Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 weeks ago
Questions:

In what environment did Todor Zhivkov grow up, how did he join the Bulgarian Communist Party (BCP), and how did he become Chairman of the BCP?

Is the theory true that Brezhnev and Yeltsin contributed to the removal of Todor Zhivkov, or was it rather Andrey Lukanov and Petar Mladenov?

Over the years, how did the relationship between Stanko Todorov and Todor Zhivkov develop, and at what point did it deteriorate?

Is the conspiracy theory true that Andrey Lukanov and Petar Mladenov drugged Todor Zhivkov, and is there any evidence for this?

Could Todor Zhivkov have avoided this situation and exited the political stage in another way?
In case you would like to support me, you can do so here
paypal.me/marialazarova1981- marialazarova1981@gmail.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Prof. Liss Karabayva
00:30And I'm fine, Prof. Baira, I'm going to tell you exactly what I want to say.
00:36It's been a year ago, if we can say it, with the first question.
00:45The first question is to look at the personality of Tordor Jirkov.
00:51How did he go to BKP and become the president of BKP?
01:04Yes, we were 36 years ago at the end of Tordor Jirkov.
01:09Actually, if we need to be honest, today, 9th of January,
01:13Politburo took the decision on Tordor Jirkov.
01:18And it was, of course, with another important event,
01:21which is the main event on Berlin,
01:23which is the beginning of the day,
01:25which is not so much like that.
01:27But to come back to Tordor Jirkov,
01:30Tordor Jirkov is from the generation of young,
01:35Lvivi,
01:37родени,
01:38предимно,
01:39по селата,
01:40дейци,
01:41които,
01:42в ония период,
01:44най-вече между двете световни войни,
01:47са увлечени от идеите за промяна,
01:50социална промяна,
01:51която да се противопостави
01:54на репресивния тогава режим.
01:56Така че той е роден,
01:58разбира се, на село,
02:00в тогава селото Правец.
02:03Има много труден начален живот
02:05като малък,
02:07защото е от такова
02:09сравнително бедно селско семейство,
02:11но той е убеден,
02:13че не желая да остане на село,
02:16иска да се включи в по-големите общности
02:20и така след като завършва прогимназия в Орхания,
02:24тогава в Орхания,
02:25сега Ботевград,
02:26в крайна сметка отказва се от възложностите
02:30да работи в селското стъпанство
02:33и заминава за София,
02:34където започва работа,
02:36започва работа като келнер,
02:38но се облича от,
02:40още от преди това,
02:41още като ученик,
02:42от идеите на,
02:44тогава на комунизма в крайна сметка.
02:47Идеите и така започва неговия път.
02:49Това е пътен на една,
02:51не малка част от българската младеж тогава.
02:54Разбира се,
02:56трябва да има предвид,
02:57че по същото време има български младежи,
03:00които се обличат в друга посока от национализма
03:02и в крайна сметка ще се превърнат
03:04в националисти,
03:06българските национални,
03:08легионни браники и така нататък.
03:10Или с други думи,
03:12то е част от най-политическа борба
03:14в българското общество между
03:16две различни альтернативи.
03:18И ако погледнем сегашното българско общество,
03:21то ще видим, че също има такова разделение
03:24и то е нормално за обществото.
03:26Значи шансът на Тодор Живков е в това,
03:28че неговата теза,
03:30тезата, която той е превърнал,
03:32в крайна сметка в резултат на Втората световна война
03:34взима надмощие.
03:36В българските условия
03:38това надмощие разбира се е донесено
03:40от победите на червената армия
03:42на Сирично-Съветския свъст
03:44в Втората световна война.
03:46И така той се оказва на,
03:48ако мога да използвам един
03:50по лош начин използван израз
03:54през последните десетлетия,
03:56той се оказва на правилната страна историята.
03:58Като казвам, че по лош начин
04:00използван този израз,
04:02имам предвид това, че историята няма
04:04лоша или добра страна, няма правилна
04:06или неправилна страна. Историята е това,
04:08което правят хората.
04:10И работата на историците,
04:12които се опитват
04:14да опишат историята,
04:16е да обяснят защо и как е
04:18how it is done with this, and not to be able to do it with another possibility.
04:22So, that it is, that Tordor Živkov is found on the communists,
04:28who are taking place on September of 1944,
04:33is a historical, can say, or a historical evidence,
04:40related to the Second World War.
