Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 minutes ago
The Federal Court showdown between the consumer watchdog and Coles is entering its final stages. The court will decide whether the supermarket chain misled consumers with fake discounts.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:01Well, after five days of hearings here in court, today we have the ACCC entering the
00:07final stages of this case, with the Consumer Watchdogs head counsel making closing submissions.
00:13And it has been tense at times here in the federal court, with Justice O'Brien noting
00:19that he was troubled and burdened by some of the ACCC's interpretations in this case.
00:25Now, the ACCC's lawyer has been fighting back, reiterating that this case is about fake
00:31discounting, they claim, by Coles.
00:34They are reiterating their case that they believe that Coles often fake discounts when they use
00:40down-down promotions on products like dog food and pet food, and then they set them at prices
00:45that were actually higher than they had been in some instances only a few weeks earlier.
00:51Now, the ACCC's lawyer has summed up this case as being ultimately about Coles' customers.
00:57He says that they range from pensioners to high-income earners through to teenagers.
01:02And Gary Reich made this comment.
01:04He said that these customers read that the price is down-down.
01:09They read that the price was much higher.
01:11They think that they're being offered a good deal.
01:13The price has gone down, they're told.
01:15They think it's a genuine discount.
01:16Many will have no idea that the price was actually lower four weeks ago.
01:22The ACCC has used 12 products specifically to argue its case here in the Federal Court.
01:29That's ranged from sticks of deodorant to toothpaste to dog food.
01:34We have heard very specific testimony from Coles' senior managers about these items, and the ACCC has really tried to
01:44tease out of these senior managers about the practices and guidelines that they have in place for their down-down
01:51promotions.
01:52Now, some of these interpretations has really been the sticking points here today, and what I noted was Justice O
01:59'Brien saying that parts of the ACCC's interpretations were troublesome or burdensome.
02:05Justice O'Brien noted at one point that there are many reasons why prices might have been elevated and then
02:12lowered, and that could come down to things like negotiations with Coles' suppliers.
02:17We have Coles obviously vigorously defending this case.
02:21We've had experts say that the supermarket giant could be up for a fine of in excess of $100 million
02:27if it loses this blockbuster case.
02:30Coles' reputation is also on the line here at a time when trust in supermarkets, both Coles and its major
02:38competitor Woolworths, has been declining.
02:41Now, for the ACCC, the stakes are very big as well.
02:45The consumer watchdog will obviously be spending a lot of time and money prosecuting this case, and if it loses,
02:53there will be a lot of questions about why it took on such a big company.
02:57If it loses as well, the ACCC might have to reconsider its case against Woolworths, which it has made a
03:05similar allegation against over fake discounting.
03:09That hearing is set down for April at this stage.
03:12Thank you very much.
Comments

Recommended