Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 25 minutes ago
Merch: docrichclothing.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/therealdocrich/

Discord Link: https://discord.gg/Gz8naHHEH3

To Donate And Support The Channel Paypal: https://www.paypal.me/therealdocrich

Merch: https://docrichclothing.creator-spring.com/?

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/DocRich2

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@xtrarichh

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therealdocrich/

Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/therealdocrich

Follow us on twitter: https://twitter.com/therealdocrich?lang=en


Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/therealdocrich/

*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS*
Transcript
00:00Sue O'Connell, who has been on the story from the very beginning.
00:03Sue, your team at NBC Boston has discovered documents related to the jurors' past.
00:08Talk to us about what you're seeing.
00:13Well, Tom, you know, in addition to the allegations that you talked about,
00:17there was also an active non-payment of rent civil case that was going on during the trial
00:24and a restraining order around an alleged assault.
00:27So in Massachusetts, you get a standard questionnaire to serve on the jury.
00:32They ask you questions like, do you have any of these issues, and you answer them.
00:36So we don't know if this juror did or did not answer the questions,
00:40but it does raise a lot of questions about his serving on the jury,
00:43if the lawyers, prosecution, and defense saw them, and what happens next, if anything, after this.
00:49So this case continues on, even though it was allegedly done on Friday.
00:53Sue, I'm just wondering, does either side or the court system,
00:58do they run criminal background checks on potential jurors?
01:03No, not to the best of my knowledge, Tom.
01:06I mean, generally, this is an oath.
01:08It's something that citizens fill out and give.
01:10And then if you get to the part of the trial where you're getting a voir dire and being interviewed,
01:15you answer the questions.
01:16But no, there's no criminal background check.
01:18Sometimes high-powered lawyers will investigate the jurors on their own.
01:23This obviously did or did not happen here.
01:25Well, you were in the court for the entire trial.
01:29Were you surprised to learn that this juror was to hold out?
01:34Absolutely.
01:35I mean, in my experience of watching this juror over this entire time, he was attentive.
01:39He took notes.
01:41He was well-dressed.
01:42He appeared alert and friendly with all of his fellow jurors.
01:48In fact, he laughed at many things.
01:50If you watched the trial, Kevin Reddington had a certain way of delivering a line or taking a shot at
01:55someone,
01:56which was entertaining, obviously, regardless of what side you are.
01:59So I actually had him in the camp of not guilty.
02:02So I was very surprised to find out that he was the holdout juror because of his demeanor during his
02:09jury service,
02:10which he seemed happy to be doing.
02:12Yeah, you mentioned the defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, there.
02:16He is pursuing multiple avenues to get this case tossed.
02:19Is that likely?
02:21Yep.
02:23Well, remember the Karen Reed trial, the first one, went to the Supreme Court over issues that happened after the
02:30verdicts were released.
02:32So there's a chance here.
02:34I'm not a lawyer, but there's a lot here to be argued about if this juror did or didn't fill
02:40out the form correctly,
02:41should he have been on the trial?
02:43And if not, you had 11 not guilty by reason of insanity, our version of that.
02:48So I think it definitely gives the defense some opportunity to move forward in their argument.
02:56Yeah, this whole trial, man, it's just absolutely wild.
03:00All right.
03:01I've never seen that all of you have said the same thing.
03:05You know, people doxing the juror and us finding out information about said jurors.
03:14It's just wild, man.
03:16But the juror has kind of spoken out.
03:21And I want to talk about it a little bit because we're getting more and more information about this guy.
03:26Obviously, we were getting a lot of information previously, you know, about his background, his name, his history, crimes he
03:33allegedly committed and all of this other stuff.
03:35But now he is kind of speaking out a little bit more.
03:39And I do think eventually he'll come out and, you know, really give a whole full, probably hour long interview.
03:51But I think there's some legal things that he may be worried about because, of course, they're going to come
03:58after this guy because.
04:02One, I'm just going to come out and say it because the left always says it themselves, right?
04:07In reality, I think it's them.
04:09They're racist.
04:11They're racist.
04:12That's just the way that I feel about it.
04:13You guys can let me know how you feel about it in the comments, because the moment the moment as
04:17a black person, when you disagree with these white liberals, they'll call you everything under the sun in words with
04:23the hard are they'll say you're stupid.
04:26There's all types of stuff, you know, as if you're just supposed to capitulate to whatever it is that they
04:31say do.
04:32When they say jump, you're supposed to you're supposed to ask, well, how high, master?
04:36You know, in the moments you don't, they bring out the whip on you, you know, but he's got some
04:42legal issues.
04:43That may arise.
04:45And I think he's kind of worried about that because not only is he black, but he's also a Republican,
04:50allegedly a Republican.
04:51So they're really going to come after him about that one.
04:56Because, of course, if you're a Republican right now, that means you voted for Trump.
05:00And, of course, you know how they hate Donald Trump, you know, goodness gracious, like Pavlov's dog for them.
05:07And the moment you mentioned Donald Trump, they like just like instant anger reaction from them.
05:13Goodness gracious.
05:14Anyway, let's hop into this in here a little bit more about what this juror had to say.
05:22All right.
05:23This has been the foundation of everything I have said about this juror.
05:29But I've always said when the holdout juror states their own case, then we will assess.
05:36Now we can.
05:37All right.
05:38You just heard there the juror who was the forewoman and Lindsay Clancy.
05:41And she says the lone juror in an 11 to 1 hung jury said he had reasonable doubts, but refused
05:54to acquit.
05:55Couldn't let her get away with it.
05:57OK, now, if that is what he said, then that is not doing your job.
06:03But is that what he said?
06:05Let us discuss because somebody was able to get an interview with him.
06:13OK, and the person who did is the creator of Fugitive TV, Ray Marcel.
06:19And Ray joins me now.
06:21Ray, good for you getting this phone or interview.
06:25And thank you for talking to me about it.
06:27I want to say thank you so much for having me on, Chris.
06:30I appreciate that.
06:32All right.
06:33And look, we'll put up the guy, put out pictures of himself and his name.
06:36I don't really want to target this guy, to be honest.
06:40I really don't.
06:41I just want to know one thing.
06:43OK, did he say to you, how did he explain what kind of doubt he had about what the verdict
06:53should be and on what basis?
06:55Or let me even make it easier.
06:56And then we'll have a broader discussion.
06:58Did he say to you, I had reasonable doubts that this, you know, was her illness that did this, but
07:06I couldn't acquit her?
07:09Well, first, before I say that, I do want everybody to know, no matter if you agree with him or
07:16not, and me and him had this conversation, if you agree with him or not, guilty or not guilty, his
07:23name shouldn't have been put out there like that.
07:25And no juror should be, you know, put to the forefront like that because it's their civic duty to do
07:32that and they should be protected.
07:34So he never asked for, you know, any of this whatsoever.
07:37When I had my conversation with him, he said that based off all the evidence that he's seen, everything that
07:45he heard, he felt that she was guilty and felt that at the time she was not, or I should
07:54say not guilty for a reason of insanity.
07:56He felt that she was sane when she did it.
07:59And that's exactly what he told me.
08:01Okay, what about the reasonable doubt part?
08:04Did he mention to you, because that's what they say, did he mention what he thinks of what they said
08:11that he said to them?
08:13Now, what he told me was he did say that I don't want to put other jurors on, you know,
08:21on blast.
08:21There's enough of that going on right now.
08:24He did say things got heated in the jury room.
08:26And once he speaks, I'll let him, you know, confirm more of this.
08:30But he said things got heated in the jury room.
08:34And, you know, jurors were not agreeing, some agreeing, some not agreeing.
08:40But he said from day one that he always felt that she was guilty and he never displayed or said
08:52anything about reasonable doubt.
08:53That was one of the reasons why he put the water bottle on the table with the string attached to
08:58it and to tell them, hey, this is what she probably did to her children.
09:06Okay, so as far as you know, if he says, I always thought she was guilty, but you didn't ask
09:13him specifically.
09:13They said that you told them you had reasonable doubts, but wouldn't acquit.
09:18Did you hit him with that specific, not to play gotcha about your interview, but just to kind of drill
09:23down on this?
09:25What I asked him, I asked him, the question I asked him was, and what he told me was, from
09:33day one, they voted every single day.
09:35There was a vote.
09:37And from day one, there was eight people that walked into there.
09:41And the eight people who walked in there thought she was not guilty from the start.
09:45That's what they were set on.
09:48Two of them thought that she was guilty, and he's one of those two.
09:52And then the other two were undecided.
09:55And he said, you know, as the days went on, as they're deliberating, because every day they're voting,
10:00he felt that the other eight were pretty much, you know, stating their case and trying to get everybody else,
10:08you know, pretty much to go on to their side.
10:11And this is exactly what he told me.
10:13And then he said at the last moment, it was just him and one other juror that were saying guilty.
10:21Guilty, we see the evidence, guilty no matter what.
10:26And then he said at the last moment, that other juror decided to go not guilty, and he just stood
10:33his ground.
10:34It was him and a female juror, he had said, right, who were the two holdouts.
10:39And did he tell you why he thought, what was the evidence that made him as convicted, excuse the pun,
10:50as he was,
10:50that this was guilty, that it was not a function of the disease?
10:55No problem.
10:57We didn't talk about all the evidence, I will tell you that.
10:59But what we did talk about, he said that he felt that she was saying by the preparation she did,
11:06how, you know, she waited for her husband to leave, sent him out.
11:11But the preparation showed that she was saying and knew what she was doing, pretty much knew right from wrong
11:17before she did what she did.
11:19And that it wasn't a quick death with the kids, you know, that she took her time and did to
11:28the kid each one that she did, strangled each one pretty much, you know, in separate rooms.
11:32So he felt, because of that, he felt that she knew that what she was doing was right from wrong.
11:38I get it.
11:39Look, in truth, I think he, all of the optics aside, them saying that he said he had reasonable doubt
11:46is what created a lot of this controversy around him.
11:49Because as we both know, and people should look up Ray's story and his, his site and his backstory of
11:59how well he understands the system.
12:02But if you have reasonable doubt, you have to acquit.
12:06That's why I was saying this guy, if that's true, he didn't do his job.
12:10But in the conversation with you, that's not what he said.
12:13He said, I just always thought she was guilty.
12:14And here's why.
12:15If he didn't tell you that he had reasonable doubt, then that's the standard.
12:19That's all we needed to hear.
12:20It's just, we heard something else first.
12:23Ray Marcel, thank you very much for talking to me.
12:25I wish you good luck going forward.
12:28Subscribe below and download our...
12:31Shout out to that lone juror, man, because he did the right thing.
12:35He did the right thing.
12:36He stood on business and I, listen, from everything that I've seen, I would have said the exact same thing
12:44and would have felt the exact same way had I been a juror.
12:49Like, I don't know how y'all can say that she had no clue what she was doing and that
12:56she was in some psychosis this entire time.
12:59Because, like you said, one, like, you knew well enough to send your husband away.
13:05That's for one.
13:07But then also, and this is one thing that a lot of people, or I haven't seen anyone except for
13:11myself speak about this, and I'm not saying that I'm the first person that's ever thought of this, but I
13:16just haven't seen anybody else talk about it.
13:18She's a medical professional.
13:20So, if you wanted to prematurely put yourself six feet in the dirt, she would know how to do it.
13:26So, why didn't she?
13:27She made it look good.
13:29Sure.
13:29Like, yeah, and slip the fist and jump out the window.
13:32Cool, cool, cool, cool.
13:34But typically, you know jumping out of a second story window isn't going to put you six feet in the
13:38dirt.
13:38It's not high enough.
13:40You know what I mean?
13:41Like, it's just not high enough.
13:42Yeah, it'll hurt a little bit.
13:44Clearly, you might paralyze yourself, but you're typically not going to pine box yourself jumping out of a second story
13:52window.
13:52It's just not high enough, right?
13:56And like I said, if there's anybody who would know how to do this to themselves, like really do it,
14:03it's her.
14:04She knows where every artery, every vein, you know how the body works, medications to take and how much of
14:11it to take to, you know.
14:14Do the deed and whatnot.
14:16So, I'm just not buying the whole, oh yeah, she did it and then try to pine box yourself.
14:21Like, no.
14:22I just don't buy it.
14:24And maybe I'm crazy, but y'all let me know how you feel about it in the comment section.
14:28But then also, you know, like you said, that would take some time to truly put those kids six feet
14:35in the dirt.
14:36You've got to be sitting there holding that for a while.
14:41Okay?
14:42Quite some time.
14:43And if I remember the story correctly, once she felt like they were done, like she tied the band around
14:52their neck so that they couldn't be resuscitated.
14:55Like, that takes some level of thinking.
14:57Most people, in a moment of rage, would just choke them.
15:01They pass out.
15:02They let go.
15:03They go on to the next person.
15:04Like, no.
15:05She knew to hold on for long enough till they stopped breathing, past when they stopped breathing, but then also
15:13tie it around their neck.
15:15And correct me if I'm wrong on these details in the comment section, please.
15:19But if I remember correctly, she tied the band around their neck after she felt like they were dead so
15:26that they could not be resuscitated.
15:30Because, obviously, once you pass out, the body just naturally starts to breathe again.
15:34So, if she just would have let go after they passed out, eventually their body would have started breathing again
15:39and they would have, you know, came back.
15:43So, if I'm correct in my memory, that takes some thinking.
15:51That takes some planning.
15:52Like, no, I can't just let them go because they're going to come back.
15:54So, let me tie this around their neck.
15:58You know what I mean?
15:59But, anyway.
16:00Y'all get into the comments.
16:01Let me know your thoughts and your opinions.
16:03Regardless of how or why it was done, in my opinion, whenever you harm kids, you deserve the death penalty.
16:11The fullest extent of the law.
16:13And I believe that fullest extent should be the death penalty.
16:16But, like I said, that's just me.
16:18Peace and love.
16:19I'm out.
Comments

Recommended