Skip to playerSkip to main content
A short presentation of a quantitative article concerning three quantitative models of the different perspectives related to USA migration and its indirect causes. What causes migration? What are some short term and long-term solutions? What are the economic and labor costs of decreasing the supply of legal migration?

Ultimately, only we can decide the kind of world we want to live in.
------
Check out some of my research!
If you prefer to start at the beginning, read my first thesis
https://scholarworks.calstate.edu/concern/theses/bv73c947v
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12680/bv73c947v
Or, you can go at your own pace
https://independent.academia.edu/FranciscoJLopezMont

#science
#research #study #studyscience #academia #academic #science #scienceexperiment #stories #storytelling #human #experiences #perceptions #perception #america
#university #graduate #graduatestudent #graduatestudies #thesis #communication
#usa #colombia #brazil #guatemala #elsalvador #peru #perú #bolivia #argentina
#california #paraguay #uruguay #chile #chilenos #venezuela #ecuador #chicano #chicana
#migration #border #bordersecurity #southernborder #borderpatrol #asylum #asylumseekers #migrationpolicy #migrationexperts #migrationstories #migrationservices #analysis #datascience #dataanalytics #dataanalysis #data #data #refugees #taxation #taxationsystem #individual #individualrights #humanrights #humanity #evidence #evidencebasedpractice #analyze #election #vote #voting #representacion
#immigration #migrantes #migrant #migrants #migrantlabourers #venezuela
#immigrationlaw #leyes #leyesdeinmigracion #policy #policyanalysis #politics #politicalnews #politicalscience #2026 #2026election #2026elections
#immigrationstories #riogrande #crossing #resources #labor #laborers #trabajadores
#undocumentedimmigrants #north #mexico #méxico #mexican #latinamerican
#undocumented #latino #latinx #latina #latinas #latinoamerica #latinoamérica #global

Category

📚
Learning
Transcript
00:00Thank y'all for y'all's time. My name is Francisco Lopez. Today's presentation is modeled after part of my
00:082025 thesis, titled Migratory Sanctuary, State-Level Marijuana Laws in All 50 USA States, TCOs, and Mexican Migration.
00:20We'll get started by discussing some of the frameworks integrated within this thesis. Thereupon, we'll continue with a review of
00:28the research structure, methodology, and its results.
00:32Our phenomena of interest concerns the unique species, Homo sapiens. Early available records indicate that humans have migrated seeking safety
00:42and sanctuary in different places, as depicted online by the illustration credited to the USA's public broadcasting system.
00:48Our present-day lives are similarly filled with trillions of decisions, whose analysis has concerned the effects of roles on
00:56interpersonal behaviors, as well as the variation in inscriptions of the rational versus irrational dichotomy.
01:02While all decisions can thus be analyzed, decisions and decision-making patterns undertaken over millennia, like human migration, are more
01:11dependent upon resources needed for human survival, such as food, water, health, eusociality, and shelter.
01:17This is supported by mixed methods evidence from Infante Amate, Masi, and others, as noted on screen.
01:24Though many studies analyze the direct effects of laws on migrating folks, few analyze the indirect effects of USA laws,
01:31much less at the state level.
01:34Thus, we arrive at my analysis' main aim, to analyze the indirect effects of USA domestic laws within some of
01:42the USA's open system spheres.
01:44Specifically, in the USA, some migration laws attempt to control the supply of legal migration through use of numerical limits
01:51based on nationality.
01:53However, while this can artificially raise both the value and price of USA citizenship due to the USA federal government's
01:59monopoly in the supply of legal migration, it also results in monopoly deadweight loss.
02:04This deadweight loss of legal migration impacts labor industries in the USA, such as nursing, hospice, education, construction, and agriculture.
02:15As aforementioned, the decision to pursue migration is highly dependent upon the minimum resources needed for humans to remain alive.
02:22One of these, physical safety, is impacted by USA demands for marijuana from the USM.
02:27As noted by Gabrielo Baita's quantitative analysis, USA states ordering the USM which legalize marijuana have a statistically significant decrease
02:36in their violent crime rates.
02:38As such, this analysis' objective is to understand if marijuana legalization's negative relationship with violent crime results in the indirect
02:47effect of decreasing migration demand from the USM to the USA.
02:52Essentially, do increases in USA state-level marijuana legalization decrease migration from Mexico?
02:59While the primary hypothesis operationalized this objective relative to the net undocumented population of USM-born folks in the USA,
03:07this analysis employed a series of posteriori models, which compared and contrasted differing quantifications of USA state-level marijuana legalization,
03:15among other variables.
03:17The research was first conceptualized in 2023, since USA law provides protections on human subject research, which require permission from
03:26institutional review boards at universities, or IRBs, among other requirements.
03:30IRB classification as non-human methodology research was obtained in early 2024.
03:36Results were available in 2024, and by 2025, the thesis features were finalized.
03:42Though the thesis contained three quantitative analyses, today's presentation is based on the original thesis, second analysis.
03:50Thus, some on-screen references to this work may be labeled analysis too.
03:55This analysis thus sought to provide evidence of the indirect relationship between marijuana legalization in the USA and USM migration
04:03to the USA.
04:06As a result, this analysis addresses an existing gap within the academic literature on the spillover and or unintended effects
04:12of USA laws.
04:14Therein, I reviewed all 50 USA state legislature's legislative records in order to quantify the level of marijuana legalization in
04:22the USA at the state level.
04:25An example of this quantification is provided on-screen, along with the respective state statutes.
04:30Moreover, though academic analyses of marijuana have a variety of differing methods for quantifying marijuana,
04:37these variable operationalization methods haven't been contrasted previously.
04:41As a result, I operationalized the data collected in three differing ways and tested these through linear regressions.
04:48An example of one of these operationalization methods is shown on-screen, by table E2MA24.
04:54As visible on-screen, the longitudinal data collected and operationalized represented all 50 USA state statutes from 1990 to 2021.
05:04This analysis's primary results were statistically significant, as shown by the corresponding model's p-value.
05:1162.22% of the variation in the annual change of the total population of undocumented Mexican citizens in the
05:20USA was explained by the amount of states with statutes legalizing marijuana recreationally and or medicinally for the first time.
05:27The model's tolerance and variance information factors led to the rejection of the probability of multicollinearity.
05:34Moreover, the additional operational methods employed indicate that the relationship between the net annual change, as aforementioned, and the USA's
05:41state-level legalization of marijuana is sensitive to differences in defining the operationalization of concepts such as legalization, marijuana, and
05:49CBD.
05:51These differences extend to those amongst USA state statutes in defining the aforementioned terms in interstate, comparable terms.
05:59Other notable concepts include low THC.
06:02Thus, this analysis results, stemming from the model C2MA24, particularly when contrasted by those of alternative methodologies, support the statistical
06:12effectiveness of the continuous quantification of marijuana legalization, rather than an original operationalization method.
06:19Concerning some of these additional secondary results,
06:24Model 6 is a linear regression between the USA's state-level legalization of marijuana and the aggregate undocumented migrant population
06:32of Mexican citizens in the USA.
06:35Notably, Model 6 had the highest confidence interval out of all the models employed in this analysis.
06:40Moreover, although both Model 5 and Model 6 tested the same relationship, Model 5's inclusion of low THC both overestimated
06:49and underestimated the data, leading to a lower variability accounted for than the Trichotomous Model 6.
06:56Conversely, when employing a multilinear regression with all variables, including the year, total undocumented population as aforementioned, as well as
07:05both the Trichotomous and Quanticotomous models of USA state-level marijuana legalization,
07:09the year was the only variable with a statistically significant relationship with the annual change in undocumented Mexican citizens in
07:18the USA.
07:19However, the variability in this relationship is supported by both the operationalized data shown on screen and the model's heteroscedastic
07:27bias noted in the paper.
07:29Last but not least, Model 8 ran the same multilinear regression, but without the variable for the undocumented population of
07:37Mexican citizens in the USA.
07:38The confidence interval for the remaining variables improved, though at the cost of a 0.06 point decrease in the
07:46Model R-squared, indicating that the population of US citizens undocumented in the USA may explain some of the data
07:52which would not be counted otherwise.
07:55Last but not least, we turn to the thesis implications.
08:01For most, this analysis, Model MA24 provides statistically significant evidence supporting the rejection of the null hypothesis.
08:09However, the replicability of the results generated can be improved through the continuous rather than ordinal operationalization of the USA's
08:17state-level marijuana legalization.
08:19Secondarily, Model 6 provided evidence that, in direct contrast, the trichotomous operationalization may be more internally valid than the quad
08:28-cotomous.
08:29These results are particularly significant when limitations don't allow for the continuous operationalization of the USA's state-level legalization and
08:38or regulation of an object such as marijuana.
08:40Notably, the relationship between the aforementioned variables appears to be moderated by variables oscillating in years such as 2007, among
08:49others.
08:51Therein, Model 7, 8, and C2 MA24 provide support for Massey and Prang's model of migration's rational and irrational incentives.
09:00However, the successful application of Occam's razor and extension of its time horizon poses significant questions for the rationality versus
09:09irrationality debate,
09:10particularly due to the unexpected spillover costs created by USA domestic statutes, such as state-level marijuana legalization and or
09:20regulation statutes.
09:21Secondarily, Models 5, 6, and C2 MA24 provide evidence indirectly supporting Gavrilova et al.'s results on the relationship between USA
09:33marijuana legalization and violent crime rates.
09:35Finally, Models 5, 6, and MA24 all provide support for Molina's analysis on an authorized USM marijuana farms and their
09:46geographic correlation with USM states with the highest immigration rates to the USA.
09:54As such, Models 5, 6, and C2 MA24 partially quantify the long-linked causal chain qualitatively supported by Muñoz, Fuentes,
10:06and Obina between USA weapons, commodities like marijuana, and displacement.
10:12Furthermore, the analysis results present further evidence for the rationality versus irrationality debate, given the opportunity costs of USA weapons
10:21exports, the stigmatization of marijuana use, and the USA's marijuana demand.
10:26Therefore, future analyses should review the intersection between these, specifically including USA weapons exports and migration.
10:34Significantly, there is evidence to support the socialization processes inherent with an undocumented in-group self-identification and their causal
10:43link to their determining frames.
10:45For example, individuals fleeing violence from TCOs or criminal organizations may have differing perceptions on TCOs and the illicit products
10:54they supply,
10:56particularly when they are faced with constant framed associations to TCOs themselves, such as THUG or CHOLO.
11:04However, countries which legalize and or decriminalize non-lethal drugs, such as marijuana, can monitor and incorporate their financial transaction
11:13while decreasing both direct and indirect framing costs to the population.
11:16Last but not least, the co-production of public policy outcomes through the set of iterative frames experience is vital
11:25to the prediction of future outcomes.
11:27In the case of Latin America, the USA's military intervention passed in Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras, Peru, Chile, Panama, Bolivia,
11:37Dominican Republic, Paraguay, Brazil, Uruguay, Haiti, Venezuela, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii, among other countries,
11:44have led to the spatial temporal dissemination of maladaptive behaviors, such as military human rights abuses, which mirror the more
11:51maladaptive governance behaviors employed by the USA, such as the use of torture techniques.
12:00Last but not least, this analysis results provide statistically significant support for the effects of differing taxation values placed upon
12:09differing individuals.
12:11Specifically, these tax law inequalities in the inscription of taxation values to citizens, among others, previously resulted in a comparatively
12:19greater value for USA citizenship over USM Mexican citizenship.
12:22Although the USA federal tax law inequalities didn't change after 2007, their international effects on migration were moderated, resulting in
12:32the aforementioned annual decreases.
12:33Similarly, this study quantifies Zikraff's theoretical inequality between nutritional and non-nutritional agricultural goods in Latin America, wherein non-nutritional
12:44agricultural goods, such as marijuana, may have an advantage over some climate change effects due to characteristics such as longer
12:51shelf life.
12:51Nevertheless, excessive dependency on autoliberalism, when combined with the horizontal dissemination of maladaptive behaviors, such as human rights abuses, provide
13:01evidence in support of the social construction of pan-ethno-racial identities, such as Latinx, Latina, and Trans-Latino, for
13:08the work of Gomez.
13:09It's also worth noting that the comparison of models dependent upon differing operationalizations also provide evidence for the support of
13:17the socio-legal construction of terms like marijuana, low THC, and CBD, among others.
13:23In particular, the lack of interchangeability between differing statutory definitions provides evidence of the need for the quantification of qualitative
13:35data.
13:37Thus, understanding the indirect spillover effects of USA domestic statutes, such as state-level marijuana statutes, can result in evidence
13:48-based statutory changes, indirectly alleviating gridlocked political and legal systems, such as the USA's migration supply.
13:57My name is Francisco. You can find a link to my thesis through either QR code, which you can scan
14:02by opening your camera, pointing it at the code, and pressing on the code on your camera screen until the
14:07hyperlink appears.
14:09You can also find it linked on my ORCID, as listed on screen. Thank you all for your time, energy,
14:15and consideration.
Comments
El Don Francisco
Creator
What are some of the unintended effects of our laws? How do they affect others? What do companies do with the money from our purchases?

Recommended