Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 day ago
Transcript
00:00I want to start by just clarifying some things for our audience.
00:04Now that the proxy's filed and the proposed compensation plan is out there,
00:08have you continued to be engaged with Tesla's special committee or was that work finished?
00:13No, we've still been very actively involved with the special committee throughout this whole
00:18process. Obviously, that was just the start of it to kind of work with them. But we've been
00:23working with them ongoing and they've been engaged with all their advisors and legal advisors along
00:28the way. And since the proxy was filed and shareholders became aware of the terms of the
00:33proposed compensation agreement, what is it specifically that you have been talking to
00:39the special committee and the board about? Well, the issues that most people see every
00:44single day, a lot of the headlines that come up and then how can we proactively really address
00:49those? And more importantly, it's just really to make sure that it's clear. Obviously, as your
00:54viewers certainly saw the proxy advisors came out and actually commented on the plan and some other
01:01aspects as well. And then we just wanted to make sure that the shareholders, not the proxy advisors,
01:07were very fully informed about what the plan is and why this is different from what the ISS or
01:14Glass-Lewis is really reviewing. So the biggest headline of this week is that Norway's sovereign wealth fund
01:22came out and voted no against the proposed pay package. Not an advisory, but an actual shareholder.
01:29I believe Tesla's ninth biggest shareholder. And their argument was very simple, that they appreciated
01:35the significant value that Mr. Musk has created, but argue that this proposal, the total size of the
01:42award is too great. And like the advisory services, they're worried about dilution. Could you respond to
01:48that dilution part? Yeah, well, first, let me just address, obviously, they also oppose the pay plan
01:56on the ratification last year as well. So for me, it was a little hard to understand kind of the
02:02rhetoric versus the reality because they've been a shareholder in Tesla since 2011. So right after the
02:08IPO, they had a very small position and they've actually continued to build that position to where
02:13they are today. So although they may have some concerns, they've enjoyed the benefit of nearly a
02:1940,000% increase in their share value during that particular time and constantly adding to their
02:25position. So they're obviously willing to enjoy the benefits of that. You know, with respect to the
02:32dilution, it's been very clear about what the plan was. And I know we talked about this last time, Ed, which
02:38was when the special committee, Robin Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson sat down with Elon to
02:45understand not only his vision for master plan four, but obviously what he wanted to accomplish.
02:50And Elon has been very clear about this and obviously the chair as well, which is he wanted to make
02:55sure he has enough voting influence. And that number was around 25% that would matter for him.
03:02That this has been discussed as well, which is the committee reviewed numerous ways of finding a
03:09way to actually accomplish the voting and decoupling the economics. And unfortunately, under current
03:15exchange rules that we have today with either, you know, NASDAQ, NYSE has a similar rules. You can't go
03:21and do a high vote or dual class listing once you've been listed on the exchange.
03:27Shane, we've also spoken to Tesla's board chair, Robin Denholm, subsequently since you're on the
03:33program, right? And there is an acknowledgement that there is a very real risk that if this is
03:38a no vote in the end, Elon Musk either leaves Tesla or he pairs back his activities in a different
03:45role or he focuses more attention elsewhere. You are privy to these conversations. You've just told us
03:51that what is the plan B? What is the, I guess, mitigation of key man risk in the event that you
03:58don't secure the votes? Yeah, I know Robin has addressed this specifically with both you and
04:04Caroline as well. You know, quite frankly, and this is really what I classify really as a kind of a
04:10Super Bowl performance that we're doing right now. We're focused on winning the game and not looking
04:15at what happens if we lose. I actually do believe that the shareholders are going to come out in a very
04:20strong way tomorrow and really support not only the plan, but the directors. We're obviously up
04:27for nomination and all the proposals that are put forth. And I think a lot of that is already out
04:31there. So I don't think there's really a need to focus on plan B. I can assure you that they're a
04:36very diligent board. They fought through these things, but I think everyone's very focused on
04:41winning. We continue to get the same question for you and for the board, which is this is the first
04:46vote under Texas law? What do shareholders need to know that's different under Texas law from what
04:52they voted previously under Delaware law? Yeah, I would say the biggest one that comes up is that,
04:58you know, insiders, particularly in a transaction like this, are allowed to vote their shares
05:03in this particular election. So, you know, Elon's shares will definitely be counted and included in
05:11part of this process, whereas previously, as it was discussed within Delaware, it's not. I'd say
05:16that's really the fundamental big change. But quite frankly, if everyone recalls, the previous plan,
05:22the 2018 plan, both originally in 2018, but also in the ratification in 2024, it had over 70 plus
05:30percent shareholder approval, which did not include Elon's in that particular time. So I do think we're
05:35going to have a lot more of a support here than some of the headlines are reacting to right now.
05:41But that is really one of the bigger changes here for Texas.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended