Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 months ago
Transcript
00:00$80 million. That's what the first batch of NIL deals approved by the College Sports Commission is worth.
00:08Over 8,300 students have submitted third-party deals to the commission since the pay-for-play era began in June.
00:16The new system to approve name, image, and likeness contracts between college athletes and third-party companies
00:23must approve any deal over $600 and has rejected 332 deals so far.
00:3175 of those rejected deals have been resubmitted.
00:35The NIL Go platform and the College Sports Commission were created as part of the House vs. NCAA settlement,
00:42which allows schools to pay athletes directly while also offering them a chance to make money from outside groups.
00:49Ross Bjork, the athletic director at Ohio State University, says third-party deals are essential
00:55because schools can only pay $20.5 million directly to athletes.
01:01So is $18 or $20.5 million enough? No. The answer is no.
01:07Right, because again, it's all about, okay, what are they doing over here?
01:10What's this program doing? How is this person now taking their apparel contract, let's say,
01:15because those have been in the news lately, and then redeploying that towards NIL above and beyond the cap.
01:21Has to go through the system, has to go through the clearinghouse,
01:24it has to meet those standards that are part of the settlement.
01:27So now we're all going through this analysis.
01:30Those third-party deals are expected to increase exponentially in the next year.
01:35In just the first six weeks, more than 28,000 athletes and more than 1,200 administrators have registered.
01:41Those athletes have added more than 3,000 designated representatives or agents.
01:471,658 athletes and 507 school administrators log on to NIL Go in an average week.
01:54And some of those 8,300 deals that have been cleared are worth more than $1.6 million.
02:00Right now, there's no data available outlining which sports facilitate the most outside NIL deals.
02:07It's safe to assume that power for football and basketball lead the way.
02:10Does that mean Olympic sports and others that are less popular are being left behind?
02:16Martin Jarmond, AD at UCLA, believes something has to change.
02:20You know, is there going to be a cliff with Olympic sports?
02:23I don't see that, obviously, at UCLA, but I do worry about, as a whole, our Olympic movement,
02:28if we don't figure out a better way to fund Olympic sports, because that's the issue.
02:33The issue is the funding model for Olympic sports, and I think that's got to adjust.
02:37Athletic departments can influence third-party deals through their marketing and collective efforts,
02:42but ultimately, administrators have no control over which athlete receives money from outside sources,
02:48as long as it's approved by the College Sports Commission.
02:51The CSC has said its deal flow reports will be updated regularly, and the numbers promise to be staggering.
02:58Ross Bjork put it this way, everybody needs money, everybody is trying to churn and burn
03:03through this new era of what it looks like to keep investing and supporting your athletes.
03:09For Straight Arrow News, I'm Chris Francis.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended