Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 39 minutes ago
It is absurd to say, as some people have been saying in Atlanta of late, that Solicitor General Dorsey "has taken the Phagan case from the Coroner," or has "butted in" on the Coroner's business in some way.

It would be equally sensible to say that the commanding general in a battle had "butted in" on a captain's business, when, as the battle progressed, the general gave directions of one sort and another to the captain as to its conduct.

The truth of the matter is, Solicitor General Dorsey has been in charge of the Mary Phagan case ever since it was brought to light.

Murder is a crime against the sovereign State, and not particularly against either the city of Atlanta or the county of Fulton, save in so far as they are a part of the State.

A murder in Atlanta is as much Savannah's business as it is Atlanta's so far as the violation of the laws of Georgia are concerned.

Solicitor Dorsey is a State official, and not specifically an Atlanta official, not yet a Fulton County official.

Office Useless in Main.

For certain purposes a Coroner's inquest sometimes is permitted under the law prior to Grand Jury investigation. Many lawyers hold, and rightly, that the office of Coroner is useless in the main, and ought to be abolished. It is a relic of old English procedure, instituted before the days of newspapers, telephones, telegrams, fast mails and other quick methods of communication.

In the absence of eyewitnesses to an apparent murder, however, a Coroner's inquest sometimes may serve an immediate purpose, and, perhaps, the Phagan case is a case in point with regard to that.

The Coroner is an officer entirely and definitely subordinate to the Solicitor General, and does not exercise any authority except such as he may exercise under the Solicitor.

The Solicitor assembles, in his discretion, the evidence against the accused, from it makes out a case for the Grand Jury, advises and instructs the Grand Jury as to its duty and rights in the matter, prepares an indictment for the Grand Jury's consideration, which, if found true, must be depended upon to set forth the case against the defendant to be summoned to bar in such exact terms that it may be guaranteed to withstand all attacks of opposing counsel in the trial of the case.

Has Full Responsibility.

The initial and the final responsibility for the State's case is in the hands of the Solicitor General.

There never is a minute from the time a murder is committed until a verdict is recorded that the State's cause is not in the hands of the Solicitor General, over and above all other officers.

He can not take a murder case "from the hands of a Coroner," because there never was a point of time in any murder case's history that it was not more in the hands of the Solicitor than it possibly could have been in the hands of the Coroner.
Transcript
00:00Fagan case and the Solicitor General's power under law, Dorsey, hasn't encroached on Coroner
00:05Atlanta, Georgia, on Tuesday, May 6, 1913, by a Georgia lawyer. It is absurd to say, as some
00:11people have been saying in Atlanta of late, that Solicitor General Dorsey has taken the Fagan
00:16case from the coroner, or has butted in on the coroner's business in some way. It would be
00:21equally sensible to say that the commanding general in a battle had butted in on a captain's
00:26business, when, as the battle progressed, the general gave directions of one sort and another
00:32to the captain as to its conduct. The truth of the matter is, Solicitor General Dorsey has been in
00:38charge of the Mary Fagan case ever since it was brought to light. Murder is a crime against the
00:43sovereign state, and not particularly against either the city of Atlanta or the county of Fulton,
00:48save insofar as they are a part of the state. A murder in Atlanta is as much Savannah's business
00:53as it is Atlanta's, so far as the violation of the laws of Georgia are concerned. Solicitor Dorsey
00:58is a state official, and not specifically an Atlanta official, not yet a Fulton County official.
01:03Office useless in Maine. For certain purposes, a coroner's inquest sometimes is permitted under
01:09the law prior to grand jury investigation. Many lawyers hold, and rightly, that the office of
01:14coroner is useless in the Maine and ought to be abolished. It is a relic of old English procedure,
01:19instituted before the days of newspapers, telephones, telegrams, fast mails, and other
01:24quick methods of communication. In the absence of eyewitnesses to an apparent murder, however,
01:30a coroner's inquest sometimes may serve an immediate purpose, and perhaps the Fagan case is a case in
01:35point with regard to that. The coroner is an officer entirely and definitely subordinate to the
01:40Solicitor General, and does not exercise any authority except such as he may exercise under the
01:45solicitor. The solicitor assembles, in his discretion, the evidence against the accused, from it makes
01:51out a case for the grand jury, advises and instructs the grand jury as to its duty and rights in
01:57the
01:57matter, prepares an indictment for the grand jury's consideration, which, if found true, must be
02:03depended upon to set forth the case against the defendant, to be summoned to bar in such exact terms
02:09that it may be guaranteed to withstand all attacks of opposing counsel in the trial of the case,
02:14has full responsibility. The initial and the final responsibility for the State's case is in the
02:20hands of the Solicitor General. There never is a minute from the time a murder is committed until
02:25a verdict is recorded that the State's cause is not in the hands of the Solicitor General,
02:30over and above all other officers. He cannot take a murder case from the hands of a coroner,
02:35because there never was a point of time in any murder case's history that it was not more in
02:40the hands of the Solicitor than it possibly could have been in the hands of the coroner.
02:44No man may be put in jeopardy of his life a second time in Georgia, save of his own motion,
02:49in criminal proceedings, but the verdict of a coroner's jury cannot be pleaded as former
02:53jeopardy. Policemen, coroners, sheriffs are all peace officers and have their direct and indirect
02:58duties to perform in the presence of crime against the State, but never is there a time when any one
03:03of
03:04them is equal in dignity or authority to the Solicitor General. There is but one trial upon
03:09motion of the State of a criminal case in Georgia, and that is in the courthouse under the direction
03:14of the Solicitor. If a defendant be acquitted, that ends the matter. If he be convicted, he may move for
03:19another trial or appeal to a competent court of review. The State has no appeal. Therefore, the law
03:25very properly provides that coroner's findings, committal hearings, and grand jury returns shall be merely
03:31parts of the process employed or permitted by the Solicitor, in whole or in part, prior to the actual
03:37trial of a case in the courthouse before the judge and the trial jury. There never is any question of
03:42the Solicitor General's supreme prosecuting status in the progress of a criminal investigation. Within
03:48the wide and sometimes arbitrary scope of his office, he stands first in responsibility as the
03:53State's accredited representative and agent in the prosecution. To be sure, there are constitutional and
03:59statutory curbs and restrictions upon a Solicitor General, but none of them may be invoked by a coroner.
Comments

Recommended