- 6 weeks ago
"يوروب توداي": مسؤول الاقتصاد الأوروبي دومبروفسكيس على "يورونيوز" في الذكرى 25 لهجمات 11 سبتمبر
بعد مرور 25 عاما على هجمات 11 سبتمبر، نسلط الضوء على كيف تغيّرت أمريكا والعالم، مع مقابلات حصرية مع مفوض اقتصاد الاتحاد الأوروبي فالديس دومبروفكس، ووزير خارجية النروج إسبن بارث إيده، وسفير البرازيل لدى الاتحاد الأوروبي بيدرو ميغيل دا كوستا إيه سيلفا.
لمزيد من القراءة : http://arabic.euronews.com/2026/09/11/europe-today-eus-economy-chief-dombrovskis-on-euronews-as-911-attacks-mark-25-years
سجل: يورونيوز متوفرة باثنا عشرة لغة
بعد مرور 25 عاما على هجمات 11 سبتمبر، نسلط الضوء على كيف تغيّرت أمريكا والعالم، مع مقابلات حصرية مع مفوض اقتصاد الاتحاد الأوروبي فالديس دومبروفكس، ووزير خارجية النروج إسبن بارث إيده، وسفير البرازيل لدى الاتحاد الأوروبي بيدرو ميغيل دا كوستا إيه سيلفا.
لمزيد من القراءة : http://arabic.euronews.com/2026/09/11/europe-today-eus-economy-chief-dombrovskis-on-euronews-as-911-attacks-mark-25-years
سجل: يورونيوز متوفرة باثنا عشرة لغة
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:30وفي أقترب الأساعة أجهزة
00:32ومن ثم الأشخاصين في نصف 11 سنة
00:36في حيات الأحداث تزيارة
00:38اليوم السيء والعالم المتابعة
00:41وقفتها وحبتها
00:44ولكن العلمية الثمانية
00:46أشهدنا كله فيه
00:47ويصفنا وعالي
00:49وحن السنة بعد
00:51نظر إلى أنه دي
00:53جديد كل شيء
00:54الفرنسي Macron
00:56ومسوطة الرشاوي
00:58فن دالين
00:58وصفاكية إيلا أن تتابعها في القز coco
01:01مزيدة في قائلة في العالم إلي السمية
01:03المترجمات العقاؤية ما يعتبر النماط الأول
01:07وعبط لدى الإحترابين الصعب مع المعارضة
01:14أمترك ستاق lifelong قليل
01:15واقع من ترمي إلى الفتر الإيسافة
01:17ومع الفترة المترجمات
01:17ومعا في القليل
01:18وعصف مضاً على المطلوبية
01:20وعصف العالم الإنسافي
01:25والأمر في المترجمات
01:27موسكو's aggression is spilling beyond its borders
01:29from drone incursions
01:31to suspected cable cuts
01:33EU News' EU correspondent
01:35Angeles Kuchin spoke exclusively
01:37to Kirillou Budanov
01:39head of the office of the president of Ukraine
01:42at the Riga conference
01:43asking whether the Baltic states
01:45are getting the Russian threat right
01:49currently it is not only the Baltic states
01:52but also for example
01:53central European countries
01:55that are facing certain aggressive forms
01:57of hybrid threats from the Russian Federation
01:59in the form of targeted operations
02:02that was Kirillou Budanov
02:04speaking to Angeles Kuchin
02:05and now let's go live to Riga
02:07where EU News' EU editor
02:09Maria Tadeo is standing by for us
02:12good morning Maria
02:12what's the latest there?
