Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 11 hours ago
What if I told you the Washington Commanders can add Brandon Aiyuk and Stefon Diggs to the roster this offseason, would you do it? Kevin Sheehan discusses why the Commanders trading for Brandon Aiyuk could actually make sense for the Commanders after his discussion with Spotrac co-founder Mike Ginnitti and the possibility of adding Stefon Diggs to the offense as well.
Transcript
00:00Yesterday on the show, Avin, who's been a longtime caller, I enjoy Avin's calls, he said, go look at Brandon
00:09Ayuk's contract on SpotTrack because it looks like it's changed a bit.
00:15And whether or not it changed or not is actually immaterial, and I'll play the soundbite from my conversation with
00:23Mike Giannetti here in a moment, but what Avin said was, look, his base salary is only listed as $1
00:30.215 million, so just over $1.2 million is a base salary.
00:36So why wouldn't you trade for that, especially if the rest of his contract, the other two years, 2027 and
00:462028, where he is due in base salary $27.2 million in 2027 and then in 2028 $29.1 million,
00:55if those two years aren't guaranteed, why wouldn't you just do a sixth round, seventh round swap to get it
01:03done, to get him in,
01:05make sure he's able to participate in off-season activities, make sure he's able to participate in training camp, and
01:13have him for the full upcoming lead-up to the regular season.
01:17And I said, well, that's news to me because I thought it was $27 million in 2026 that a team
01:26would owe him.
01:28And he said, well, just look at it, and I pulled it up, and sure enough, it said base salary
01:32$1.215 million.
01:36But per usual, there's a lot of other stuff behind that.
01:42That is actually the base salary for Brandon Ayuk in 2026.
01:48But I had Mike Giannetti on the show, and I explained to him, you know, it looks like it changed
01:55a little bit, or did it change?
01:57What exactly is Brandon Ayuk's contractual deal that is keeping teams from trading for him versus waiting for him to
02:07be released?
02:08Here's what he said.
02:10Yeah, so along with that $1.2 million base salary is about $26 million more in roster bonuses, option bonuses,
02:18all those bells and whistles that come with NFL contracts, which are seemingly hard to understand at times.
02:23So it's a $27 million payout this year.
02:25However, none of that is guaranteed.
02:27Nothing going forward because of his issues with the 49ers and eventual suspension are guaranteed anymore.
02:34So while you are inheriting a contract that has, you know, finances to it, it is essentially an open book
02:43that you can,
02:44as long as the player and agent are on board, and maybe that's what the hang-up is with some
02:48of these scenarios,
02:49you can sort of move things around, start over from scratch.
02:53We'll see kind of where that lands.
02:54But I do think your first point is still the best of that point, which is there are 31 teams
03:00just waiting this situation out.
03:01They want the 49ers to, June 2nd, after, you know, the cap split can come into fruition,
03:08they want the 49ers to outright release him so that they can set their market with this player,
03:13because I do think it's a limited market, and the teams that are interested want to come way down
03:19on where that cost currently is, which is about $3 for $85 million total remaining on this contract.
03:27So, basically, you know, summarizing what he said, as a practical matter, yes, the base salary is $1.215 million,
03:38but if you trade for him and you inherit that contract, he's going to play for you in 2026,
03:46and if he plays for you in 2026 the entire season, it's going to cost you $27 million.
03:53And that's why teams are hesitant to trade for him, because if you trade for him, you're not trading,
04:00you're not giving up a pick with the, you know, idea of, well, let's just see if it works out,
04:06you know,
04:06and if it doesn't, we'll cut him loose.
04:08Unless you're trading for him because you expect him to, at the very least, play in 2026,
04:14which would cost you $27 million if he plays in 2026.
04:19Now, I had a longer conversation with Mike, and let me just essentially net it out for you.
04:26So, you know, the number one is this.
04:30It is possible that to get to a team that he wants to play for,
04:35and let's assume that he really wants to be in Washington for a moment,
04:39that Washington could, you know, do a late round swap, trade a sixth for a seventh, something like that,
04:47maybe just give up a seventh, a day three pick to the 49ers.
04:52And he commits prior to the trade,
04:55because the 49ers give him and his agent permission to talk to Washington,
04:59he commits to tearing up his current deal and playing on a much more team-friendly deal,
05:05you know, a one-year prove-it deal, which, by the way, Mike said he believes there will be enough
05:11interest
05:12that if he played it out, he'd probably get between $12 million and $15 million as a base
05:18with incentives that might get him to $20 million for next year.
05:22That's higher than I would have thought, but that is coming from somebody who's much more expert
05:28at these scenarios than I am.
05:31But you could potentially work out a deal, but he doesn't have to.
05:38Like, if you trade for him, you're inheriting his contract unless he commits to tearing it up
05:44and doing a new deal, right?
05:46So if you inherit that contract and he plays for you next year,
05:50you've given up a pick and you're going to pay him at least $27 million next year
05:54if he plays the entire season, you could, you know, you could decide you're going to cut him
05:59in October and not have the rest of whatever the prorated version of it would be.
06:04But the bottom line is you're probably going to pay him $27 million next year.
06:08And then you're going to be, he'll be under contract for two more years if it goes well.
06:16That's actually the advantage of inheriting his current contract.
06:20Is if it goes well in 2026, he's under contract in 27 and 28 for a pretty decent number
06:27if he turns out to be high level again.
06:31But the rest of it is not guaranteed and you could cut him loose and not owe him anything
06:36and no dead cap, you know, penalty because that's all absorbed by San Francisco.
06:41So netting it out, the reason teams don't want to give up a pick is that it's going to cost
06:48them $27 million next year if he plays the whole season.
06:53And if you trade for him, you're intending for him to play the entire season next year.
07:00Again, it's possible he could work out a deal with Washington that's more team friendly
07:04because he wants to be here.
07:07But the idea, here's the other part of this, like just do the math.
07:11If Gennetti's right, that he's going to end up getting a deal that's 12 to 15 million base
07:17with incentives up to 20 million for one season.
07:20And that's the prove it deal.
07:23Seems like an expensive prove it deal, but let's just say that's the prove it deal.
07:27Well, you know, if you traded for him and he played in 2026, you were going to pay him 27
07:34million.
07:35If he performs, that's a difference between, you know, 20 and 27 million, $7 million.
07:42So maybe it would make sense to give up, you know, a late day three pick swap for him just
07:50to get him in early.
07:51Um, Mike, uh, totally agreed that even though, you know, the 49ers get the benefit of, you
07:58know, splitting up the dead cap money over two years, if they do it, whatever they decide
08:03to do post June one, they don't have to pay him anything until September 1st.
08:08It's like a $25 million bonus.
08:11They'll never pay that.
08:13They could take it all the way to the end of August without having to write a check to
08:19him for anything and then turn them loose then.
08:23And out of spite or maybe just out of good business, they may choose to do that.
08:28So that was the situation with Brandon.
08:31I, you, uh, when a vein brought that up, I thought it was interesting.
08:34There's a lot of ways to look at this, but it certainly feels like teams aren't interested
08:40in trading for him because of the idea that you'd be, be inheriting a contract that would
08:46pay him $27 million, regardless of what the base is, all of the other options, all of
08:51the roster bonuses, et cetera, would get it up to 27 million if he were to play, um, in
08:5820, 27, uh, in 2026.
09:01In fact, the $25 million roster bonus on September 1st would be due by the new team, by the acquiring
09:08team.
09:08So there wouldn't even be a big savings if you cut them loose midway through the season.
09:13Uh, now, um, I also asked him while I had him on about Stefan Diggs and what a Stefan
09:21Diggs contract might look like, uh, in free agency.
09:25This is what he said.
09:27Yeah.
09:27It's a bumpy road there.
09:28Um, but this is one of those guys that sort of, whether it's self-induced or, or, or,
09:33you know, from injury perspective has always sort of bounced back and been the exact player
09:38that said team that signed him is asking to be, there's a lot to that despite his age
09:43and what's going on around him right now, we've got to be priced exactly with IU here.
09:49You know, he's still a 13 to $15 million player, even on a one-year look on a one-year
09:53guarantee.
09:54Uh, it kind of feels like that Cooper cup situation in Seattle where, you know, we know
10:00we're kind of overpaying a little bit for that whole, for what, you know, he's going
10:03to provide for us, but there's a moment in a season.
10:06If things are going well, uh, he's going to be the guy we're looking to, uh, that's
10:11exactly what Diggs can be and has been for multiple teams now.
10:14So again, in that 12 to 15 range on a one-year deal and, uh, you throw some incentives in
10:19there, which he's, he's, he's had tons of incentives throughout his career that have
10:23sort of self-motivated him through the dog days of the season.
10:26Do you think there's a, uh, an active and, and, you know, sizable market for him in terms
10:33of number of teams, you know, it's, I, I'd probably put these two players pretty close
10:39together.
10:39I think the teams that need it are looking at these two players specifically right now.
10:43Maybe there's a couple of names on the trade block, uh, you know, that are in conjunction
10:48with it, but yeah, I'd say there's probably four to five teams monitoring both of these
10:53scenarios with IU having the slight favor because of age and, and maybe ability.
10:58But yeah, I, I, I, I'd put this all into one big basket right now in terms of teams that
11:03are at least, uh, you know, fringe WR2 need right now.
11:08There you go.
11:09Um, you know, I thought the, uh, interesting thing, and I, I, I'd have to go back and match
11:14it up to when he signed these deals, but that Stefan Diggs has pretty much lived up to whatever
11:22deal he has signed when he has signed a new deal.
11:25Now in Houston, he got injured, you know, um, during that season, that was the one season
11:31in which he's been seriously injured, uh, but came back last year and, you know, performed
11:36up to the contract with 85 catches for over a thousand yards.
11:40You know what?
11:41I bet whoever signed Stefan Diggs, as long as the quarterback situation is solid and the
11:45team is decent, I bet he'll live up to whatever they sign him to next year.
11:50I'm interested in both.
11:52I don't know why you guys wouldn't be.
11:53I mean, obviously we don't have all of the information you gotta, you gotta, you know,
11:59trust that Adam Peters, Lance, Newmark, Sassana, the whole group, like they're, they're looking
12:05into all of those items that we're not, we don't have access to, and we're not able to
12:13sort of decipher in, in a decision making process.
12:17But yeah, I mean, if they were to sign either one of those players, my assumption would be
12:22they believe they're getting a player that's motivated, healthy, mentally, physically, and
12:28ready to roll.
12:28Why would you do it?
12:30You know, for any other reason?
12:32Um, so if they ended up signing either one of the two, I'd feel good about it.
12:37If they ended up signing both of them, I'd feel good about it.
12:40I would trust that they've checked off the boxes on the kind of people they're bringing
12:46into, you know, a pretty good culture in terms of the locker room.
Comments

Recommended