Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 11 hours ago
In an exclusive interview with India Today, legal expert Harish Salve discussed the constitutional crisis in West Bengal following Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's refusal to resign despite losing her seat and the decisive mandate against her party.
Transcript
00:00And joining me now, I can't hear any.
00:05Expert, Harish Salve. Mr. Salve, really appreciate your time.
00:08Sir, under Article 164, if a chief minister like Mahmouda Banerjee loses her own seat
00:15and her party loses the election decisively, but refuses to resign,
00:20what are the options before the governor?
00:27Well, you hold office during the pleasure of the governor.
00:32Like the prime minister holds office during the pleasure of the prime minister,
00:35of the president, in the sense that the constitution doesn't set out the circumstances,
00:40but it's obvious that the governor can demand the resignation of the chief minister
00:46and, if necessary, remove the chief minister.
00:48But this is, I don't think, this is anything more than a political statement.
00:53Yes, it's a transatlantic virus, as I call it, which has come,
00:57and we maybe want to repeat, of Capitol Hill and Calcutta.
01:03And, well, if the leader of the world's greatest, the world's richest democracy can do this,
01:08why not the leader of West Bengal?
01:12So, I think this is a new disease we are getting.
01:17We are seeing this in the world, and, you know, it bothers me to see how
01:23constitutional leaders now are completely dismissive of a rule-based order.
01:31In a rule-based order, you like some decisions, you don't like some decisions.
01:35But the rules must prevail over your personal choice.
01:40And you can say, I'm sorry, with respect, I disagree with the judgment of the court,
01:44but I obey it. I disagree with the judgment of the election commission, but I obey it.
01:47If each one of us becomes prosecutor, judge, and jury in our own course,
01:52then you go from a rule-based order to a person-based order.
01:55What I say is right, what anybody else says is right.
01:57And that completely undermines any democracy.
02:01But this is all in theory, and I think this is a good wake-up sign for India
02:08to see that we don't go the American way.
02:11Okay.
02:12Mr. Salve, in such a stalemate, many would say that this is a stalemate,
02:16stalemate, which has been created by a defeated chief minister,
02:20who has refused to resign.
02:22You have spoken about the constitutional options,
02:24but a seventh is when the tenure of this assembly comes to an end.
02:29What happens in the interim?
02:32No, it's very clear.
02:34She, at best, can be continued till the seventh.
02:37After which the term of the assembly comes to an end,
02:39the governor can invite her to be a caretaker chief minister,
02:43or he may not.
02:45So, if the governor says,
02:47I do not invite you to become a caretaker chief minister,
02:50you may have president's rule till the next government is sworn in.
02:54Unlike the union,
02:56in the states, you have that option
02:59of having governor's rule till the next government.
03:01government comes in.
03:02Well, it may just be for three days.
03:07So, that's why I said this is storm in a teacup,
03:09but it's a good wake-up call for India
03:12to see that we do not go down the way
03:17certain other countries have gone.
03:21You know, Mr. Salve,
03:23it's one thing for leaders to claim moral victory,
03:29but here is Mahmouda Banerjee
03:32completely dismissing a decisive mandate
03:35that people of Bengal have given to the BJP,
03:38instead saying that the election commission
03:40has helped the BJP win 100-plus seats.
03:43You know, what has happened recently, sir,
03:46is that in repeated elections,
03:48opposition parties have said that
03:50this is some kind of subversion of people's mandate.
03:59Rahul Gandhi is saying so
04:01in the context of Maharashtra and Haryana as well.
04:05With this kind of repeated charge
04:07against election commission in particular,
04:10do you think that entire concept
04:13of free and fair election
04:15is facing a huge question by the opposition?
04:20Fortunately, and I say so in a lighter way,
04:24unfortunately, I mean,
04:27our prime minister,
04:28who's an enormously popular leader,
04:30Amit Shahji and all,
04:31they all go and campaign
04:32and Mr. Gyaninder Kumar gets the credit.
04:37You know,
04:38it's they who are only winning elections,
04:40not the election commissioner.
04:42So this kind of a thing is absolutely,
04:44it's trivializing the constitution.
04:47I'm sorry to say,
04:48it's trivializing the constitution.
04:49Also,
04:51people who aspire to hold constitutional office,
04:56not people who want to have
04:58a revolution overthrowing the constitution.
