Woke Democrat BETRAYS Activists On Live TV... (TOTAL BACKFIRE!)

Doc Rich

Merch: docrichclothing.com  Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/therealdocrich/  Discord Link: https://discord.gg/Gz8naHHEH3  To Donate And Support The Channel Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/therealdocrich  Merch: https://docrichclothing.creator-spring.com/?  Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/DocRich2  Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@xtrarichh  Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therealdocrich/  Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/therealdocrich  Follow us on twitter: https://twitter.com/therealdocrich?lang=en   Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therealdocrich/  *Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS*

Transcript

00:00James Tallarico says I oppose trans athletes. What about biological men competing in women's

00:05sports? That's a big deal here in Texas. That's right. And I oppose trans athletes playing

00:10in girls sports if it endangers safety or fairness. Every sport has he's hedging. He's

00:17hedging by saying if it endangers safety or fairness. And he's doing that. So, you know,

00:22he can say that later on that, well, it doesn't endanger safety or fairness. And that way it's

00:27okay to do it. Be safe and fair. As a former public school teacher, I care a lot about our

00:33student athletes. I care a lot about our students. And so I will oppose trans athletes playing in

00:39girls sports if it risks safety or fairness. Yeah, no, I don't believe this. I mean, again,

00:45and also like he already said this in the past, he already said this was an issue. Like he's done

00:50a

00:50180 on this as well. If somebody changes their opinion, you should just assume that the thing

00:55that they said at first is actually what they think. Because this is a super unpopular opinion,

01:00and he had it anyway. It's because that's what he really thinks. Or at least that's the audience of

01:06people. And that's the group that he is going to effectuate. So you should never allow it to identify

01:12out of that risk. You just said you want to base this on statistics. So this bill just passed. That

01:18means throughout all of Texas history, we operated with inclusion in sports, trans women competing with

01:23women, trans men competing with men. So how many documented cases of a trans athlete causing a

01:30problem on a sports team in Texas exist? How many would have to exist in order for you to think

01:34that

01:34this is worthy? I'm asking if you're pushing this bill. I don't think there has to be a case

01:38documented in Texas. Let me just rephrase it then. Are there any cases where a trans athlete has caused a

01:43problem on a sports team in Texas? I don't think there has to be that occasion. Is that a note?

01:48That's a zero. There are no cases where a trans athlete has caused a problem on a sports team in

01:52Texas? I think that trans athletes have caused problems on female teams. Absolutely. And we talk

02:00about the NCAA being a capable organization. They completely flubbed what happened with

02:07UPenn swimmer Will Thomas by telling the women that felt uncomfortable with a fully intact male in their

02:13private space that they needed to go to counseling. That's not a capable organization. But are you

02:19seeing why viewers are probably realizing this is more about a culture war than actually solving a

02:23problem if there are no statistics of there being a problem anywhere in Texas of a trans athlete causing

02:29a problem on a sports team? If there were no murders in Texas, would we still have a law against

02:33murder?

02:34Yes. To identify out of that risk? Gotcha. We got to talk about James Tallarico because as you guys

02:46heard in the very first clip there, he is now backtracking on this whole trans in sports issue

02:55and kind of riding the fence a little bit. And you heard Asmund called him out on that

03:01in saying that, you know, he's only against it if it's an issue, which gives him an out, right? Because

03:09as you heard in the second clip that I played for you, that's why I played it. In the past,

03:14he's already

03:15kind of said some of these things that it's not really an issue. But now when he's asked about it,

03:20he says it's only a problem if it's, you know, unfair or unsafe. But he's already indicated that he

03:29doesn't feel that it's unfair and unsafe. So I want to talk about it a little bit because he has

03:33actually angered a lot of the far leftists with that statement, believe it or not. Yeah, he has.

03:40And so I want to dive into that whole topic of discussion because it is quite interesting to

03:46watch these far leftists lose their minds over what I would consider somebody still being on their

03:54side. Like, of course, James Tallarico was trying everything he can to get elected, which I find a

03:59problem in that. You're trying to change who you are just to try to win an election just for power.

04:05That means you shouldn't have the power, right? But he's angered the far left. So let's hop into it.

04:16Well, are you going to talk to him about it? What's the plan? What's the move? This is not an

04:27other thing. I'm going to talk to him about it. And I told you so. These feelings right here are

04:33valid.

04:38And Democrats keep forcing people into the margins and leaving us out. And I just want to let you know,

04:48I 110% support you pressing for an explanation because you deserve one, just like black people

04:56deserve explanations about why we keep getting shortchanged. Many of you who are feeling this,

05:06who are hurt by this, and you have every right to be, you used your identity, you weaponized your

05:14identity against black people that said that we had problems with things about James Tallarico.

05:20And you said, but what about trans lives? As if black people are saying, advocating for black lives is not

05:27advocating for trans lives. Black trans lives exist and matter. I ain't forgot that. All trans kids need

05:36quality education. I was fighting for education when y'all went up because I had questions.

05:46With that being said, for the good of these kids out here, please ask questions

05:57and demand answers for these kids. James Tallarico throwing trans people under the bus in his latest

06:05interview is just another example in the very long, long list of examples of liberal politicians selling out

06:12trans people the first second that they think it will be politically expedient for them to do so.

06:18And honestly, the response from a lot of liberals and a lot of Democrats has been incredibly disappointing,

06:24including some leftists, to be honest. The idea that, yes, he's running in a state like Texas,

06:30so he has to capitulate on trans rights is truly disgusting and revolting. And I'm tired of our rights

06:39being something that it's okay for politicians to capitulate on in order just to be, quote unquote,

06:46more electable. Newsflash, Democrats have tried this over and over again, and they still lose. How

06:53about actually standing for something? How about standing up for my rights, you know? And I don't

06:59give a shit if he's running in a state like Texas. I want him to actually stand up for my

07:03rights. I don't

07:04want him to abandon us the second he believes it might get him a little bit larger share of the

07:09voter base. Because we are human beings. We are not political pawns that can be discarded the second

07:16that it becomes convenient for you. And our rights are not something that can be discarded simply

07:22because you think it'll get you more votes. Fuck you.

07:25James Tallarico has decided to join the throw trans people under the bus train in order to try and win

07:31power for his Senate race. In a Fox exclusive interview the other day, James Tallarico decided

07:35to walk back many of his pro-LGBTQ, specifically pro-trans statements and positions, specifically

07:41falling for the bait of trans kids shouldn't compete in girls sports because of fairness and safety

07:47issues, which is a non-issue in and of itself. Now, I'm personally not surprised because I haven't

07:52been a fan of Tallarico since day one because he's been taking money from the exact same people

07:58who have been funding Donald Trump, specifically Miriam Adelson. And people are trying to link his

08:03criticism of Israel as a reason for why he won the Senate primary over Jasmine Crockett. They are

08:09the same person when it comes to the foreign aid to Israel. I'm just going to call it this is

08:14going to

08:14sink his chances for the Senate because no one's going to vote for the Diet Republican. They're just going

08:18to see you pivot and go, well, then clearly the Republicans have been correct on this topic the whole

08:22time and they don't flip-flop on it. So we're just going to vote for them. So good job. Great

08:27job,

08:27James Tallarico for throwing trans people under the bus for no reason at all. James Tell- We don't

08:32have to throw trans people under the bus in order to get out the vote. And James Tallarico did just

08:37that. Now, a lot of people are focusing on the fact that he said that he would not support the

08:41inclusion

08:41of trans kids in sports. But I think the worst part of that interview is that he said that he

08:46supports

08:46barring trans youth from accessing gender-affirming care at the federal level. And here's the other

08:53thing. These candidates do not need to answer these questions. Abdul El-Sayed has proved this before.

08:59All that they simply need to do is say to the interviewer, you are not asking me this question

09:03in good faith. And then they can follow up and say, if you would like to talk about helping all

09:08Americans

09:08get access to affordable health care, then that is a question that I would like to answer. If you would

09:13like to talk about making sure that all Americans can afford their groceries, that is a question that

09:18I would like to answer. It is not impossible to reship the focus of the interview so that you don't

09:24have to throw trans people under the bus. Unless you're going to be speaking in support of trans

09:29people, shift the conversation. And before you get in my comment section and say that my post is

09:35discouraging people from voting, that is not what my post is doing at all. I actually highly encourage

09:40that my followers exercise their right to vote. We are also allowed to criticize the candidates that

09:46are placed in front of us, especially when they are so willing to just throw trans people under the

09:52bus. When they truly don't need to answer the question. We- Yeah, throw them under the bus.

10:02Criticize the candidate. Please do. Please do. Yeah, James Talarico. He's a terrible candidate.

10:10You know, but I disagree with the part when she said, um, candidates don't have to answer the

10:19question because I believe they do. And here's why the question is being asked for a reason,

10:26because most people in America don't buy into the woke nonsense. That's why the question is being

10:34asked. Okay. That is part of the reason why Kamala Harris lost this past election.

10:40Right. You guys remember the ad Kamala cares about they, them, right? You guys, you guys remember

10:46that ad. Um, and, um, so, so yeah, it, it does have to be answered. And also when you don't

10:52answer it,

10:53people are smart. People understand that a non-answer

11:00means that, um, you'll agree with it. Right. Uh, so

11:06nobody, nobody's being fooled by you trying to dance around it. That stuff doesn't work anymore.

11:11It might've worked 20 years ago, right? When candidates would try to dance around stuff,

11:16um, and, and, and try to be professional and whatever, whatever you want to call it,

11:22but it doesn't work. We're, we're, we're on to them now. Okay. Uh, the whole beating around the

11:28bush kind of stuff, it, it's null and void. It's null and void. It's going to make you look even

11:34in my humble opinion than just coming out and flat out answering the question. I think a lot of,

11:39a lot more people would respect you if you just stood on it. If you stood 10 toes and said,

11:46yeah,

11:46I, I support having trans playing in sports with everyone. Okay. Or whatever you believe in.

11:55I think you get a lot more support than trying to beat around the bush. That's just me personally.

11:59I'm not saying that I would vote for somebody that, uh, uh, thinks that, but what do y'all

12:05think? I, I honestly think they would get a bit more support. Um, if they didn't beat around the

12:11bush with it, but yeah. So James Tallarico is in a bit of a pickle here because he's having to

12:19walk

12:19back a lot of things that he said in the past and people aren't stupid. We understand what this is

12:25all about. We understand what's going on here. He's backtracking because he realizes he's, he's

12:29about to lose and he needs to try to make it seem as if he's closer to the center. The

12:36same way that,

12:37um, the governor of Virginia, uh, uh, Spanberger did in her election. Uh, when she tried to make it

12:45seem like she was a moderate middling candidate. And as soon as she got an office, boom, she showed her

12:51true colors. Everything went, she went sprinting to the far left, sprinting to the far left. And,

12:59uh, you got away with it once in a random off year election, but you're not going to get away

13:05with that kind of stuff. Uh, in a midterm, it's just not happening, especially since you already

13:10done it this year or not this year. It was last year. Excuse me. You've already done it last year

13:15with Spanberger and, uh, the governor of New Jersey, I believe, wasn't it that they, that they won along

13:22with the Virginia election. Correct me in the comments if I'm wrong, but yeah. So we, we, we,

13:29we see what's going on here. And, uh, like I said before, I'm not concerned about winning or beating

13:37James Tallarico or even beating, uh, um, Abdul Rahman El Saeed in Michigan. I'm not concerned.

13:46I think Mike Rogers is going to come out on top in Michigan. If you're a Republican living in

13:51Michigan, Mike Rogers is your guy. If you're a Republican living in Texas, Ken Paxton is your guy.

13:58I think we're going to win both of those. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's just my humble opinion

14:04based upon what I've seen in the past with a lot of these different polls that the Ann Seltzer poll

14:10three days before, two days before two or three days before, uh, the 2024 election. Oh my goodness.

14:16Trump's going to lose Iowa by three or whatever it was. He ended up, he ended up winning Iowa by

14:22like

14:2215. Like it wasn't even close. Like they weren't even in the ballpark, but that was intentional in

14:27my humble opinion. It was intentional. The same thing with these polls. Oh my goodness. James Tallarico

14:33is beating Ken Paxton in Texas. No, he's not. No, he's not. You're going to have to show me.

14:40You're going to have to show me because I'm not buying it. I'm not buying it. I'm not buying what

14:45you're selling. Okay. Same thing in Michigan. I'm not buying that, uh, Abdul Rahman El Saeed

14:51is beating Mike Rogers in Michigan. I'm just not buying it. I'm not buying what you're selling.

14:57Just don't. Okay. You fooled me once. Okay. Shame on you. You can't fool me twice. Okay. You cannot

15:05fool me twice. It ain't happening. But anyway, get in the comments. Let me know your thoughts

15:09and your opinions as always. Stay safe out there. Peace and love. I'm out.

Category

Transcript

Comments

Recommended