Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 hours ago
The Supreme Court has ruled that the legal principle of bail being the norm and jail being the exception remains applicable even in cases filed under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. .

Category

ЁЯЧЮ
News
Transcript
00:00The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that the principle of bail is a rule, jail is the exception, remains applicable
00:06even in cases under the stringent Unlawful Activities Prevention at a UAPA,
00:12while expressing serious reservations over its own earlier order denying bail to former JNU leader, student leader Omar Khaled.
00:19In the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, the court observed the ruling denying bail to Khaled was to remain incarcerated
00:27since September 2020,
00:30failed to properly apply the principles laid down by the Apex Court on prolonged free trial detention.
00:38Khaled was denied bail in January this year and his review petition was rejected in the month of April.
00:44The court underscored that although Section 43D of the UAPA imposes strict conditions on granting bail in terror-related cases,
00:52those restrictions can't override the constitutional guarantee of personal liberty under Article 21,
01:00therefore reaffirmed the long-standing legal principle that bail is the rule, jail is the exception,
01:07making it clear that courts must not treat denial of bail as automatic merely because the charges are under the
01:16UAPA.
01:17That's what the court has said in a significant ruling.
01:21Remember, this has been something that has been said in the past as well, but it comes as it does
01:27with the court.
01:29Anisha, flagging off improper UAPA ruling, application of the UAPA bail law, saying that bail is the rule, jail is
01:39the exception.
01:40This is a big order from the court, isn't it, today?
01:44Well, Sneha, the Supreme Court, and this is not the first time the Supreme Court has said this,
01:48this is the legal principle that the Supreme Court has followed for decades.
01:52In fact, this bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice Nagar Ratna, has specifically flagged the Gulsusha Fatima judgment,
02:00saying that a two-judge bench of the court went very differently from what the three-judge bench order,
02:08which is the principle that is followed, that jail is the rule, jail is the exception.
02:13In fact, the court also flagged the fact that, especially in these kind of cases, NDPS, UAPA, NIA cases,
02:21less than 5% of cases across India end in conviction.
02:27That means in 99, almost 95 to 99% of the cases, after the end of a long, long trial,
02:35people are acquitted.
02:37There is no evidence against them.
02:38And the court, in fact, noted that in Kashmir in particular, where this particular case came from,
02:43the case in which the judgment has been given, Kashmir has less than 1% conviction rate over the last
02:50several years,
02:51according to NCRB data, which means that 99% of cases, people are finally acquitted after having been in jail
02:59for very, very long periods of time during the trial.
03:02And that is why the Supreme Court has flagged this question of law that is being done,
03:08that multiple, the two-judge benches have gone against what the legal principle of bail being the rule and jail
03:15being the exception.
03:16And particularly in the Gulsisha Fatima case, where the Umar Khalid and others were denied bail.
03:23So it's a very interesting proposition that has happened today.
03:26And it's an adverse order on its own previous ruling.
03:28I'm going to leave it there for the moment, Anisha Mathur, getting us the very latest on that big story.
03:33Bail, a rule, jail is the exception, should be the exception, is what the Apex Court has said today.
Comments

Recommended