04:42But there, at September of 1944,
04:46and it is a career that he has done in the career,
04:50which is a career that has been in the 10 years of a decade.
04:55It helps a communist from a medium scale
05:00to become a figure in a political figure in the political world
05:05and to become a figure in a more than three years.
05:08So this is a figure in a scale for his own time.
05:14But also, I would say that that, that he is slain in October in 1989,
05:22it would be necessary to be a product of the changes that have been caused by this time.
05:29It is a common process of the system that the Soviet Union has set up in the Second World War in the entire Europe.
05:38and that this trip was even from Poland in 2009, and then the other one was, as it was said,
05:46where they were placed on the domain of the system, on the east side of the block,
05:51and Todor Živkov is one of these places, which is not the last place in the east side of Europe,
05:58but we can call it the last place in the last place.
06:03So, if it's one of the reasons that he has to explain the presence of Todor Živkov in politics,
06:12it is in the context of the history.
06:16The history of it is, with the individual benefits, and the history of it is.
06:24In the history of it, after the Second World War II,
06:27the dream of the economic empire of the Soviet Union in the territory of the Soviet Union,
06:36the war is, and after the construction of this system of the Soviet Union,
06:44the war is, and when the war is burnt out of the war.
06:46Do you believe that this theory, that Brezhnev and Eltsin helped them to fall out of power?
07:04Others say that Petr Mladenov and Andrei Okanova are out of power.
07:13Who are the people who are, if we can say, are the ones for them?
07:23Like I said, it's part of a very serious process.
07:27This process is not based on British history,
07:31which means that there are no longer crisis.
07:35Of course, there is a crisis in the 1980s, and it is clear that the first half of the 1980s is, and there is a regime in Bulgaria in the 1980s, and there is a regime in Bulgaria in the 1980s, but these are problems with the управление on the Юрий Андропов.
07:58And what does that mean in the sense of the US, it is a process in the US, but it is a part of the Urbachov, and it is before Elsin.
08:08When Elsin is in the US, he is already dead, so it is a problem with the other side of the US, when it is in trouble with the other side of the US,
08:19That was actually during the time of Brezhnev, he was from 1964 to 1982.
08:24In 1964 he was taken care of Hrushchev from Vlasi,
08:28and he was born in the Soviet Union.
08:31He died on the 10th of November of 1982.
08:34But this is the period in which Todor Живkov
08:37has the best relationship with the Soviet leaders
08:40and the period in which Todor Живkov
08:44is the leader in which Todor Живkov
08:47and his strategy is to get more than a big deal
08:52from energy resources,
08:55including financial resources from the Soviet Union,
08:58including other countries with the Eastern Bloc.
09:01This is a very scandal of the day,
09:06but from the day of the day,
09:08the day of the day,
09:10the Todor Живkov
09:12is to be able to,
09:13to be able to,
09:14to be able to,
09:16that they are willing to do
09:19to be a part of the Soviet Union,
09:21to become part of the Soviet Union,
09:23to become part of the Soviet Union,
09:25And this is a unique part in the East Bloc, and this is a part of the Soviet Union, which should be able to help more.
09:32Now I want to say that, of course, that is a scandal, because it is a scandal, because it is a part of the Polish country, but there must be a national sovereignty.
09:43But there is a part of the United States that nobody is able to realize this initiative.
09:49And that is why it is a part of the fact that it is a part of the propaganda.
09:53The only thing that is, is that the US is to give more and more and more and more.
10:05It helps with credit and economic economic,
10:08and it helps with the US production,
10:12because it is in a large number of countries.
10:15The US production of US production is not only in the US,
10:20but it is not only in Europe,
10:23but it is not only in the US production of the US production,
10:26but it is also in the US production of the US production of the US production.
10:30So, this is the period,
10:33in which the Tordor Živkov and Leonid Bréjnev
10:36are getting better.
