- 1 day ago
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00Acharya Ji, the elections in Bengal have just concluded.
00:07Marx used to say that a person's thinking is determined by their class, without exception.
00:12If they are a worker, they will think like a worker.
00:16If they are bourgeois or ruling class, their thinking will be like the ruling class.
00:21Bourgeois means roughly understand it as a rich person.
00:24And the second class is what you call the proletariat.
00:26These are the people who work by going to his factory.
00:30There will be class struggle between these two classes.
00:32The result will be that capitalism will be destroyed.
00:35And there will be revolution in the world.
00:37Classless society.
00:38There will be the establishment of a classless society.
00:41Who is Marx himself?
00:42Marx himself is a bourgeois.
00:44If someone asks where Marxism failed, do not give examples of Russia or China.
00:49Where did Marxism fail?
00:51The whole theory of Marx becomes completely irrelevant in front of Raja Ram Mohan Roy.
00:56And if you take this among Brahmins, it applies to Tilak.
00:58It applies to Gokhale.
01:00It applies to Agarkar.
01:02It applies to Ranade.
01:04Many great social reformers challenged the Brahminical dominance.
01:09If Swami Vivekananda is educated, would he be bourgeois or proletariat?
01:14They themselves are living proof that Marxist theory is flawed.
01:17And this is why when the election results come in Bengal, who will lose, who will win, only God knows.
01:25But this is...
01:25So, there can never really be a perfect theory then.
01:29Perfect theory would say that.
01:33Hello sir.
01:34The elections in Bengal have just concluded.
01:37I was reading your article that you wrote in the Pioneer after your trip to Kolkata.
01:42It was an Advaitic critique of Marxism.
01:46After reading it, I started studying a bit about Marxism and Karl Marx.
01:51So, I found it a bit interesting that Marx used to say that a person's thinking is determined by their
01:59class without exception.
02:01If they are a worker, their thinking will be like that of a worker.
02:06And if they are bourgeois or ruling class, their thinking will be like that of the ruling class.
02:14So, I was thinking according to this framework, what was Marx himself?
02:19Was he bourgeois, proletariat?
02:21He wrote the entire theory.
02:23So, I wanted to understand a bit from you according to the AP framework.
02:30How does one understand that?
02:32First of all, the one who has a lot of Marxism.
02:37They present a simple framework to everyone.
02:40You just talked about class.
02:42So, broadly speaking, there are two classes.
02:45Two classes.
02:45So, roughly speaking, two classes.
02:50There are two classes.
02:55There is one who has goods.
02:58What kind of goods?
03:00Those that can produce more goods like money, like a factory, like forest resources.
03:13So, this will be the one that, which is the honors class.
03:18The class that owns factors of production.
03:23Meaning resources from which production can occur, from which goods, means, things, goods can be produced.
03:35They own them.
03:37What is that class called?
03:39A person from that class is called bourgeois.
03:41Bourgeois.
03:42That entire class will be called bourgeoisie.
03:46Bourgeoisie.
03:47And anyone from that class, we will say, this is bourgeois.
03:50This is bourgeois.
03:51This is bourgeois.
03:52Okay.
03:53So, bourgeois roughly means a rich person.
03:56A rich man who has a factory, car, money, etc.
04:00He becomes a bourgeois.
04:03And the other class, this class struggle, is at the very heart of Marxism.
04:12The entire theory is built around it.
04:15What is the other class called proletariat?
04:20These are the people who go and work in their factory.
04:26These are the people who go and sell their labor to him.
04:30So, how does that upper class, the bourgeois, the bourgeoisie operate?
04:34Where does their money come from?
04:37By exploiting these people.
04:41Yes, from profit.
04:43Alright.
04:43If they have a factory, where does the profit from the factory go?
04:47So, it goes to them.
04:49It goes to the bourgeoisie.
04:51And those who are below the proletariat, how do they manage their work?
04:55They go there to work.
04:56They get paid.
04:57They receive wages.
04:58So, these are the two classes.
05:01And Marx's entire theory is that the whole story of history is written by the class struggle
05:10between these two.
05:12The entire story of history is written from the class struggle of these two.
05:23So, Marx said this in the 19th century.
05:26And then Lenin and others advanced this idea in the 20th century, meaning the last century.
05:35So, when Marx saw a lot of capitalistic exploitation in Europe, in England, he developed his theory
05:45with Engels and it was said that the class struggle between these two classes will result in the destruction
05:52of capitalism, leading to a revolution in the world.
05:57And from that revolution, an egalitarian state, a communist state will be established.
06:03Although Marxism and Communism are two different things, the indication was almost towards this
06:09classless society.
06:11The establishment of a classless society will occur.
06:14Right?
06:15So, this is what Marx said.
06:17So, in summary, what did Marx say?
06:21Now, let's understand it in very simple language.
06:25Because your question is, who is Marx himself?
06:30Marx has said that the class you are born into, that's it.
06:36If you are born into a bourgeois family, then you have no such thing as a choice.
06:47Now, you will have to behave according to your class.
06:52Your thoughts will also be according to your class.
06:56Your clothing and your entire focus, your entire labour, your entire effort will be that
07:05whatever you do should benefit your class.
07:09And your proletariat class, which you would call the class of the miserable, the destitute,
07:15the proletarians.
07:16There will always be a kind of class hostility between you and them.
07:23They will remain your enemy.
07:25You cannot think of their welfare, because you do not belong to that class.
07:30You are not of that class.
07:32Suppose it is the class of workers.
07:34Broadly speaking, we would say there is a class of wealthy people, a class of rich people,
07:38a class of educated people.
07:40There is a class of those who have some privilege.
07:44And there is a class that is weak, proletariat, downtrodden, poor, labourers, farmers, and less educated.
07:52This is their class.
07:53Alright?
07:54These are two classes.
07:55One is the class of labourers, and the other is the class of the wealthy.
07:58And they are saying that whoever is born in the class of the wealthy,
08:03he will think like a businessman, and will hold hostility towards the workers.
08:12The class you are born into determines what your consciousness will be like.
08:17This is what Marx said.
08:19Now here your question becomes quite evident.
08:22Who is Marx himself?
08:25Marx himself is bourgeois.
08:28Because he was not born in a worker's home.
08:30He was born in a lawyer's home.
08:33There was money.
08:34He was married into an aristocratic family.
08:38It was a Prussian aristocratic family.
08:40He was married into a royal family.
08:44He was well educated, unlike workers who might be uneducated.
08:48And just as a worker sells their labour, Marx never sold his labour.
08:55Who did Marx receive money from for his living?
08:59From Engels.
09:02And Engels himself had a factory in Manchester.
09:06So in every sense, Marx himself is bourgeois.
09:11But what Marx talked about, was for the welfare of the proletariat.
09:16So Marx himself is an example that there is something wrong with Marxism.
09:21And it's a significant flaw.
09:23If someone asks where Marxism failed, give an example.
09:26Don't give the example of Russia or China.
09:30Where did Marxism fail?
09:31It failed in Marx.
09:33The biggest example of Marxism failing is Marx himself.
09:38Because according to Marx, Marx himself, there should have been an exploiter.
09:45Marx should have been a wealthy man.
09:48Sucking the blood of the poor because he himself came from a bourgeois background.
09:53But Marx did not do anything like that.
09:57The thing is like this.
09:58So that fundamental assertion of Marxism that consciousness is class determined, it completely collapses right there.
10:06Now either you accept this, that Marx was just an exception in this.
10:12If only Marx was an exception, are we considering Marx as some kind of god or something?
10:16If Marx is an exception, then there could be other exceptions too.
10:20And if there could be other exceptions, then there could be a hundred exceptions.
10:23If there could be a hundred exceptions, then the theory is destroyed.
10:26The theory is destroyed.
10:28One possibility is that you directly accept that what you have said.
10:34That a person's consciousness, thoughts and inclinations all come from their class is incorrect.
10:41Yes, class is important.
10:43It has a significant impact on the individual.
10:47But that is not the only thing with which you can write a person's entire horoscope.
10:53You have made it completely deterministic, made it fatalistic like a horoscope.
10:59You said that someone born as a laborer will have a laborer's consciousness.
11:03And someone born in a rich household will have a rich person's consciousness.
11:07This is like fatalism, isn't it?
11:09This is fatalism.
11:10Another thing could be that if we consider Marxism's theory to be correct,
11:17so Marx is bourgeois,
11:22then what Marx should do
11:24is act for the interests of the bourgeois class.
11:28Because whatever anyone does from the bourgeois,
11:30it will be for the interests of the bourgeois class.
11:33So the theory Marx has given
11:36is to protect the interests of the bourgeois class.
11:39This all got messed up.
11:41Everything got messed up.
11:44But there is some evidence in favor of this as well.
11:47Because who has most widely adopted Marxist theory?
11:50The bourgeoisie has adopted it.
11:52The proletariat has not adopted it.
11:54The biggest proponents of Marxism can be found in universities,
11:58among writers and among artists.
12:01You will find a few among farmers and workers.
12:04Farmers and workers are the proletariat.
12:06You will not find much support for Marxism there.
12:09There you will not really find much support for Marxism at all.
12:13Instead, you will clearly see that people are mostly guided by religion.
12:17And they are also driven in the name of patriotism.
12:20And beyond this,
12:21they have many other concerns as well.
12:23Many other centers of focus
12:25and many different kinds of motivators influencing them.
12:29The bourgeois class has made it their own rigid philosophy.
12:32So this proves that even Marxist theory
12:34is a bourgeois theory for the bourgeois.
12:36So this proves that even Marxist theory
12:40is a bourgeois theory
12:43only for the bourgeoisie.
12:47Now if all three of these things are present,
12:49then it becomes a big mess.
12:51But if you take any one of these three things,
12:54whether the theory is wrong
12:55or Marx is an exception
12:58or Marx himself is bourgeois,
13:00any one of these three things
13:01leads to the conclusion that
13:03sir, do not create a fatalistic
13:05or deterministic theory.
13:07Because there are big issues in determinism
13:11when you say that
13:14the bourgeois consciousness
13:16can only think in a bourgeois way.
13:19So then Marx himself gets caught up in it
13:22because Marx is bourgeois.
13:24The Freudian theory says that
13:26that all thoughts
13:27are the rational manifestation
13:31of your subconscious desires.
13:35And what was said,
13:36this is also a thought
13:37from which subconscious desire did it come.
13:41If Freud said that
13:43your thoughts are the hidden desires
13:44in the basement of your mind
13:46and those basement desires manifest as thoughts,
13:49then this statement is also a thought.
13:52which desire's manifestation is this.
13:55Please tell us that too then.
13:58So you got stuck here too.
14:01All these kinds of theories,
14:03they trap you.
14:07Honestly,
14:09you should say that
14:10we are influenced by our environment.
14:15But it is not necessary
14:16that we behave according to that environment.
14:20Absolutely not necessary.
14:22Hmm.
14:24Actually, you know,
14:25when Lenin saw this,
14:28that all these workers
14:30are not actually making a revolution.
14:34This was called false consciousness.
14:36It was said that
14:38they should be revolting,
14:39but they are not.
14:40Because their minds
14:42are intoxicated with other things.
14:45That was not Marx's.
14:46Religion is the opium of the masses.
14:50So they are not even doing the revolution.
14:53So a new concept was given.
14:56These are called epicycles.
14:59These are patches
15:00added to Marx's theory.
15:03These patches.
15:05Somehow, yes,
15:07adjust the theory to preserve it.
15:09Because the empirical evidence
15:11is going against the theory.
15:13It appears that
15:14the working class,
15:16instead of making a revolution,
15:18is praising the wealthy.
15:19They are considering
15:21the wealthy as their ideals.
15:24So it doesn't seem like
15:26a revolution is happening anywhere.
15:28The revolutions that did occur,
15:30they didn't happen
15:31in the highly industrialized countries.
15:33They happened in the
15:34less industrialized countries.
15:36There was no revolution in America.
15:40All right.
15:42So then a concept was given.
15:44The vanguard intellectual.
15:45Who?
15:46The vanguard intellectual.
15:48It was said,
15:49look sir,
15:50these workers and so on,
15:53they don't have much intelligence.
15:56Someone will emerge
15:57from the bourgeois themselves.
16:00Who,
16:02disregarding their class interests,
16:04their class selfishness,
16:05their class interests,
16:08leaving his own class,
16:10he will go to these workers,
16:12to this proletariat.
16:13And then by removing
16:15their false consciousness,
16:16he will awaken them
16:17and prepare them for revolution.
16:20Now an even more astonishing thing
16:22has happened.
16:24Now see what you are saying.
16:25You are saying that there are two classes.
16:28And even the revolution can only be done
16:30by the bourgeois class.
16:31Meaning the proletariat has to do the revolution.
16:34But who will make it happen?
16:36Some separate vanguard intellectual will emerge
16:41from the bourgeois class itself.
16:44And then it will go and incite revolution among the workers.
16:47And who will this vanguard intellectual be?
16:48Someone who is educated but idealistic.
16:51Someone who is educated, idealistic but without selfishness.
16:53Only rebellion and fire.
16:55This person will go and tell the workers and farmers to rise and revolt.
17:00And we see many examples of this.
17:03If you look at the communist parties in India,
17:07much of their leadership
17:08has come from the largest bourgeois class in Indian society.
17:13The Brahmins.
17:15Do you understand?
