Skip to playerSkip to main content
The 13th Malaysia Plan, which is the Government’s blueprint for national development over the next five years, was unveiled last week. Among its many ambitions are efforts to strengthen the education system and develop a future-ready workforce. But do the policies go far enough to ensure Malaysia’s human capital is fit for 2030 and beyond? On this episode of #ConsiderThis Melisa Idris speaks with Professor Moses Samuel, Senior Research Fellow with the School of Education at Taylor's University, and Honorary Professor at Universiti Malaya’s Faculty of Education.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Hi, welcome back to Consider This. I'm Melissa Idris. Let's continue our discussion about the
00:1513th Malaysia Plan, which was tabled in Parliament last week. We're zooming in on the policy roadmap
00:22that's been outlined specifically for education and human capital development. Joining me on the
00:28show now is Professor Moses Samuel, who's Senior Research Fellow with the School of Education at
00:32Taylor's University. He's also an Honorary Professor at University of Malaysia's Faculty of Education.
00:39Prof Moses, thank you so much for being on the show with me today. Was there anything in the
00:4313th Malaysia Plan that you thought might be a game changer for education and for building
00:49Malaysia's human capital? Well, I want to step back a little bit. And I think when we look at
00:55Malaysia plans, we must realize they are five year plans. And they were built on the old Soviet
01:01style development plans. That's good in a sense, because it offers a medium term or slightly long
01:09term perspective. What it doesn't do is it doesn't because of the time span, it doesn't deal with
01:21mid-flight changes. You know, I'm thinking of an analogy of an aeroplane that's flying to a destination.
01:28There are mid-flight changes that you take to deal with turbulences and so on. And this is especially
01:36critical now, because we're dealing with a period of uncertainty, economic uncertainty, on the one hand,
01:45and also technological change, which is happening so fast, you can't predict what's going to happen in
01:51five years. Two years might be a more realistic target. And especially when technology seems to be
02:01part of the education, part of the blueprints. I think this is something that we need to take into
02:07account, especially when you're dealing with the training of teachers. So in a period of rapid change
02:14all around, I think the five-year targets are good. But there must also be, well, planners need to take
02:23cognizance of how you can tweak and monitor what's going on. That's my take on Malaysia plans.
02:34Right. You're right. It is kind of a long period for something as quickly evolving as the education
02:47system. Can we talk a little bit about some of the things that the plan got right in terms of its
02:54vision for the education system of Malaysia over the five years? Was there anything that you thought
03:00really stood out to you in saying, okay, it's good that we've got this on the table now,
03:04that we're thinking about these issues? Well, one of the things I think that the plan is trying to
03:11address is access to education right throughout the system. And I like the systemic kind of an approach,
03:19making sure people have a head start in education with early childhood education,
03:25specific sectors like the Orang Asli, you know, rural schools, rural teachers. So I think in a sense,
03:37it's got the access dimension right. I mean, it's good to focus on it. Of course, the challenges are in
03:43terms of the granularity, how it's implemented. Yeah. So I think that's one challenge that is obvious.
03:54It alludes to a number of things, the emphasis on looking at professional development of teachers,
04:02that is alluded to in the plan, without details being fleshed out. We're also seeing emphasis on
04:11preschool education, you know, starting at the age of five, the emphasis on AI, which is new in terms of
04:22curriculum. The emphasis on STEM, the emphasis on multiple languages in primary school. So a number of
04:31things they have touched the right buttons, I would put it that way. Having said that, I think the devil is
04:40always in the details in terms of how it's implemented, how it's carried out, how it's operationalized on the
04:46ground. So I'm happy that at least there is acknowledgement of important areas that we need to work on.
04:55And of course, I'm cautiously optimistic about how the program is going to play out in the next five years.
05:04So how do you think this might fit into, because we're also expecting a new education blueprint,
05:11which is a longer term blueprint. How, as you said, the devil is in the details, but how do you think that,
05:19or what do you think the blueprint ought to be, ought to flash these buttons out, do you think?
05:30Well, two broad areas. One is the school system, from kindergarten right through form five SPM.
05:39And also there's the higher education sector, which is also referred to.
05:44Um, as far as the school level is concerned, I think, um, what we will hope to see now is how teachers
05:54are empowered and provided agency to deal with many of the challenges that are, in a sense, new in a
06:01changing environment. How do you deal with artificial intelligence? Uh, how do you deal with, um, preschool
06:10education? Um, you know, so it's, it's a question of teacher preparedness and continuous professional
06:16development. I think that is something that we're going to expect right through the school system.
06:21Right. Yeah. Okay. You mentioned higher education, um, and the 13th Malaysia Plan also talks about
06:28reforms for tertiary education in terms of, um, the ministry's portfolio, kind of the segregation or
06:35demarcation of that. Also talked a little bit about piloting autonomy for public universities,
06:41um, and also improving global competitiveness. Can I ask you, Professor Moses, what you think,
06:46whether you think those are the right, um, buttons to hit? Uh, yeah. Do you think these changes are
06:53going to be sufficient to address some of the structural issues that we know plague the higher education system?