10:38In the US production of the US production,
10:40there is something that is called
10:43the period of the pishnit pogradenia
10:46or gerontokrasia,
10:48as well as Leonid Bréjnev
10:52is already in a 12-year period,
10:54but he is already in the 1862,
10:56he is in the 1852,
10:57he is a leader in the 1852 in the future
10:59and after this is Konstantin Chernenko,
11:04who is also in the 1852,
11:05who is also in the 1882,
11:08while he is there in 1872,
11:10And this is where the first time in 75 years,
11:14the first time in 75 years,
11:16one of the first few years,
11:18one of the first few years,
11:20who was elected to try to make it
11:22for me,
11:24one of the last few years,
11:26and one of the other leaders,
11:28and one of the last few years,
11:30he was elected to take over,
11:32and he was elected to start
11:34the transformation in the SOS,
11:36and in the same way in the U.S.
11:38So in terms of the transformation, which is oriented to the Soviet Union,
11:46the Soviet Union, which is not our job, even though it is not our job,
11:53but in terms of the transformation of the Soviet Union,
12:00in terms of the European Union,
12:02and it is in 1985,
12:04because in October 1985,
12:06Borbachev is on a visit in Bulgaria,
12:09with other European European Union,
12:11because there is an agreement for the European Union,
12:14and that is an organization of the European Union,
12:18and even then he believes that,
12:20that regardless of the relationship between the European Union,
12:24they will be on financial basis,
12:27on economic interest,
12:29and, as it is said,
12:31and as it is written in the document of the protocol of the 16th century,
12:36that the Druza is a Druza,
12:38but the Druza is a Druza,
12:39which is the Druza,
12:41which is from the form of the card,
12:43with which the part of the Soviet Union,
12:45that Bulgaria is the being of the Soviet Union,
12:47that Bulgaria is the first country,
12:51which is the country,
12:52which is the part of the Soviet Union,
12:54and that means that the Soviet Union
12:57in high levels for the economic interests in Bulgaria,
13:00and so the other countries began to continue
13:04the conflict between the other side and the other side
13:09of the other.
13:11And there is no doubt that they already have
13:13and recommendations, and documents that have been,
13:16that we have been in 1989
13:18in the Soviet Union,
13:21with the President's largest in the US
13:23Victor Sharapov, of course, in the interview, he doesn't recognize it, but we see it because the documents show it.
13:31He has to do it with the communist leaders in the first place on Andrei Lukanov and on the second place on Petra Mladenov,
13:42so that he has to organize it on Jivkov.
13:45The Soviet Union is very clear that he wants other European countries to follow the Soviet model, the Soviet Union.
14:01And he seems to be that this could make the older leaders, the dinosaur, as they call it, between whom he is the oldest.
14:12He is a member of the community.
14:15And it is a weird thing that he tries to do it with his own ideas.
14:22He has to do it with his own ideas.
14:24He has to do it with his own ideas.
14:27In the meantime, they are with the young leaders who are not ideologically and technologically,
14:36they are thinking about how it is, and they are convinced that the system for economic development is not socialism, but capitalism.
14:45Then they don't call it as if they call it as an economic economy.
14:50But so or so, Toto Živko is trying to do it and try to do it as a result of this,
14:59as it is trying to take a more radical change in Bulgaria,
15:03more radical change in the Soviet Union.
15:05It is about the U.S. concept of 1987.
15:09In the end of the month of July, on the 27th and 29th July,
15:13on the Central Committee on BKP,
15:16where then they take all the important decisions.
15:19Toto Živko is with the concept of transformation of the system in Bulgaria,
15:24which is the socialistic system that it has to be used to be on the pazaar.
15:29The ralps, he, he, предлагa,
15:32that transformations,
15:35that were, the ones who were,
15:36they were, they were,
15:37they were, they were,
15:39they were,
15:40they were,
15:41they were,
15:42they were,
15:43and they were,
15:44they were,
15:45they were,
15:46they were,
15:48they were,
15:49they were,
15:51they were,
15:52they were,
15:53they were,
15:54they were,
15:55they were,
15:56they were,
15:57they were,
15:58they were,
15:59they were,
16:00they were,
16:01they were,
16:02they were,
16:03they were,
16:04they were,
16:05they were,
16:06they were,
16:07they were,
16:08they were,
16:09they were,
16:10they were,
16:11they were,
16:12The idea of the idea of the initiative in the result of the concept of the UKAZ-56 in January 1989,
16:22with which began the business of the UKAZ-56.
16:28The UKAZ-56 was in the development of the economic economy until the 1990s.
16:36They continued to act as a small part of the UKAZ-56,
16:43a small part of the UKAZ-56,
16:46a small part of the UKAZ-56,
16:49which was the idea of the USA-56 in the UKAZ-56.
