Skip to playerSkip to main content
To mark International Youth Day, tonight we’re looking at how young people are confronting one of the biggest changes to the future of education and work: Artificial Intelligence. Students at University of Nottingham Malaysia (UNM) have produced Southeast Asia’s first student-written AI manifesto, titled ‘While the Machine Learns: A Manifesto on AI Education’ which allows some insight into what young people think the future of learning should look like. On this episode of #ConsiderThis Melisa Idris speaks with Kristin Tan Kai Yen, Outreach Ambassador, 'While The Machine Learns: A Manifesto on AI Education', UNM & Yukthamugi Kandasamy, Campus Ambassador, 'While The Machine Learns: A Manifesto on AI Education', UNM.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:10Hello and good evening, I'm Melissa Idris. Welcome to Consider This. This is the show
00:15where we want you to consider and reconsider what you know of the news of the day. To mark
00:19International Youth Day, tonight we're looking at how young people are confronting one of
00:25the biggest changes to the future of education and work, which is of course AI. Students at
00:32University of Nottingham Malaysia have produced Southeast Asia's very first student written AI
00:37manifesto. It's titled, While the Machine Learns, a manifesto on AI education. And it hopefully will
00:45give us some insight into what young people think is the future of learning in tertiary education.
00:52So joining me on the show, I have with me from University of Nottingham Malaysia, Christine
00:58Tan Kayan and Yukta Mugi Kandasami. Welcome to the show both of you. Thank you so much for
01:03being here. So what a beautiful manifesto. It looks a little bit like a vinyl when I first
01:08saw it. I'm so curious to know how this project came about. And Yukta, if I may begin with
01:13you, maybe you can take us to the very beginning. How did this manifesto project come to life?
01:19Yeah. So firstly, it all began with a module called Writing for the Media. And our convener
01:26is Dr. Ahmad Fuad. And we also had formal partnerships with Cellcom Digi, journalist Raina Lam, as well
01:37as Trapper Group. And so actually this manifesto, as we mentioned, it is a manifesto for AI in education.
01:45And it has 15 principles in it, each tracing back to a real student project. And this was
01:52a two-fold assignment where AI was both the strategic analyst and the object of critique.
01:59So firstly, we would share our ideas, like what is our project about, give some context behind it. And
02:05then we would ask it to play devil's advocate, to highlight what's good, what's bad, what could be
02:13improved on. And at the same time, we would look, and at the same time, it would also be the
02:19object
02:21of critique. So what we would do is that we would interrogate it and break down the machine to come
02:26up
02:26with an investigative narrative on a daily aspect in terms of AI. So that would include context, truth,
02:35agency, authorship, choice, etc. So we have plenty to choose from. And so what came from that is that
02:43we found that, you know, we came up with creative and compelling narratives for the public. So what we did
02:52was each group came up with about three to five Instagram reels. The total runtime was under 10
02:59minutes. We had to get familiar with audience engagement. And also we felt that we were more
03:06confident in demystifying new tech practices. So yeah, sounds good. Okay, I'm going to bring Christine
03:13into this conversation. So this was kind of a collective group project. Talk to me about the kind of central
03:20question you wanted to answer because I think that the premise of it of understanding what AI can and
03:27cannot do and what we we can and cannot achieve with AI was quite interesting. Tell me more about it.
03:32Yeah, so this manifesto basically begs the question, how can we learn with AI without losing what makes
03:37us human? Right, because I think when AI entered the educational space, students adopted it quite rampantly
03:45because we realised that, wow, we can do our assignments for us so quickly. Yeah. But I think the
03:49question became, okay, if AI can do our assignments for us, what does that mean? What does that say about
03:55our education? What was our education teaching us in the first place? So I think that's what this
04:00whole manifesto was. Can I ask both of you, when did you first become aware of how AI could help
04:07in your
04:08life? When did you first both start using AI? Do you remember when? Were you in university at the time?
04:14Yes. You were already in university? Yes. I think maybe ChatGPT was starting to get really popular,
04:22like during my foundation days. Okay. But I actually did not know that, I actually did not understand or
04:30know like how powerful it actually was. Like I would see my friends like, we would just use it to,
04:35um, oh, like plan my day for me. Just like stupid questions. Just for fun, without realising how
04:44powerful it is. That's actually interesting because it means that your cohort actually came into university
04:50with these tools, right? You're the first kind of test case of how AI can fit into education. When you
04:57spoke to your colleagues and working, your cohort working in these, on this project, what is it they tell
05:03you? How do students use AI? How did your peers, your friends use AI? I mean, yes, planning the day
05:09was one thing, but are there other uses of AI that you surprised you that you didn't realise that people
05:16used it for? I think the use of AI among students depends on what faculty they are in. Because it's
05:22definitely, I think as we are humanity students, we do international communications, we also do a lot of
05:27writing. So I think for us, we definitely felt like, okay, if we could use AI to write for us,
05:32but that's essentially, that's primarily our task. What does that say about us as writers then,
05:38if AI can write so eloquently or seemingly eloquently? And in seconds and minutes, right?
05:43But I think people who are in, I think those who are in comm science, they definitely use it as
05:48like
05:48a quick fix. Like, wow, it's so easy now to do my assignments. But I think one of the things
05:55students
05:55actually feel is this sense of ambivalence. So that means actually we have this like love and hate
06:00relationship with it. Like on one hand, it's so convenient, it's efficient. On another hand,
06:06we feel like by outsourcing our skill and cognition to it, we actually don't gain much
06:13value from our education. And then there is also this unsettling feeling of people telling us that
06:19AI is going to enter the workforce. And if we are not, if we don't know how to use it
06:25well,
06:25we will be left behind. Right. Like, right. Yeah. There's a lot of that fear mongering,
06:29that alarmist narrative. Yeah. Because fresh graduates are one of the groups of people that
06:35are quite affected by the adoption of AI into workplaces. Yeah. Absolutely. I love the description
06:40of a love-hate relationship. Is that how you feel, Yuta? Yeah. Actually, like, I think for me,
06:51How do you feel about it? Do you have that same tension of, I like the ease of it, but
06:57I also
06:58am scared of the dependence on that? What was some of the things that surprised you
07:02when you were working on this manifesto? I think when, especially before working on this manifesto,
07:09I think I was more like, I felt whatever with it. Like, it's ambivalent, right? Ambivalent.
07:14I was like, okay, whatever, like, it's just this thing. I don't even use it like that. So,
07:19but then when, and I personally don't really use AI that much. Okay. So, but then because we had to
07:27actually use it for our assignment and everything, I was actually surprised by how
07:35some people use, actually use AI, you know, because like, in my group, it's either we don't use it at
07:41all, or there's people that use it every day, all the time for everything, including the assignments
07:46and everything. So, one of the things that surprised me about when I talk to young people is how much
07:51they incorporate AI in, they're almost like a counsellor, almost like checking in with AI about
07:58decisions, about friendships and relationships. And that was an aspect that was, for me, kind of
08:05new. I hadn't considered, I thought AI was very, or gen AI was very work-related in the workplace or
08:12to
08:12learn something new. So, one of the things that I also really like about the way you approach this
08:17project was, you called it an AI autopsy, right? So, you talked about AI was the object of critique.
08:24Let's talk a little bit about that, about what you discovered as students, the flaws of AI,
08:32what AI can and cannot do. Christine, if I may come to you. Yeah. So, I think I would like
08:37to expand a bit
08:38more on how Yukhtar explained to the module, but basically we were broken down into groups of like
08:43four and each of us tackled a different human value. So, for example, this group looked at authorship,
08:50another group looked at agency, truth, context, love, empathy. So, we definitely delved into the
08:57different ways that people can actually use gen AI. For example, one group actually looked into empathy
09:03and they told it through like a child's educational. So, how do you, how do you really wrestle with the
09:12machine? And you ask the questions, yes, when like people go to AI as a therapist, but what kind of
09:18empathy is actually, are you experiencing? Is it a true human connection? If it is, then what does that
09:23say about our human relationships? If not, what is it about us humans that AI actually cannot replace?
09:27What is it good at doing? But what can it not do that humans are really good at? So, actually,
09:35there was this article written, I think, in Numa online. She is actually a researcher at OpenAI and
09:45she talked about how ChatGPT can interpret your grief. As in, when you tell it, man, I like went
09:52through something really difficult. ChatGPT can seem understanding, can seem very empathetic,
09:59even more empathetic than a human at times. But what it cannot do is participate in your grief.
10:04It cannot sit with you as you lie awake at 3am fighting demons in your head. It cannot sit with
10:09you the way that a human can. So, I think being able to study it deeply and see these distinctions,
10:16I think, for me personally, it has helped me to be more confident in human, in what is inherently
10:23human, that AI. So, like, the idea of AI is replacing us, I know for a fact that it will
10:30not.
10:30Yeah, but I feel like, and that is the kind of confidence that I think my classmates and I have
10:35gained through a module like this. Oh, wonderful. So, the more you learn about it, the more you see
10:41what makes us human is quite irreplaceable, right? There were principles that you put forth as part
10:49of your manifesto. And I wanted to ask about that, if we may zoom in on some of the principles.
10:54So,
10:54the manifesto says AI education is critical, it's not just instrumental. And I'm curious to know what
10:59that means. Talk to me about that. What does AI education, what is it that you're hoping comes up from
11:07this manifesto? Yukta? I think when it comes in relation to that particular
11:15principle, I think what we were hoping for is that when we interrogate this machine or when we make any
11:22decisions really, the thing is, if we continue to use AI, we are actually outsourcing our cognition to
11:30this machine. And what that happens is that we actually trust the machine more and trust ourselves the
11:36less. And our critical thinking skills actually get weaker. And I also want to touch a bit upon
11:46epistemology as well. So, what that means is the study of how we know what is real and true. And
11:54so, for
11:55example, if we say, oh, yeah, a banana is yellow, we know that it is yellow, because we know that,
12:08okay, yellow is this colour. And we know that it's a banana. But if you tell, if you ask AI,
12:14like, oh,
12:14do you know what yellow is? It was a yeah, yeah, I know. But it's actually all pattern recognition,
12:20word recognition and everything. Because when you say banana, what usually comes before that,
12:26yellow. So, it's all just pattern recognition. It doesn't inherently know it, like intrinsically
12:31know it, right? It just learns from the data. And another thing as well, we actually talked about
12:39this before. But it's this thing called incidental learning. So, and that's actually what this
12:49manifesto is about. It's about a slow exploration, slow learning, where, for example, back then,
12:57when we wanted to gain knowledge, we would read books and actually let go through the whole thing.
13:03And then one thing would lead to another, because there's all these, all these concepts
13:07and ideas and theories, fall down rabbit holes. Yes. And so, and then we learn more. But now,
13:14when you use Google, what comes up is that Gemini summary, right? Yeah. And then,
13:18a lot of people just take the answer that it gives you, right? Without even clicking.
13:23They don't even click into the links and read for themselves to fact check. And so, you're just,
13:29and when you do that, you actually outsource your coordination and you don't trust yourself.
13:33You trust the machine's judgment. And so, our whole thing is to just come back and to recalibrate,
13:40really slow down and come back to trusting your true human instinct to your thinking.
13:47Yeah. I really like that, taking a kind of slower approach, right? We don't have to rush and skim
13:51through everything. So, so talk to me about this because you're, you're in university, you're essentially
13:56the first kind of cohort having to deal with this. Something you said a little bit earlier,
14:01Kristin, kind of piqued my interest. What is the role of a university education can be given in
14:09in the age of AI? If all this information is at your fingertips, if it's the easier way to just
14:17kind of get AI to do your assignments, what do young people see as the value of a university education
14:24today? Yeah. Actually, if I could answer through one of the student projects, which was, which was my
14:29student project, because we looked at authorship in educational spaces. So, who is the true author
14:34of your education, right? And for my project, we actually interviewed students in our university,
14:40asking them, um, is this the death of the university? Oh yeah. Wow. Like in the age of AI,
14:47right? Like, because the argument is that students really pay so much to go to uni. We pay so much
14:53in
14:53the hopes that we would gain a good education in order to get a higher paying job so that we
14:58could
14:59improve our standard of living, um, live the good life, whatever it is. But we feel that that dream is
15:04crumbling because we pay so much to go to uni. We learn these skills and we come out and we
15:08are rendered
15:09obsolete by, um, the rapid adoption of AI. Um, and many students actually feel like, um, they feel
15:17like you have to be able to use AI critically in order to be competitive in the workspace. Yet,
15:23they also feel uncomfortable with how much they are using it. Yeah. But I think, um, the conclusion of
15:30my group's argument, which is also, I would say, the soul of this manifesto is that, um, I think AI
15:36is
15:37just a light to expose the issues that are already there in university institutions because we see
15:43that universities unfortunately have become quite commercialized. They are businesses, um, but they
15:49are also quite fossilized in the sense that when changes happen, they are slow to respond just because
15:54of how big they are, right? Yeah. It's a huge organization. So what would you like to see? How would
15:59you
15:59like, um, universities to adapt to AI based on the projects and, and kind of putting together this
16:05manifesto? Clearly, I love that young people are taking, are speaking out about this because often
16:12what we hear, um, is how do universities adapt to it? How are, how are the faculty adapting to it?
