Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 20 minutes ago
The Supreme Court has asked the Election Commission of India to resolve the Trinamool Congress party name and symbol dispute within three months following the completion of pleadings. Rejecting the poll body's request for six months, the top court granted all parties four weeks to complete pleadings, allowing the commission three months thereafter to decide the matter under Paragraph 15 of the Election Symbols Order. The dispute arose after rival factions staked claim over the party name and symbol, prompting the Election Commission to freeze the original symbol and allocate temporary symbols ahead of by-elections.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Let me take you through the top breaking news coming in at 5 p.m.
00:03The Supreme Court asking the Election Commission of India to decide
00:06the Trinamul Congress election symbol dispute within four months.
00:10Remember, there's been a temporary order that was given.
00:13Both these parties were given new symbols and that was temporary in the sense of the by-elections.
00:18Now the top court has maintained, I quote it here first,
00:21three months are enough for the Election Commission to finally decide the Trinamul Congress name,
00:26the flowers in grass symbol and the dispute between the rival factions.
00:30The court has directed all the parties to complete the pleading within four weeks,
00:34give the ECI three months thereafter to finally decide the dispute under paragraph 15 of the Election Symbol's order.
00:41The ECI had sought at least six months after the completion of pleadings,
00:45citing the scale of evidence, affidavits involved,
00:48but for now we are told that the judge had said three months is good enough.
00:54Our legal correspondent Anisha Mathur for the latest on that.
00:57Anisha, there is quite a difference between three months and six months.
01:00Why do you think the Supreme Court possibly has given the reason
01:03that three months should be enough to decide and end the dispute?
01:06Well, see, the argument before the court by the Mamata faction was very simple,
01:11that the Election Commission should not have passed the interim order
01:16giving one kind of symbol to both factions and recognising the other faction.
01:21With bi-polls also coming in, the Mamata faction also said that this decision has to be taken quickly.
01:28Election Commission, on the other hand, was saying that we will need about six months to decide the matter,
01:34that there is a lot of documentation that needs to be considered.
01:36But the court, however, said that if, you know, three months is quite enough,
01:42if there is some exigency, then you can come back to us and tell us why you cannot take that
01:47decision.
01:47Now, remember, just a few minutes before this matter was heard,
01:51in the speaker, in the disqualification case also,
01:55the Supreme Court has reminded the speaker as well
01:59that there has to be some reasonable timeline to make decisions,
02:03particularly when democratic principles are involved.
02:07So, it seems that the Supreme Court is once again reiterating
02:10that three to four months is considered a reasonable time to take decisions.
02:15Quickly, Anisha, how do you think this matter has progressed in the court?
02:19Because since the time we have seen defections, merging with another party,
02:23a rival faction that has claimed that they are the real TMC,
02:25how has this matter really been in the court?
02:28We have seen it play in political corridors, on the streets as well.
02:31But in court, of course, that is where the significance definitely changes.
02:35Well, see, Pooja, when you are looking at defections,
02:38when you are looking at a merger of parties,
02:41if you look at what has happened in the TMC case, right,
02:44the MLAs in the party have defected,
02:48well, the Mamata Banerjee faction says that the MLAs under Ritavrata Banerjee
02:52have defected and claimed control of the Trinamul Congress name.
02:56In the parliament, MPs have defected and gone and joined the NCPI.
03:03So, the TMC is fighting this battle on multiple fronts, really,
03:08whether it is the Speaker of the Parliament,
03:10whether it is the Speaker of the Assembly,
03:11recognising Ritavrata as the leader of opposition,
03:14whether it is the Election Commission,
03:15which on September 17th froze the symbol of the party
03:19and gave temporary symbols to both factions.
03:23A lot is being said in the court by the TMC's lawyers
03:26about the impact on democratic functioning of the state
03:32and how the various constitutional authorities,
03:36whether it is the Speaker, whether it is the Election Commission,
03:38whether the delay in taking decision would create,
03:42what Kapil Sibbal and Kalyan Banerjee have been arguing,
03:45is a faith, a comply.
03:48If there is no decision and there are elections that happen,
03:51then by default, one faction or the other will gain power,
03:57which is what we saw happening in the Shiv Sena case, for example,
04:00and which is still being fought out in the Supreme Court.
04:03The Shiv Sena simple dispute is still being taken out now.
04:06This could be very crucial.
04:07Anisha, please keep tracking all the latest
04:09on what happens with the TMC as well
04:10and will the matter be decided and how
04:12and what happens to Mamata Banerjee thereafter.

Recommended