Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 10 months ago
On this Special Report, the focus is on significant remarks made by the former Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, regarding the incarceration of under-trial prisoners. Speaking at the 'Ideas of Justice' session during the Jaipur Literature Festival, the former CJI addressed the Umar Khalid case, stating as a citizen that 'if a person remains in jail as an under trial prisoner for 5 or 7 years and is finally acquitted, the lost years cannot be compensated.' He emphasized that the foundation of Indian law rests on the presumption of innocence and reiterated that bail should be the rule rather than the exception. Chandrachud outlined three specific conditions under which bail can be refused: danger to society, risk of absconding, or potential tampering with evidence. The discussion highlights the legal and human rights concerns surrounding long-term imprisonment without conviction, particularly in high-profile cases that have sparked national debate over judicial processes and the rights of the accused.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00and now we move on to another big breaking news coming in this is related to a comment
00:10made by the former chief justice of india devait chandra chul in a discussion held at the jaipur
00:15literature festival he spoke about the umar khalid case while speaking at the ideas of justice
00:21session at the literary festival the former chief justice of india mentioned that the foundation of
00:27indian law rests on the presumption of innocence the former cgi mentioned that bail should be a rule
00:35not an exception he said every accused person should be considered innocent until proven guilty
00:41now he also added if a person remains in jail as an under trial prisoner for five or seven years and
00:48is finally acquitted the lost years cannot be compensated now joining us right now is india
00:55today's devankur devankur this issue of bail for umar khalid had been in controversy for fairly long
01:02time but the supreme court had given its arguments about it but we hear the cgi the former cgi now
01:09speaking about it on a public platform well this is extremely significant anjali the former chief
01:17justice of india devait chandra chul was at a session at the jaipur literature festival and when he was
01:23questioned about umar khalid case he mentioned that uh he will speak about the matter as a
01:30citizen and he mentioned that if five to seven years are lost uh for a person who has been incarcerated
01:39or who had been imprisoned and if thereafter that person is acquitted then the lost time cannot be
01:47compensated for apart from that uh anjali the former chief justice of india mentioned that
01:53under three conditions uh a bail can be refused one of which is that if there is a danger that the
02:00person if released on bail can be a danger to the society secondly if after being released on bail the
02:07person can be absconding and third if the person can manipulate or uh change the evidence or try to
02:16uh play with the evidence if these conditions are not there if these exceptions are not there the
02:21former chief justice of india mentioned that the bail is the rule uh and uh imprisonment or rejection of
02:29bail is the exception so given the fact that umar khalid has spent uh the amount of time that he has
02:35already spent in jail this kind of statement coming from no one other than the former chief justice of
02:42india is something which is extremely relevant and might be taken note of by those who are concerned
02:49with the case at present anjali right thank you very much uh ankur for all these details so clearly
02:56the chief justice of india former chief justice of india making some very important and relevant comments
03:02the chief justice of india at a literary festival
03:11you
03:13you
03:15you
03:17you
03:19you
03:21you
03:23you
03:25you
03:27you
03:29you

Recommended