Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 9 hours ago
Businessman Dominic Hadeed and his wife Genevieve Hadeed have filed an appeal against High Court Judge Justice Frank Seepersad's decision refusing their release from detention under the State of Emergency regulations.

The appeal challenges both the legality of their detention and the Judge's refusal to grant interim relief while their constitutional challenge proceeds. Urvashi Tiwari Roopnarine reports.
Transcript
00:00The legal battle over the detention of businessman Dominic Hadid and his wife Genevieve has now moved to the Court
00:07of Appeal.
00:08On Tuesday, the couple filed a procedural appeal seeking to overturn Justice Frank Cipersad's June 30 ruling,
00:15which dismissed their application for interim relief and refused to order their release from detention pending the hearing of their
00:23constitutional challenge.
00:25The appeal argues that the High Court placed insufficient weight on one of the most fundamental constitutional rights, personal liberty.
00:34Among the grounds of appeal, the Hadid's contend that Justice Cipersad erred in treating financial compensation as an adequate remedy.
00:43Their attorneys argue, quote,
00:45The continuing deprivation of liberty is the paradigm of irreparable harm.
00:50Liberty taken cannot afterwards be restored.
00:53The breach having occurred, it can never be undone, end quote.
00:58The appeal also claims the judge failed to properly consider alternatives to continued detention,
01:04including releasing the couple on conditions or placing them under house detention, supervised by the Trinidad and Tobago Police Service.
01:12The Hadid's are also challenging the judge's findings that their arrests and subsequent preventive detention orders were likely lawful,
01:21arguing the burden should have rested on the state to justify their continued detention.
01:27In one of the appeal's most serious allegations, the appellants contend Justice Cipersad failed to give adequate weight to evidence
01:35suggesting they were targeted for an improper purpose.
01:38The appeal states, quote,
01:40The executive detention of the claimants was for a declared improper purpose of retaliating against members of an ethnic minority
01:49who were believed to be supporters of the political opponents of the government, end quote.
01:54The appeal further argues the court failed to adequately consider allegations that the arrests, detention, and preventive detention orders were
02:04motivated by bad faith
02:05and political considerations, including statements made during the parliamentary debate on extending the state of emergency.
02:13The Hadid's are asking the court of appeal to urgently hear the matter before July 27th,
02:19set aside Justice Cipersad's ruling, and order their immediate release or alternatively permit their release
02:25under conditions or supervised detention at their private residence while the substantive constitutional challenge proceeds.
02:34Ravishi Tawari Rupnarein, TV6 News.
Comments

Recommended