Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 hours ago
The ACT integrity commission's findings of serious corrupt conduct by a former senior public servant and then-Deputy Chief Minister Yvette Berry's former chief of staff were a bombshell for the territory government. It's prompted generational change within ACT Labor with Ms Berry resigning to sit on the backbench Rachel Stephen-Smith elevated to the role of deputy and the promotion of first-term backbencher Caitlin Tough to the ministry. The opposition argues those changes will do little to change perceptions of government corruption. We sat down with Chief Minister Andrew Barr to ask whether he thinks those perceptions can be changed.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:01Chief Minister Andrew Barr, welcome to Stateline.
00:04Was the Government caught off guard by the Integrity Commission's report with findings
00:09of corrupt conduct against a former senior public servant and a ministerial staffer,
00:14or were the wheels already in motion for Yvette Berry to fall on her sword and for her to
00:18be replaced in Cabinet?
00:19Look, obviously the Integrity Commission process was an extended one with public hearings
00:26and then a range of reports back, I guess.
00:31We were aware from the Integrity Commissioners' statements in an estimate, an annual report
00:39hearing, that the report was likely to arrive in the middle of this year.
00:44So there was some understanding it was due, but you don't get much notice when the final
00:52report is released and that then required a response, obviously within 24 hours initially
01:00and then 72 hours later the Cabinet reshuffle.
01:04Were you surprised by the findings?
01:06Well, from the public evidence in the public hearings it was clear that there was an issue,
01:13but the extent of that only became clear with the final report.
01:19Has public trust, confidence in the Government been irrevocably damaged by this and can you repair it?
01:26Well, it's certainly a serious issue that has commanded both an Auditor-General's report
01:32and an Integrity Commission report, the resignation of the former Deputy Chief Minister and accountability
01:39across the public sector. We have in anticipation of this made a series of changes
01:47really following on from the Auditor-General's report several years ago in terms of how government
01:53procurement is undertaken. There have been other external events as well in relation to the CFMEU
02:01being placed in administration, that a part of a joined-up response that is both territory level
02:09and across the country. So I understand the seriousness of the issue has had political consequences
02:17and no doubt will into the future. All we can do now is address the systemic issues. We believe we
02:26have
02:26made significant reforms to ensure that something like this would not happen again, but we do
02:33acknowledge the seriousness of the matter and I think from the Government's response and the
02:38consequences for individuals that's quite clear. Given the findings of the Integrity Commission here,
02:43as well as some of the concerns we've seen raised in Victoria, do you think that unions and other
02:47interest groups have too much influence over Government decisions? Well, I think there needs to be an
02:53appropriate framework and we've sought to legislate one around important protections for the workforce
03:01and that is the principal role that that unions play in occupational health and safety for example,
03:07particularly in the construction sector. So ensuring that those who tender for Government work
03:13meet all of their legal requirements is an important part of a Government procurement system. There will
03:21always be external organisations who will seek to influence policy, seek to influence legislation,
03:31and you see that both from the trade union movement and from business organisations.
03:39It's perfectly within the realms of the role of the Master Builders Association,
03:45the Property Council and others to have a view on public policy questions here, just as unions have a legitimate
03:53right to have a say, but it must be within a legal framework and consistent with both Government procurement
04:01law and of course the Public Sector Management Act. It was clear from the Integrity Commission's report that
04:08they found breaches there. That's acknowledged, not dismissed and there have been consequences for those individuals.
04:17The Opposition says this report points to the Government being corrupt, the Government itself. What do you say to that?
04:22Well, the Integrity Commission was very clear in making no such findings against any politician and what I think
04:32is important out of all of this is a very clear message to ministers, to ministerial staff and to organisations
04:40who would seek to lobby ministers and ministerial staff that Government procurement decisions are not made
04:48by ministers or ministerial staff and that they appropriately sit at arm's length in a clear legal framework.
04:57And so the message on the ground of all of this is for everyone in the system who seeks to
05:05lobby,
05:06it's important that lobbying is declared, whether that's ministers or other members of parliament.
05:12And it's important that organisations understand that they can't influence individual procurement decisions.
05:19And that's an important guideline that really needs to be out there for everyone.
05:24Now, no findings against Yvette Berry in the report, but she still resigned.
05:28Is there a chance she could return to the Cabinet after a spell on the backbench as Suzanne Audie?
05:33Well, Minister, former Minister Berry took responsibility under the Ministerial Code of Conduct
05:40for the actions of her former staff member. That was quite clear in the Ministerial Code.
05:45That is part of the responsibilities of a minister. I don't believe Yvette Berry is looking to come back
05:54into the ministry anytime soon. There aren't any vacancies at this point. What happens in the future
06:02will be determined in the future. Ministers who have had a period out of Cabinet have come back in.
06:10That's a historical fact, both in our jurisdiction and elsewhere. But I wouldn't think it would be assumed
06:18that that would be the case, but nor would I assume that it would not be at any point in
06:22the future.
06:23On the future, is it a fate of company that Rachel Stephen-Smith becomes the next ACT Labor leader,
06:28if and when you leave the Assembly?
06:29Look, ultimately, the leadership of the Labor Party is a matter for caucus members to both nominate
06:38and determine. But we are lucky within our team to have a number of potential future leaders.
06:47And I'm sure when the time comes for me to retire from territory politics, that the Labor Party will be
06:56in safe hands into the future.
06:58Chief Minister Andrew Barr, thank you for your time.
Comments

Recommended