05:02People who aspire to hold constitutional office
05:05must do so
05:05within the framework of the constitution.
05:09And in the framework of the constitution,
05:11you have the judiciary,
05:12you have the election commission,
05:13you have institutions.
05:15Secondly,
05:16under our representation of people act,
05:19a voters list and an election are decoupled.
05:22You can never challenge an election
05:24on the ground that the voters list
05:25had errors in it.
05:27It's different if a particular
05:30election has been derailed,
05:32not as per the voters list,
05:34but that the voters list itself
05:35had certain names included
05:37or not included,
05:38et cetera,
05:38cannot be a ground for challenging an election
05:40because otherwise no election would be certain.
05:43So,
05:44people who aspire for constitutional office
05:46must live within the constitution.
05:49The SIR was challenged
05:51in the Supreme Court.
05:52The Supreme Court
05:53considered the matter
05:54on multiple occasions,
05:57set down a procedure.
05:58If any names have been wrongly omitted,
06:00they will come back on the list.
06:02But the Supreme Court was asked,
06:04what happens about these elections?
06:06They said,
06:06well,
06:06these elections have to go on
06:07the way they are.
06:09Now,
06:09you have to accept that.
06:10And I think everybody accepted,
06:13including
06:14Malta Banerjee.
06:15She went to the polls.
06:17She went and asked people for votes.
06:19She didn't get the votes.
06:21We have to live with it.
06:23She can later on,
06:24if
06:25all the 2.7 million people
06:27who have been disenfranchised,
06:29if all of them are put back
06:30on the rolls,
06:31she can say,
06:32well,
06:32I have a moral victory,
06:33which also is a deeply flawed argument,
06:35let me tell you,
06:36because you are then assuming
06:38that those 2.7 people
06:39have no mind,
06:40have no will,
06:41and they are your slaves
06:42who would have voted for you mindlessly.
06:45I'm sorry.
06:46That is a very unfair
06:50assumption
06:50in a democracy.
06:51How do you know that
06:53those 2.7 people,
06:55each and every one of them,
06:56would have voted for you?
06:58How do you know
06:59they were satisfied
06:59with the way you run the government
07:00last five years?
07:01How do you know
07:02they have not changed their mind?
07:03How do you know
07:03that they have not felt persuaded
07:07by the Prime Minister
07:09and by the others
07:09who have come and campaigned
07:11that,
07:12all right,
07:12our development
07:14is falling back,
07:15let's give the BJP a chance.
07:16How can you make that assumption?
07:18You are insulting
07:19those 2.7 million people.
07:21I am assuming
07:22that there are such a
07:23body of 2.7 million
07:25who have been disenfranchised.
07:27So,
07:27you know,
07:28these kind of statements
07:29ill behove somebody
07:30who wants to hold
07:31a constitutional office.
07:33But anyway,
07:34this will all last
07:34for hopefully 48 hours.
07:36Okay,
07:37but Mrs. Salve,
07:38you know,
07:39repeatedly in India,
07:41post-2024,
07:42every election
07:43after the results
07:45has faced this question
07:46of absence
07:47of level playing field.
07:49And we are seeing
07:50this repeated charge
07:51of misuse
07:52of agencies
07:53and that the election commission
07:55doesn't act
07:56in a fair manner.
07:57All this charge
07:58coming out
07:59repeatedly
08:00by opposition
08:01against the election commission.
08:02what should
08:03the election commission do?
08:05Shouldn't it also
08:06make an effort
08:07to have,
08:09to perhaps ensure
08:11that the opposition parties
08:13have some faith in them?
08:15See,
08:16I'll tell you
08:16the problem today
08:19is not
08:20what the election commission
08:21is or is not doing.
08:23Yes,
08:24every institution
08:24has a lot of scope
08:25for improving,
08:27including improving
08:28its communication skills.
08:30But I have noticed
08:31and I say so
08:32with a sense
08:33of deep concern
08:35for the country.
08:36In the last 10 years,
08:38I have noticed
08:39once again
08:40some kind of
08:41a transatlantic virus
08:43which has come into India.
08:44It's my truth
08:45and your truth.
08:48So,
08:49if either you agree with me
08:52or you're a liar,
08:55it happens in courts.
08:56If the court decides
08:57a particular,
08:59I bring an issue
08:59to the court
09:00and the court decides
09:01in my favor,
09:01what a great judiciary.
