Skip to playerSkip to main content
Impeachment court Presiding Officer Francis "Chiz" Escudero on Thursday, Nov. 11, reminded his fellow senator-judges and members of the prosecution and defense panels, to exercise restraint when dealing with the testimonies made by witnesses presented during the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte.

Escudero cited the rights and obligations of trial witnesses, such as the right to be protected from insulting questions, "not to be detained any longer than the interest of justice required", and not to be examined except on matters associated with an issue.

The Presiding Officer reminded senator-judges and panel members to exercise restraint towards witnesses, despite frustration over answers which may be perceived as unsatisfactory, which he also stated that such remarks are not necessarily subject to contempt.

This, particularly over remarks such as: "I do not know", "I do not recall", which in recent trial dates tested the patience of senator-judges. (Video courtesy of Senate of the Philippines)

#VPSaraOnTrial #VPOnTrial

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5664f6TkaeHgwBly50DWZQ/join

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00The Chair wishes to make some remarks.
00:05The Chair wishes to place on record and remind the counsel for both parties and our distinguished
00:10senator judges, including the presiding officer, that while every witness takes an oath before
00:17this court to testify truthfully to answer all questions, the witness remains entitled
00:24to the rights enumerated under Rule 1323, Section 3, of the Rules on Evidence, which has
00:32suplatory application to these proceedings.
00:35The Chair would like to spread into the records the provisions of Section 3.
00:40Section 3, Rights and Obligations of Witnesses.
00:45A witness must answer questions, although his answer may tend to establish a claim against
00:51him. However, it is the right of a witness, number one, to be protected from irrelevant,
00:58improper, or insulting questions, and from harsh or insulting demeanor.
01:03Number two, not to be detained any longer than the interests of justice require.
01:08Number three, not to be examined except only as the matters pertinent to the issue.
01:14Number four, not to give an answer which will tend to subject him or her to a penalty for
01:19an offense unless otherwise provided by law.
01:23Number five, not to give an answer which will tend to degrade his reputation unless it is
01:29to be the very fact at issue or to a fact from which the fact in issue would be presumed,
01:38but
01:38a witness must answer to the fact of his previous final conviction for an offense.
01:43The Chair wishes to emphasize that an answer which may be unsatisfactory is not inherently
01:50contemptible. Supreme Court cases have cautioned courts to use the power of contempt with the highest
01:57restraint. The Chair wishes to remind the members of this court as well, including the presiding
02:02officer himself, who stated that his patience was wearing thin the other day, that we are
02:12sitting as senator judges in a trial. Our rules behoove us to receive and evaluate the evidence
02:18with impartiality and due to the often lengthy examination by both parties with utmost patience
02:24as well.
02:25I wish to also remind the Council for both parties, as well as our fellow senator judges,
02:31including this representation, that while we may rigorously examine witnesses and test the
02:37credibility of their testimonies, we must refrain from resorting to a manner of questioning or
02:43to making declarations that elicit fear rather than candor.
02:47The Chair therefore respectfully requests our distinguished colleagues, the Councils for the parties, including
02:57this representation, to exercise restraint expected of us. Unlike in inquiries in aid of legislation,
03:05an answer of I do not know or I do not recall may be extremely frustrating, is one that we
03:12may
03:12encounter numerous times in a proceeding such as this. What we can control, however, is how we appreciate
03:18and weigh the testimonies and statements delivered before this court. We owe it to the parties, to the
03:24witnesses, and to the institution we represent to conduct the proceedings still with fairness, dignity,
03:30and respect, in spite and despite our frustration and or disappointment with what the witness may or may not
03:40be saying. For the record,

Recommended