Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 18 hours ago
Thursday, June 5th, 1913

Utter repudiation of the affidavits which she was alleged to have sworn to incriminating conversations in the home of Leo M. Frank, indicted for the slaying of Mary Phagan, was made Thursday by Minola McKnight, negro cook for the accused factory superintendent and his wife's parents.

The woman denies absolutely every statement attributed to her by the police, and denies that she even signed the paper made public by the police.

The Georgian presented the McKnight affidavit to its readers with the distinct admonition that it must not be accepted as credible evidence until passed on in a court of law. The affidavit was so full of strange incoherencies and the need for some explanation was so apparent that a further investigation was decided upon.

The cook's statement, giving the case a new and startling turn, is therefore presented just as the police affidavit was—for what it is worth and not as evidence. It is an utter and absolute repudiation of the affidavit printed Wednesday and which purported to have been signed and sworn to by her.

She denied unequivocally that she had made the startling statements in the alleged affidavit which might send Leo Frank to the gallows could their truth be established beyond a doubt.

Repudiates Whole Affidavit.

She repudiated the alleged affidavit as a whole and in detail. She made her denials willingly and emphatically. There was no hesitation in her replies. Her first comment on the alleged affidavit constituted a complete and absolute denial of its truth.

Her statements were made at her home in the rear of 351 Pulliam Street. Only her husband, Albert McKnight, and the Georgian reporter were present. No member of the Frank family was about to influence her replies in any manner. If any influence could have been exerted it would be supposed to have been in the opposite direction, as it was her husband who was said indirectly to have furnished the information which resulted in her arrest and the three hours "third degree" in the office of Chief Lanford.

McKnight, however, furnished another sensation by declaring that he never had heard his wife say those things which he is reported to have told at the hardware shop of Beck & Gregg, and which resulted in her grilling.

Says She Had No Attorney.

The McKnight woman even went so far as to say that she had no attorney. Yet the affidavit she is alleged to have signed said:

"Q. You make it of your own free will and in the presence of Mr. Gordon, your attorney?

"A. Yes, sir."

To The Georgian, the McKnight woman declared that she did not know who Mr. Gordon was.

"I ain't got no lawyer, ‘cept God; He's my lawyer," she cried, raising her right hand toward heaven. "You jus' put that in the paper. You jus' tell them I ain't got no lawyer, ‘cept God."

"Did you sign any affidavit in the office of Chief Lanford?" was the first question that was asked the McKnight woman.

"No, sir, I never had a pen or pencil in my hand," she replied.
Transcript
00:00Cook repudiates entire affidavit police possess. Atlanta, Georgian, Thursday, June 5, 1913.
00:06Utter repudiation of the affidavits which she was alleged to have sworn to incriminating
00:11conversations in the home of Leo M. Frank, indicted for the slaying of Mary Fagan, was
00:16made Thursday by Manola McKnight, Negro Cook for the accused factory superintendent and his wife's
00:22parents. The woman denies absolutely every statement attributed to her by the police
00:27and denies that she even signed the paper made public by the police. The Georgian presented the
00:32McKnight affidavit to its readers with the distinct admonition that it must not be accepted as credible
00:38evidence until passed on in a court of law. The affidavit was so full of strange incoherencies
00:43and the need for some explanation was so apparent that a further investigation was decided upon.
00:49The Cook's statement, giving the case a new and startling turn, is therefore presented just as
00:54the police affidavit was, for what it is worth, and not as evidence. It is an utter and absolute
01:00repudiation of the affidavit printed Wednesday, and which purported to have been signed and sworn to
01:06by her. She denied unequivocally that she had made the startling statements in the alleged affidavit
01:11which might send Leo Frank to the gallows could their truth be established beyond a doubt.
01:16Repudiates Whole Affidavit. She repudiated the alleged affidavit as a whole, and in detail,
01:22she made her denials willingly and emphatically. There was no hesitation in her replies. Her first
01:28comment on the alleged affidavit constituted a complete and absolute denial of its truth.
01:33Her statements were made at her home in the rear of 351 Pulliam Street only. Her husband Albert
01:38McKnight and the Georgian reporter were present. No member of the Frank family was about to influence
01:43her replies in any manner. If any influence could have been exerted, it would be supposed to have
01:48been in the opposite direction, as it was her husband who was said indirectly to have furnished
01:53the information which resulted in her arrest, and the three hours third degree in the office
01:58of Chief Lanford. McKnight, however, furnished another sensation by declaring that he never
02:03had heard his wife say those things which he is reported to have told at the hardware shop of Beck
02:07and Gregg, and which resulted in her grilling, says she had no attorney. The McKnight woman even went so
02:13far as to say that she had no attorney, yet the affidavit she is alleged to have signed said,
02:18Q. You make it of your own free will, and in the presence of Mr. Gordon, your attorney?
02:23A. Yes, sir. To the Georgian, the McKnight woman declared that she did not know who Mr. Gordon was.
02:30I ain't got no lawyer, sep God. He's my lawyer, she cried, raising her right hand toward heaven.
02:35You just put that in the paper. You just tell them I ain't got no lawyer, sep God.
02:39Did you sign any affidavit in the office of Chief Lanford? was the first question that was asked
02:44the McKnight woman. No, sir, I never had a pen or pencil in my hand, she replied. Most all jack
02:49of
02:49lies. Have you read what this affidavit says as it was published in the papers? It was read to me.
02:55I can't read. Is there anything in there that you said? No, sir, it's most all a pack of lies.
03:01Where did they get all that stuff, then? I don't know, sir, I don't know.
03:05The remainder of her statement, in effect, was, I did not say that Frank was in the house only about
03:10ten minutes when he came home about one-thirty on the Saturday of the murder. I did not say that
03:15I understood that a girl and Mr. Frank were caught at the office Saturday. I did not say that I
03:20heard
03:20Miss Lucille, Mrs. Frank, say that Frank was drunk Saturday night and made her sleep on the floor.
03:25I did not say that I heard Miss Lucille tell her mother that Mr. Frank had said that he was
03:29in
03:30trouble and didn't know the reason why he would murder, and that he told his wife to get his
03:34pistol and let him kill himself. I didn't say they gave me extra money to keep me quiet. I didn't
03:39say
03:40that I made any affidavit in the presence of Mr. Gordon, my attorney. The strange turn that has been
03:45given by the McKnight woman's repudiation of the affidavit, and her declaration that she never even had a
03:51pen or pencil in her hand adds fresh mystery to the hunt the detectives are making after the slayer
03:56of Mary Fagan. Actions appeal peculiar. That the woman would make statements most damaging to Frank
04:02and then calmly return to his home to work is peculiar in itself. That she would make these
04:07statements and then, almost the moment she is at liberty, utterly repudiate them is still more
04:12inexplicable. Several explanations have been offered, but they are only guesses at the best.
04:17The implication contained in the McKnight woman's emphatic denial is that the testimony in the
04:22affidavit was manufactured by the detectives and not given by herself. It is regarded as unfair,
04:28however, to draw this inference, as it has to be taken in consideration that the McKnight woman is
04:33illiterate, and that there was great opportunity for misunderstanding and confusion. A still weightier
04:38consideration with others is contained in their declaration that there is no basis for the
04:43assumption that the detective force is after anyone but the guilty man or that they would frame
04:48evidence against any man. McKnight disavows all accusations. Another strange feature of this phase
04:55of the case is McKnight's sudden change of attitude, if change there actually has been. It was reported
05:01that McKnight had informed persons at the Beck and Gregg hardware store that his wife had told him of
05:05conversations between Mrs. Frank and her mother that strongly indicated Frank's guilt. To the
05:11George and McKnight said that he had done nothing of the kind. He declared that his wife never had
05:16told him that she overheard Mrs. Frank tell her mother that Frank had said that he was in trouble
05:20and didn't know the reason why he would murder. He was plied with questions as to other statements
05:26in the affidavit until he finally said, half angrily, I told you she ain't told me about anything at the
05:31Frank's house, nothing at all. Just wait till she comes and she can tell you everything she said in
05:36two minutes. The McKnight woman said that she only bore out Frank's own statements as to the
05:41approximate time that he arrived home Saturday afternoon and again in the evening.
Comments
VERDICT VOYAGER
Creator
#MurderofMaryPhagan

Recommended