06:59Well, it's a good first step, I think, to recognize this. Um, I think these are issues that were even
07:06highlighted in the previous higher education blueprint, but there remain a lot of issues even
07:11from that blueprint to now where we're at. And the first issue I can think of is governance issues in
07:19terms of higher ed. Um, there needs to be clear demarcation between the roles of the ministry of higher
07:28education and the emerging autonomous universities. There seems to be a role overlap. Um, and I can
07:38understand why this is so because public universities, for example, are funded by public funds. Um, and
07:45therefore, um, the ministry of higher education often gets to call the shots because they are,
07:51uh, they hold the purse strings, you know, um, and incidentally, this might result in political
07:59interference in terms of shaping the cost of higher education. Um, so I think that's one issue that has
08:06to be ironed out, uh, to reduce the kind of overlaps and to see what autonomy really means, um, and how that
08:15autonomy actually is tied to the national agenda, the national development agenda. I mean, that's one of
08:23the things about public universities, especially at the undergrad level where you're providing human
08:29capital development for the population. And, um, it has to be tied very closely to emerging sectors of
08:38growth and how it serves the national agenda while at the same time contributing to scholarship,
08:43international scholarship, you know, however that may take us. So it's a question of, um,
08:50deciding to strike a balance between these two things.
08:53Right. That's really interesting. Can you talk to me more about that? Because when we look at, um,
08:59a roadmap for developing Malaysia's human capital, if that is the goal, then what's missing from this
09:06broader vision? I'm just wondering whether, like you said, uh, are we aligned with some, the,
09:11the, the, the shifts that may happen during this time, jobs that may not even exist yet? Uh, are we looking
09:18at it as a whole of government approach or is this solely resting on the shoulders of higher education, uh,
09:26or, you know, and universities?
09:27Yeah. Um, couple of issues there. One of course is, um, whether the graduates that come out of the higher ed system,
09:37uh, fit into the emerging workplace. Uh, there's been a recent report, um, by Kazana,
09:45a report that's called Shifting Tides, which shows that many graduates who are coming out of the system
09:52are starting with very low salaries. You know, um, I was looking at the statistics, 66% earned below
10:002000, this was 2021 figures, uh, 10% earn over 3000. Um, so they're under, underemployed and very often
10:11there isn't a fit between the kind of specializations that they have developed and the kind of work that
10:16they're doing. Um, and these things haven't changed in the last decade, haven't changed very much in the
10:22last decade. So the system needs to sort of respond so that graduates are future ready. Graduates are
10:30ready for the new workplace. Um, and that's changing very fast, you know? Um, so that's one, one area
10:37that needs to be looked at. There are many things that higher ed can do, um, exploring internships, for
10:43example, um, looking at different kinds of systems, looking at TVET related higher ed. Um, TVET very
10:52often is, uh, a second option, uh, or it's perceived that way, at least in the public, uh, public size.
10:59So the question of how higher education might have a vocational focus, um, for TVET as well,
11:08so that there isn't this kind of two tier system. Um, and that requires different universities with
11:15different strengths and different specializations to deal with it on, on their own terms. You know,
11:23um, I think the big picture from MOHI might be a guiding, might provide guiding light, but I think
11:30universities with their academics, with their different areas of specializations, all universities
11:36don't have to be the same. They have different strengths. You know, I mean, we tend to think in
11:40terms of, uh, monitoring things so that it's one size fits all. I mean, each university can develop
11:45their own strengths, you know, either in applied sciences or the social sciences or whatever issues
11:51they're dealing with, um, based on the staff that they have developed, both the local and international
11:58staff. So staff develop expertise in terms of research. Um, and I think that's one thing that can be
12:05done. So it's, one is the fit employability, the fit to the real workplace. The other issue I can see
12:13emerging in higher ed is the kind of gulf that's emerging between research universities and teaching
12:22universities. And I think research is very often interest, concerned about advancing the frontiers of
12:30knowledge. But a lot of those, a lot of the work that's done in research can actually dovetail with
12:38more teaching universities. And I think what we can see is more collaborations, um, not coordinated from
12:45the top. I mean, I, sometimes we might expect a hidden hand to, to manage it, but I think developing it in
12:51terms of, you know, ways in which the research agendas of the universities can actually drive the teaching
12:57agenda so that teaching universities also benefit from the research as consumers, not necessarily as
13:04producers, but also as consumers of this research.
13:07Very interesting points that you've given us to think about tonight. Uh, Prof, thank you so much for
13:13sharing some of your insights with us. Educationist Professor Moses Samuel from Taylor's University
13:18and University of Malaya. Wrapping up this episode of Consider This. I'm Melissa Idris,
13:23signing off for the evening. Thank you so much for watching and good luck.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended