Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 year ago
A California State Assembly Elections Committee hearing got testy when Republican Assemblymembers tried to amend the Democrats' bills to advance new Congressional districts.
Transcript
00:00We'll now move on to additional witnesses and they come up to the mic. Madam chair, I make a motion to amend
00:09And then what
00:12Amend ACA and I would like that the sergeants pass these amendments out so that way everybody could read them
00:20Give me one second, please
00:30Thank you
01:00Are the amendments in ledge council form? Okay
01:30That to reanalyze the bill constitutional amendment or resolution just give me a second so we can answer your question here
02:00So these are not author's amendment so the rule you cited is not relevant as a member does not say the author
02:14But they are not author's amendments once again, it's
02:30You
02:40The committee rules are clear that this is really two authors amendments only these are not being offered by the author of the ACA
02:48This is not clear
02:58The author is Rivas and McGuire in section 2
03:03That we authored this actually prepared this ACA. Okay. Give me one moment to thoroughly answer your question
03:18You
03:35My ruling is the amendments are not in order. There is a motion on the table
03:39And your motion is not in order as well. Madam chair, I read I asked to read the amendments into the journal
03:54Second
03:56I
03:57Reject that no on what ground madam chair my decision. So there's transparency and bipartisanship
04:06I
04:09Yes, it's something members I like to move the bill for approval. Oh, yeah
04:22We have a motion to approve the bill madam the motion to journal read into the journal one one second
04:39And you
04:41If you are not
04:42I
04:43I
04:44I
04:45I
04:46I
04:47I
04:48I
04:49I
04:50I
04:52I
04:53I
04:54I
04:55I
04:56I
04:57I
04:58I
04:59I
05:00I
05:01I
05:02I
05:03I
05:04I
05:05I
05:06I'd like to recognize
05:23Assemblymember Stephanie
05:24there's a motion
05:31and a second to amend
05:33ACA 8
05:34and I'd like to recognize
05:40Assemblymember Stephanie
05:41I move to lay the amendments on the table
05:44so you're not going to allow us to debate
05:46or present these amendments for anybody to read
05:48they're just going to vote on them correct
05:50we are going to the motion is to lay the amendments
05:53on the table
05:53none of my colleagues are going to read this before they vote on it
05:57correct I just want to clear
05:58so I'm good
05:59Madam Chair we just
06:01I don't think they will
06:02we just heard both testimony from the author
06:05we haven't even heard all the testimony
06:07so let's try to get through this hearing on the bill
06:10all right
06:11let's try to hear the bill in its current form
06:13we have a motion to lay the amendments on the table
06:16Madam Secretary please call the roll
06:19Madam Chair we made the statement
06:21that we're making this very transparent
06:24we have a motion to lay the amendments on the table
06:27and I just
06:28we're going to proceed with that motion
06:30wait a second
06:31the whole thing is that this is about transparency
06:33and that you want fairness in this
06:35we got the language at 8 o'clock
06:37all we're asking is for our input to be taken
06:41you didn't talk to me as your vice chair about this
06:43so here's our opportunity
06:44Madam Chair
06:45all we're asking for is participation in this
06:48and Mr. Tongipa came prepared
06:49the rules state this
06:51that I would be happy to bring the chief clerk in to review this
06:53I don't know why you're shutting this down
06:55and Madam Chair I would have presented this to you
06:57sometime sooner at any other time
06:59I had no time
07:00we didn't receive this
07:02and yet there are authors on this
07:03before I even got to see this
07:05I didn't get this till last night
07:07because we were not informed
07:09so my question is
07:11since everybody's prepared
07:12since you're so fine with the ACA
07:14is how much time did they get to prepare
07:17before I did
07:17why am I not deserve that same
07:20for the 500,000 representatives
07:22that I get to represent in my district
07:24why am I not granted that same right
07:26to defend them
07:27I believe we have a law in California
07:29that members get 72 hours
07:31before final vote on any legislation
07:33to review the legislation
07:37and the language of the legislation
07:38before they vote
07:39on that language
07:39as the final version
07:41I saw this language yesterday
07:43I saw this language yesterday
07:45it was in print yesterday morning
07:47correct
07:47and that's when I saw
07:48it was in print
07:50and you're a co-author on it immediately
07:53so you had seen that
07:54even before it was printed
07:55you were already a co-author
07:56yeah
07:57I absolutely support the concept
07:58I had faith in the authors
07:59to draft the right language
08:01they did
08:01and I support it
08:02but I did not have that same
08:03but you didn't even read language
08:04I did not have that same ability
08:05you weren't aware of the concept
08:06you weren't aware of the news
08:08that we were planning on doing that
08:09no that's not what I'm saying
08:09Mr. Berman
08:10excuse me
08:11we have the chief clerk here
08:12Sue Parker
08:13I am simply just asking
08:14for the same amount of time
08:16so that way
08:16I can go into this
08:17just as much as everybody else
08:19I saw the language
08:19when it went into print
08:20yesterday morning
08:21and I understand that
08:22and I have a different opinion on it
08:24and that's okay
08:24because I'm granted
08:25okay
08:25all right
08:26excuse me
08:26we're gonna
08:27hey
08:27I'm asking for
08:29we're gonna stop this right now
08:31this back and forth
08:32okay
08:33we have to have some civility in here
08:34we have our chief clerk
08:36Sue Parker
08:37if you could please
08:38come on up
08:40for a consult please
08:51thank you
11:21All right, we're going to take a temporary recess.
11:37We'll be back in 10 minutes.
11:39Thanks.
Comments

Recommended