00:00Supreme Court has first found that there is a prime FSI case for stay on certain provisions.
00:06They have not stayed all the provisions, the complete act.
00:09But certain provisions have been stayed, like the provision that said that you have to be a Muslim for five years have been stayed
00:14because there is no mechanism to determine.
00:17It looks like a balanced order.
00:19This can be termed as a victory for us.
00:21The Supreme Court has first found that there is a prime FSI case for stay on certain provisions.
00:49They have not stayed all the provisions, the complete act.
00:53But certain provisions have been stayed, like the provision that said that you have to be a Muslim for five years have been stayed
00:58because there is no mechanism to determine whether the same can happen or not,
01:03to determine whether someone has been a Muslim for five years or not.
01:07Apart from that, the provision 2.3c, the court has said that until there is a mechanism devised,
01:12no third-party interest can be created, the people cannot be dispossessed of their work properties.
01:19As far as non-Muslim members are concerned, the court has said that in the waqf vote it cannot be more than three
01:24and not more than four in the Section 9.
01:27And on the registration, the court has apparently extended the time limit but has not stayed the provision.
01:33Sir, there was a contestous issue or inquiry by the DM.
01:36Has anything been said?
01:37So, on that, it has been said that the executive cannot take the role of the judiciary
01:42and have, in a way, stayed the provision until a proper mechanism is devised
01:47and that is why he said that no one can be dispossessed of their waqf property in this matter.
01:51And what about the partners, sorry, members of the waqf board?
01:55The three in, not more than three in the waqf board can be non-Muslim members.
02:02And how do you see this order, sir?
02:05I am very positive.
02:07We will have to read it.
02:08It is a lengthy order.
02:09The chief has informed us and we will read it.
02:12But it looks like a balanced order.
02:14This can be termed as a victory for us.
02:16Reprise, this is a very good decision and it has a good decision for the citizens of the waqf board.
02:37This is a very good decision for the government.
02:39This is a very good decision for the government.
02:41foreign
02:54foreign
02:58foreign
03:04foreign
03:11number one there is no history on the amendments brought in by the central government headed by
03:18money narendra modiji so there is no history on the amendments only there is a interim order in
03:25favor of the petitioners regarding that they cannot be deprived of the work property without
03:31following the procedure laid down in the law including the amended law third that if any work
03:38has to be taken by the government or they the the possession has to be taken back that the procedure
03:44laid down in the work act including the amendment of the work that procedure has to be followed
03:51by the tribunal as well as by the honorable high court so after judgment of the tribunal only that
03:59order can be given effect too so that is the very clear order today by the honorable supreme court
04:04and very important order that those works are now has to be registered meaning thereby those works
04:12which are not registered they will not be treated as work property you see if you remember that
04:24when this argument was going on at that point of time learned solicitor general of india had given
04:30concession about this provision that the five years practice of islam the honorable court can decide this
04:37issue as per their own discretion so accordingly those who are practicing who have not practiced islam for
04:43for five years they cannot create work that provision has been established
04:48you
04:50you
04:52you
04:54you
04:56you
04:58you
05:00you
05:02you
05:04you
05:06you
05:08you
05:10you
Comments