- 22 hours ago
Watch The Rachel Maddow Show full episode – April 4, 2026 on MSNOW Breaking News Today.
Rachel Maddow delivers in-depth analysis of the most important political developments, White House updates, congressional investigations, national security briefings, and global affairs impacting the United States and the world. This episode features breaking political coverage, exclusive reporting, expert commentary, and detailed investigations into the biggest stories shaping American democracy.
In This Episode:
White House breaking developments
Congress and Senate investigations
Biden administration updates
U.S. national security briefing
Election 2026 coverage
Supreme Court legal analysis
Global political developments
Stay informed with trusted journalism from MSNOW.
Subscribe for daily breaking news, political analysis, and full episodes.
The Rachel Maddow Show full episode
MSNOW breaking news today
Rachel Maddow April 4 2026
MSNOW live today
White House breaking news
US politics today
Biden administration news
Congress breaking news
Supreme Court news
US election 2026
Breaking news USA
American politics today
#RachelMaddow #MSNBCBreakingNews #BreakingNews #USPolitics #WhiteHouseToday #PoliticsToday #AmericaNews #Election2026 #CongressNews #SupremeCourt
Rachel Maddow delivers in-depth analysis of the most important political developments, White House updates, congressional investigations, national security briefings, and global affairs impacting the United States and the world. This episode features breaking political coverage, exclusive reporting, expert commentary, and detailed investigations into the biggest stories shaping American democracy.
In This Episode:
White House breaking developments
Congress and Senate investigations
Biden administration updates
U.S. national security briefing
Election 2026 coverage
Supreme Court legal analysis
Global political developments
Stay informed with trusted journalism from MSNOW.
Subscribe for daily breaking news, political analysis, and full episodes.
The Rachel Maddow Show full episode
MSNOW breaking news today
Rachel Maddow April 4 2026
MSNOW live today
White House breaking news
US politics today
Biden administration news
Congress breaking news
Supreme Court news
US election 2026
Breaking news USA
American politics today
#RachelMaddow #MSNBCBreakingNews #BreakingNews #USPolitics #WhiteHouseToday #PoliticsToday #AmericaNews #Election2026 #CongressNews #SupremeCourt
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00And thanks to you at home for sticking with us for this hour. The president has a 33% approval
00:05rating and a 62% disapproval rating. The president is now sending American ground troops, thousands
00:12of them, and special forces as well to join his inexplicable war in Iran, which is now entering
00:19its second month. That war is even less popular than the president himself is, specifically the
00:26idea of U.S. troops having boots on the ground in that war. That is even less popular than the
00:32overall
00:33war. There is now a 10-foot-tall golden toilet on the National Mall at the Lincoln Memorial.
00:40It says, quote, a throne fit for a king. In a time of unprecedented division, escalating conflict,
00:46and economic turmoil, President Donald Trump focused on what truly mattered, remodeling the
00:51Lincoln bathroom in the White House. The plaque next to the 10-foot-tall gold toilet says Trump
00:56is, quote, an unwavering visionary who looked down, saw a problem, and painted it gold.
01:04The gold toilet president this weekend was also the target of one of the largest
01:08single-day nationwide demonstrations in American history. Organizers say more than 8 million
01:16Americans protested against President Donald Trump this weekend. These were the third
01:22no-kings protests against Donald Trump in 10 months. And there were more than 3,000 separate
01:29protests all over the country, which, if I went one by one, it's too many for me to show you
01:34all in
01:34one sitting. But, you know, the organizers in advance of this weekend's protests had said
01:39that they were noticing a little bit of a theme, sort of a trend. They were noticing not only that
01:45there
01:45were going to be more no-kings protests against Trump in more places than there ever had been
01:52before. But they said specifically they'd noticed kind of a red state spring happening. More sign-ups,
02:01more planned protests against Trump in red states. And in places specifically, even within red states,
02:07that voted for Trump. They had said to expect that based on what they'd seen from sign-ups. And then
02:13that's what happened this weekend. Look, this is what no-kings protests looked like this weekend
02:17in northern Alabama, in Huntsville, Alabama, also in red state Alaska, in Anchorage, in the villages
02:24in Florida, which is the biggest retirement community in the country. It's famously a nest of
02:30Republican votes for Republican politicians. But this was the villages' huge no-kings anti-Trump
02:36protest this weekend. Also check out Jonesboro, Arkansas. The county where Jonesboro, Arkansas is,
02:42Trump won that in 2024 by a 37-point margin. But now look, this weekend, Jonesboro, Arkansas is
02:50no-kings. This is Nebraska. Hastings, Nebraska, up there in the upper left. Adams County is where
02:59Hastings, Nebraska is. Trump won there in the last election by 40 points. But now here's Hastings,
03:05Nebraska, no-kings. Look at North Dakota. In the last election, Trump won that state by the largest
03:11margin in that state in a presidential election in more than 70 years. But you're looking in the
03:16upper right there, you're looking at Minot, North Dakota, where Trump won by nearly 50 points.
03:22Well, yeah, that was then. This was Minot, North Dakota this weekend. No kings. This is not some,
03:28you know, caricature of liberal America. Lower left there, that's Topeka, Kansas. Lower right there,
03:34that's Rapid City, South Dakota this weekend. I mean, behold, famously liberal Wyoming. Lower
03:42left there. Wyomingnews.com says there were at least 20 different no-kings protests this weekend
03:47in Wyoming, including this one in Cheyenne at the state capitol. The local press reported that Cheyenne
03:53protest was significantly larger than previous no-kings protests at that site. Up in the upper left,
03:59that's Tupelo, Mississippi. In the upper right, that's Bluefield, West Virginia. Lower right,
04:04that's Southern Indiana. That's Evansville, Indiana, where Trump won by 13 points in that county. But
04:09this weekend, that was Evansville, Indiana. No kings. Some of the biggest protests in the whole
04:15country were in red states this weekend. Look at the upper left there. That's Boise, Idaho. Look at
04:20the turnout there. In the upper right, look at Salt Lake City, Utah. Louisville, Kentucky in the lower
04:26left there. Lower right, that huge protest in the lower right. That's Louisiana. That's New Orleans,
04:31Louisiana. Missoula, Montana, which is the upper left here. Look how big that is. They had pretty big
04:37crowds for the previous no-kings protests in Missoula. But this weekend, Missoula organizers
04:42said the turnout was double or possibly triple the turnout they had previously had on previous no-kings
04:48protests. Up in the upper right there, that's Charlotte, North Carolina. You will remember that
04:52locals in Charlotte stood up mightily and protested and protested and protested against the attack on
04:58their city from Trump's federal ICE agents. Well, this was no-kings in Charlotte this weekend,
05:03a really big turnout. Lower left, that's Dallas, Texas. Lower right, that's Columbus, Ohio.
05:10The great state of Tennessee saw big protests for no-kings. Up in the upper left, that's Chattanooga,
05:16Tennessee. In the upper right, that's Nashville, Tennessee. Lower left, that's the state capital in
05:22Texas. That's Austin, Texas. Lower right, that big protest there is Columbia, South Carolina. Check
05:28that out. Here's Mississippi. Here's Hattiesburg, Mississippi in the lower right there. Look how big
05:34that is. Upper left, that's Little Rock, Arkansas. Upper right, that's Wichita, Kansas. Lower left,
05:43that's beloved Oklahoma City. So three times in 10 months now, we've had this big tent peaceful
05:52protest movement against Trump, against this president trying to assume the powers of a king
05:57and the breadth of what people have been able to build, the geographic spread of where people are
06:03organized, the sheer number of protests at each of these just goes up and up and up. But even in
06:09a
06:10deliberately decentralized, far-flung thing like this, where there's, you know, we got 50 states,
06:14but we had more than 3,300 protests, even in a decentralized, far-flung thing like this,
06:20there are still the places where just the sheer number of people in one place is overwhelming.
06:25Organizers say this weekend's flagship no-kings protest in St. Paul, do you see there on the
06:30lower left? They say that was the largest demonstration of any kind in the history of
06:35the state of Minnesota. Biggest protest of any kind ever in that state. Los Angeles in the upper
06:41left there was huge. Boston, upper right there, that was huge, which was all the more impressive
06:46because there were more than 160 different no-kings protests in Massachusetts all at the same time.
06:53And Massachusetts isn't that big a state, but Boston still had nearly 200,000 people turnout
06:58at that one no-kings protest alone. Boulder, Colorado, lower right there, that was big as well.
07:04Boulder, Colorado was big, as was Denver, Colorado, which you see in the upper right there. And again,
07:11that is particularly impressive given that Denver and Boulder are only 30 miles apart.
07:15But both kings simultaneously, both cities simultaneously had huge no-kings protests.
07:20Upper left there, look at that sea of people in Chicago, Illinois. Chicago, you would expect them
07:25to turn out numbers like that after that city fought back so hard against the attack on that city
07:30by Trump's ICE agents this year. San Francisco in the lower left there was huge. Lower right there,
07:37that's Minneapolis. And again, the size of the turnout in Minneapolis and on the other side of
07:43the river in St. Paul, where they had the largest demonstration in state history, both of those
07:47things happening on the same day. It's just very impressive. Philadelphia was really big.
07:55Philadelphia had been the flagship protest at an earlier no-kings, but look at how many people
07:59turned out in Philly for this one. San Diego was really big. Look at that lower right. Look how
08:04many people in San Diego. Washington, D.C. is lower left there. That was big. In D.C., some people
08:10from the no-kings protest marched to a military base where Trump administration officials,
08:16Trump cabinet officials, have been taking over military housing for themselves. So people at no-kings
08:21in D.C. made some noise there this weekend, reminding those folks in Trump's cabinet that even
08:27though they have looted those houses for themselves from the military, those are not their houses.
08:32Upper left, you're looking at New York City. The crowd was so large in New York City this weekend,
08:37even the New York Times had to begrudgingly concede that the New York City protest stretched
08:44for more than a mile on either side of Times Square.
08:50But again, it's not just that there were some really large protests and that the collective
08:55number of people protesting was one of the largest protests in American history ever.
09:01It's also the sheer number of places in which Americans were willing to turn out. So like in New
09:08York, for example, yes, there was that massive protest in New York City. But you know what?
09:11There were 150 no-kings protests all over New York State. I mean, here, just as a sampling,
09:19here's Albany in the lower right and Rochester in the lower left and Plattsburgh in the upper right
09:25and Buffalo, New York. In the great state of Georgia, there was a huge protest and march in
09:30Atlanta, which you might expect. But would you expect that there'd be 62 different no-kings protests
09:36all over the state of Georgia? In addition to Atlanta, here's Savannah and Sandy Springs and
09:41Decatur. In Arizona, there were surprisingly gigantic no-kings protests in Scottsdale,
09:49for example, but there were more than 70 protests statewide in Arizona. In some of these places,
09:53it was 95 degrees on Saturday. But here was Scottsdale and Mesa and Phoenix and Tempe and Tucson
09:59and Surprise, Arizona, which is one of the places they've been trying to put a huge Trump prison camp.
10:05The great state of Wisconsin had over 100 no-kings protests, including really big ones in Madison
10:13and in Milwaukee, but also in places like Greenfield and Shorewood and Brookfield and Eau Claire and the
10:18famously conservative city of Waukesha, Wisconsin. And the town of Dodgeville, which is west of Madison,
10:25Wisconsin. Dodgeville has about 4,000 people. In Dodgeville, more than 10 percent of the whole town
10:30showed up for the Dodgeville no-kings. And it was cold. New Jersey had more than 65 no-kings protests.
10:38Here's a look at Camden and Newton and Trenton and Toms River. Indiana, I mentioned Evansville before
10:46in southern Indiana. Indiana had more than 65 no-kings protests. Here's Indianapolis and Henderson
10:52and South Bend and Bloomington and Valparaiso and Zionsville. Virginia had more than 100 no-kings
11:00protests. Here's a look at Blacksburg and Charlottesville and Harrisonburg and Roanoke and
11:06Alexandria and Richmond. Pennsylvania also had more than 100 no-kings protests. Here was Bloomsburg,
11:15Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh was huge. And Lancaster, Pennsylvania and Pottstown, PA.
11:22There was a lot of attention this weekend to the no-kings protests that happened near the
11:26president's weird, like, gilded Florida palace where he both lives and also charges strangers
11:35money to be members at his house. Very weird. But that Palm Beach no-kings protest in Florida
11:41was dramatic because it's the site of the president's home. But, you know, the no-kings protests were also
11:47pretty dramatic in Miami and in Naples and in Cocoa and in Orlando and in Fort Lauderdale. I mean,
11:52there were more than 120 no-kings protests across red state Florida this weekend.
12:00One of the places where the local press reported a steep increase in participation compared to
12:05previous anti-Trump and no-kings protests was in Hagerstown, Maryland. Look at this turnout in
12:12Hagerstown. They got something like 3,000 people at the public square in Hagerstown on Saturday.
12:17And in Hagerstown, the banner for their protest wasn't just no-kings. It was no-kings, no-camps.
12:24And that's because it's just outside Hagerstown where the Trump administration is trying to put
12:29one of their giant Trump prison camps to hold thousands of people indefinitely and without trial.
12:36And Hagerstown has been, and the rest of Maryland has been, been trying as hard as they can to stop
12:41it. So, and that led to kind of an interesting local dynamic. And in Maryland, unlike in every
12:47other state where people were just expected to go to whatever no-kings protest was nearest to them,
12:52in Maryland, a grassroots group called the Maryland Coalition to Stop the Camps
12:58asked people in Maryland, Maryland residents, to come from all over the state, specifically to
13:04Hagerstown to show opposition to this particular prison camp that Trump is trying to put just
13:10outside that town. So it's, it was no-kings, no-camps in Hagerstown, Maryland. And I got to say,
13:18there's a, there's a piece of that story that is worth watching right now, now that Kristi Noem has
13:22been ousted as Trump's Homeland Security Secretary, and this new guy, the former Oklahoma Senator Mark
13:27Wayne Mullen is taking over. One of the things that has emerged about these warehouse purchases
13:34they're making for the Trump prison camps is that for some reason, the Trump administration appears
13:41to be eager to wildly overpay for these warehouses that they're buying even before they start spending
13:48to convert them into prison camps. So like in Salt Lake City, they paid nearly 50% more than the
13:54property appeared to be worth. This warehouse facility was assessed at roughly $97 million. For some reason,
14:00the Trump administration decided they wanted to pay over $145 million for it. Why is that?
14:08Roxbury, New Jersey, the warehouse they bought there was assessed at $62 million. The Trump
14:13administration came in and offered them $129 million. More than double what you'd expect to pay
14:21for it. One of the warehouses they bought in Georgia was valued just last year at $26 million.
14:28The Trump administration came in and bought it for $129 million. Assessed at $26 million. They came in and
14:36paid $129 million. What's going on there? What's going on there? Well, I will just point out two other
14:44things that are going on that might shed a little bit of light on this ultimately. Number one, Washington
14:49Post obtained an internal memo that apparently circulated last week, the day after Mark Wayne Mullen was
14:54sworn in as the new head of Homeland Security. That memo reportedly said that the process of
15:00turning these warehouses into Trump prison camps is going to be slowed down. That the proposals for
15:06these facilities are going to be revised. That they're going to start incorporating feedback from
15:12stakeholders, whatever that means, before they move ahead with these Trump prison camps. Why is that?
15:18Why are they slowing down? What's up with that? Well, turns out simultaneously, we have learned
15:23that there's a new inspector general investigation into alleged corruption at the Department of Homeland
15:29Security. The soliciting and handling of contracts, quote, including the involvement of former Secretary
15:35Kristi Noem and her de facto chief of staff, Corey Lewandowski. There was already an internal audit that had
15:41been sparked in the department for some reason. But now on top of that, there's a new and apparently quite
15:47urgent, quite aggressive investigation, which apparently included investigators searching the
15:52offices of one Homeland Security official last week, an official who had been reportedly placed in her
15:58DHS job by Corey Lewandowski and Kristi Noem. After NBC News recently reported that Corey Lewandowski
16:06reportedly sought multi-million dollar payments from companies that were contracting with Homeland Security,
16:13including specifically companies that operate immigration prisons. He was seeking multi-million
16:20dollar payments for himself from those companies as he was acting as the de facto chief of staff
16:28at that agency, including an unusual degree of oversight of contracts. I mean, Mr. Lewandowski denies
16:35this, but Democratic members of Congress have now opened their own investigation into what may have been
16:40going on there. So I'm just, you know, you put these things together. I'm just going to say,
16:46hey, you guys, anybody wondering why it is that they slapped an extra 60, 80, 100 million dollars
16:55on top of the price tag for these Trump prison camp warehouses they're buying in multiple states
17:01through totally opaque processes that make no financial sense whatsoever on their face?
17:08Yeah, you guys maybe want to slow that down a sec? 3,000 people in the Hagerstown,
17:13Maryland public square would like you to slow that down for sure. Social Circle Georgia town
17:18officials put a lock on the water meter at the warehouse the Trump administration is trying to
17:22turn into a prison there. I think they'd like you to slow it down a little bit. Take another look.
17:27The city council in Salt Lake City, Utah just voted to cap the amount of water they'd be allowed to
17:32use
17:32at the warehouse. They want to be a huge prison there as well. That's one where they appear to have
17:37overpaid 48 million dollars for that warehouse for no explicable reason. Yeah, maybe they'd like you
17:44to slow that down. Take another look at that one as well. Why'd they overpay for all these things
17:49in such a rush? Why'd they overpay by tens of millions of dollars at one of these things after
17:57another? Who made off with all of that money? Whose pockets just got stuffed with the tens of millions
18:03of dollars in taxpayer money that is unaccounted for in almost all of these transactions?
18:10Yeah, you think you might want to slow it down a little bit?