02:16good morning Stefan
02:18and you played those words
02:19from Budanov
02:20the head of the office of the president of Ukraine
02:22telling a panel discussion here in Riga
02:24said that if you are European
02:26and you don't want to deal with Russia
02:27then deal with Ukraine
02:29they have paid quote in treasure and blood
02:32also pointing to that wartime experience
02:34a lot more coy when asked directly
02:36whether he believed an attack on the Baltics
02:39is likely and coming
02:41to that point
02:41I spoke with the commissioner for the economy
02:45Valdez Zembrovskis himself from Latvia
02:47we spoke about European security
02:49but also funding for Ukraine
02:51where he told me at this stage
02:53the EU and the IMF
02:54are still crunching the numbers
02:56to figure out what Ukraine will need
02:58look into that funding gap
02:59going into 2027
03:00let's take a look
03:02we are having here
03:05eastern border with Russia
03:07and we see that Russia is an aggressor state
03:09waging full-scale war in Ukraine
03:12and openly talking about invading other countries
03:15so we cannot be complacent
03:17we need to do preparedness
03:19we need to have stronger also EU and NATO
03:22presence in the region
03:24to have also a credible deterrent
03:27against any Russia's plan
03:29in a sense
03:29the stronger and the more credible deterrents will be
03:32the less chance there will be
03:33of any Russian aggression
03:36when you look at the situation now
03:37are you more concerned that you were
03:39let's say before the summer
03:40because there was a letter
03:42that you also did sign with a number of other commissioners
03:45from that country
03:45saying the picture has deteriorated
03:47is that how you feel
03:49when you come here
03:50you say
03:51the perception of a threat
03:52is not just a perception
03:53there's something that has changed
03:55well we see no signs of Russia
04:00willing to engage in any meaningful peace process
04:04what we see is actually the contrary
04:06Russia is ramping up its military production
04:09it's strengthening its military industrial complex
04:12there are talks on mobilization of Russia
04:15and the question is
04:16where all this weaponry
04:18and all those troops will march
04:19so you say you don't believe at this point
04:21that the war can end
04:23real negotiations this year
04:25well I very much wish so
04:29but currently we do not see
04:30any credible signs of engagement
04:32from the Russian side
04:33and that takes us to the support
04:35and the money question
04:36for the Ukrainians
04:38it is clear now
04:39that it's the EU
04:40that is going to have to really do
04:41the heavy lifting here
04:43and the bill is not smaller
04:44it's getting bigger
04:45you had conversations
04:46with your Ukrainian counterparts
04:48the Prime Minister too
04:49what do you see?
04:50indeed we had these discussions
04:53with our Ukrainian counterparts
04:54including myself
04:56with Prime Minister Koretsky
04:58earlier this week
04:59so we are now in a sense
05:02in strong engagement
05:04with Ukrainian authorities
05:06finance ministry
05:07to in a sense
05:08to pin down exact financing needs
05:10to understand what exactly
05:12is driving those financing needs
05:13and to seek solutions
05:15and you mention the payments
05:18and this loan
05:18there was a loan
05:19that was essentially paid out of pocket
05:20by the European countries
05:22they agreed this is going to be two years
05:23we heard the President of Ukraine
05:25saying the payments
05:26will have to be accelerated
05:27there's now an open question
05:29about upfront payments
05:31is that something
05:31that you think is justified
05:33and do you worry
05:34what was budgeted for two years
05:36may not last more than a year?
05:38well first of all
05:40we need to find out
05:43exactly
05:43these additional financing needs
05:45and then discuss
05:46with the Ukrainian authorities
05:48how we are financing them
05:50they are still open
05:52questions
05:52we have this engagement
05:53we do it also
05:54in coordination with IMF
05:56but then
05:59the question is that
06:00already in this
06:02Ukraine support loan regulation
06:04we foresaw
06:05the possibility
06:07to do some adjustments
06:09of this funding
06:10if this is necessary
06:11so such a possibility
06:13is foreseen
06:14to that
06:14I have to ask you
06:15a final question
06:16the idea of the Russian
06:17frozen assets
06:18we see there's now
06:19a push by a number
06:20of European countries
06:21to revive
06:22the idea
06:23would you be in favor?
06:25well from European
06:26Commission side
06:27we are certainly ready
06:28to engage in this
06:29discussion
06:30as you know
06:30already last year
06:31we came forward
06:32with a concrete
06:33legislative proposal
06:34to use those assets
06:36unfortunately
06:36member states
06:37were not able
06:38to agree on this
06:39mainly because of
06:40resistance of Belgium
06:42but we certainly
06:43are ready
06:44to re-engage
06:45those discussions
06:46seek those
06:47additional reassurances
06:48which may be needed
06:49and to help
06:50find a way forward
06:51what is it going to take
06:52for the Commission
06:53to put it back
06:54on the table?
06:55a signal from Belgium
06:56the French
06:56the Italians
06:57the ECB
06:58saying they're willing
06:59to explore it now
06:59what will it take?
07:00well I cannot now
07:02give you no
07:03kind of exact
07:04triggers
07:05but as I said
07:06we are ready
07:07to engage
07:08in this discussion
07:09and to put this
07:10question back
07:11on table
07:15Maria Tadeo
07:16there speaking
07:16to Valdes Dombrowskis
07:18in Riga
07:19tensions have risen
07:20between Brussels
07:21and Brazil
07:22after the European
07:23Commission
07:23suspended imports
07:25of Brazilian meat
07:26and other food
07:27products
07:27over concerns
07:28about antimicrobial
07:30substances
07:31used in production
07:32the Brazilian authorities
07:34have expressed
07:34indignation
07:35at the lack
07:36of dialogue
07:36before the measures
07:37were adopted
07:38our correspondent
07:39Marek Gwynn
07:40sat down
07:41with Brazil's
07:41ambassador to the EU
07:43Pedro Miguel
07:43da Costa e Silva
07:45she asked him
07:46whether he believed
07:47the two sides
07:48could strike a deal
07:49to reverse the ban
07:50and if not
07:51whether Brazil
07:52could consider
07:53countermeasures
07:54we believe
07:55in dialogue
07:56we believe
07:56in cooperation
07:57we are one
07:58of the biggest
07:59providers
08:00of agri-food
08:01products
08:02in the world
08:03we have a lot
08:03of quality
08:04so we are very
08:05confident
08:05in what we
08:06send to the
08:07European market
08:08and I'm very
08:09confident
08:09and hopeful
08:10that we will be
08:11back on the list
08:13soon
08:13on the first
08:14phase
08:15for some
08:15of the
08:16products
08:17I think
08:17poultry
08:18and honey
08:19and I hope
08:20that soon
08:21after
08:21the rest
08:22of the
08:22products
08:22do you
08:23fear that
08:24this
08:24episode
08:25could have
08:26somehow
08:27emboldened
08:28those people
08:29who have been
08:29against
08:30the EU
08:31Mercosur deal
08:32which is a trade
08:33deal between
08:33the EU
08:33and Brazil
08:34and other
08:34Latin American
08:35countries
08:35that it
08:36could have
08:37encouraged
08:38them somehow
08:39to see
08:39that there
08:40might be a
08:40way
08:41to prevent
08:42these kind
08:42of inputs
08:43from coming
08:44into the
08:44European market
08:45you have
08:46touched on
08:47a very
08:47sensitive
08:48point
08:49which
08:49because I
08:50do fear
08:51that this
08:52episode
08:53and this
08:55issue
08:55is going
08:56to be
08:56distorted
08:57people are
08:57going to
08:58say
08:58oh Brazil
08:59does not
08:59comply
09:00with our
09:00regulations
09:01Brazilian
09:01products
09:02do not
09:02have
09:02the same
09:03quality
09:04they are
09:05at risk
09:05and none
09:06of this
09:07is true
09:07because if
09:08you look
09:08objectively
09:09at what
09:10we're talking
09:11about
09:11in no way
09:12has the
09:12EU
09:13said
09:13that our
09:14products
09:15have a
09:15problem
09:16in terms
09:16of quality
09:17the important
09:18thing
09:18is to make
09:18sure
09:19that this
09:20doesn't get
09:20distorted
09:21that people
09:22who are
09:22against
09:23the agreement
09:23and people
09:24who are
09:24against
09:25Brazil
09:25being here
09:26and competing
09:27with us
09:27will distort
09:29this and
09:29transform
09:30this into
09:31again another
09:32part of this
09:33disinformation
09:33campaign against
09:34Brazil
09:35that we do not
09:36have quality
09:36that we do not
09:37comply
09:38and all this
09:38that is
09:39I think
09:40does a lot
09:41of harm
09:41to the EU
09:42Brazil
09:43relation
09:44and it also
09:45creates a problem
09:47in terms of the EU
09:48Mercosur agreement
09:49and if
