that Germany,
31:45the US,
31:46the US,
31:47the US,
31:48the US,
31:49the US,
31:50the US,
31:51the US,
31:52and the US,
31:53which leads to their partners and shows that she is
31:59in respect to the United States.
32:03We saw that in the last few days,
32:06that Hungary also acts on this way,
32:09and it is possible to make it out of the US and Donald Trump.
32:16All these actions are in Bulgaria.
32:21We see that even no one has a member of the United States.
32:26Even on the мест level,
32:28we have a good way to discuss these problems.
32:35What do they want to be in the Belia Dom?
32:38And what do they want to be in the United States?
32:40And what do they want to be in the United States?
32:43What do they want to be in the United States?
32:46I hope that I have problems with the functioning of the refineries,
32:58and that I have problems with the United States.
33:01And in a way,
33:03in a way,
33:04in a way,
33:05it is possible to have financials
33:08for the country,
33:10if the state of the United States
33:12decide to find their rights
33:14against the international arbitrage
33:18and there is a chance to prove that the rights of the United States
33:25are too high.
33:28In the last question,
33:30Mr. Statenew,
33:31Mr. Statenew,
33:32Mr. Statenew,
33:33can you help me to make a critical analysis
33:35of the Bulgarian approach
33:37towards the Bulgarian approach
33:40on the local and what does he show
33:43for the effectiveness of the sanctions
33:47and energy policy in Bulgaria?
33:53Effective. For now, the energy policy is good at the point that there is energy in the country,
34:06which is necessary, because the energy is not only in the top, the energy is all in the
34:13parts of the country, which are not only in the top, but if the energy is not only in the top,
34:27but if the energy is not only in the top, they can understand the energy in the
34:38and because they would have taken care of the work in Bulgaria,
34:48the problem with all the products will be huge.
34:54The sankcities mean that the bank sector,
35:01they don't have to work with the clients who are sanctioned,
35:08because they are the administrative charges from the states.
35:18This is the case for the sankcities.
35:22And exactly why we see how the UN government acts on the high level
35:29to avoid the priority of the sankcities
35:33on their infrastructure.
35:37I think that in Bulgaria,
35:40we have more of the political war and the sport
35:45between the economic and economic markets,
35:48which is the control of the independent activity,
35:51without thinking about the strategic activities
35:53and how they can function with this activity,
35:57and what have been the consequences of their function?
36:03will they be the same?
36:05The same is the same.
36:07The same is the same.
36:09In Russia, we see that
36:11as a whole,
36:13the EU and the EU
36:15are the same.
36:17The same.
36:19The same.
36:21The same.
36:23The same.
36:25The same.
36:27The same.
36:29They know that such a type of expropriation, or something that is not your own,
36:37is a huge financial and financial risk.
36:42And that what Belgium wants to do with one activity,
36:47it seems that Bulgaria or Bulgaria or the political class is incredibly smart
36:52and, like to say, dost-a-liko-missile is decided to be responsible
37:00with something that is not her own,
37:02without thinking about what is the end of the day.
37:06Mr. Stanev, thank you very much for my interview
37:12and that the time for me and my viewers,
37:16I would like to wish you a good, healthy, healthy day,
37:22and to new meet you.
37:24Yes, thank you very much.
37:26And I hope to see you again in a more optimistic situation for Bulgaria.
37:32Yes, until then.
37:34Until then.
37:36Thank you very much.