- há 2 dias
Guerra do Irão domina segundo dia do G7 com presença de Rubio
Veja o Europe Today, o programa de referência das manhãs da Euronews, às 8h de Bruxelas, 7 em Lisboa. Em apenas 20 minutos, fica a par das principais notícias do dia.
LEIA MAIS : http://pt.euronews.com/2026/03/27/franca-rubio-junta-se-a-reuniao-do-g7-dominada-pela-guerra-no-irao
Subscreva, euronews está disponível em 12 línguas.
Veja o Europe Today, o programa de referência das manhãs da Euronews, às 8h de Bruxelas, 7 em Lisboa. Em apenas 20 minutos, fica a par das principais notícias do dia.
LEIA MAIS : http://pt.euronews.com/2026/03/27/franca-rubio-junta-se-a-reuniao-do-g7-dominada-pela-guerra-no-irao
Subscreva, euronews está disponível em 12 línguas.
Categoria
🗞
NotíciasTranscrição
00:13Transcrição e Legendas Pedro Negri
00:58Legendas Pedro Negri
01:01Legendas Pedro Negri
01:03Legendas Pedro Negri
01:03Legendas Pedro Negri
01:04Legendas Pedro Negri
01:05Legendas Pedro Negri
01:06Legendas Pedro Negri
01:06Legendas Pedro Negri
01:06Legendas Pedro Negri
01:08Legendas Pedro Negri
01:12Legendas Pedro Negri
01:13Legendas Pedro Negri
01:14Legendas Pedro Negri
01:15Legendas Pedro Negri
01:16Legendas Pedro Negri
01:17Legendas Pedro Negri
01:18Legendas Pedro Negri
01:21Legendas Pedro Negri
01:22Boa noite, Maia.
01:24Então, olha, todos os olhos, de fato,
01:25na U.S. Secretaria de Estado Marco Rubio
01:27hoje em esses talks.
01:29Ele pode conviver os seus companheiros
01:31que o U.S. realmente tem um plano aqui
01:33para acabar com essa guerra?
01:34Eu vou ter conviver, mas ele também
01:36tem que reassurem eles
01:37que há um plano de exito.
01:40Porque nós ouvimos
01:41do U.S. Presidente Donald Trump
01:42que há negociations entre
01:44o Americano e o Iraniano,
01:46mas não sabemos muito
01:47sobre o que esses talks são sobre.
01:50E no fim, você tem, você tem,
01:52você tem, você tem, você tem,
01:53que estão no Brasil no Brasil.
01:54E agora nós temos Trump
01:56dizendo que ele está no interesse
01:58de Irã para negociar o deal.
02:01Let's take a listen.
02:02Eles estão pedindo a fazer a deal,
02:04não me.
02:05Eles estão pedindo a fazer a deal.
02:07E alguém que viu o que estava acontecendo
02:09por aí vai entender
02:10por que eles queriam fazer a deal.
02:12Eu digo que eles são lousy fighters,
02:13mas eles são grandes negociadores.
02:15Presidente Trump,
02:16e, Maia, fill us in.
02:17O que mais é para discussão
02:18hoje em todos os talks?
02:19So, besides Iran,
02:21which is the main topic
02:22of the day,
02:23there is Gaza.
02:24The ministers will call
02:26for a ceasefire in Gaza,
02:28but they will also say
02:29more humanitarian aid
02:31is needed there.
02:32Clearly, as you know,
02:33there are divisions
02:34also with their relationship
02:35with Israel,
02:36especially the Europeans.
02:38They will also talk
02:39about Ukraine,
02:40which is the main topic
02:42on the agenda.
02:43How do we maintain
02:44the support for Ukraine,
02:46but also how do they intend
02:48to put more pressure
02:50on Russia?
02:51And that is the key question here.
02:53All the attention is on Russia
02:54because Russia is involved
02:56in two conflicts.
02:57You have Ukraine,
02:59but also there is Iran.
03:01And so these two conflicts
03:02are intertwined.
03:03And this is what,
03:04you know,
03:05the EU's chief diplomat
03:07said yesterday.
03:08as she entered the G7,
03:10do not separate
03:12the two conflicts
03:12and do not separate
03:13Russia's key role here.
03:15Let's take a listen.
03:16We see that Russia
03:18is helping Iran
03:20with intelligence
03:22to target Americans,
03:23to kill Americans.
03:25And Russia is also
03:26supporting Iran now
03:28with the drones.
03:29These wars
03:30are very much interlinked.
03:31So if America wants
03:33the war in the Middle East
03:35to stop Iran,
03:36to stop attacking them,
03:38they should also
03:39put the pressure on Russia.
03:41Kaya Kalas there.
03:42And Maya,
03:42this summit also
03:43is coming ahead
03:44of the big G7 summit
03:45taking place in June.
03:47There's a bit of controversy
03:48here, though,
03:48about South Africa's participation.
03:50It looks like
03:51they won't be invited now.
03:52Yes, there was a lot
03:53of pressure
03:53from the US on France,
03:55which is presiding the G7
03:58to boycott South Africa.
03:59So clearly,
04:00these are accusations
04:01from Donald Trump
04:02about, you know,
04:03mistreatment
04:04of white farmers
04:06in South Africa.
04:07Also, Trump
04:08is very angry
04:09at South Africa
04:09because of Gaza.
04:11They have filed
04:11a legal complaint
04:12for crimes
04:12against humanity,
04:14against Israel.
04:16So these are part
04:17of, you know,
04:18the conflict
04:19that there is,
04:19which is basically
04:20between US
04:21and South Africa.
04:22But it shows you
04:23that, you know,
04:24geopolitics are not
04:24just about decision.
04:25It's about who sits
04:27at the table.
04:28Indeed.
04:29Maida Lubum,
04:29thank you so much
04:30for that update.
04:31We'll, of course,
04:31keep a very close eye
04:32on those meetings today.
04:34But in case you're
04:34sitting there
04:35and actually wondering
04:35what exactly
04:37is this G7 forum
04:38and what it aspires
04:39to achieve,
04:40you're not the only one.
04:41Jakob Janis
04:42takes a look.
04:44You might have heard
04:45about G7 meetings
04:47and one is happening
04:48right now in France
04:49as we speak.
04:50And the foreign ministers
04:51of one of the most
04:52advanced economies
04:53are gathering
04:53to tackle a world
04:54on fire.
04:55But your reporter
04:56started to wonder
04:57what exactly
04:58is this group doing
04:59and does it still
05:00have the power
05:01to fix global crises?
05:04The Group of Seven
05:06is an exclusive
05:07informal club
05:08made up of
05:09the United States,
05:10Canada,
05:11France,
05:12Germany,
05:12Italy,
05:13Japan
05:13and the United Kingdom
05:15alongside the EU.
05:16And they have
05:18immense economic gravity.
05:20When the G7
05:21unifies on freezing assets
05:23or setting global taxes,
05:24the rest of the world
05:26glistens
05:26and usually adapts.
05:28And as they meet today,
05:29they will discuss
05:30ceasefire plans
05:31in Gaza,
05:32securing maritime passage
05:33in the Strait of Hormuz,
05:35backing Ukraine
05:36and adding more sanctions
05:37on Russia's shadow fleet.
05:39And it all feels like
05:40history is repeating itself.
05:43After all,
05:43the G7 was created
05:45on the French initiative
05:46following the 1970s
05:48oil crisis.
05:49And it all sounds nice,
05:51but you might be wondering,
05:53does it actually have power?
05:54And the answer depends
05:56on how we define it.
05:57The G7 cannot pass
05:59binding international laws
06:01and it has no combined military.
06:04Every pledge relies entirely
06:05on leaders keeping
06:06their promises back home.
06:08But not everything
06:09is so sweet
06:10as it faces
06:10structural limits.
06:12By limiting its membership
06:14to traditional
06:15Western powers,
06:16it does overlook
06:17the global South.
06:19And the rapid expansion
06:20of BRICS+,
06:21so a coalition
06:22of emerging economies
06:23proves the G7
06:25is no longer
06:26the only heavyweight
06:27in the international affairs.
06:29And as Donald Trump
06:30pushes to make global policy
06:32entirely by himself,
06:34the G7
06:35might seem like a relic.
06:36However,
06:37it stands as a major attempt
06:39to keep the world's
06:40biggest democracies
06:40working together,
06:42rather than
06:43each going its own.
06:50And as those talks
06:51get underway today,
06:53President Trump
06:53has said he will
06:54delay attacks
06:55on Iran's energy
06:56infrastructure
06:57until the 6th of April.
06:58He claims that talks
06:59with Iran
07:00on a peace deal
07:01are going, quote,
07:02very well.
07:02But the Iranian regime
07:03has said it has doubts
07:04about Washington's
07:05willingness to negotiate.
07:07To find out exactly
07:08what is the Iranian
07:09counter-ceasefire plan,
07:10we can cross now
07:11to Euronews' newsroom
07:12in Lyon
07:13and bring in
07:13our Babak Kamir,
07:14that's the head
07:15of our Persian news service.
07:17Good morning, Babak.
07:18Just tell us,
07:18the Iranian regime
07:19so far is rejecting
07:20President Trump's plans
07:22to talk.
07:23So what exactly
07:23is their proposal?
07:26Listen,
07:27what we know
07:28about Iran's plan
07:29largely comes
07:30from Iranian media reports.
07:32It includes
07:33several key demands,
07:34the withdrawal
07:35of U.S. troops
07:36from the Middle East,
07:38guarantees against
07:39any further strikes
07:40on Iran,
07:41compensation
07:41for damages
07:42and recognition
07:43of Iran's missile program.
07:46At the same time,
07:47Tehran has dismissed
07:48a proposal from Trump
07:50describing them
07:51as an unrealistic
07:52list of demands.
07:54In reality,
07:55both sides
07:56are putting forward
07:57conditions
07:57that the other
07:59is highly unlikely
08:00to accept.
08:01From Iran's perspective,
08:03giving up core elements
08:05such as its missile program
08:07would go directly
08:08against the Islamic Republic's
08:10strategic doctrine.
08:12In fact,
08:13accepting such terms
08:14could fundamentally
08:16undermine the system itself,
08:18something Trump
08:19has at the time
08:20hinted at
08:21in the context
08:22of regime change.
08:23We are also seeing
08:24mixed signals.
08:26On the one hand,
08:27Trump has extended
08:28his deadline
08:29and paused
08:30the potential strike
08:31for another 10 days.
08:33On the other,
08:34there are credible reports
08:36of increased
08:36U.S. military deployment
08:37in the region.
08:39The gap between
08:40the two sides
08:41remains extremely wide.
08:43Even 10 weeks,
08:44not just 10 days,
08:45would likely not be
08:46enough to bridge it.
08:48So while some of this
08:50may still be signaling
08:52or a strategic bluffing,
08:54the overall picture
08:55is clear.
08:55The positions remain
08:57fundamentally incompatible
08:59and the risk of escalation
09:01is not only real,
09:02it may be increasing.
09:05Thank you so much
09:07for that update there
09:08from Euronews Leon.
09:10Now,
09:11Lebanon was drawn
09:12into this war
09:12in early March
09:13when Tehan
09:14backed Hezbollah,
09:15began firing rockets
09:16into Israel
09:17and Israel fired back.
09:19The Lebanese cabinet
09:20has now said
09:20that Israel is
09:21quote,
09:22threatening Lebanon's
09:23sovereignty
09:23and will file a complaint
09:24with the Security Council
09:26in this regard.
09:27The humanitarian impact
09:28in just a couple of weeks
09:29has been devastating
09:30with over 1 million
09:32displaced in Lebanon
09:33and many, many dead.
09:35For the view now
09:35from Lebanon coming up,
09:37we'll be joined by
09:38Ghassan Salami,
09:40a huge academic
09:41and political figure
09:42in Lebanon,
09:43currently serving
09:44as the Minister of Culture
09:45since February 2025.
09:47Good morning, Minister.
09:49Thank you so much
09:49for joining us here
09:50on Euronews.
09:51Thank you.
09:52Just first question,
09:54how severe is the situation
09:56in southern Lebanon,
09:57especially right now?
09:59Well, I think I agree
10:00with the Associated Press
10:02qualification
10:02of what is happening.
10:04Yesterday,
10:05AP has shifted
10:07from something
10:08quite vague
10:09into saying
10:10exactly that
10:11it's an invasion.
10:12I used to say
10:13it's a creeping action
10:15by the Israeli military
10:16and I say
10:17since yesterday
10:18it's now an invasion.
10:20And Israel is saying
10:22clearly that it wants
10:23to create a buffer zone
10:24in south of Lebanon.
10:25Are you fearing now
10:26a land grab?
10:27We've even heard
10:27one far-right Israeli minister
10:28calling for annexation.
10:31Yes, that's true.
10:32We take seriously
10:33all these statements.
10:35I take seriously
10:36what Smotrich said
10:37that he wants to occupy
10:39and annex
10:40all the areas
10:41south of the Britannia.
10:42I take even more seriously
10:44what Katz,
10:45the Minister of Defence,
10:46said that he wants
10:47to have a buffer zone
10:48until the retaliation.
10:50The problem
10:50is the following.
10:52There is a long history
10:53of Israel
10:54with buffer zones.
10:55They had a buffer zone
10:56in South Lebanon
10:57for 22 years
10:58until the year 2000
10:59when they withdrew
11:01and said
11:01we don't need it anymore.
11:03It is doing harm
11:05to us
11:05more than
11:06it is doing any good.
11:07But now
11:08the new form
11:10of buffer zone
11:11they are
11:12trying to
11:14implement
11:15on the ground
11:16is very different.
11:17wherever they go
11:19they don't leave
11:20any civilian.
11:21They don't leave
11:22any house.
11:23They don't leave
11:24any possibility
11:24for civilians
11:25to go back to houses
11:26because they are
11:28absolutely destroying
11:30all the villages.
11:3134 of them
11:32have been destroyed
11:32and therefore
11:34what they are
11:35the new concept
11:37of the buffer zone
11:38is a much more
11:39radical one
11:40much more
11:41damaging
11:42for the civilian population.
11:44And tell me
11:44how are you
11:45supporting
11:46how is your government
11:47supporting civilian populations?
11:48Are you encouraging
11:49people to stay
11:50in areas that are
11:51under attack
11:52or should they flee
11:53and do you have
11:53enough support
11:54for these people
11:54on the ground?
11:56It is very difficult
11:57to support them
11:58because very often
11:59ambulances are hit
12:02relief
12:04tracks are hit
12:05etc.
12:06So no
12:06we leave it to them
12:08to decide what they do
12:09but whenever they
12:10move
12:11from their homes
12:12we take care of them
12:13and that's why
12:14we have now
12:15more than 700
12:17shelters
12:18across the country
12:19where they are
12:20received and
12:21properly treated
12:22and I am going
12:24immediately after
12:25this interview
12:25to visit
12:26three or four
12:27of these shelters
12:29in the outskirts
12:30of Beirut.
12:31We take care of them
12:33and I should say
12:34that the flow
12:36of international aid
12:38is starting
12:38to come
12:39and to help us
12:40by sea
12:41and by air
12:42and we have
12:43put in place
12:44a service
12:45of very rapid
12:46distribution
12:47once we get
12:49any help
12:50it goes almost
12:51the same day
12:52to those
12:53who need it.
12:54We have now
12:55more than
12:561,100,000 people
12:59that's one
13:00out of five
13:01Lebanese
13:01who have been
13:02displaced
13:03and some
13:04I would say
13:0517 or 18%
13:07of them
13:07live in these shelters.
13:08And any hopes
13:10for talks
13:10with the Israelis
13:11to bring an end
13:12to this?
13:13We offer
13:13the President
13:15of the Republic
13:16offer negotiating
13:16with Israel
13:17we didn't have
13:18the proper answer
13:19so far
13:20and we didn't
13:22we didn't
13:25we haven't
13:26been able
13:26to encourage
13:27possible mediators
13:30to put enough
13:31pressure on Israel
13:32to answer
13:33to our proposal
13:34but the proposal
13:35was officially made
13:36by the President
13:37three weeks ago.
13:38And even if there
13:39is a ceasefire
13:40eventually between
13:40the US, Israel
13:41and Iran
13:42to end the war
13:43to what extent
13:44could Lebanon
13:44just be left
13:45to be destroyed?
13:47It can be left
13:48to be destroyed
13:49we need to
13:50here we are
13:51navigating
13:52very very
13:55prudently
13:55between two
13:56possible scenarios
13:57we don't like
13:58one that
13:59there is a ceasefire
14:01in the Gulf
14:01although I don't
14:02see it right now
14:03I don't see it
14:04but this is another
14:04story
14:05but suppose you have
14:06a ceasefire
14:07in the Gulf
14:08and Lebanon
14:09is left to
14:10itself
14:10to be destroyed
14:11entirely by the
14:12Israelis
14:12this is one
14:14horrible scenario
14:15the other
14:15no less horrible
14:16scenario
14:17is that Lebanon
14:18is one item
14:20on somebody's
14:21else agenda
14:22to negotiate
14:23we don't want
14:24anybody to
14:25negotiate for us
14:26because we know
14:27that it will be
14:28a serious
14:29violation of our
14:31sovereignty
14:31okay
14:32Minister Salami
14:33thank you so
14:34much for speaking
14:35to us here
14:35this morning
14:36on your news
14:36on your stay
14:37take care
14:39now of course
14:40although the
14:40world's focus
14:41is very much
14:42on Iran
14:42the threat
14:43of Russia
14:44is still
14:44Europe's
14:45number one
14:45concern
14:46but the two
14:47wars are
14:47very much
14:47interrelated
14:48and if
14:49hostilities
14:50continue in
14:50the Middle
14:51East
14:51there are
14:51fears for
14:52NATO's
14:52ability
14:53to deal
14:54with so
14:54much
14:54widespread
14:55conflict
14:55NATO
14:56allies
14:56have been
14:57meeting
14:57in Helsinki
14:58Finland
14:58to discuss
14:59all this
14:59and that
15:00is exactly
15:00where our
15:01NATO
15:01correspondent
15:02Shona Murray
15:02finds herself
15:03as well
15:03this morning
15:04so good
15:04morning
15:05Shona
15:05thanks so
15:05much
15:05for joining
15:06us
15:06just tell
15:07us
15:07how is
15:07Europe
15:07addressing
15:08security
15:09matters
15:09amidst
15:09the war
15:09in the
15:10Middle
15:10East
15:13well
15:13Maeve
15:13as we
15:14heard
15:14from
15:14NATO
15:14yesterday
15:15Russia
15:15remains
15:16the
15:16biggest
15:16threat
15:16to
15:17European
15:17security
15:18but as
15:18you
15:18mentioned
15:18there
15:19these
15:19wars
15:19are
15:20very
15:20much
15:20intertwined
15:21and
15:21we've
15:21had
15:21reports
15:22over
15:22the
15:22past
15:22few
15:23days
15:23that
15:23apparently
15:24crucial
15:25military
15:25equipment
15:25destined
15:26for
15:27Ukraine
15:27from
15:27the
15:28United
15:28States
15:28could
15:28be
15:29diverted
15:29to
15:29Iran
15:30as
15:30the
15:30war
15:31in
15:31Iran
15:31grinds
15:32on
15:32now
15:32NATO
15:32has
15:33said
15:33this
15:33isn't
15:33the
15:33case
15:34that
15:34that
15:34material
15:35is
15:35still
15:35flowing
15:36to
15:36Ukraine
15:36particularly
15:37interceptors
15:37but I
15:38heard from
15:38someone
15:38this
15:39morning
15:39who said
15:39this
15:39is
15:40probably
15:40inevitable
15:40that
15:41this
15:41may
15:41happen
15:41in
15:42addition
15:42to
15:43that
15:43here
15:43in
15:43Helsinki
15:44we
15:44had
15:44the
15:44leaders
15:44of
15:44the
15:45Baltics
15:45and
15:45the
15:45Arctic
15:46countries
15:46in
15:56now
15:57that's
15:57problematic
15:57because
15:58if you
15:59see
15:59what
15:59Marco
15:59Rubio
16:00the
16:00US
16:00Secretary
16:00of
16:01State
16:01last
16:01night
16:01said
16:02on
16:02the
16:02way
16:02to
16:02the
16:02G7
16:03he
16:03said
16:03well
16:04in
16:04actual
16:04fact
16:04Ukraine
16:05isn't
16:05the
16:05United
16:05States
16:06war
16:06so
16:06we'll
16:06have
16:06to
16:07take
16:07that
16:07into
16:07account
16:08so
16:08there
16:08could
16:08be
16:08some
16:09conflict
16:09here
16:10but
16:10for
16:10now
16:10in
16:10Helsinki
16:11I'm
16:11joined
16:11by
16:11Valérie
16:12a
16:12French
16:13MEP
16:13and
16:13leader
16:14of
16:14the
16:14Renew
16:14group
16:15in
16:15the
16:15European
16:16Parliament
16:16Valérie
16:17for
16:18how
16:18long
16:18do
16:19you
16:19think
16:19NATO
16:19can
16:19stay
16:20out
16:20of
16:20the
16:20war
16:21in
16:21Iran
16:22let's
16:23be
16:23clear
16:23this
16:24is
16:24not
16:24our
16:25war
16:25and
16:26a
16:26shift
16:26of
16:26attention
16:27on
16:28Ukraine
16:28would
16:28be
16:29a
16:29huge
16:29mistake
16:30Europe
16:30security
16:31is
16:32Ukraine
16:32security
16:32and
16:33Ukraine
16:33security
16:33is
16:34Europe
16:34security
16:35Russia
16:36is
16:36the
16:36first
16:37threat
16:38for
16:38us
16:39and
16:40that's
16:40why
16:40you
16:40have
16:40to
16:40be
16:40fully
16:41committed
16:41and
16:42to
16:42empower
16:42ourselves
16:43but
16:44what
16:44we
16:45NATO
16:45yesterday
16:46was
16:47that
16:47well
16:47the
16:48United
16:48States
16:48is
16:49really
16:49helping
16:49in
16:49this
16:50war
16:50with
16:50Ukraine
16:51and
16:51Russia
16:51because
16:52of
16:52the
16:52negotiations
16:53at
16:53the
16:53table
16:54now
16:54Marco
16:54Ruby
16:55is
16:55saying
16:55if
16:55you
16:56don't
16:56help
16:56us
16:56in
16:56Iran
16:56we
16:57won't
16:57help
16:57you
16:58with
16:58Ukraine
16:58and
16:58Russia
16:59anymore
16:59Ukraine
17:00is
17:00not
17:00a
17:00bargaining
17:01ship
17:01and
17:02this
17:02is
17:02not
17:02Iran
17:03war
17:03is
17:03not
17:04our
17:04we
17:05stand
17:05here
17:05today
17:06in
17:06Finland
17:06this
17:07is
17:07the
17:08longest
17:08border
17:09between
17:09the
17:10EU
17:10and
17:10Russia
17:11we
17:11have
17:11to
17:12defend
17:12Finland
17:12we
17:13have
17:13to
17:13defend
17:13Ukraine
17:14we
17:14have
17:14to
17:14defend
17:15the
17:15EU
17:15and
17:16this
17:16is
17:16our
17:16top
17:16priority
17:17and
17:17it
17:17remains
17:18but
17:19France
17:19and
17:19the
17:20UK
17:20and
17:20several
17:20other
17:21countries
17:21are
17:21part
17:22of
17:22a
17:22joint
17:22coalition
17:23to
17:24maybe
17:24re-secure
17:25the
17:25Strait
17:26of
17:26Ormos
17:26now
17:26they
17:26say
17:27it's
17:27when
17:27the
17:27hostilities
17:28end
17:28but
17:29they're
17:29part
17:29of
17:30that
17:30do
17:30you
17:30think
17:30that
17:30maybe
17:31the
17:31Europeans
17:32will
17:32need
17:32to
17:32put
17:33their
17:33shoulders
17:33to
17:34the
17:34wheel
17:34help
17:35the
17:35Americans
17:35in
17:35order
17:36to
17:36get
17:36some
17:36payback
17:37for
17:37Ukraine
17:38this
17:38is
17:38not
17:38a
17:39question
17:39on
17:39helping
17:39the
17:40Americans
17:40this
17:40is
17:41a
17:41question
17:41of
17:41securizing
17:42the
17:42Hormuz
17:43path
17:44to
17:44make
17:45sure
17:45that
17:46energy
17:47issues
17:47is
17:48not
17:48so
17:48harmful
17:49for
17:49Europe
17:49but
17:50do
17:50you
17:50think
17:50that
17:51the
17:51Europeans
17:51can
17:51do
17:51anything
17:52realistically
17:52anyway
17:53in
17:53the
17:53Strait
17:53of
17:53Ormos
17:54despite
17:54the
17:54fact
17:54that
17:55European
17:55economies
17:56are
17:56really
17:57suffering
17:57as
17:58I
17:58said
17:58this
17:59is
17:59a
17:59question
17:59of
17:59energy
18:00security
18:00also
18:01what
18:01we
18:01have
18:01done
18:01until
18:02now
18:02at
18:02the
18:02European
18:03level
18:03is
18:04also
18:04to
18:04move
18:05on
18:06environmental
18:07transitions
18:08what
18:08is
18:09the
18:09what
18:10this
18:10question
18:11this
18:11war
18:11shows
18:12us
18:12is
18:12our
18:13weakness
18:13we
18:14are
18:14too
18:14dependent
18:14on
18:15fossil
18:15fuels
18:16so
18:16we
18:16have
18:17to
18:17move
18:17on
18:17and
18:18to
18:18be
18:18more
18:18independent
18:19and
18:19the
18:19largest
18:21border
18:22with
18:22inside
18:23NATO
18:23with
18:24Russia
18:24and
18:25that's
18:25very
18:25much
18:26leading
18:26the
18:26way
18:27when
18:27it
18:27comes
18:27to
18:27preparedness
18:28thank
18:28you
18:28very
18:28much
18:28Valérie
18:29Ayer
18:29for
18:29that
18:29this
18:29morning
18:30and
18:30back
18:30to
18:30you
18:31Maeve
18:31thank
18:32you
18:32so
18:32much
18:32Shona
18:33for
18:33that
18:33update
18:33and
18:33of
18:34course
18:34to
18:34your
18:34guest
18:34there
18:35in
18:35what
18:36looks
18:36like
18:36a
18:36very
18:36windy
18:37chilly
18:37Helsinki
18:38well thank
18:39you so
18:39much
18:39now
18:40for
18:40tuning
18:40in
18:41to
18:41us
18:41here
18:41on
18:41Europe
18:42today
18:42that
18:42brings
18:42this
18:43edition
18:43to
18:44an
18:44end
18:44thank
18:44you
18:44so
18:44much
18:45for
18:45your
18:45company
18:45as
18:46always
18:46if
18:47you
18:47need
18:47any
18:47more
18:47context
18:48news
18:48and
18:49analysis
18:49please
18:49do
18:50visit
18:50yournews.com
18:51you can
18:51also
18:51download
18:52our
18:52app
18:52and
18:53you
18:53can
18:53join
18:53us
18:54on
18:54any
18:54of
18:54our
18:54social
18:55media
18:55sites
18:55and
18:55send
18:56us
18:56direct
18:56messages
18:56if
18:57you
18:57want
18:57to
18:57get
18:57involved
18:57in
18:58the
18:58conversation
18:58take
18:59care
18:59and
18:59see
19:00you
19:00very
19:00soon
19:00here
19:00on
19:01your
19:01own
19:01news
19:01you
19:11you
19:36Tchau.
Comentários