Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 hours ago
Tension surfaced in the House of Representatives on Friday as several supplemental questions were disallowed by Speaker Jagdeo Singh, triggering sharp exchanges with Opposition members.

The rulings, led to accusations of condescension and a broader debate over the interpretation of Standing Orders governing parliamentary procedure.
Transcript
00:01Multiple supplemental questions were disallowed during the sitting of the House of Representatives on Friday by Speaker Jagdeo Singh.
00:08That's simply another way of asking the same question already asked.
00:14I recognize that perhaps you might have been belaboring under the misapprehension that it is a new question.
00:22So I'm going to ask you, if you have another question, ask it.
00:25But that's the same question you asked.
00:27So, ask away.
00:29Can a minister identify why the delay in the promise that was made?
00:34It doesn't arise out of the primary question.
00:38Disallowed.
00:39But it was during answers to a question on laptop distribution, emotions flayed.
00:45Will laptops be provided for the students that are going into form one of the new academic year?
00:51Disallowed. Disallowed.
00:54The question, all right.
00:57You can, you can, could be an exaggerated exasperation.
01:03All right?
01:06Yes, I can understand why you might have such exaggerated exasperation.
01:11Because you asked a very pointed question, which has six components, none of which are relevant to the supplemental questions
01:20you are seeking to ask.
01:21Then again, when questions on notice about teachers' access to the Employee Assistance Program arose, this happened.
01:30That's an entirely different question.
01:31If you want to ask that question, there's a mechanism in the standing order by which you can ask that
01:37question.
01:37It does not arise out of the answer given.
01:41House Speaker Jack Dave Singh insisted the questions were not within the standing order requirement for supplemental questions.
01:48In disallowing the question, he explained why.
01:50He chose to circumscribe your question in a very narrow manner.
01:56And now what you're seeking to do is expand on that by the use, a seemingly clever use of supplemental
02:04questions.
02:05Which the minister may or may not be prepared.
02:06And it's not fair.
02:07It's a question of fairness.
02:09It's a question of notice.
02:14I understand that you don't like the lecture you're getting, you know.
02:17I quite understand it.
02:20No, but yes, I am standing here and I'm seeing it.
02:25And I quite understand that you do not appreciate the lecture you're getting.
02:29But there's a method to asking these questions.
02:32This was challenged by MP4 Aruka Lopino Marvin Gonzalez.
02:36My understanding, Mr. Speaker, is that the Speaker, acting in his capacity as the presiding officer of the House,
02:45will invoke the standing orders to either allow the supplemental questions or disallow the supplemental questions.
02:54So why is it?
02:55And we respect that because that is the practice and the proceedings of this House.
03:00And therefore, Mr. Speaker, I'm asking whether or not members ought to be lectured to in the way that you
03:08are seeking to do, Mr. Speaker.
03:10Because it comes across, Mr. Speaker, with the greatest of respect.
03:15With the greatest of respect, Mr. Speaker, it comes across in a bit condescending way.
03:20Singh said he doesn't intend to be condescending, but expects members to familiarize themselves with the standing orders.
03:27I don't intend to lecture anyone.
03:29This is not a classroom, and I've repeatedly said so, even though at times the behavioral paradigms which members descend
03:37into
03:37may very well remind ourselves of a glorified kindergarten.
03:42I've often said, I don't intend to lecture anyone.
03:45But certainly members must know.
03:49You all have all been here longer than I have.
03:52Orvishita Wari Rupnarain, TV6 News.
Comments