Skip to playerSkip to main content
A new dispute emerged in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial after her defense sought to add former McLean Hospital clinical social worker Emily Thorndike as a witness.

Defense attorney Kevin Reddington argued that Thorndike could challenge what he described as a misleading portrayal of McLean’s treatment options and staffing.

Reddington said prosecutors had presented McLean as a “five-star hospital” where staff were constantly trying to treat Clancy, while claiming that picture was inaccurate. He also said Thorndike posted a TikTok criticizing “the lies and the misrepresentations from that witness stand about McLean Hospital.”

Prosecutors opposed the request, noting Thorndike left the facility about a year before Clancy’s treatment and had no firsthand knowledge of her care.

Judge William Sullivan questioned whether the TikToker should testify about the hospital’s overall quality, bluntly saying, “This is not Tripadvisor.”

However, Sullivan called questions about staffing and available treatment programs a “closer call” and has not yet ruled on the request.

During testimony, psychiatric nurse practitioner Rebecca Jollotta said she interpreted Clancy’s messages about hopelessness and intrusive thoughts as depression rather than suicidal ideation.

The defense is seeking to challenge the prosecution’s portrayal of Clancy’s psychiatric treatment and the care she received before the killings.

Follow for the latest updates.
.
.
.
.
#LindsayClancy #ClancyTrial #MurderTrial #TrialNews #CourtNews #EmilyThorndike #McLeanHospital #MentalHealth #LegalNews #Courtroom #DefenseAttorney #CrimeNews #BreakingNews #LatestNews #NewsUpdate #BreakingNewsAlert #NewsAlert #DevelopingStory #WorldNews #GlobalNews #CurrentAffairs #TopStories #Headlines #LiveUpdates #NewsFlash #TrendingNow #ViralNews #thenewswhirl

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00That witness would be allowed to give her, in a sense, review of McLean's.
00:08If it's five-star and she may say it's two-star, you know, this is not TripAdvisor.
00:15I wouldn't allow that.
00:17But the question seems to be, for me, a closer call
00:23about what the standard staffing and programs may be available on a holiday weekend.
00:32Because the Commonwealth's witness said, I don't know that.
00:37And that seems to be something that maybe the parties could come to an agreement about establishing.
00:48Either, you know, there's got to be somebody who's still working there
00:53that says the weekend after this wasn't a holiday, we have X amount of people there.
01:02We have X amount of programs that are available.
01:04On the holiday weekend, we do or we don't.
01:08That's, to me, that's where the battle on this motion is.
01:13I have, I do understand the Commonwealth's objections regarding allowing people who watch the trial
01:20to then say, I disagree with it and I want to testify about what I disagree with.
01:27That's troubling.
01:29But I'm talking about the facts on this thing.
01:32And that's, if it was anything other than those kind of facts
01:35and this witness was not, had not worked there,
01:40I'm not sure we'd even be having this hearing.
01:43And I would suggest that
Comments

Recommended