00:00I don't really understand this Washington Post article that, who hears from the Post?
00:05Yeah, terribly written, terribly edited, because basically what it says is that Treasury is
00:11following the law and that we've created the bill and that it's up to Congress, but that we follow
00:17the bill and it's up to, I didn't really understand what the story was. So you aren't
00:21involved in that, two of your political appointees? Yeah, of course, but we prepare for everything
00:26if it gets passed. Just like we were ready six months in advance of the one big beautiful
00:31bill for tax guidance. So we have to prepare in advance. You can't draw something up the
00:37day before. Politically, do you think it's a good idea, though, where people are struggling
00:40to afford gas and groceries? Look, I think it has, I think that it's bifurcated. Do you
00:46think we should have a 250th anniversary, the celebration? Well, that's happening anyway,
00:52but putting the president's face on a $2 billion bill of choice. No, no, no, but Caitlin, it's
00:56not happening anyway. It's happening because it's being funded by private citizens, by the
01:01federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments, to celebrate our country.
01:05And I don't think that there's anything untoward about having the president of the United States,
01:11the person who was president of the United States on the 250th anniversary bill.
Comments