Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 6 months ago
The first round of public consultations on Stand Your Ground legislation kicked off in Barataria last evening, with roughly one hundred and fifty people in attendance. Among the concerns raised: issues of domestic violence, excessive versus reasonable force, and the definition of home and property. Rynessa Cutting reports.
Transcript
00:00The first round of public consultations on the home invasion, self-defense and the defense of property bill 2025 drew a crowd last evening with roughly 150 people turning up at the Barataria Community Center with overwhelming support registered for the bill.
00:18I supported 400. The bill will allow property owners to use reasonable force to protect themselves or their property or even the life or property of another.
00:29While a person may be acting to protect himself or his property, if another person acts in good faith in the aid of an occupant in a home invasion or on the direction of the occupant of that house, that person also can use the same degree of force against the home invader.
00:53Persons found guilty of contravening this act will face fines and imprisonment.
00:59If the court sentenced someone to home invasion, they are liable on conviction to a fine of $500,000 and to imprisonment for 20 years.
01:14You all agree with that one?
01:15And if the offense is carried out by a gang member or the victim is a child, a senior citizen, a differently abled person, the fine will be $750,000 and to imprisonment for 25 years.
01:36And where a person who commits an offence of home invasion that results in the death of a person, they will be charged for murder and is liable for conviction to suffer death.
01:52However, while many support the move, concerns were raised.
01:56If a person is experiencing domestic violence and they pull their gun to defend themselves, can they use that at that point?
02:11Husband and wife have difficulties.
02:14Assuming the husband is the abuser, the wife is the abuser, and a domestic violence order is made against the other party.
02:22And assuming that person breaches the order, first one, he commits an offence by breaching the domestic violence order.
02:31And secondly, if the person intends to kill the other person, of course the person has a right also to defend themselves.
02:38But again, that must be looked at contextually.
02:41The subjectivity of reasonable versus excessive force was also presented.
02:46They enter your house with a firearm, they take off two shots, you take off about ten.
02:55Your ten shots, pick them up, their two shots miss you.
02:59In the past, I have known for a fact, persons were hauled before the court, right, for using excessive force.
03:06Where a court of law determined that these persons used this excessive force.
03:11What the bill is suggesting is that once the person reasonably believes and is justified in doing so, deadly force can be used against the home invader.
03:22Concerns were also raised about the legality of an occupant of a home using a firearm registered to another occupant or relative.
03:31That is a very gray area with respect to the law.
03:34I'm glad that you raised it, and that is something that we will take back to the attorney general.
03:38The attorney general will also deliberate on whether the legislation is applicable only to homes, or can also apply to business places.
03:48The law does contemplate circumstances of that, but again, that is a suggestion that we are open, that we can discuss with the attorney general for further elaboration.
03:59But in my respectful view, the law in itself does cover issues with respect to business places.
04:06For Nasa Cutting, TV6 News.
Comments