18:14That stink is what you think it is. It smells like corruption, which you know what? Kings and
18:21dictators on their golden toilets are quite famous for. And here's something else to keep an eye on
18:29in coming days. This week, the Trump administration is going to try to make its most radical move yet
18:36against immigrants and against the Constitution in order to get at immigrants. This week, they're
18:43going to argue before the Supreme Court that when the Constitution says anyone born in this country is
18:47an American, they're going to argue this week at the Supreme Court that the Constitution doesn't
18:51really mean that, even though that's what it plainly says. And you'll see this headlines as
18:57the birthright citizenship case. In my experience, nobody who's not a lawyer instinctively knows what
19:02the words birthright citizenship mean. What this case is, what they're going to be arguing this week,
19:10the whole idea of birthright citizenship is that from the beginning in this country, anybody born in
19:16this country has been an American by virtue of the fact that they were born here. It's a core part
19:21of
19:22what makes America, America, and it's in the Constitution. The Trump administration is trying
19:26to change that, and they're going to try to change it this week. What they want instead is for you
19:32not
19:32to be an American by virtue of the fact that you were born here. Instead, they want a new test.
19:37They
19:37want to assess the allegiance, the loyalty of a person's parents before they decide if that person
19:45who was born here in this country can be considered really an American, really a citizen.
19:54I mean, before, just to put this in perspective, before this current experience we are having right
20:00now with the Trump administration trying to build, you know, in Hagerstown, Maryland,
20:04and Social Circle, Georgia, and Salt Lake City, and all these other places, before this experience
20:09we're having now, where they're trying to build these huge Trump prison camps to hold people without
20:14trial indefinitely. Before this, the last time we had massive domestic prison camps in this country
20:18to hold people indefinitely and without trial, the last time we did something like this was in World
20:23War II, when the U.S. government locked up Japanese Americans for years, regardless of their
20:29citizenship, on the theory that their race alone made them dangerous and justified putting them in what
20:36were, effectively, concentration camps, even though they weren't called that.
20:41Well, now today, Japanese American groups and experts on Japanese American incarceration during
20:46World War II, they've been filing friend of the court briefs in this Supreme Court case ahead of
20:51the oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case this week. Law professor Eric Muller of the
20:57University of North Carolina is a nationally recognized expert on what happened to Japanese
21:01Americans during the war. He has written four books on the incarceration of Japanese Americans during
21:06World War II. He has submitted a friend of the court brief in which he explains sort of patiently
21:12that even in World War II, even when we were so panicked about the loyalties and the allegiances of
21:18whole huge swaths of our population, so much so that we effectively created a concentration camp system
21:25to lock up an entire ethnic group for years on the basis of how scared we were about their supposed
21:30loyalties and loyalties and allegiances. Even then, even when citizens of Japan, who we had locked up in
21:41those camps, had babies here inside those camps, even then there was no controversy at all about the fact
21:46that those babies born in American concentration camps to citizens of another country, those babies born here
21:53were definitely American. Even beyond that, even when people had renounced their American citizenship during
22:01World War II, and as people who had renounced their citizenship, we had them locked up in prison camps
22:07here. If those people who renounced their citizenship had babies here while they were in prison here, there was
22:13no question, no controversy at all that their babies born here in prison were Americans by virtue of the fact
22:19that
22:20they were born here. And as Professor Mueller points out to the court in this friend of the court brief,
22:25even beyond that, it gets even worse and weirder. Because in World War II, the United States went so far
22:33as to go out into the world to grab a whole bunch of people who had no ties to the
22:40United States of
22:40America whatsoever. We were at war with Japan. Japan had lots of American prisoners of war.
22:46And the United States went to Latin America and seized people of Japanese descent from Peru.
22:55It forced these people to come to the United States to be put in prison here so that these
23:00people could potentially be used in prisoner swaps with Japan. These people had no connection to the
23:07United States of America. They were Peruvians of Japanese descent. They were only in this country
23:12because they were taken here. They were forced against their will to be here. But still, even
23:17them, those people with no connection to America, when they inevitably had babies in American prison
23:25camps during World War II, even their babies, uncontroversially, were considered to be American
23:32citizens. Because those little kids were born in American prisons, which means they were born in
23:39America. So they were American, even then, without controversy and without question.
23:47But right now, under Donald Trump, Donald Trump, who has entrusted the wise and prudent stewardship of
23:55immigration matters to geniuses like Corey Lewandowski and Kristi Noem and now Mark Wayne
24:00Mullen, who's maybe having to pull up a bit on the new Trump prison camp archipelago for immigrants
24:05because, wait a second, aren't we missing hundreds of millions of dollars somewhere? And has anybody
24:11seen Corey? I mean, now, right now, under these geniuses this week, they are going to try to tell
24:19the United States Supreme Court that the Constitution has been wrong all this time.
24:25And even though people born to Peruvians who were being held in U.S. prison camps against their will
24:35because they were of Japanese descent, because we wanted to use them as chits in a prisoner exchange,
24:39even though their babies were considered to be American because they were born in America,
24:46the whole history of this has all just been gotten wrong all along.
24:50And they're going to try to tell the Supreme Court this week that Donald Trump is actually the only
24:56one who really understands the way this is supposed to be done. And so now, from here on out, regardless
25:01of what we've done in the past, regardless of what we did even during World War II, when we were
25:05really
25:05stressed out about this issue, regardless of how we have handled this through the entire history of
25:11our nation back to its founding, that's all been wrong. And Donald Trump is the only one who knows
25:17how to do it right. And from here on out, it will be Donald Trump who will neutrally and with
25:21an even
25:22hand assess your loyalties and your allegiances before he decides if you're really an American.
25:29Because it doesn't matter if you're born here, he's going to pick who's an American and who's not.
25:35It is just incredible that they are dragging that stinking heap up to the door of the Supreme Court this
25:46very week. The same week that more than 8 million Americans from every single corner of this country
25:53came out full tilt and at full volume to say no kinks. No kinks, no thrones, no golden toilets,
26:01no crowns, no kings, no camps. That's where we are. That's where we stand. Game on.
26:14The military calls them AWACS, A-W-A-C-S. A-W-A-C-S. It stands for Airborne Warning
26:22and Control Systems.
26:24This is one. It's called the E-3 Sentry. It costs about $300 million. It's called a Sentry because
26:32it functions basically as eyes in the sky, that big dome on top, that thing that sits on top of
26:39the plane that makes it look like not a normal plane. That's a 30-foot long rotating radar.
26:45It can detect anything airborne within 250 miles from the surface of the Earth all the way up to
26:50the stratosphere. We do not have a ton of planes like these, and they are very, very, very expensive.
26:59But AWACS are just key to American air dominance in faraway war zones.
27:07Well, on Friday, Iran blew one up. Iran carried out a targeted attack on the Prince Sultan air base
27:14in Saudi Arabia. That attack wounded a dozen U.S. troops. It also destroyed this vital and rare and
27:21expensive and strategically critical radar aircraft that we don't have very many of.
27:29How did it know how to find it? Why wasn't it protected? Why was it out in the open?
27:35Over the weekend, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told NBC News that it wasn't Iran that
27:40figured out where that vital U.S. aircraft was sitting there unprotected. It was Russia.
27:46In an interview with NBC, Zelenskyy shared his own briefing from Ukraine intelligence. It showed
27:52that Russian satellites had taken images of that air base in Saudi Arabia, not once, not twice,
27:57but three times in the week leading up to the strike that injured all those American troops and
28:03destroyed that critical plane. Since the start of this war in Iran, we have seen report after report
28:09citing U.S. officials and British officials, even German officials, all saying that Russia is helping
28:16Iran target U.S. assets, helping Iran target and attack and kill and wound U.S. troops.
28:23So how is the United States roaring back at Russia for that? How are we getting them to back off?
28:29How
28:29are we making them pay for doing that? Not at all. We're not doing anything quite the opposite.
28:34President Donald Trump has instead inexplicably twice cut sanctions on Russian oil. And then this
28:42weekend, Trump decided to additionally give Russia a big new gift. The U.S. has imposed a blockade on
28:50all sorts of fuel to the island nation of Cuba for a couple of months now. But this weekend, for
28:57some
28:57reason, who knows why, Trump decided to let a Russian oil tanker go right through the blockade,
29:04sail on through, unmolested, to bring oil to Cuba anyway. I mean, Trump's war on Iran has been one
29:11question mark after another about the most serious stuff in the world. Tonight, not only is the Strait
29:17of Hormuz still unsafe for shipping, but Iran appears to have hit a fully loaded Kuwaiti oil tanker in the
29:23port of Dubai. The crew were reportedly unharmed, but they hit the tanker. Meanwhile, this weekend,
29:29thousands of troops from the U.S. Army's elite 82nd Airborne Division, the paratroopers,
29:33arrived in the Middle East, which means there are more than 50,000 American troops in the region.