09:50you cannot
09:51come to
09:51resolution
09:52through these
09:53talks
09:53and the ban
09:55remains in
09:55place
09:56do you fear
09:57it could
09:57somehow
09:58undermine
09:59or jeopardize
10:00the broader
10:01EU
10:02Mercosur deal
10:02in any way
10:03I hope
10:04that we can
10:05quickly
10:05solve this
10:07because if you
10:07look at the
10:08products that
10:09are involved
10:09these were
10:10sensitive products
10:12that were the
10:12object of quotas
10:13I was one
10:15of the negotiators
10:16of the agreement
10:16and I know
10:17how much
10:17we paid
10:18in terms
10:19of if you
10:19want
10:20for these
10:21quotas
10:21in terms
10:22of the
10:22negotiation
10:23so if
10:23we stop
10:24exporting
10:24bovine
10:25meat
10:26poultry
10:27honey
10:28we are
10:28losing
10:29there is a
10:30reversal
10:31of expectations
10:32of what we
10:32thought the
10:33agreement was
10:33going to be
10:34for us
10:34so there is
10:35frustration
10:36on the part
10:37of the
10:37Brazilian
10:38producers
10:39and I don't
10:39want to
10:40not respond
10:41to what you
10:41asked me
10:42about
10:43countermeasures
10:43or whatever
10:44that's not
10:45how we
10:45operate
10:46we prefer
10:47dialogue
10:47we prefer
10:48cooperation
10:50but if
10:51we need
10:52to go down
10:53another road
10:54we will
10:55but this is
10:56not the time
10:56to speculate
10:57about that
10:58not to
10:58anticipate
10:59that
11:02Brazil's
11:03ambassador
11:04Pedro Miguel
11:04da Costa
11:05e Silva
11:06speaking to
11:06Marek
11:07Gwyn
11:07let's go
11:08back to
11:08Maria
11:08Tadeo
11:09in Riga
11:10now
11:10Maria
11:11you spoke
11:11to Norway's
11:12foreign
11:13minister
11:13S.P.
11:14Bart
11:14Aydab
11:15tell us
11:15all about
11:15it
11:18yeah I
11:19did
11:19Stefan
11:20and this
11:20is an
11:21interview
11:21in a
11:22week
11:22in which
11:2311
11:23countries
11:23including
11:24Norway
11:24but also
11:25the
11:25United
11:25Kingdom
11:26and
11:26France
11:26have
11:27announced
11:27sanctions
11:27on
11:28Israeli
11:28settlements
11:29in
11:29the
11:30West
11:30Bank
11:30Norway's
11:31foreign
11:31minister
11:32telling me
11:32this is
11:33fully
11:33justified
11:34he also
11:35said
11:35Israel
11:35should
11:36now
11:36listen
11:36and
11:37change
11:37course
11:37but
11:38added
11:38some
11:39very
11:39strong
11:39words
11:39this
11:40is
11:40the
11:41most
11:41far
11:41right
11:41government
11:42in the
11:42history
11:42of
11:43Israel
11:43has
11:43now
11:44taken
11:44the
11:44country
11:44in a
11:45very
11:45dangerous
11:46path
11:46let's
11:46take
11:46a
11:47look
11:48it
11:48is
11:49absolutely
11:49not
11:50true
11:50that
11:50this
11:50in
11:51any
11:51way
11:51is
11:51a
11:51reward
11:52for
11:52terrorism
11:52this
11:53is
11:53a
11:53strong
11:53signal
11:54of
11:54support
11:54for
11:55all
11:55those
11:55Palestinians
11:56who
11:56want
11:56to have
11:57a decent
11:57Palestinian
11:57state
11:58that
11:58signed up
11:59once upon
12:00a time
12:01to the
12:01agreement
12:01that there
12:02should be
12:02a two
12:02state
12:02solution
12:03these
12:03are
12:03the
12:03people
12:04who
12:04rejected
12:05violence
12:05the
12:06Palestinian
12:06authority
12:07has nothing
12:08to do
12:08with
12:09Hamas
12:09who is
12:10actually
12:10their
12:10enemy
12:11and this
12:11is
12:11support
12:12to the
12:12moderate
12:12Palestinians
12:13but
12:13we
12:14cannot
12:14see
12:14this
12:14extreme
12:15settler
12:16activity
12:17where
12:17you
12:17have
12:17violence
12:18against
12:18people
12:19against
12:19livestock
12:20against
12:21houses
12:22you
12:22know
12:22really
12:23removing