16:55The UKAZ-56 was in the UKAZ-56.
17:00The idea of the USA-56 is that there is a political pluralism.
17:05For this, the political pluralism,
17:08the political pluralism,
17:09the so-called informal organizations,
17:11which have the right to organize,
17:14but they are in the U.S. front.
17:19It is not a political pluralism,
17:23but it is a liberalization of the regime.
17:27It is a political pluralism.
17:28It is a political pluralism.
17:30It is a political pluralism.
17:31It is a political pluralism.
17:33It is a political pluralism.
17:35It is a political pluralism.
17:36It is a political pluralism.
17:38It is a political pluralism.
17:40It is a political pluralism.
17:41It is a political pluralism.
17:42It is a political pluralism.
17:43It is a political pluralism.
17:44It is a political pluralism.
17:46It is a political pluralism.
17:48It is an political pluralism.
17:49It is not, if the so-called
18:11to apply this system, this reform.
18:15And this reform is in charge of the economic capitalism,
18:20the capitalism of the government,
18:21and the government of the government.
18:23This, what is real, and what is going on in the US,
18:27is not the Chinese model.
18:30There is a way to put it on the organization,
18:35or the political economy,
18:39and the political economy controls.
18:45Prof. Urbaева,
18:48tell us a little story about the relationship between
18:54Todor Živkov and then Stankov's premiere.
19:03How did they grow up and how did they hear?
19:15Yes.
19:17Actually, Stankov Todorov is the president of the parliament.
19:21He is the president of the president of the United States.
19:27And Stankov Todorov is the last time on Todor Živkov.
19:31It is the most close to the president of the United States.
19:34In the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States,
19:38he is the president of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of the United States of
20:08in the 1980s. But in the 1980s,
20:11he decided to decide that the economy
20:14or the управление should be
20:17from new types of people,
20:20these pragmatics.
20:23And, in fact, Stamko Todorov
20:26is the president of the NSE,
20:29and the president is the poet of Gheorgia Tanasov,
20:32when Gheorgia Tanasov is the president of Gheorgia Tanasov
20:35and the president of the NSE.
20:38Tanasov is the president of the NSE,
20:41he is the president of the NSE,
20:43but he is the president of the NSE,
20:46and he is the president of Gheorgia Tanasov
20:48and he is reformator
20:51on the point of economic development.
20:53He is the president of the reform and he is trying to make it
20:56to make it a more,
20:57that in 1980,
21:00especially in the 1980s,
21:02in the 1980s,
21:04the economy is a big problem,
21:06and the climate,
21:09and the Soviet Union,
21:11and the restrictions,
21:13and the United States,
21:15and the European Union,
21:17and the European Union,
21:19especially in Bulgaria,
21:21and that is,
21:22I think,
21:23it is a major problem in the country
21:24and the European Union,
21:25and the European Union,
21:26who was inspired by Gheorgia Tanasov
21:28so that the situation in Bulgaria is very tough.
21:32And George Atenasos is trying to realize
21:36a positive policy.
21:40In 1987, the concept of the state
21:44has changed the structure of the country.
21:48There are 28 countries
21:52that are transformed into 9 countries.
21:54There are many differences.
21:58And, in general, the differences are very high.
22:02George Atenasos is not so obvious
22:06against George Atenasos,
22:08but he is a man who thinks modern
22:10and he is a member of his people
22:14who are with the initiative
22:16and who are with the initiative
22:18and who are with Andrei Lukanov
22:20and Petr Mladenov
22:22and they are not so obvious.
22:24They are not so obvious
22:26that the future
22:28is to be made to make
22:30the decision,
22:32because Michael Gorbachev
22:34is, in the end,
22:35on George Atenasos
22:36and George Atenasos
22:38and he is actively active in the
22:42on the line of the process.
22:44And George Atenasos
22:46the date on which we have made this conversation,
22:50this is how it is,
22:52as well as the most part of the Politburo.
22:54And it is very obvious,
22:56that for this most part of it
22:58are such an old friends
23:02to be able to
23:04to be able to
23:06Mr. Dobry Djurov,
23:08to Yordani Otov
23:10and to Dmitry Staniše.
23:12Actually,
23:14против оставcata
23:16are very small.
23:18This is
23:20Pencho Kobedinsky
23:22and
23:24Milko Balew.