09:02If not,
09:03they are sold
09:05or they are being dishonest.
09:07So,
09:08we have seen this
09:09and this has come
09:10from the time
09:12the system
09:13has changed
09:14in 2014.
09:16Some people
09:17who have got displaced
09:18are unable
09:19to accept
09:20that there has been,
09:21India has seen
09:22certain foundational changes
09:24in the way
09:25India looks at life.
09:27Yes.
09:28and these are
09:30evolutions
09:31in the life
09:33of a nation.
09:33You have to accept them.
09:35Nobody has
09:36a vested right.
09:38So,
09:39this kind of a thing
09:40of creating
09:41this false narrative
09:43by some people
09:44who feel
09:45they are entitled
09:45to rule
09:46and if you take that away
09:47then there has to be
09:48something wrong
09:49with the system.
09:50this vocabulary
09:51has to go back,
09:52go away.
09:53It wasn't like this
09:54and it shouldn't be like this.
09:56Even Mrs. Gandhi
09:57in 77
09:57elected,
10:00accepted defeat.
10:01She had never
10:02denied defeat.
10:05Last question
10:06and I'm going
10:06to go back
10:07to where we began,
10:09Mr. Salve.
10:10To prevent
10:11a governance
10:12vacuum,
10:13especially
10:14if
10:15Mahmata Banerjee
10:16attempts to function
10:17beyond a legitimate
10:18caretaker
10:20chief minister
10:20with limited
10:22decision-making
10:23powers,
10:24what can the
10:24governor do?
10:26There's no question
10:27of her continuing.
10:30The governor
10:31will,
10:32after two days,
10:33she ceases
10:34to be
10:35in office.
10:37The governor
10:38will say,
10:38I remove you
10:39and he will
10:40have president's
10:42rule imposed,
10:42finished.
10:43And there is a question
10:44of putting the
10:45assembly under
10:45suspended animation
10:46because there is
10:47no assembly
10:47after two days.
10:48And then
10:50a fresh assembly
10:51will be called.
10:52There will be
10:52a pro-term speaker.
10:53He will give
10:54oath to all the
10:54people who have
10:55won.
10:57And I mean,
10:58if she wants
10:58to continue,
10:59then she will
10:59have to have
11:00her own oath.
11:00Because see,
11:01even if she
11:02had won
11:02the election,
11:03she would
11:04have had
11:04to go
11:05back,
11:06take fresh
11:07oath.
11:07All her
11:09MLAs would
11:09have had
11:09to take
11:10fresh oath.
11:10And then
11:11she would
11:12have been
11:13reappointed
11:14as a chief
11:15minister.
11:15So she
11:16can't continue.
11:16So if she
11:17wants to have
11:17a charade
11:18of having
11:18her own
11:19oath-taking
11:19ceremony
11:19of people
11:20whom she
11:20thinks has
11:21won and
11:22create a
11:22parallel
11:23government
11:23outside the
11:24government,
11:24I mean,
11:25that's another
11:25story.
11:26So tell me,
11:26what is the
11:26status of
11:27Mamata
11:27Manaji
11:28right now
11:28according to
11:29you legally?
11:30Well, the
11:31governor has
11:31not asked
11:32her to
11:32vacate.
11:33So she
11:33is continuing
11:34as a caretaker
11:35chief minister.
11:36If the
11:37governor do
11:37issue appropriate
11:38orders,
11:39and either he'll
11:39impose
11:40president's rule,
11:41because there's
11:41no vacuum,
11:42either he will
11:43impose
11:43president's rule,
11:44although,
11:45sorry,
11:45to correct
11:46myself,
11:47either the
11:47union will
11:48impose
11:49president's rule
11:49on the
11:50recommendation
11:50of the
11:50governor,
11:52or she
11:53continues till
11:537th,
11:54and then he
11:55imposes
11:55president's
11:56rule,
11:58or she
11:59gracefully
11:59says,
12:00okay,
12:00this was a
12:01burst of
12:01anger,
12:02in which
12:03case she
12:03continues as
12:04a caretaker
12:04chief minister
12:05for another
12:05week till
12:06everybody is
12:07warning.
12:08All right.
12:08Mr. Salve,
12:09really appreciate
12:09your time.
12:10Thank you for
12:10joining us.
Comments

Recommended