00:00New move in Fagan case by solicitor. The Atlanta Georgian Sunday, July 6, 1913. Dorsey will endeavor
00:07to force defense to disclose their documentary evidence. Act is counterstroke. Frank's attorneys
00:12said to have affidavits exonerating Frank and indicating Conley's guilt. A sensational turn
00:18in the Fagan murder mystery, according to one of the attorneys for the defense, will develop next
00:22week when Solicitor General Hugh M. Dorsey issues a subpenadusis tecum on attorneys Luther Z. Rosser
00:28and Ruben Arnold, citing them to produce all the affidavits they have secured that bear on the
00:34crime. The movement is in the nature of a counterstroke to block the pending subpenadusis tecum
00:39filed by the defense, citing the state to produce all the affidavits that have been secured. The
00:45defense strongly maintains that it will win its point and that the prosecution will suffer.
00:49The attorneys say that the constitution of the state clearly outlines the action of the court
00:54in such matters, that the defendant is entitled to be faced with all the evidence against him,
01:00while the prosecution will labor under the handicap that a defendant is innocent until he is proven
01:06guilty. Dorsey is silent. While no announcement would be made by Solicitor Dorsey relative to the
01:13contemplated subpenadusis tecum, it was intimated by him that such action might be taken at an early
01:19date, and that when it was the defense and the prosecution would lock horns in the first decisive
01:25battle in the sensational case. Affidavits that are sought by the defense are the three different
01:30sworn statements of the Negro, Jim Conley, the affidavit given by the Negro cook at the Frank home,
01:37Manola McKnight, the Formby affidavit and the affidavit of Monteen Stover, the girl who stated that
01:43she entered Frank's office at a time when he said he was there and found the office deserted.
01:48The state will seek to obtain affidavits contradicting their theory and placing the
01:53crime on the Negro sweeper Jim Conley. These affidavits are said to deal principally with the
01:58time different witnesses entered and left the factory April 26th, the most vital question in
02:04the trial, affidavits of defense. The defense is said to be in possession of affidavits that show
02:10Monteen Stover entered and departed from the factory before Mary Fagan's car reached the heart of the city,
02:16that the Negro Jim Conley entered the factory earlier in the day than he said he did, and that
02:22he, instead of the indicted pencil factory superintendent, committed the murder because
02:27the superintendent left the factory at least ten minutes before Conley said he helped him dispose
02:32of the body, and that the Formby affidavit, a one-time sensational bit of evidence substantiating
02:38the defense, was given by the woman at the behest of the police detectives without regard for its
02:43accuracy, and that Mrs. Formby has since admitted that she never knew Leo M. Frank or heard of him
02:49until he was held as a suspect in connection with the murder.
Comments