23:26Yeah, yeah,
23:28for Milko Balew
23:30for his support,
23:32and
23:34not so much
23:36it is
23:38Pencho Kobedinsky.
23:40So
23:42he doesn't have a conflict
23:44with Gheorgia Tenasov
23:45and that's why
23:46the fact that Gheorgia Tenasov
23:48on the next day,
23:49when he was in the plenum
23:50on the 10th of November of 1989,
23:52the plenum
23:53on the central committee
23:54on the BKP
23:56in the rezidencia Bojana.
23:58Gheorgia Tenasov
23:59is a person
24:00who is a person
24:01who is a person
24:02who is a person
24:03who is a person
24:04who is a person
24:05who is a person
24:06who is a person
24:07who is a person
24:08in the one
24:10of the present
24:11he was a person
24:13who is a person
24:14who is someone
24:15who is a person
24:16who is a people
24:17who is a person
24:18who is a person
24:19on theіч 없
24:21because he doesn't give a good time, he doesn't say that he doesn't give a good time.
24:26These two people, maybe even the ones that are talking about,
24:31because they are already talking about how to behave,
24:34they don't care how to describe it,
24:37they take away from the archive,
24:44from the CKBKP,
24:47they take away one of the archive,
24:49which is theyourselfish chat,
24:53and it is up to date on March 1988.
24:57Then it's about the text,
24:58and there are already about it,
25:01and so on.
25:03And so on.
25:05Then, in April,
25:07they will have clearer this event,
25:09which will send it to the L.A.
25:11late 2018
25:13they say that they are under the tariff
25:15They said that they had to leave them for their own rest, and they had to leave them for their own rest.
25:20But one more time, they were recording at the gate, they said that they were in the process of the political process,
25:26and they would want to leave them for their own written status on the billboard.
25:31This shows, first, how they'd like to see this in this subject.
25:38The most likely that there was a really falsehood.
25:42because one day before they said no, we don't know how to leave it,
25:48and then they did it with this.
25:51And second, this shows you a bit of a hint or a desire,
25:57for me, they say that they want to leave it, and they say that they want to leave it.
26:02They say that they want to leave it.
26:04They say that they want to leave it.
26:06So they say that they want to leave it.
26:08And they say that they want to leave it,
26:11so they want to leave it, and they want to leave it,
26:14and they want to leave it.
26:16And they say that they want to leave it with these kinds of hittances.
26:19In the end of the day,
26:22on the 10th of November,
26:24and then they say that they want to leave it,
26:27which is a bit of a doubt,
26:29that they want to leave it with Peter Mladenov,
26:31as a president of the general secretariat of the Part.
26:36and then they say that they don't have a good idea,
26:39but they don't have a good idea.
26:41And then they say that they want to leave it with their own.
26:44And that's the end of the day,
26:45and then they say that they have a good idea.
26:48But in any way, they don't have a conflict with Gheorgia Tanasov.
26:51Gheorgia Tanasov has a good idea with time and tendencies.
26:56And that's the end of the day.
26:58And the end of the day is the end of the day.
27:00And that's the end of the day.
27:02And the other day is the end of the day,
27:04because Peter Mladenov plays a bit more than a person in the day.
27:08And, and Peter Mladenov takes a post and two of the Day of the day,
27:12and Gheorgia Tanasov and the general secretariat of the Part.
27:15It is the state of the state of the state of the state of the United Republic of Romania.
27:23That is a collective organization, but it is the state of the state of Petsch.
27:27This is the state of the state of England.
27:31It's not for the other way, because when the PSA made a survey,
27:36who is to follow Dordor Živkov and put their own choice,
27:43they see in the BKP and in the center, and in Sofi, and in the center,
27:48one of the opposition.
27:50The political parties, the BKP,
27:54they don't like BKP, and they don't like BKP,
27:57even because of their family.
28:00Because of course, they always thought about the people in Moscow,
28:04they emigrant in the 20th century,
28:09in Moscow.
28:10Karlo Lukanov was in the Soviet Union,
28:13he was in the position of the Soviet Union,
28:15and they were in the Soviet Union,
28:17and they were in the Soviet Union,
28:19and they were in the Soviet Union,
28:22and then Andrei Lukanov,
28:26instead of himself,
28:28they were in the Soviet Union,
28:32they were in the Soviet Union,
28:34and that is a partizanin and the whole thing is not there any problems,
28:41but that is not the case for Petr Mladenov,
28:44and that is the reason for me that he is so fast to be released,
28:49not so fast to be released,
28:51but to be released from the first months of the return in Bulgaria,
28:55while Andrei Lukano is still doing a long time.
28:59Or, with other words, if you need something to say
29:02that, to be able to say,
29:05it is the question of why it is so time.
29:10And Andrei Lukano is well aware,
29:12that time is really a step,
29:15because he sees it,
29:17that the Soviet Union is against it,
29:20that the society is against it,
29:22and that the problem is against the society,
29:26and that it is not against it,
29:30and the Federal Union is against it,
29:33and that it is the most important thing,
29:39that, because in the beginning of the period of the 10th of November,
29:45He is very much in the meeting.
29:47All meetings are asked to do it.
29:49He is an arrest.
29:51He is an arrest.
29:53But, a few weeks later,
29:55people are
29:57disappointed
29:59by what is happening.
30:01They are not sure they are not aware of it.
30:03They are not aware of it.
30:05They are not sure that
30:07in Bulgaria the economy is not only
30:09but it will be a new way.
30:11And again,
30:13nostalgia to the time of the time,
30:16which is what's going on to say.
30:17I'm going to tell you something,
30:19which is his personal life.
30:21It's been a long time ago,
30:22when the WNC
30:24is the idea of the idea of
30:25the WNC,
30:27to explain all the problems,
30:35which was in Bulgaria before this time.
30:40He doesn't go to the parliament
30:42in the UN, but it seems to be a publicist, in which he says that I'm ready to put
30:50the word for all the problems and the problems and the ones that have been in Bulgaria,
30:56but also I think that I'm going to put the word for everything that is done.
31:01This is the first person, this is the second half of the 1990s,
31:06which allows us to say that in the 1989-1989,
31:12there have been good things and good things, because before that,
31:15including BKP and BSEP, which is mentioned on the 3 April 1990s,
31:20he doesn't want to say that there have been good things and bad things,
31:25and the leaders of BSEP have been able to get rid of it,
31:31and then he is the first person who has said that
31:35that they have been able to get rid of it,
31:38and that is the first step to the division of BSEP.
31:44This is the first step to the division of BSEP,
31:48and the people who have been able to get rid of it,
31:51that they have been able to get rid of it until 1989.
31:56This is the first step to the persistence of the reforms of BSEP.
32:05to meet Bulgaria during the democratic democracy and the capitalism,
32:10as it was not called capitalism, but it was called the economic economy.
32:14So, as with every historical figure,
32:17it is one of the historical evidence,
32:21because the system is in general.
32:25On the other hand,
32:28the development of the Bulgarian leader
32:31is that he has to be used by the misunderstanding
32:35and, at the end, he dies
32:37with a good relationship to him.
32:41And on his grave,
32:43there was a huge number of people
32:46who were difficult to imagine on the 10th of December.
32:49On the 10th of December,
32:51everyone was happy to be a dictator,
32:53as they were called.
32:55Prof. Paeva, I would like one other conspiracy to say whether it is true or not.
33:11Prof. Paeva,
33:13after several years,
33:15there was a conspiracy theory that
33:21that Peter Mladenov and Andrei Lukanov
33:25were the ones that were called by the Dordor Živkov.
33:29Now, is this theory true?
33:34Are there any such evidence?
33:37No, no it is true, there are no such cases.
33:40But for many reasons, one of which is an important part of the education system,
33:51the crisis in education, the COVID-19, which we close and we are not going to survive,
33:56the third, the crisis in which we live, the wars, which we are living,
34:01and that they have to believe that the process can be used to be able to develop and so they have to be able to develop the conspiracy theories.
34:11There is no such a thing.
34:13The three of them are in the Politburo and the Plenum.
34:19They are quite, as they say, with a couple of theoretical theories.
34:24It is true that the Plenum is in the first part of the Plenum.
34:32It looks like it is in the second part of the Plenum.
34:38He knows that the Plenum knows that the Plenum knows that the Plenum can be opposed to the leader.
34:55And that shows that the Plenum, without a problem, without a concurrence,
35:03it is degraded on the psychics.
35:06Because, in fact, he thought that the Plenum is a good way to keep it.
35:12And we all know that the system is so,
35:16that the government, which is the control and is controlled,
35:23the people who think about the other way.
35:26And the other way.
35:28It was very important to talk about the system,
35:32about the regime in the house.
35:34And, at the same time,
35:35to be able to solve all the rules,
35:36which were made.
35:38But, in fact, it is very interesting.
35:40I see that now it is like this.
35:42That now, the people who say,
35:44I have to meet them,
35:45I have to meet them,
35:46for example, for example,
35:47for example, for example,
35:48for example,
35:49for example,
35:50for example,
35:51for example,
35:52for example,
35:53for example,
35:54for example,
35:55that has got a very high health standard
35:57and in parliament,
35:58and so,
35:59that this standard,
36:00it is as if so,
36:02that it is not that they are not sure.
36:05So,
36:06David,
36:07I have to be out of the way,
36:08that they are not as well
36:09as they are leaving
36:10by the way.
36:11He has to be wrong,
36:12in a way,
36:13that it is just a funny thing,
36:15when he already said,
36:16that the people who they are in...
36:18He would be able to be,
36:19that the people that have by the way,
36:20that the people that have do not help them,
36:21they cannot keep them,
36:22but I have told them
36:23and honestly,
36:24when a man is with so high a glass, he will see the reality.
36:28He will see the reality with the reality.
36:32The last question.
36:36Is he possible to make this situation
36:40and to another way
36:44to be released from the political scene?
36:50Absolutely, it is always a choice.
36:54The choice is always a choice.
36:58It always has a choice between life and death.
37:02Of course, it is always a choice.
37:06He always had a choice.
37:08He always had a choice.
37:10He always had a choice.
37:14He had a choice.
37:16and how can other people say, how are the отношения they are,
37:20but you know that it is something like that it is hard to leave it alone.
37:27There are many cases that have been on the politicians who have been leaving it
37:30and they have been leaving it for a long time.
37:33I have to give two examples, for example, one of Charles de Gaulle,
37:36who in 1946, in the New Constitution of France, has been leaving it,
37:39but in 1958, one of the other cases have been with the Polish dictator,
37:44at the end of the year, Yusef Pilsudski,
37:46who, by the same way, in 1922, has been leaving it for a long time,
37:49in 1926, has been leaving it for a long time.
37:52So, yes, he is able to do it, as he said, as he said,
37:56as he said, I am a young age, a young age, which is the truth,
37:59but he is able to leave it for a long time,
38:03but he would like to have some kind of hope that he is able to leave it,
38:07that he is able to leave it, which of course, of course, not to be able to leave it,
38:11but the fact that he is able to leave it for a shock,
38:13that he is able to leave it for a long time,
38:15to live it, known as Arisda, Sada,
38:19he is able to leave it on his own way.
38:21He is able to, he is able to leave it for a long time,
38:27to live it for a long time,
38:29it is sudden,
38:29and even after the years in August,
38:31and they are able to do a degree to a degree,
38:36and they are very close to it,
38:39and as I said, at the end of my life,
38:42he is quite satisfied with his life.
38:46There is a leader,
38:48who is so close to him,
38:51so close to him,
38:52so close to him in 1989-1990 years,
38:55he is able to live in a very good way.
39:01There are examples of the people who are in a war,
39:05who are in a war,
39:07who are in a war,
39:09who feel like they are in a war,
39:11and in a war,
39:13in 1996-1996 years,
39:15he was able to have a war in Yundola,
39:18and he just said,
39:19I don't know why I am in a war,
39:21because I am in a war,
39:23but in the end of my life,
39:25he is able to live in a war,
39:27and that is,
39:28as I say,
39:29for a leader,
39:31to show him the leader,
39:33that he can show him
39:36exactly the group,
39:38in which he has led to the worst,
39:40because they are in a bad way,
39:42because they are in a good way,
39:44and I think he is in a good way,
39:46and I think he is in a way,
39:48he is happy,
39:49and he is happy,
39:50and he is happy.
39:52Professor,
39:53I will thank you,
39:55that you do welcome my interview for interview,
40:00and I wish you to wish you a good day,
40:03and a good day,
40:04and a good day,
40:05and a good day,
40:06and a good day!
40:07All good!
40:08And then,
40:09as soon as you look good in Bulgaria,
40:11and as soon as you look good!
40:13All good!
40:14the journey
40:44you
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended