- 3 months ago
Prof. Nako Stefanov is an expert on East Asian affairs.
Questions:
What is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)? What are the key decisions and agreements reached at this SCO meeting?
The invitation to Armenia and Azerbaijan for this SCO summit—what does it indicate about the SCO’s ability to intervene in such regional conflicts?
Could the SCO be an alternative to the G7 and NATO?
What is China’s main objective in holding this significant parade in its history? Was it a challenge to the Western-oriented world order, particularly the United States?
The presence of our Deputy Prime Minister and the leader of the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) at the parade—how does this fit into the context of international relations and geopolitics regarding Bulgaria?
What interpretations does Prof. Nako Stefanov see regarding the secret conversation between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping about immortality, organ transplantation, and the possibility of living up to 150 years? Could this conversation be directed at people who practice Falun Gong for organ harvesting, or is it speculation?
How does this secret conversation fit into the overall context of the SCO meeting and the military parade? Does it enhance the sense of unity and shared vision between Beijing and Moscow?
Is the presence of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the military parade a sign that North Korea’s policy toward other Asian countries will change?
Questions:
What is the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)? What are the key decisions and agreements reached at this SCO meeting?
The invitation to Armenia and Azerbaijan for this SCO summit—what does it indicate about the SCO’s ability to intervene in such regional conflicts?
Could the SCO be an alternative to the G7 and NATO?
What is China’s main objective in holding this significant parade in its history? Was it a challenge to the Western-oriented world order, particularly the United States?
The presence of our Deputy Prime Minister and the leader of the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) at the parade—how does this fit into the context of international relations and geopolitics regarding Bulgaria?
What interpretations does Prof. Nako Stefanov see regarding the secret conversation between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping about immortality, organ transplantation, and the possibility of living up to 150 years? Could this conversation be directed at people who practice Falun Gong for organ harvesting, or is it speculation?
How does this secret conversation fit into the overall context of the SCO meeting and the military parade? Does it enhance the sense of unity and shared vision between Beijing and Moscow?
Is the presence of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at the military parade a sign that North Korea’s policy toward other Asian countries will change?
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Hello dear viewers, I am Maria Lazarova. Thank you for sharing and commenting on my videos.
00:07Today my guest is Professor Narko Stefanov, expert on Eastern Asian questions.
00:17Hello Professor Stefanov, how are you?
00:21Hello, colleague Lazarova. Thank you.
00:24Live and healthy, as I said. Now we are alive.
00:28Professor Stefanov, I was given you on the basis of the meeting of SHOS, which is going on these days, and the military apparatus in China.
00:45But my first question is, according to you, what are the key decisions and assumptions, which have been achieved in this meeting in SHOS?
01:04First, let's say something about SHOS.
01:08SHOS is the organization of SHOS.
01:12It started its creation from 1996, when it was created by the PETORC.
01:20It is the PETORC.
01:22It is the Russian Federation, China, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan.
01:28So, these are the former Republic of SHOS, which are in Central or in the Middle East, as we call it.
01:34Actually, this organization has for the whole fight against terrorism.
01:39So, until it comes to terrorism, it islamic terrorism, it islamic, it islamic, it islamic, it islamic, it islamic.
01:52overs and extremists have against extremists both markets against Nigeria, in Russia, in Russia, in Caucasian region, and such.
02:09So like this is the goal of raising this organization.
02:14In 2001, during the meeting in Shanghai, this organization came to Uzbekistan.
02:22In this way, the organization began to be called the Shanghai Organization for the Co-sumption.
02:29In other words, this organization, when it is introvert,
02:34she is not designed outside to fight against the outside confrontations,
02:41it is introvert, not extrovert.
02:44It is introvert.
02:45The goal is to fight against the counter-terrorism,
02:50a special organization for fighting against terrorism,
02:53a counter-terroristic struggle.
02:56This is also for the inside conflict between the countries,
03:00who are members of SHOS,
03:02that they don't get to serious confusion,
03:04but they are to decide in the organization,
03:07as other organizations,
03:10to moderate, let's say, these conflicts,
03:13to help solve these conflicts with peace and peace.
03:18And another moment is when there are any kind of, let's say,
03:25any kind of, let's go outside,
03:28against the sides of the country,
03:30who are part of the organization,
03:32to be part of the organization,
03:35that have a desire to do this together,
03:37to be part of the coalition of the organizations,
03:39including the organizations,
03:40with the organizations,
03:41to be part of the organization.
03:42which is hybrid, even if it's like every one of the other side of the organization.
03:47But, I repeat, it's only because of the fact that no one is going to be.
03:51It's not like NATO, where there is a member of the 5th,
03:55where if it's a member of a member of the NATO,
03:58it means that other people have to help them in one way.
04:01Here it is left on a free will.
04:04However, with the time, this organization began to change.
04:10In India, first of all, it's been a number of countries.
04:14For example, such a powerful country as India.
04:20India, when it comes to their own problems with China and with their neighbor, Pakistan,
04:26there must be said that there is an organization in Pakistan.
04:32The other people have to change the number of countries.
04:36And there are so many countries.
04:40And they have to change the number of countries.
04:42And they have to change the number of countries.
04:44to go to dialogue.
04:46To say, number of countries, they have to change the number of countries,
04:51plus, to say, people, partners, and social media.
04:53plus partners in dialogue,
04:55especially to say partners in dialogue,
04:57even in Turkey, who is a member of the NATO,
05:00and she is a member of the dialogue in CHOS.
05:04This is a geografical organization
05:08that is very strong for her potential.
05:12Or, to another way,
05:14in this 25th meeting,
05:17we have to say that this year
05:20in 2025.
05:25This organization has already demonstrated
05:30the potential for alternative global управление,
05:37which was so said.
05:40Alternative global управление
05:42has a special declaration for this reason,
05:46which means what?
05:49This organization,
05:51without being confronted,
05:53but it is not a very important thing,
05:58with the so-called red,
06:01the so-called West-West,
06:05the so-called West-West,
06:07the so-called NATO,
06:09the SASH, the European Union.
06:11So, I repeat,
06:13without being confronted,
06:14I often call them CHOS
06:15and call them
06:18as an NATO.
06:20It is not an NATO.
06:22It is not an NATO because it is not a central,
06:24it is not a bureaucratized organization,
06:25it is a hierarchical organization.
06:27It is an organization,
06:30it is an organization,
06:32it is not a country,
06:34it is a country,
06:35who have a goal,
06:36that they protect their sovereignty,
06:37and they do not allow their sovereignty
06:40to be used to be on any way.
06:42It is not inside,
06:43nor outside.
06:44It is a way to say,
06:45in terms of hybrid wars,
06:47on terrorist actions, and so on.
06:51And in this Tienzinsk Declaration,
06:55there was a lot of attention on economic security.
06:59Inclusive, it was created a bank on SHOS.
07:05Of economic security, all of it,
07:08is an energy security.
07:11We have a plan that the SHOS is a significant part of the energy supply of the world.
07:21In this sense, here it is a talk about that
07:25that it is not used to use energy,
07:27but it is not to say that without energy,
07:29there is no development.
07:31There is a plan that we have to talk about financial security.
07:36We have a plan that when we talk about financial security,
07:40it means that they, in a small amount of transactions,
07:45between us,
07:46they don't have to say,
07:47like dollar, euro, and so on.
07:51So, transactions,
07:53they have to be used, if needed,
07:55to be in the local markets.
07:57So, in every one country,
07:58they have to use a unit,
08:00which has to be established in a system of course,
08:05so that they don't depend on any way of the financial system,
08:12which today is the financial system of dollars,
08:15which is the financial system of dollars,
08:18which is actually created by the collective capital.
08:22Or, in another way,
08:24today,
08:25if we say that today,
08:27today,
08:28we have to say that the world is beginning to say,
08:31so that there are tendencies on many polarity,
08:34or many-centricity,
08:35or multi-centricity,
08:36and so on,
08:37so on.
08:38And so,
08:39the появitas of Shos
08:41in the day,
08:42the new form,
08:43the one-centricity,
08:44which is,
08:45in August 31,
08:46and 1,
08:47of September,
08:48where it was in the day,
08:50where 25,
08:51the number of VSE in the national level,
08:52the new format,
08:55I would say,
08:56this is,
08:57the way,
08:58the organization for global управления,
09:00alternative global управления.
09:02So we can say that 31 August, and maybe here we can say that this parade, which is on 3 September,
09:12these four days, 31 August, 2 August, 3 August, and 3 September,
09:19these are the only days in the history of the XXI century.
09:25Why are these days in the 19th century?
09:27Because they had the beginning of a very centric and very polarity world.
09:34Tell us about this parade to Armenia and Azerbaijan,
09:41about this meeting on Shos,
09:47what shows that Shos can already be placed
09:53in such regional conflicts?
10:00It is created in the beginning as a regional organization,
10:07for so on, so to say,
10:10for reducing the conflict,
10:12this will be more than a term, for reducing the conflict.
10:15Now, if you have a plan,
10:17that in fact, the member of Azerbaijan in Shos is a member of Shos,
10:24which is India,
10:25and she is against.
10:26Why is it against?
10:28Because you know that there is a conflict between India and Pakistan,
10:32where there is a borderline.
10:34The question is,
10:35the question is that Azerbaijan,
10:37after this explosion,
10:38after this explosion,
10:39has made special congratulations
10:42to the parliament of Pakistan.
10:44And India said,
10:45that we don't want to have such a special congratulations
10:48to our nation,
10:50to our forces.
10:52But we can no way,
10:53no way,
10:54no way,
10:55no way,
10:56one country,
10:57who pretends to be a member of Shos,
10:59to actually,
11:00to be in this way,
11:02to be in practice,
11:04in a conflict,
11:05which is not a conflict,
11:06which is not a conflict,
11:07and to take a country.
11:09Because the main point,
11:11in this organization today,
11:14is to reduce the conflict
11:17through dialogue,
11:19through dialogue,
11:20through dialogue,
11:21within the organization,
11:23without a resistance,
11:25without a resistance,
11:26without a resistance,
11:27without a resistance,
11:28to be in the way,
11:30in which the conflict,
11:32and in almost all the conflict,
11:33will be in a way of reducing the conflict.
11:35Through dialogue.
11:37In this sense,
11:38it's a clear,
11:40that Azerbaijan,
11:41with such a country,
11:42he doesn't need to become a member of this organization.
11:47Do you think that SOS can be an alternative to G7 and NATO?
12:18Tia ne e anti-Zapad, kakto često i pati ja narijat.
12:21Često pati po-skoro kaja, če tia e ne-Zapad.
12:24Ne e anti-Zapad, no ne-Zapad.
12:26I tva mislite, je po-vjarno, što tia destitulno ne e-Zapad.
12:29Tia ne prezpriema onezi подходi, характерni za Zapada,
12:34kakto bese kazano tuk, bese diskuтиrano даже v ramkite na SOS,
12:39tъй kato, za съžalanie, tazi kolektiven Zapad ništo novo ne e naucil
12:44i ništo staro ne e zabravil od swoite kolonialiski nachini na misle.
12:50Ako pogledajte даже последnite такa съbitia,
12:54sega 2025-ta godina, koji se случiha,
12:57kato, например, zabeljajte,
13:00konflikta, kogato Izrael napad na Iran,
13:04s raketi, s bombi,
13:06tia получi ответen udar
13:08i slet tva, obache, taj ответen udar se okala dosta silen
13:12i Amerikan, štadite,
13:14rešiha da pomognat na Izrael
13:17i te odariha също i Iran.
13:20Zabeljajte.
13:22Faktiчески,
13:24nije наблюдavame kakvo.
13:26Nije наблюдavame,
13:27destitulno,
13:27i nije takiva,
13:28bih kaza takaj,
13:30stari kolonialiski
13:31odhodi na dæstri.
13:34T.e. vmesto da se sedne na masna na pregoori,
13:37se počet obvinenia,
13:40siperce insinuacii i takaj, takaj.
13:43I bez tva vrvahat pregoori,
13:45vrzka se jadrenita programa na Iran.
13:48Oste poveče,
13:49če koi faktyczki izvrši napadene to,
13:51jedna strana kato Izrael,
13:53koja to ima yadrno uražie,
13:55no ne priznava,
13:55če ima yadrno uražie.
13:57Razbite,
13:58tuk imam jedna сложna situacija,
14:00no osnovno to bese drugo,
14:02če tazi сложna situacija
14:04se opitva da je rishat
14:06čez vrvahajeni sredstv.
14:08Momentalno.
14:10Napadene, takaj,
14:11bez predoprždene,
14:13faktyczki.
14:14I da rečem,
14:14je vzame tva konflikta v Gaza,
14:16kreto bяхa izbiti,
14:18faktyczki tam imam jedin genozid,
14:19forming genozid na praktika.
14:2150 000 čovjeka bia konflikta.
14:23Da, tam също je сложin konflikta.
14:26Sigurno i drugata strana
14:27ne je nevinna,
14:28tva bezporno,
14:29takaj, takaj.
14:30No može li,
14:31извинявam se,
14:32da izbièš 50 000 čovjeka,
14:35ženi,
14:35dica,
14:35starci?
14:36Tva vrvahajne se pozwolava.
14:38Особено,
14:38kogato stavala dumna
14:39za jedna dõržava kato Izrael,
14:41kde to znamem,
14:42če ta je съzdadena
14:43od evrejskih narod,
14:44tazi dõržava,
14:45a tazi evrejskih narod
14:47je bil objekt
14:48na destitulno genozid
14:49po vremem na II. svetovna wojna.
14:52Za nas
14:52ne je redno,
14:54imam predviz za čovечеството,
14:56ne je redno
14:56един народ,
14:57koyto je bil
14:57objekt na genozid,
15:00da počne da se dõrži
15:01taká,
15:01kakto s-a bili
15:02ne,
15:02tazi,
15:03koji to s-a go obrekli
15:04na genozid.
15:05Taz vijedate,
15:06če tia
15:07действителno
15:07предлагa,
15:08Shos
15:09предлагa
15:09drugi,
15:10повtariam,
15:12metodi
15:12v международnete
15:14отношения,
15:15kreto da bude
15:15zabraveno,
15:16nekaj taká
15:17da kajem,
15:17na mesata,
15:18решavane to,
15:20всяkakvi
15:20цветni
15:21revoluции,
15:22hibridni
15:22войni
15:23i
15:23всичko
15:24останalo,
15:25koje to,
15:25za съжalanie,
15:26treba da kajam,
15:27če se
15:27провожda
15:28света
15:29od
15:30taká da kajem,
15:32od
15:32epohata
15:33na
15:33велikite
15:34geografske
15:34otkritia,
15:35kogato
15:36Zapada
15:37faktycznie
15:38ustanovi
15:39sloata
15:40dominacia
15:40na sveta.
15:42Imen od
15:43tazia
15:43organizacja,
15:44veče
15:44zato
15:44i kajam,
15:45veče
15:46nijem
15:46jedna
15:47alternaativa
15:48na
15:49dosegajniat
15:50monocentrigen
15:51svět,
15:51na dosegajniat
15:52jednocentrigen,
15:54jednopоляren
15:54svět.
15:55Da,
15:55i tazia
15:56alternaativa,
15:57bezporno,
15:58jedin od
15:58ključovite
15:58faktori
15:59na tazia
15:59alternaativa
16:00je
16:01organizacijata
16:01SHOS.
16:03Profesok
16:04Stefanov,
16:05neka,
16:05malo
16:05kora
16:05pomenem
16:07kum
16:07voennyat
16:08parad.
16:09Sporne
16:10vas,
16:10kakla
16:11je
16:11osnovna
16:12cel
16:12na
16:12Kitas
16:13s
16:13provezdanie
16:15na
16:16tazi
16:16voennyat
16:17parad
16:18in your history, and in your opinion, was there any
16:26obstacle to the Western-Orientian world and more specifically to S.A.U.?
16:38You see, this parade, in fact, must be said, that this parade is
16:46a powerful
16:50explanation
16:53in the meaning of the word
16:55powerful explanation
16:57to what?
16:59to historical
17:00memory
17:02to
17:04strategic memory
17:10because there is a
17:13goal
17:13in the history of the legitimacy of the Kittai
17:16why do I say history of the legitimacy of the Kittai
17:19because of the fact that
17:21until now
17:21it seems to be that the Second World War is
17:23started
17:24to be massive
17:25to see that she is started
17:27on 1 September 1939
17:30with the attack on the Kittarius
17:32Germany at Poland
17:33but for me
17:35it is also made
17:36when it says that
17:38even in 1937
17:40when Japan
17:41I was basing
17:43in the last year
17:45I was out of the beginning of the Kittai
17:46over in 1931
17:48when Japan
17:48I was born
17:50in the same time
17:50attack
17:52against the Kittai
17:52and actually
17:53in 1931
17:54the coups
17:55of the Kittai
17:56when I was
17:56to create
17:56that
18:07and the creation of the territory of Manchuria, the so-called Manchou-go,
18:11actually started in Second World War.
18:15There was a question on Xi Jinping.
18:19In this question he had to confirm,
18:22that there was a history of legitimacy,
18:26with which to be confirmed,
18:30that this history of reminiscence had to confirm
18:35the new history of legitimacy of China.
18:38That the war began in 1931.
18:41If you look at the point of the victims in Second World War,
18:46you know that the Soviet Union has 27 million victims,
18:50and China has 35 million.
18:53One large part of the victims are living citizens.
18:57About 7 million soldiers,
19:00all the other people are living citizens,
19:02children, children, children, children.
19:03For example, the so-called Ankii clan,
19:06where the Japanese army
19:10even used to kill them,
19:12and kill them,
19:14so that they don't have a patron,
19:16300 000 children, children, children and children.
19:20300 000 children, children and children.
19:22This is a history of legitimacy,
19:25which is extremely important for China.
19:28And for this reason,
19:29this war was the siege of apartheid.
19:31In any case,
19:32it was not the only thing
19:34it was the only thing
19:36it was the only thing
19:37for this history of the reminiscence,
19:39through which,
19:40it was established
19:42a new history of legitimacy.
19:45It was very important
19:46that it was the same thing
19:48that it was to demonstrate
19:50the only way to death
19:51back to Hong Kong.
19:53It was the only way to go
19:54the source of the rich
19:55and most influential oxygen,
19:56because
19:57until today
19:58we must say
19:59the main doctrine that
20:00is the key.
20:01After the creation of the KNR,
20:03one of the main forces
20:04is the key to the war.
20:06The key is the key to the war.
20:07If it was the key to the war,
20:08in fact,
20:09that if the war,
20:10they actuallyude the war,
20:11the attack of the war,
20:12in the war.
20:13Здесь already
20:14see the key to the war.
20:15It's a new doctrine, a doctrine based on the most new technological means.
20:24This is, as you can see, the cyber wars, lasers, hyper-sumatic rockets,
20:32nuclear-sumatic forces, robot-sumatic forces,
20:42that is, China, as I said, is out on the highest level of its military power.
20:52And in this way, he has revealed another place in global position.
21:02T.e. Kитай se utvrždava kata jedna od velikite sili, koji to ošte rešavat sadbata na sveta.
21:11Imano kato takava glubalna sila, bяхa pokaneni, znaete, če prisëstvaka tam na parada,
21:19na përva redica, bih kazal prisëstvaka na parada, tam v početnete gosti,
21:25prisëstvaka Putin, Wladimir Wladimirovich i Kim Chen Un na Kenedere, prakoditelia.
21:34T.e. ki. tva bese demonstracia na kako?
21:37T.e. nije poveče ne bihme pozwolili, t.e. naka taká da kajem, da, te govorit za morkova,
21:45za to, či treba da ima kooperirane, a ne konfrontacija.
21:48And even if he says, he says,
21:50He says,
21:51He says,
21:52He says,
21:54He says,
21:56He says,
21:58That today, human being is a path.
22:00It is a war, a war, a war, a confrontation.
22:03And he says,
22:04He says,
22:05He says,
22:07He says,
22:08He says,
22:11That today,
22:13It is in a difficult situation today.
22:16And it is a difficult situation.
22:18It is an important thing to choose.
22:20It is a war, a war, a war, a war, a confrontation.
22:24And they say,
22:26We are a peace,
22:28We are a search for a better future,
22:32for a sustainable development of the country.
22:35But,
22:37if we give a hand for such a type of life,
22:42who doesn't want this hand,
22:45we have to know,
22:47that we have enough power for any kind of war,
22:51to talk about the same way.
22:53This is actually the idea of the power,
22:59this demonstration of power,
23:01which we looked at the most important part in the history of the National Republic.
23:05How will you comment on the presence of our vice-premier and leader of the BSEP,
23:19and how do you describe it in the context of the international relations and geopolitics in Bulgaria?
24:04The United States and the fourth place in Indonesia.
24:06It is a very big country for its population.
24:10And it is an important part of the world,
24:14who are the ones who joined the Запад?
24:16I don't know whether you know it,
24:18but the ones they joined the cual part of the Brazil of Belgium,
24:20who was the president of Belgium,
24:22who was the president of Belgium.
24:24Who was the president of Germany.
24:26Who was the president of Bulgaria.
24:28Who was the president of Romania.
24:30And who was the president of Ficaria,
24:32who was the president of Romania.
24:34in Slovakia. And from our side, we have a vice-premier with more four ministers, one minister and more two representatives of the BSEP.
24:50So, of course, here the idea is that we give our hands to everyone.
24:59If they had a desire, they would have given their hands to the United States,
25:08to be there to be Trump.
25:10The question is, that the United States at this moment they had to send them a person
25:17for a number of their minds.
25:20But, I repeat, there were many representatives of the West Europe.
25:26In addition, at the United States, I'm talking about the people who are the most famous ranks.
25:29You can see how many people are from Europe,
25:32or from Europe, from Europe.
25:34Yes, they are from Europe even in the U.
25:37They are from Europe, even in the U.
25:38They are from the two-year-old, but they also are from the United States.
25:41Even if they are not a member of the NATO, they are from the European Union.
25:44And other countries who were the people who were the best members,
25:47perhaps not the ones who were the former minister-president, former premiers,
25:51they are more high than our ones.
25:53All these countries, and Belgium, and Greece, and Romania,
25:59they are practically members of the European Union,
26:03and the NATO members of the NATO.
26:05Even Belgium and Greece are members of the Eurozone.
26:13I don't think that there is an exclusive thing,
26:17but this shows that our country,
26:22not to say that, but there are such reasons for a lot of vector politics.
26:30There is no reason to lie.
26:33Today the world is called Europe.
26:38This is the world.
26:40While all the other regions of the world are living with high temperatures,
26:45this is especially for East Asia and East Asia.
26:50Even the United States also have a temperature of growth.
26:54Stagnation and even the depression are in the EU.
27:00There is an immigration crisis.
27:05You can see it.
27:07It is a very tough crisis.
27:09I don't know how the European Union will be able to deal with this.
27:14It is an immigration crisis.
27:17It has different moods.
27:19And now the European parties are starting to lose the trust of their citizens.
27:26And if you look at one Germany,
27:28in Germany,
27:29in Germany,
27:30in Germany,
27:33she has already received a lot of votes.
27:35She has already received a lot of votes.
27:36She has already received a lot of votes.
27:38She has already received a lot of votes.
27:43And you see it already.
27:45So you can see one another picture.
28:15So you can see one another picture.
28:45So you can see one another picture.
29:15So you can see one another picture.
29:17So you can see one another picture.
29:19So I think one another picture.
29:21So you can see one another picture.
29:23So you can see one another picture.
29:25So you can see one another.
29:27So you can see one another.
29:29So you can see one another.
29:31So you can see one another.
29:33So you can see one another.
29:35So you can see one another.
29:37So you can see one another.
29:39So you can see one another.
29:41So you can see one another.
29:43So you can see one another.
29:45So you can see one another.
29:47So you can see one another.
29:49So you can see one another.
29:51So you can see one another.
29:53So you can see one another.
29:55So you can see one another.
29:57So you can see one another.
29:59So you can see one another.
30:01So you can see one another.
30:03So you can see one another.
30:05So that's a good one.
30:07So that's a good one.
30:09For you, what are your interpretations of this debate about death, transplantation of organs,
30:21the possibility of living there for 150 years?
30:27Some of the media said that they may be talking about people who practice Faun Gong.
30:43What are your comments about this topic?
30:48You have a story that modern medicine makes a big leap.
30:52It makes a big leap and this big leap includes the possibility of the human life.
31:00I think this is related to the moment that these achievements of medicine
31:07are not only in the higher levels,
31:15whether they are in a political or social hierarchy
31:20or people who have a lot of money,
31:23but they are not accessible for a big part of the planet.
31:28This is the secret debate for which people are talking about.
31:34There are such experiences, such experiences, such experiences in medicine.
31:39There are everywhere.
31:40There are in the Western world, there are also in the Eastern world,
31:43and so on.
31:44It's bad that we do not work well with medicine
31:47and with the health care.
31:49And we see how it is a day-to-day,
31:51a little bit more,
31:53a place where it is for the profession,
31:55a little bit more, a little bit more,
31:57and a little bit more, a little bit more.
31:59And then, if they are conspiracy theories,
32:05they want to take the organs from the body of people,
32:11who practice Falun Gong?
32:15Oh, no, these are, извиняюсь,
32:17these are deep insinuations and manipulations.
32:20Absolutely deep insinuations and manipulations,
32:23but clearly there are such areas,
32:25which have no way to achieve the achievements of China.
32:30They are visible in the whole world.
32:32And from here all these manipulations and insinuations.
32:40So, just give me attention to this thing.
32:47As the conversation is expressed in the general context
32:53of the meeting of the SHOS and the military apparatus,
32:58does it feel like it is a feeling
33:02about the unity and the common vision
33:05between Peking and Moscow?
33:08Not only between Peking and Moscow.
33:11That is, and Xi Jinping said,
33:13that today the relations between Russia and China
33:15none of them were better.
33:17But here it is not only Russia and China.
33:20Here is the word for India.
33:22If you remember,
33:24you are aware of that,
33:26you are aware of that,
33:27but you are aware of that,
33:28you were in the SHOS
33:29and they are not even in the way
33:31and they have to go with Putin.
33:33What is this?
33:34What is this?
33:35What is this?
33:36You are aware of that India has been one of the global forces.
33:41And I think that Putin
33:42and Putin,
33:43and most likely
33:44with Xi Jinping,
33:45they have expressed this
33:48and the relationship between Xi Jinping
33:51and Narendra Modi,
33:53as well as he said.
33:54And then the other that,
33:55that is also one of the things
33:56that he has been doing
33:58with the redstone,
33:59that he has been doing
34:00with the redstone,
34:02with the redstone,
34:03with the redstone,
34:05and Russia and Xi Jinping
34:08said,
34:09that they are not opposed to this
34:10This very centric world, one of the central forces, is to be India.
34:16So most likely this world, which is already present in us,
34:21which is already a very popular world, will be the central forces.
34:25And India will be one of these central forces.
34:29In a short way, this is what it is.
34:33And unfortunately, Europe, I have to say that Europe,
34:38more and more, will lose its chances to be some central forces.
34:43Why is the leader of the South Korea, Kim Cheung-un,
34:48standing in the parade?
34:52And how will this change?
34:56How will the political politics of the South Korea
35:05towards other Asian countries?
35:09But now, the political politics of the South Korea towards other Asian countries
35:12always has been pleasant.
35:14As it may be, there is a place in Japan,
35:17and, to know the extent, the relationship with the South Korea.
35:20Do you think that these countries, in the form of the Soviet Union,
35:26the KNR and then the KNDR,
35:29were together in the only very big war,
35:35the Great War, in terms of the Sturgeon War.
35:37That was the word for the Korean War, in the 1953-1953.
35:42And today, they still gather together.
35:46So, it is not to be seen.
35:52It must be seen in this moment,
35:54that between the South Korea, the KNDR and the KNDR,
36:01there is a agreement about cooperation.
36:03And between the Russian Federation and the KNDR,
36:06there is also a agreement about cooperation.
36:08So, in practice, we are witnesses
36:11with such a configuration,
36:13with the relationship between the KNDR and the Russian Federation.
36:19And when we say that we have a change in the geopolitical picture,
36:25that the world is very centric.
36:27And this moment is one of the arguments for this very centric.
36:34It is the need of such a union between three nuclear countries,
36:41which, in fact,
36:42with its good power,
36:44will be far beyond the West.
36:48Professor Steffanov,
36:52thank you very much for my interview.
36:56I would like to wish you a nice and successful day,
37:00happy weekend,
37:01and have a new meeting.
37:04Thank you very much for that.
37:05Thank you very much.
37:06.
37:06Thank you very much for having a new meeting come out soon.
37:10Bye bye.
37:12Thank you very much for being with us.
37:13Thank you very much.
37:14Thanks very much for coming on to the
37:16I want to meet you on the next one.
37:17Woo-sports high.
37:19Bye bye.
Be the first to comment