00:00Effort being made to indict Negro Conley. The Atlanta Journal. Thursday, July 17, 1913.
00:07Foreman Beatty of Grand Jury, however, says he knows of no such move. W.D. Beatty, foreman of
00:13the Grand Jury, declares that, so far as he knows, there is no intention on the part of the Grand
00:18Jury to consider an indictment of Jim Conley, the Negro sweeper who figures so prominently in the
00:23Fagan murder mystery. The Journal has learned, however, on excellent authority that a determined
00:28effort is being made to have the Conley case passed upon by the present Grand Jury. Whether the effort
00:34will or will not be futile is a matter of conjecture. Foreman Beatty states that no meeting of the jury
00:41is expected during the present week, but that the body will probably be called together early next
00:46week to consider matters of a routine nature. Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey is said to be
00:52making every effort to block the proposed indictment of Conley, who will be used as the principal witness
00:57against Leo M. Frank when he faces a jury probably a week from next Monday. The present Grand Jury has
01:04not been called together since its organization several weeks ago, but it is known that a number
01:09of its members think that despite the attitude of the solicitor, a meeting should be called, and the
01:14evidence against Conley, including the confessions of complicity, submitted for the jury's consideration.
01:20It is said that the indictment of Conley as a principal would seriously injure the state's case against
01:25Frank, and Solicitor Dorsey is naturally opposing every move in that direction, certain to consider
01:31case. The present Grand Jury was organized early in July, but since the organization meeting its
01:37members have never been called together. In the past, the majority of Grand Juries have met weekly.
01:42Further still, it is known that the present Grand Jury will hold no meeting unless the call originates
01:47with the members, and if it does, it is practically certain that the Conley matter will be considered.
01:52Should the Grand Jury meet and indict the Negro sweeper over the direct and vigorous protest of
01:58the solicitor, it will break a long-established precedent in the county. While the Grand Jury has
02:03full authority, without even consulting the solicitor, to call a meeting and indict the Negro,
02:09the Solicitor General's wishes in regard to criminal cases have been respected in the past.
02:13However, there is said to be such a sentiment in the Grand Jury that its members should consider
02:18the Conley case that the calling of a special meeting for that purpose is a strong probability,
02:23sufficient evidence. A very significant point showing the solicitor's attitude is the fact
02:29that he has not called a meeting of the jury and is not expected to call one until after the
02:33Frank
02:34case has been called for trial. Following the trial of the Frank case, the indictment of Conley,
02:39either as an accessory or as a principle, is certain. After the Frank trial, the Solicitor himself
02:45will present the case against the Negro to the Grand Jury. There is no question about the fact
02:50that there is now sufficient evidence against Conley for the Grand Jury to indict him. It can be shown
02:55that he was in the factory on the day Mary Fagan was killed, and his admissions of complicity to the
03:00detectives and his alleged admission of the crime to W. H. Mincy would be sufficient to warrant a bill.