Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 23 minutos
El director de El Espectador, Fidel Cano Correa, lee el editorial de este domingo 26 de julio, en el que reflexiona sobre la propuesta del presidente electo, Abelardo de la Espriella, de posesionarse en una guarnición militar.

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:01The president-elect should not be sworn in in a military zone.
00:05During the campaign, then-candidate Abelardo de la Espriella sought to position himself
00:10as the defender of institutionalism, democracy, and the constitution.
00:15In his speeches he said that his opponent, Senator Iván Cepeda, represented the way
00:21towards a breakdown in the separation of powers, while he was going to guarantee respect
00:27to the civil tradition, beyond the discussions about the validity or not of its
00:32criticisms, towards Cepeda.
00:34The question now is whether that important promise will be kept.
00:40Receiving his mandate in a military garrison, as he has proposed to do, would be sending a
00:45a message very far removed from that promise.
00:48To begin with, the president-elect has already made the same mistake as outgoing president Gustavo.
00:53Petro. After a long tradition of civilian defense ministers, the current president
00:59He appointed Pedro Sánchez at a time of chaos within his government.
01:04Now, the designated defense minister is retired General Jorge Eduardo Mora.
01:11Beyond Sánchez and Mora's capabilities to hold the position, the problem
01:17It is a symbolic one. Military forces, in their contemporary version, are designed
01:23to not participate in government or be deliberative.
01:27This is a national and global learning experience from the years in which the army and forces
01:33Police forces were used to persecute opponents of the governments.
01:37The 1991 Constitution made an explicit effort to create mechanisms to guarantee that the
01:46Civil institutions must be respected by the military, regardless of who
01:51occupy the Casa de Nariño.
01:53In that context, the proposal to hold the presidential inauguration at a garrison
01:59The military violates that constitutional principle.
02:02The president-elect's team has sold the idea as an opportunity to
02:08to pay tribute to the military forces, which is well deserved.
02:12However, actively involving the military in an event of this nature
02:18This policy sends a message contrary to its required subordination to civil power.
02:24Receiving the presidential sash is the culmination of an electoral process and that is why it is done before
02:30another democratic and civil body, the Congress of the Republic.
02:35Introducing the military into that dynamic is not paying them homage, but throwing them out.
02:42to the political debate, damage his image among all Colombians and awaken unnecessary fears
02:48in the opposition.
02:50As he mentioned in an interview with El Espectador, the senator from the Democratic Center,
02:55Rafael Nieto, and I quote, in the history of Colombia, only three heads of government
03:01They have taken possession of a barracks.
03:04José María Melo, Tomás Cipriano de Pósquera and Gustavo Rojas Pinillo, the three dictators.
03:11The message is very bad.
03:13It's unfortunate.
03:15Of course, the president-elect's goal is not to stage a coup, but that's why
03:22He himself must reconsider his intentions.
03:27The Senate already threw a possible lifeline to the next government this week.
03:31This week they approved the move to Cauca for the presidential inauguration.
03:37Nowhere does it say that it has to be done inside a military garrison.
03:42The message of decentralization and of reclaiming a department that is experiencing several crises is
03:48important.
03:49There, the president-elect's team can hold a civic event and send a message
03:55of unity that the country needs.
03:58The tribute to the soldiers and police officers, necessary and just, can be carried out immediately afterward.
04:05in ceremonies appropriate for that purpose.
04:07To avoid sowing more fear and division, let us not forget that our democracy is, in essence, civilian.
04:16If you agree with this editorial, please send your 500-word counter-editorial to
04:37also, in essence, civilist.
04:37If you agree with this editorial, send your 500-word counter-editorial to agar.
04:38In other words, if you agree with this editorial, send your counter-editorial of 500.
04:38It can be done in a straight line in a planned case.
04:39Thank you so much.
Comentarios

Recomendada