12:24every
12:25possibility
12:26of life
12:26in large
12:27parts
12:28of what
12:28is
12:28legally
12:29Palestinian
12:30land
12:30to promote
12:31settlements
12:31and I'm
12:32very happy
12:33that
12:33the United
12:34Kingdom
12:34and Canada
12:35and France
12:36and several
12:37other countries
12:37have come
12:38to the
12:38place
12:39where
12:39countries
12:40like Norway
12:40and Spain
12:41already
12:41were
12:41a long
12:42time ago
12:42so this
12:43was a
12:43strong
12:44statement
12:44to Israel
12:45they should
12:45take it
12:46seriously
12:46you speak
12:47about the
12:47UK
12:47the reaction
12:48from the
12:48Israeli
12:49has been
12:49to say
12:50you need
12:50to close
12:51down
12:51the consulate
12:51within 30
12:52days
12:53from Jerusalem
12:54to me
12:54that really
12:55doesn't sound
12:56like a country
12:56that is going
12:57to change
12:57course
12:59this
12:59the
13:01Netanyahu
13:01government
13:02is the
13:03most far
13:03right
13:04government
13:04in Israel's
13:05history
13:06elections
13:07are coming
13:07let's see
13:08what the
13:08Israelis
13:08choose
13:09in this
13:10election
13:10but that
13:11government
13:11in my
13:12view
13:12has
13:12driven
13:13Israel
13:13into a
13:14very
13:14dangerous
13:14place
13:15I think
13:15because I
13:17very much
13:17care about
13:18Israel
13:18I'm inspired
13:19by Israel
13:20I know
13:20Israel quite
13:20well
13:21just like I
13:22am inspired
13:22by the
13:22Palestinian
13:23community
13:23I think
13:24the only
13:25way to
13:26live
13:26normal
13:27peaceful
13:27life in
13:28that region
13:28is that
13:29they agree
13:29to have a
13:30two-state
13:30solution
13:31to delineate
13:32what is
13:32Palestinian
13:32what is
13:33Israeli
13:33and then
13:34the Israeli
13:35state as a
13:36Jewish homeland
13:37can continue
13:37so I
13:38believe
13:38what we
13:39are doing
13:39although it
13:40might seem
13:40rough for
13:41some Israelis
13:42right now
13:42is also a
13:43commitment to
13:44peace for
13:44Israel itself
13:45but just as a
13:46final point
13:46so this is
13:46clear you
13:47mentioned the
13:47election
13:47obviously will
13:48be the Israeli
13:48people who
13:49will have to
13:49decide who
13:50leads Israel
13:52but do you
13:53hope whatever
13:54the outcome
13:55that there will
13:56be a change
13:57of course because
13:57it does not
13:58look like from
13:59the ground
14:00as it stands
14:01that much of
14:01this will prompt
14:02action
14:02so it's not
14:04my job to
14:05tell other
14:05countries who
14:06to elect
14:06that for
14:06the Israelis
14:07but I do
14:07hope that
14:08whatever happens
14:09there Israel
14:10at one point
14:11understands that
14:13they've been on
14:13a very dangerous
14:14track
14:14that Israel
14:18whatever government
14:18understands that
14:20they have been
14:21losing so much
14:22support they had
14:22tremendous support
14:24after 7th of
14:26October across
14:26the world
14:27there was a lot
14:28of understanding
14:28for the need to
14:29defend against
14:30terrorist attacks
14:32but the way
14:32that they have
14:33done this
14:34you know
14:35with more than
14:3570,000 people
14:36killed including
14:3720,000 children
14:38the total destruction
14:39of most of Gaza
14:40it's a blatant
14:41violation of
14:42international law
14:42of international
14:43human rights law
14:44of international
14:45humanitarian law
14:46and the problem
14:47has been that
14:48too many countries
14:49have been careful
14:50in criticizing Israel
14:51because you were
14:52so easily attacked
14:53of being anti-Semitic
14:55which is a very
14:55That has been a factor
14:56you think?
14:57I think that has
14:58led to less
14:59daring positions
15:01and since we
15:02started this
15:03interview with
15:04Ukraine
15:05I want to say
15:05that the West
15:07has been very
15:08firm and clear
15:09and good
15:09on saying that
15:10Ukraine is the
15:11victim of a
15:12Russian aggression
15:13but we would be
15:14more credible
15:15if we stood up
15:16for international
15:16law everywhere
15:18against all people
15:19you know
15:20in all times
15:22and I think
15:23by being so
15:24wobbly
15:24and so unclear
15:26and so
15:27unprincipled
15:28in the dealing
15:28with the Middle East
15:29I think that has
15:30undermined the
15:31credibility
15:31of the West
15:35Maria Tadeo
15:36in Riga
15:37thank you
15:37very much
15:3925 years
15:4025 years
15:42already
15:42I'm sure
15:43you still remember
15:44where you were
15:45on that day
15:46a quarter century
15:48after the attacks
15:49of September 11
15:502001
15:50the images
15:51remain etched
15:53into the world's
15:54collective memory
15:55nearly 3,000
15:56people were killed
15:57in New York
15:58Washington
15:59and near
16:00Shanksville
16:00Pennsylvania
16:01that day
16:01a traumatic
16:03experience
16:03that changed
16:04America
16:04and reshaped
16:06global politics
16:07so 25 years
16:09later
16:09what is the
16:10legacy of 9-11
16:11and what lessons
16:12should we still
16:13be learning
16:13joining me now
16:15to discuss this
16:16this is Anthony
16:17Gardner
16:18former US
16:18ambassador
16:19to the European
16:19Union
16:20during the second
16:21Obama administration
16:22good morning sir
16:23great to have you
16:24on the show
16:24good morning
16:26good to see you
16:26again Stefan
16:27so how fundamentally
16:29did 9-11
16:30change the United States
16:32and did it change
16:32the world
16:33just as profoundly
16:36I think it did
16:37I remember
16:39where I was
16:40that day
16:40like many of us
16:41I was in a conference
16:42room in the office
16:43in London
16:44we were all
16:44called down
16:45to a room
16:46where the television
16:47was on
16:48and we felt
16:48shock
16:49of course we felt
16:50anger
16:51but we also felt
16:52unity
16:53we were a very
16:54united country
16:55then
16:55today unfortunately
16:57we're a very
16:57polarized country
16:58which of course
16:59is a shame
16:59but I think
17:00to answer your
17:00question
17:01there are probably
17:01three or so
17:02big takeaways
17:03for me
17:04one of them
17:05is the power
17:06of asymmetric
17:08warfare
17:09we saw
17:11what damage
17:12a small
17:13but determined
17:14radicalized
17:15group of
17:15well terrorists
17:17can do
17:18with few tools
17:19at their disposal
17:20against a much
17:20more powerful force
17:22and we're seeing
17:23that again today
17:24all these years
17:25later
17:25we're seeing it
17:27of course
17:27in the Middle East
17:29we're seeing
17:30it in the
17:32Persian Gulf
17:32where Iran
17:33is still
17:33continuing
17:34to inflict
17:34damage
17:35against
17:36the United
17:37States
17:37after taking
17:38a beating
17:38we're seeing
17:39the power
17:40of asymmetric
17:40warfare
17:41in Ukraine
17:41where
17:42Ukrainians
17:43are holding
17:43out against
17:44a much
17:45larger force
17:47but another
17:48takeaway
17:49is that
17:49military force
17:51is not enough
17:52to defeat
17:53terrorism
17:53the idea
17:54that we can
17:54defeat terrorism
17:55just using
17:56power
17:56is I think
17:57misguided
17:58we need
17:59financial
18:00economic
18:00means
18:01we need
18:01diplomacy
18:02we need
18:02culture
18:03and so forth
18:03and the other
18:04part of what
18:05makes it happen
18:05is that AI
18:06is going to
18:06make asymmetric
18:07warfare even
18:08more relevant
18:09and very quickly
18:10the second
18:11takeaway for me
18:12is that the
18:12United States
18:13just can't
18:14retreat into
18:15a cocoon
18:16we may lose
18:17interest in the
18:17world
18:18but the world
18:19is not going
18:19to lose
18:19interest in us
18:20and the third
18:21is that
18:22you know
18:22in the 9-11
18:23report
18:24I was struck
18:25at all the
18:25information we
18:26were receiving
18:26about a possible
18:27attack
18:28and we
18:28just didn't
18:29manage to
18:29process
18:30information
18:30fast enough
18:31for a
18:33generation
18:33that did
18:34not
18:34experience
18:34that day
18:35first hand
18:36the younger
18:37ones
18:37why does
18:389-11
18:38still matter
18:41well
18:429-11
18:43still matters
18:43for the
18:44young
18:44for the
18:44reasons
18:45I think
18:45I alluded
18:46to
18:46is that
18:47the world
18:47is full
18:48of risks
18:49that will
18:52affect
18:52the United
18:53States
18:53I'm here
18:54thinking
18:54about
18:54climate
18:55change
18:55or
18:56migration
18:56or
18:58various
18:59types
18:59of
19:00pandemics
19:01and so
19:01forth
19:01the idea
19:02that we
19:02can
19:02retreat
19:03into
19:04our
19:04own
19:04borders
19:05is
19:05simply
19:05wrong
19:05because
19:06all
19:06of
19:06those
19:06risks
19:07that
19:07have
19:07a
19:07transnational
19:08impact
19:08will
19:09have
19:10an
19:10effect
19:11on
19:11the
19:11United
19:11States
19:12and
19:12that's
19:12why
19:12we
19:12need
19:13the
19:13tools
19:14I
19:14mentioned
19:14not
19:14just
19:15military
19:16and
19:17if
19:17there
19:18is
19:18one
19:18lesson
19:18from
19:199-11
19:19that
19:19political
19:20leaders
19:20should
19:21remember
19:21today
19:22what
19:22is
19:23it
19:25well
19:25I
19:25think
19:25it's
19:26cooperation
19:26we
19:26forget
19:27that
19:27this
19:28was
19:28a
19:29good
19:30example
19:31of
19:31how
19:31countries
19:32came
19:32together
19:33our
19:34allies
19:35immediately
19:35expressed
19:36support
19:36for us
19:37and
19:38of course
19:39it was
19:39the United
19:40States
19:40principally
19:41that
19:41defeated
19:41that
19:43threat
19:44and captured
19:45Osama bin
19:45Laden
19:46but
19:46allies
19:47came to
19:48our
19:48aid
19:49at
19:49that
19:50point
19:50and
19:50we
19:50need
19:50to
19:51remember
19:52that
19:52we
19:53need
19:53allies
19:53to
19:54defend
19:54against
19:55these
19:55kind
19:55of
19:55threats
19:55in the
19:56future
19:56all right
19:56Ambassador
19:57Gardner
19:58thank you
19:58so much
19:58for coming
19:59on the
19:59show
19:59today
19:59and
20:00that's
20:01it
20:01for
20:01today
20:01enjoy
20:02your
20:02weekend
20:03I'm
20:03Stefan
20:03Grobe
20:04see you
20:04soon
20:07you
20:09you