Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 hours ago
Transcript
00:00It's one of these situations where there's the Wall Street view on this deal, the structure of
00:06the deal, and then there's the, what does this mean for Hollywood? And the reason I'm so excited
00:11to have you on the program is I think we could probably talk about both. But this is the first
00:15opportunity I've had to talk to you about two competing bids. I set the stage for it on Netflix's
00:20offer, Cash and Stock, and Paramount's offer. What is your position at this time and what is
00:26your research into the competing bids? So, I mean, I think the kudos have to go to Zaslav
00:33for creating this auction for an asset that's worth $12. We're now at $30 a share. And now
00:40we've here over the tape this morning that both Paramount and Netflix have said they could
00:44go higher. So, so far we have a 300% like premium over what the assets were trading at before
00:52the auction rumors. So, first of all, kudos to David Zaslav and the Warner Brothers team
00:59for selling an asset dear. In terms of who wins, you know, we are much more sanguine about
01:06Paramount's or Peace Guy is its tickered regulatory ability to get it through the Trump administration.
01:12You know, we think that there are real issues with Netflix being successful, not only with
01:19Hollywood talent who see this as anti-competitive. I sit in Hollywood as anti-competitive, especially
01:26because Netflix has said repeatedly it does not believe in the theatrical box office release
01:31window. And so all of Hollywood is scared to death that if suddenly Netflix owned Warner Brothers,
01:37that within five years, they would stop releasing films in the theatrical box office, which is why
01:42we've seen pressure on the exhibitors also. So I think Hollywood is really negative, or let me say
01:48it this way, much more negative about Netflix taking over Warner Brothers than Peace Guy. So I would say
01:55that. And on the money side, let me jump in real quick on the money side. We will get to Hollywood,
02:01particularly technology, because, you know, Netflix's competency is the algorithm to an extent,
02:05and the library and the content. But I just want to go back and back to basics and what you said,
02:10$12 with Warner Brothers Discovery. You're not the first person to make this point, Laura, but just explain
02:17the basics to our audience, please. People do feel that the value of what either entity ends up getting
02:24may not be at $27.75 for the studio streaming or 30 for the whole enchilada, as I keep saying.
02:31Right. So, I mean, I'm comparing the trading price for WBD, Warner Brothers, for like a year,
02:41essentially. It was falling, and it hit about a $12 price before the first rumor of a Peace Guy bid
02:47started the stock moving up. And then I can't remember the Larry Ellison first bid or the David
02:55Ellison first bid, but now we're up at $30 a share for the whole thing. And that includes 27 from Netflix,
03:00for studios, plus the idea is there'd be a $2, $3 stub left trading for the networks division,
03:09which would add up to $30 also. But in theory, so anyway, I'm saying we're like at $30 for the
03:15comparable asset that was trading at $12 before the auction began for this asset.
03:21I think there's a lot of value in that answer, because the next question is, of course, about
03:26antitrust and what the combined entities would look like in either case. You said you believe,
03:33or you're more sanguine about Paramount Skydance combined with Warner Brothers Discovery. Why?
03:39Okay. So in streaming, in the streaming industry, Netflix has over 300 million global subscribers,
03:49and HBO Max has 150. So together, there's some duplication there, but let's just call it 450
03:56subscribers, which is like 40% of the streaming market. Whereas Paramount, or Peace Guy it's now
04:02called, has 75 million subscribers that you would add to the HBO, which is 150. So now you're 225
04:10million subscribers, much smaller market share of streaming than if you can buy Netflix, which is
04:17the industry leader with Warner Brothers HBO Max, you know, streaming asset. So I would say that's one
04:24reason. And then the Hollywood Studios, as you know, Netflix is one of the largest global creators of
04:31content. And they would combine it with Warner Brothers, which is one of the largest global
04:36creators of content. They have different windows, meaning distribution windows, meaning Netflix
04:42primarily creates for television, direct to streaming, the television screen. And Warner Brothers
04:48primarily creates content for both TV, but also the film business. It's a big film distributor. So I think
04:56the idea is putting these two huge content creators together would dampen competition for
05:01talent and lower prices for talent and also raise prices for consumer. That is not a concern with
05:08Peace Guy buying Warner Brothers.
05:11Laura, we have less than a minute. Netflix would argue, and I am simplifying that, you know, it would
05:16simplify it for the consumer. You know, having HBO Max, Netflix, people have multiple subscriptions,
05:22but it sounds like you don't think that that argument will make traction.
05:25Oh, no, it would simplify it for the consumer. But if they collapse, the thinking is they would collapse
05:32Netflix and HBO Max. Great. But what happens to the price? The consumer is going to get a much higher
05:39price if you add those two things together. So it's simpler. But really, monopoly policy isn't based on
05:45simplicity versus complexity. It's based on the price to the consumer and consumer welfare. And price is part of
05:51consumer welfare. Actually, simplicity is not in the laws as a driving factor. But price is. And price
05:59would go up for consumers if they combine those two assets, I think.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended