Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 months ago
Wednesday, July 16, 1913

State Has No Intention of Changing Plan of Action in Phagan Case.

The declaration of W.D. Beattie, foreman of the grand jury, that the grand jury had no intention of taking steps to indict James Conley, and a statement from Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey that as far as he was concerned the state would continue its present plan of action in regard to the Mary Phagan murder, apparently put a block to the rumor that the grand jury would go over the solicitor's head and indict the negro sweeper for murder.

The same rumor was put into circulation in regard to the former grand jury which served during the May term, but nothing ever came of the reporta [sic].

Solicitor Dorsey stated positively that he had no intention of shifting the present plan and would continue to prosecute on the indictment returned against Leo M. Frank by the previous grand jury. Newport Lanford, chief of detectives, also declared that as far as the detective department was concerned that there would be no shift.

It apparently means that the state will continue an even course in the matter with the intention of threshing out the matter of the guilt of Superintendent Frank before taking up the question of the guilt of the negro.

It was rumored Wednesday that the solicitor had given Conley another grilling with a view to extracting further statements from him in regard to the case. He declined to discuss this feature of the case and also refused to state anything further in regard to the Mincey affidavit.

Should the solicitor in the week and a half left before the Frank trial obtain a confession from Conley or secure evidence from another source that would brand him as the guilty party that would, of course, change the entire affair.
Transcript
00:00No new indictment, says jury foreman. The Atlanta Constitution, Wednesday, July 16, 1913. State has no intention of changing plan
00:08of action in Fagan case.
00:09The declaration of W.D. Beatty, foreman of the grand jury, that the grand jury had no intention of taking
00:15steps to indict James Conley,
00:17and a statement from Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey that as far as he was concerned, the state would continue
00:23its present plan of action in regard to the Mary Fagan murder,
00:27apparently put a block to the rumor that the grand jury would go over the solicitor's head and indict the
00:32Negro sweeper for murder.
00:34The same rumor was put into circulation in regard to the former grand jury which served during the May term,
00:40but nothing ever came of the reporter.
00:42Solicitor Dorsey stated positively that he had no intention of shifting the present plan and would continue to prosecute on
00:49the indictment returned against Leo M. Frank by the previous grand jury,
00:53Newport-Lanford, chief of detectives, also declared that as far as the detective department was concerned, that there would be
01:00no shift.
01:01It apparently means that the state will continue an even course in the matter with the intention of threshing out
01:07the matter of the guilt of Superintendent Frank
01:09before taking up the question of the guilt of the Negro.
01:12It was rumored Wednesday that the solicitor had given Conley another grilling, with a view to extracting further statements from
01:20him in regard to the case.
01:22He declined to discuss this feature of the case, and also refused to state anything further in regard to the
01:28Mincy affidavit.
01:29Should the solicitor in the week and a half left before the Frank trial obtain a confession from Conley,
01:35or secure evidence from another source that would brand him as the guilty party that would, of course, change the
01:41entire affair?
01:41Let's go.
01:42All right.

Recommended