Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 19 hours ago
The Judiciary has introduced new rules governing the use of generative artificial intelligence in court proceedings, making it clear that while AI can assist with some legal tasks, it cannot replace human judgment in the administration of justice.
Transcript
00:00The Judiciary of Trinidad and Tobago has issued a new practice direction governing the use
00:05of Generative Artificial Intelligence, or AI, in court proceedings.
00:10The directive issued by Chief Justice Ronnie Budusing took effect on July 8 and sets out
00:16rules for judges, attorneys, litigants, witnesses and other court users.
00:22Under the new guidelines, AI may be used for drafting and administrative tasks, but users
00:28must independently verify all facts, legal authorities and citations.
00:33The practice direction also prohibits the use of AI to generate evidence, including affidavits
00:39and witness statements, except for limited formatting or language assistance.
00:44Anyone using AI to prepare court documents must disclose that fact and certify that all
00:50legal references have been independently checked.
00:53The new rule comes just days after High Court Judge Justice Frank C. Persaud and his ruling
00:58dismissing the Hadid family's habeas corpus application challenging their detention under
01:04the state of emergency cautioned against the uncritical use of AI in legal proceedings.
01:12Justice C. Persaud noted that while AI can be a useful research tool, it should never replace
01:17careful legal analysis or independent judicial reasoning, underscoring the need for lawyers
01:23and judges to verify authorities and factual information before relying on them.
01:29Chief Justice Rani Budusing has echoed that approach, saying AI should not be deciding cases,
01:35but can assist courts by providing useful information to support human decision making.
01:41The practice direction also empowers courts to impose sanctions where AI is misused in legal proceedings.
Comments