Skip to playerSkip to main content
Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has sharply criticized the Trump administration over its partial release of Jeffrey Epstein-related files, accusing the Department of Justice of “flaunting the law.” Massie claims the DOJ is withholding key internal communications despite Congress passing the Epstein Files Transparency Act demanding full disclosure. The controversy is reigniting political tensions over the handling of Epstein investigations and raising fresh questions about government transparency.

#Trump #EpsteinCase #BreakingNews #USPolitics #TrumpNews #EpsteinFiles #ViralVideo #PoliticalScandal #WhiteHouse #USNews #GlobalNews #TrendingNow #NewsUpdate #Controversy #LegalBattle #MediaStorm #ViralClip #Investigation #PoliticsToday #HeadlineNews

~HT.178~PR.460~ED.194~GR.508~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00There is hope here. We fought the president, the attorney general, the FBI director,
00:07the speaker of the house, and the vice president to get this win.
00:12But they're on our side today, though. So let's give them some credit as well.
00:19They are finally on the side of justice. And as Roe said, don't muck it up in the Senate.
00:26Don't get too cute. We're all paying attention. If you want to add some additional protections for
00:31these survivors, go for it. But if you do anything that prevents any disclosure,
00:36you are not for the people and you are not part of this effort. Do not muck it up in
00:42the Senate.
00:43Behind me, I have three documents from the DOJ production that are emblematic of the massive
00:48failure of the DOJ to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. To my right is an email
00:55that was sent by the victims' lawyers to the DOJ. It was a list of names not to redact.
01:01Or, sorry, a list of names not to release. What did the DOJ do with this email? They released
01:07this email in the document production. Literally the worst thing you could do to the survivors,
01:14you did. And they're getting phone calls. A lot of these people didn't want to be known.
01:19And we know you touched the document because you redacted one name and you redacted the lawyer's
01:25name, but you left the survivor's name there. The next document I want to show you,
01:30that was in the title, the victims' survivors' names, right? The title of this one is Child Sex
01:37Trafficking. Co-Conspirators. Fully Redacted. And by the way, I'm going to unredact them here.
01:48Les Wexner is in this. Now your assistant, your deputy attorney general said, oh, well,
01:56he appears hundreds of times in the files. But he doesn't appear in this file until I forced you to
02:02release it, where he's listed as a co-conspirator, not to tax evasion, but to child sex trafficking,
02:11not to prostitution, not to money laundering, child sex trafficking.
02:17And then finally, what we have here, the third exhibit that I have is emblematic of the FD302 release.
02:26These are the documents that we need, that you're holding onto and over-redacting because they have
02:33the names of the men who are implicated. How do we know? Because the survivors gave testimony
02:40to the FBI, and it's in there. And what happens when you go to the portal at the DOJ to
02:47look at
02:48what's behind this redaction? Another redaction. So we can't even see them. And then there's some of
02:54these files you've pulled down from the website that we will never see. Because we can't search
03:01the redactions. So I have several questions for you. Who's responsible? Are you able to track who in
03:09your organization made this massive failure and released the victim's names? Are you able to track
03:15who it was that obscured Les Wexner's name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document? Do you have that
03:23kind of accountability? I believe Wexner's name was listed more than 4,000 times?
03:32Yeah, I already told you that. This is where he's listed as a co-conspirator.
03:35Can I finish my answer? Come on. Let me finish my answer. We corrected that within 40 minutes. He was
03:43already, you're acting like everybody's trying to cover up Wexner's name.
03:47Reclaiming my time. Reclaiming my time. This isn't how this works.
03:52Can I have my time back? Mr. Chairman. The general lady can give her answer. The time
03:57belongs to the gentleman. All right. I'm reclaiming my time. Can I give my answer?
04:00So I'm going to put the language of the bill up on the screen.
04:04Chairman, may I give my answer on that? It's a political joke and I need to give my answer on
04:10that.
04:10We'll let the, we'll let the attorney general respond and then the gentleman can move to his next
04:14question. Chairman, it's my time. Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question.
04:17You can give me. Within 40 minutes,
04:19Wexner's name was added back. Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed.
04:24Red-handed. There was one redaction out of over 4,700. Where he's listed as a co-conspirator.
04:30And we invited you in. You know what? Shut the video.
04:32We in. This guy has Trump derangement syndrome. He needs to get, you're a failed politician.
04:38Chairman, please restore his time and remind the witness of the rules here.
04:42There is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday
04:47that he trafficked to other individuals. Is that your position as well?
04:54My position is any victim who comes forward, of course, we would love to hear from them.
05:021-800-CALL-FBI. Did you ask Merrick Garland that the last four years? Did you talk about Epstein
05:10at all the last four years? I'm reclaiming my time. I'm glad you're asking about Merrick Garland.
05:14You don't get a reclaim time. Because this is bigger than Watergate.
05:16When I don't answer a question the way you want. This goes over four administrations.
05:20You don't have to go back to Biden. Let's go back to Obama. Let's go back to George Bush.
05:24This cover-up spans decades. And you are responsible for this portion of it.
05:30And that's where you're the- Now, I want to know at what point, at what point
05:34did the FBI and the DOJ decide that Lex Wessner was not a co-conspirator? Because
05:40our Epstein Files Transparency Act requires you, please put it back on the screen, please,
05:47to release the internal decision about whether to prosecute him or not. And it's not in the files,
05:53and it's not in the files for any of these other men.
05:55The time of the gentleman has expired. May she answer?
05:59And he's a hypocrite because he voted against the ban that we were talking about on deep fake
06:05AI porn. Only two people voted against it, and you were one of them, hypocrite.
06:12The gentleman's time has expired.
06:15For what purpose does the gentleman from Kentucky seek recognition?
06:18I ask unanimous consent to address the House for one minute.
06:21Without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute.
06:28Mr. Speaker, it's been a year since the President signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act,
06:34and the government continues to withhold over three million files. That's why we've introduced
06:39the Epstein Files Transparency Act II to bring the fight to the state court's accountability to the
06:44Department of Justice and closure for survivors. We want perpetrators of these crimes to be
06:51investigated and prosecuted. Men like Jess Staley, Leon Black, Les Wexner, David Copperfield, Lapo Elkhom,
06:59Tom Pritzker, Glenn Dubin, Frederick Fekai, Eduardo Teodorani, John Luke Brunel, conveniently dead by suicide in prison,
07:08Daniel Sead, recently discovered dead in Paris, Ramsey Elkholi, and Prince Andrew, who committed
07:15sex crimes in the United States, too. And women like Leslie Groff, not a victim, who conspired with
07:21Epstein to traffic other women. Perhaps hearing these names will shame the Department of Justice
07:27Justice into delivering justice. I yield back.
07:33Subscribe to One India and never miss an update. Download the One India app now.

Recommended