29:38In the region, Trump reportedly wants to send 10,000 more. The latest deployments include large
29:43numbers of special operators, including Navy SEALs. What are they there for? What is Trump going to tell
29:51them to do? What is the point of this war at this time? Joining us now is Ben Rhodes, former
29:55Deputy
29:56National Security Advisor for President Obama. Ben, it's nice to see you. Thanks very much for being
30:00with us tonight. Hey, Rachel. So a lot is happening all at once. I feel like there's a few different
30:08things I want to ask you about. One is what is going on with the weird favorable treatment to Russia
30:14when the intelligence and the open source reporting seems to be getting stronger and stronger about Russia
30:19really playing a pivotal role in Iran's ability to hurt American assets and American personnel.
30:28But also what's happening, and I'll ask you this first, just with the strategic rationale for what
30:33we're doing, the president's incoherence in terms of being able to explain what he's trying to do
30:39and how that matches up with what he's actually doing, which is sending lots more troops.
30:44Well, the reality is, I just don't think he knows what he's doing. It seems like he launched this
30:49war thinking that Iran would capitulate quickly and he'd have some quick win like he did when
30:54he took out and abducted Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela. And anybody that has done any war games or looked
31:01at Iran would know that that would not be the case, that this is a deep regime that would resist
31:06and it would lash out across the region as they have. And the war thus far has been a strategic
31:11disaster. Rachel, I mean, let's just talk about Russia since you teed it up in your introduction
31:17there. Vladimir Putin benefits because the price of oil is up. That is money in his pocket because
31:22that's what Russia relies on for revenue. Russia has been given a waiver from U.S. sanctions so they can
31:29sell more oil at a higher price and make even more money. The Ukrainians, in an effort to be good
31:34citizens, are sharing some of their own drone defenses with the Gulf Arabs because they're
31:39getting bombarded by the same Iranian drones that were used in Ukraine. That's not good for Ukraine.
31:45That lessens their defenses. The U.S. has become completely disinterested in pursuing a peace
31:50settlement in Ukraine, certainly one that is on any kind of favorable terms to the Ukrainians,
31:54because we're consumed by this war. And then meanwhile, Vladimir Putin can now point to the rest of the
31:59world and say, what's the difference? The U.S. also attacks countries in illegal wars of aggression
32:05that are unprovoked. So kind of across the board, economically in Ukraine and geopolitically,
32:11Vladimir Putin is winning this war in Iran, and the U.S. is getting really no benefit.
32:16We've replaced one supreme leader with a younger one who's probably even more radical than his father.
32:22We've convinced the Iranians that their only survival is probably to try to pursue a nuclear weapon on the
32:28back end of this war. And the Iranians are currently running the Strait of Hormuz, which is 20 percent of
32:34the world's fossil fuel energy, like a toll road, and are charging to get oil out and gas out. So
32:40you tell me where the strategic benefit is for the United States.
32:45Ben, the Wall Street Journal is reporting tonight that President Trump has told—again, this is a thing
32:50that Trump has reportedly said. So as far as I'm concerned, things he says have no value. The only reason
32:57to talk about them is to try to figure out how they match up with things he's actually doing.
33:01While he is sending thousands of troops to the region, including now not only paratroopers,
33:08but special forces, including Navy SEALs, Trump has also reportedly, according to the Wall Street
33:13Journal, told aides tonight that he is willing to end the war in Iran, even if the Strait of Hormuz
33:20remains largely closed. So the Strait of Hormuz was open before the war. It will now stay closed
33:27and be operated, as you put it, I guess, as the kind of toll road that you were just describing.
33:32Trump is willing to have that be the outcome of his war. But there are these thousands of Americans
33:38that he has put over there. And my sense of watching Trump in various national security crises
33:45that have erupted since—in both of his terms—is that he doesn't tend to send troop places
33:50without using them. He doesn't tend to use them as a bluff to just put them there and then take
33:55them
33:55out without having them do something. Do you have any sense of what he's planning on having them do?
34:02There's really two or three things that those ground troops could be doing. One, they could be
34:06trying to secure the remaining nuclear stockpile, the nuclear fuel, the enriched uranium that the
34:13Iranians have. That's in a—largely in a place called Isfahan that is in the center of Iran.
34:17So not a simple mission to go in there and get highly enriched uranium. Two, they could be a part
34:23of
34:23some effort to open the Strait of Hormuz. That's incredibly difficult, right? This is mountainous,
34:28difficult terrain. The Iranians would contest it. And then third, they could try to seize
34:34Karg Island that Trump has talked about, which is key to Iranians' ability to export
34:39its energy resources, or some of these other islands in the Strait of Hormuz. But then they're
34:43also sitting ducks, too. It's not like the Iranians wouldn't be firing missiles and drones at them.
34:48So all three of these missions carry great risk. Like you, Rachel, this reminds me of the buildup in
34:53Iran, where as he's sending all these troops, he's saying, oh, no, we want to negotiate. Well,
34:57actually, he was sending troops for the purpose of launching this war. We saw the same thing in
35:01Venezuela. So I just don't know why you would be sending the 82nd Airborne, all these special
35:06forces, if you weren't going to use them. I guess you could say it's par for leverage in some
35:11negotiation. But the Iranians don't seem intent on negotiating with Trump. They've been bombed twice
35:16in the middle of negotiations. If he were somehow to leave the Strait of Hormuz closed,
35:21then we suffer all the global economic impacts, the potential catastrophe to our own economy.
35:26He doesn't seem to understand that either. He keeps saying that we don't use the Strait of
35:30Hormuz. That fundamentally misunderstands energy markets. It may be that more of that oil and gas
35:36goes to Europe and Asia. But look at the price of the pump, right? It impacts us, too. So we're
35:42dealing with either an escalatory cycle that he can't get out of or just a tremendous amount of
35:47incompetence because he should be trying to negotiate the reopening of the Strait as the pathway to ending
35:53the war. Ben Rhodes, former Deputy National Security Advisor. Ben, really helpful to have
36:00you here tonight. This is a seriously muddy situation, but your clarity is really helpful.
36:04Thank you. Thanks, Rachel. All right. Much more news ahead. Stay with us.
36:11The first No Kings was June last year. More than five million people took part. The second No Kings
36:17four months later was October. More than seven million people showed up. This weekend was the
36:22third No Kings. Organizers say the count was more than eight million people. Now, the organizers of
36:28No Kings have already announced what they're planning to do next. After those three gargantuan
36:33events in 10 months, the next one's going to be something very different. And it is set for May 1st.
36:39Instead of another day of record-breaking protests and marches, this time, No Kings organizers and hundreds
36:45of unions and other groups nationwide are planning what they're calling a nationwide general strike on May 1st.
36:53A general strike as in no work, no school, no shopping. Friday, May 1st. Joining us now is Ezra Levin,
37:01a co-founder of Indivisible, one of the No Kings organizers. Ezra, I know you have not slept
37:06enough. And so you are forgiven for rambling or not making sense at this point. But I know it was
37:12a ton of work. How do you think things went on Saturday? Rachel, I can't hardly imagine how it
37:17could have gone better. I mean, you covered it earlier in this program, the joy and the power on
37:23display in thousands of communities across this country, patriotic Americans showing up for their
37:28constitutional rights and demonstrating that democracy will reassert itself. It was incredible.
37:34And that was half the goal, was to get as many people there on one day in an unexpected number
37:40of places. But the other half of the goal you're covering here, which is what comes next.
37:45In terms of what comes next, you guys are getting very specific about it. I understand that you guys
37:49have a mass call, a nationwide call scheduled for tomorrow, talking about what's next after this
37:56weekend's No Kings Day protests before what's going to happen on May 1st. What's the point of that call?
38:04What are you asking people to do between now and the May 1st general strike?
38:08That's right. So if you go to indivisible.org, you can go and register for this call to get up
38:12to
38:12speed on what's coming next. But as you mentioned, this isn't just another protest. As important as
38:17protest is, this is modeled on what we learned in the Twin Cities. They had a day of truth and
38:22action
38:23in January when they were pushing back against the ICE goons who were terrorizing their city.
38:28And the Day of Truth of Action in the Twin Cities saw thousands of clergy and teachers and nurses
38:34and community leaders linking arms with no school, no business, no shopping. Because as important as
38:41it is to show up on a Saturday in millions, exercising your economic mind is a key tactic that successful
38:49anti-authoritarian movements use. And when we get to the midterms, I think we're going to get out the
38:54vote. I think we're going to crush the regime in the midterms. And I also believe Donald Trump will
38:58not go quietly. He will try to sabotage those election results. And when that happens, we have
39:04to be prepared to use that economic might. And so May Day is a chance for us to replicate what
39:10we saw in
39:10the Twin Cities nationwide to match the breadth of mobilizing that we saw through No Kings with the
39:18depth of organizing that we've seen in the Twin Cities. I think this is an important tactical
39:22escalation that is going to grow our power and allow us to actually win and protect the results
39:28of the midterm elections. May 1st, general strike, mass call tomorrow, talking about what's next and
39:36planning for that. Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible. I hope you get some sleep this
39:40week. I know sort of no rest for the wicked, but thanks very much for joining us tonight,
39:43Ezra. It's good to see you. Thank you, Rachel. We'll be right back. Stay with us.