Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Tuesday, July 1, 1913

Grand Jury Reported as Seriously Considering Connection of Negro With the Crime.

A well founded rumor Tuesday was to the effect that the Grand Jury had Jim Conley's connection with the Mary Phagan murder mystery under serious consideration with a view of finding an indictment against the negro on the charge of causing the death of the little factory girl.

Announcement was made after the close of Tuesday's session that the present Grand Jury would hold its last session Wednesday, and it was reported that if action were not taken on Conley's case before adjournment, recommendations would be left with the next Grand Jury suggesting that the negro's connection with the crime be rigidly investigated.

If the indictment is returned against the negro it will mean that he will be taken from the custody of the detectives and placed in the Tower. He also will bear a different relation to the case in the future, being a defendant instead of a material witness. Attorneys interested in the case said they had heard nothing of the proposed action by the Grand Jury.

Rumors that Newt Lee, negro night watchman at the National Pencil factory, had made sensational disclosures to his attorney, Bernard L. Chappell, and would be one of the State's most important witnesses in the trial of Leo M. Frank, were set at rest Tuesday by Mr. Chappell.

The negro's attorney said after the inquest that he would make no effort to procure the release of Lee, as he believed his client was a vital witness and it would be the wisest plan for him to remain in the protection of the State.

His statements at this time and up to the date of the indictment found against Frank led to the impression that Lee had confided in his lawyer significant circumstances, which he has told neither to the detectives nor to the members of the Coroner's jury.

Denies Confession Reports.

Mr. Chappell said Tuesday, however, that Lee had told nothing which had not already been published in the newspapers and that he was absolutely certain that the negro had been holding back nothing. The attorney said that until Conley had made his string of affidavits for the detectives he had regarded Lee as one of the most important witnesses the State could produce.

Conley's entrance into the case, he thought, changed the whole aspect of the mystery and largely eliminated the importance of Lee's testimony for the reason that its significance on the assumption that Frank was the only person having the opportunity to commit the crime was lost when it became known that Conley also was in the factory and acting suspiciously near the time it is thought the girl was murdered.
Transcript
00:00May indict Conley as Slayer. The Atlanta Georgian, Tuesday, July 1, 1913. Grand Jury reported as
00:06seriously considering connection of Negro with the crime. A well-founded rumor Tuesday was to
00:11the effect that the Grand Jury had Jim Conley's connection with the Mary Fagan murder mystery
00:15under serious consideration with a view of finding an indictment against the Negro
00:19on the charge of causing the death of the little factory girl. Announcement was made after the
00:25close of Tuesday's session that the present Grand Jury would hold its last session Wednesday,
00:30and it was reported that if action were not taken on Conley's case before adjournment,
00:34recommendations would be left with the next Grand Jury suggesting that the Negro's connection
00:38with the crime be rigidly investigated. If the indictment is returned against the Negro,
00:44it will mean that he will be taken from the custody of the detectives and placed in the tower.
00:49He also will bear a different relation to the case in the future, being a defendant instead of a
00:54material witness. Attorneys interested in the case said they had heard nothing of the proposed action
01:00by the Grand Jury. Rumors that Newt Lee, Negro night watchman at the National Pencil Factory,
01:06had made sensational disclosures to his attorney, Bernard L. Chappell, and would be one of the
01:12state's most important witnesses in the trial of Leo M. Frank, were set at rest Tuesday by Mr. Chappell.
01:18The Negro's attorney said after the inquest that he would make no effort to procure the release of Lee,
01:23as he believed his client was a vital witness, and it would be the wisest plan for him to remain
01:28in
01:28the protection of the state. His statements at this time and up to the date of the indictment
01:33found against Frank led to the impression that Lee had confided in his lawyer significant
01:38circumstances, which he has told neither to the detectives nor to the members of the coroner's
01:43jury, denies confession reports. Mr. Chappell said Tuesday, however, that Lee had told nothing which
01:49had not already been published in the newspapers, and that he was absolutely certain that the Negro
01:54had been holding back nothing. The attorney said that until Conley had made his string of affidavits
01:59for the detectives, he had regarded Lee as one of the most important witnesses the state could produce.
02:05Conley's entrance into the case, he thought, changed the whole aspect of the mystery, and largely
02:11eliminated the importance of Lee's testimony, for the reason that its significance on the assumption
02:16that Frank was the only person having the opportunity to commit the crime, was lost when it became
02:21known that Conley also was in the factory, and acting suspiciously near the time it is thought the
02:27girl was murdered. Lee's testimony still remains valuable in the eyes of the attorneys for the
02:32prosecution, and the night watchman will be called to add to the long string of circumstantial
02:37evidence that will be produced by the state. Solicitor Dorsey regards as highly significant the Negro's
02:43story of what happened the Saturday afternoon of the murder. Two sides a phone incident. One of the
02:48circumstances that the state considers suspicious is that Newt Lee found the door leading from the
02:53second floor down to the first closed and locked. It had been his experience, he has testified, that
02:59Frank, when in the E building alone, would lock the street door, but leave the door between the two
03:05floors wide open. Lee said that he went to Frank's office, and that the factory superintendent was
03:10rubbing his hands in a nervous manner. Another feature of his testimony was that Frank called
03:15him up in the evening, something he, Lee's evidence, in Frank's case, discounted, attorney denies
03:20confession, asserts, Conley affidavits, put the watchman in background. Continued from page one.
03:26Never had done before. While the prosecution will lay great weight on this testimony, the defense will
03:32seek to show that it is entirely without significance. Admitting that Frank never called Lee before in the
03:38evening, Frank's attorneys will present evidence to show that he had called repeatedly when the
03:43former night watchman was employed at the factory, and that he was led to call the night of April 26th,
03:49because a discharged employee, J. M. Gant, had been in the factory, and he wished to make certain
03:55that Gant had left. Those concerned in the trial of Frank are awaiting with interest the outcome of the
04:01fight over the subpenas duces tecum issued by the defense. The state has announced that it will
04:06combat the enforcement of these subpenas and has branded them as a subterfuge of Frank's lawyers
04:11to discredit the witnesses introduced by the prosecution. If the state fails, it will have
04:16to produce in court all of the affidavits and statements made by its principal witnesses.
04:21The defense will be able to use these to make a close comparison of the oral testimony with that
04:26which was sworn to weeks before. In the event that any of the witnesses give testimony in any respect
04:32contradictory to the statements in their affidavits, the defense will be in a position
04:37to impeach and discredit their testimony. Solicitor Dorsey and attorney Frank A. Hooper have
04:42characterized this as trickery on the part of the defense, and have announced that they do not
04:47propose to submit their mass of affidavits for the use of the defense, if the law will protect them
04:53in the matter.
Comments

Recommended