16:19How,
16:20how's government adapting to AI? But you never really ask the people who are using it and who will be
16:26most affected by it. So Yolta, what would you like, how would you like universities to respond to this
16:33wonderful manifesto for AI education that you guys have put out? I think, um, in generally speaking,
16:39I feel that when people think about AI, they think about comp sci, like, uh, AI developing and all like
16:44that. But I think what people really miss out on is the human and ethical aspect of it. And I
16:50think,
16:50um, Nottingham, um, what they're doing is that, um, there is a PhD module called humanizing AI that will be
16:58taught by Professor Joanne, I think so. And so she'll be teaching this module. And then we have
17:03this module as well, right? Um, and next is module will be focusing more on discernment and judgment,
17:09I believe. So, um, it is, uh, I feel like, uh, at least Nottingham has been adapting, they are evolving,
17:17um, which is great to see. But I think, um, because we, we are the, uh, so to say customers,
17:25we are the paying, we are the ones paying for an education, I feel like, um, our, our student voices
17:33needs to be, um, uh, amplified for sure. Yes, for sure. Uh, and, um, we have been going around campus,
17:41uh, and then we have been sharing our manifestos, uh, to our professors, to management and everything,
17:47but I still think that we could be heard more. What are they telling you when you go around
17:54talking to people? Um, I guess I kind of on the, the tour circuit for what, what are you hearing
18:03from the people? What, what feedback have you heard from them? Right. So besides campus, besides, uh,
18:08doing the rounds on campus, we have also been meeting different parties, um, externally. So
18:12we've met like the Ministry of Higher Education. We spoke to the Deputy Minister YB Adam Ali. Actually,
18:17it was the first meeting that we had. And I think the reception was very encouraging because he said that
18:22the government obviously is thinking a lot about AI by 2030, we want to be an AI nation. I mean,
18:26the supplier, um, of AI services, but he did say that, I mean, I don't really want to put words
18:32in his
18:32mouth, but paraphrasing, um, that actually, uh, the philosophical human, um, side of the argument is
18:42not as, it's not really being discussed a lot. And especially from student voices. Yes. Um, and I think we
18:49spoke to, um, we also met with like YTL, AI labs because they're building the first, um, not the
18:56first, actually there are many, but they are building a Malaysian AI model. So I'm getting to
19:01talk to them and asking, what do they think about when they build, um, the model and telling them
19:06that actually this is what we students are thinking about. And we desire for our voices to have a place
19:11in this discussion. Yeah. Because I think a principle that we hold onto is the principle of subsidiarity,
19:17which was actually mentioned, um, by the Pope in his, in his encyclical. That's right. Yeah.
19:24He actually mentioned that, um, decisions need to be made closest as possible to the people who
19:29will be affected by it. Right. So we don't, we, as students, the party, one of the parties that are
19:33greatly affected by AI, we don't just want to sit back and wait for decisions to be made. We want
19:38to
19:38go to these people and say, Hey, we've thought about this. We've wrestled with it. We came up with our
19:42own arguments. We produced a manifesto, listen to our voice. We want us, we want to be able to
19:48be part of this discussion. Yeah. Have you encountered any, almost, um, pushback from
19:54this? Are there people who say, well, you know, again, that kind of ageism comes into play. What
19:58do young people know? And, uh, you know, what, what do you say to people who think that
20:04you're overstating the problem that you're like, you know, you're leaving, you're trying to adapt to
20:10a workplace that will, AI will be kind of integrated into, um, have there been any naysayers
20:17that you've encountered before? Um, I don't. Okay. So I think the reception has been quite
20:23good. They have been quite positive actually, but I think, uh, one stereotype that we get is that,
20:29oh, we're young, uh, we're, we're digital natives. So we're very good. We're very tech savvy and whatnot.
20:34And we're all like pro AI. We're for AI. Oh my God. We love AI. But actually, um, uh, like
20:42AI is
20:42making us dumber. Like we rely so much on it and stuff. Uh, I think this is what, uh, the,
20:48I think
20:48this is the narrative that, that has been going around. We actually had somebody that said like,
20:52oh, I'm actually quite surprised to see that, um, you know, like, uh, the youth these days, students
20:58these days are actually grappling with this question on AI. Oh, because they assumed that
21:03young people love AI and want to depend to their lives on AI. Is that the assumption?
21:09Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So that has been going, this narrative that has been going around,
21:12but actually I think like us producing this manifesto is, uh, an antithesis to that. Like,
21:17we have, but I have to say it's not anti AI either. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
21:24So, um, in kind of the kind of closing the time that we have left, can I ask the both
21:30of you,
21:30where do we go from here? What would you like to see happen next? All the work that has come.
21:34It's the first in Southeast Asia. I'm very proud of that for you, for your entire class. Uh, what would
21:41you like to see happen next? And for you personally, um, for young people out there who may be watching
21:48tonight, who may be also grappling with this love, hate relationship, this tension of, um, learning
21:55at a time of AI, what would you like to say? If I may begin with you, Yuta first. Um,
22:00I think firstly,
22:01um, we are very grateful with where, where we are at right now. Uh, we've gotten so many amazing
22:06opportunities, uh, especially, uh, from the Ministry of Higher Education. They've offered us an exclusive,
22:11uh, gallery exhibition at the parliament actually, um, which is amazing. Uh, they've also invited us
22:17to festival of ideas, um, to showcase our work in Putrajaya. Um, and then we're also, uh, we're also
22:27in talks with Pintar, uh, and they might, uh, be printing 10,000 copies of our manifesto for us. So
22:34we're actually very grateful for all this positive, um, feedback and everything. Um, but I think for me
22:41personally, um, I would like to see more students, uh, voice out, um, you know, be dissentful, you know,
22:51be more dissenting, speak out and come back to that true. Um, how do I say this? Like, uh, come
23:01back to
23:01yourself, trust your human instinct and whatnot. Um, yeah, that's basically. Yeah. If I can add on
23:09actually the offer from Pintar was quite unexpected because they actually read through our material,
23:15they loved it so much. They actually wanted to sign an MOU with us. Yeah. So that is kind of
23:19like
23:20in the talks to translate this document to Malay, because obviously we don't want this to just stay at
23:25our, like the university, Nottingham English level. Sure. So it will be translated and they would also want
23:30print it out and roll out pilot projects actually in different states across Malaysia. So I think
23:35that's very exciting because I think we would want, um, not just university students, but this is also
23:41affecting secondary school students, primary school students. How are they grappling with it? Because I
23:45think as uni students, well, we've went through some degree of education where we didn't have AI. So
23:51critical thinking, judgment, all these things, we already have some of those things, which helps us.
23:56But I really wonder for a generation that is born into a world where AI is the norm,
24:01how are they going to build those skills? Um, so I think, yeah, really excited for the next few steps
24:06that we have. But for me personally, um, I think I would really hope for more people to feel encouraged
24:17and not disheartened because I think the idea, the narrative that AI is inevitable is actually false.
24:23It is not true because every technological progression happens because decisions were made
24:29by people with power, with the resources, and they decided to invest in this thing. That's how AI began.
24:35So I would encourage people not to feel powerless, as powerless as you may feel. Um,
24:41but to really grapple with it. And I think when you go through a module like this and you realize
24:47what is it inherently about you as a person that is irreplaceable, I think it's, um, a very empowering
24:53feeling. It has been for me and I will hope for people. It's confidence building, right? Wonderful.
24:57Thank you both for coming on and telling us about this project. I appreciate your time. Thank you.
25:01Thank you so much. That's all the time we have for you on this episode of Consider This.
25:05I'm Melissa Idris signing off for the evening. Thank you so much for watching. Good night.
Comments

Recommended