17:17Marx himself became an example of a vanguard intellectual.
17:21Lenin became an example.
17:25All the big names in the entire communist history
17:28became examples of vanguard intellectuals.
17:32So what is happening?
17:34In a way, if they improve the jury,
17:36that it somehow doesn't justify.
17:39It won't be justified.
17:41As soon as you included something in the theory,
17:44the theory itself collapsed.
17:45In the same way, the theory itself collapsed.
17:49Because the theory says that there are two classes
17:51and there will always be continuous struggle between them.
17:54And this dialectical friction
17:55is what leads to something new.
17:58Which is how historical time keeps progressing.
18:01The theory says this.
18:02But when you said that there are two classes
18:04where someone from the opposing,
18:08adversarial,
18:10enemy class will emerge
18:11to lead the workers,
18:13then you have torn the theory apart, haven't you?
18:18It is much better to say that
18:21Sir Marx was absolutely right.
18:25The environment in which a person is born,
18:28raised, educated,
18:30and receives values and culture
18:32affects them.
18:34But it is not the final word.
18:37That's why I often tell you
18:38that the final thing
18:40is determined.
18:42Any theory that becomes absolute
18:44will get stuck.
18:46Any theory that says
18:48X always leads to Y.
18:53Then he will also have to explain
18:55where this theory came from.
18:59Where did that theory come from?
19:01What class does the theory
19:03that Google is providing belong to?
19:05Because there is someone
19:06giving the theory, right?
19:07What class does that person belong to?
19:09Then all those deterministic theories
19:11will definitely fail.
19:12That's why the framework given to you,
19:14the AP framework,
19:15is not deterministic.
19:17It stops at your intention.
19:19It tells you nothing is certain.
19:20You will decide what will happen.
19:23Marx's theory compels you in a way.
19:26It says if you are bourgeois,
19:28you will remain bourgeois.
19:30And if you are proletariat,
19:32you will remain proletariat.
19:35This compulsion is a problematic thing.
19:37There is no place
19:37for human consciousness in it.
19:42And that's why Marxism had to fail.
19:47If we look at other examples,
19:49there is the example of
19:50Raja Ram Mohan Roy
19:52who was also born
19:53into a Brahmin family.
19:55This is not the only example.
19:57You talk about the Brahmins.
19:59But I was talking about
20:00the Indian Communist Parties.
20:05It should be that
20:06if someone is born
20:07into a Brahmin family,
20:08they should do all the work
20:10that advances
20:11the dominance of the Brahmin class.
20:13What is Raja Ram Mohan Roy doing?
20:15He is a Bengali Brahmin.
20:17An elite Brahmin.
20:21Standing against Sati.
20:23Standing against child marriage.
20:25Standing against the caste system.
20:27Even standing against idol worship.
20:29What is this?
20:31They have completely dismantled
20:33the entire structure of their class.
20:35What would Marx say about this?
20:37Marx's entire theory
20:38completely falls apart
20:40in front of Raja Ram Mohan Roy.
20:41Despite being a Brahmin,
20:43Raja Ram Mohan Roy
20:44is working for other classes,
20:46leaving his own class.
20:48And this applies to Tilak
20:49among Brahmins,
20:51to Gokhale,
20:52to Agarkar
20:53and to Ranade as well.
20:55Many great social reformers
20:57have challenged
20:57Brahminical dominance
20:58and superstitions.
21:00They were all Brahmins.
21:01Swami Vivekananda.
21:02The dominance of Brahminism
21:04has been challenged
21:06and the superstitions
21:08have been challenged
21:09and they were all Brahmins.
21:11You can talk about
21:13Vivekananda among the Brahmins.
21:15Swami Dayanand Saraswati
21:17who raised a clarion call
21:19against the entire ritualism.
21:22And the traditional Brahmins
21:23did not like this at all.
21:25So what would Marx say about this?
21:27According to Marx,
21:28a person will behave
21:29according to their class.
21:30But here,
21:31the class is being broken,
21:33being stepped out of.
21:34Because a human is conscious
21:36and the ego has the power of choice.
21:39It's about intention.
21:40What you choose.
21:42It's about intention.
21:43Swami Vivekananda is educated.
21:46So will they be bourgeois
21:48or proletariat?
21:50They must be bourgeois.
21:53Swami Vivekananda
21:54is not coming from
21:55the Dalit community.
21:56He is not coming from
21:57the untouchable category.
21:59He is a Kayastha,
22:00educated
22:01and also looks handsome.
22:03It's good.
22:03Then why is he speaking
22:05against the caste system?
22:07And why is he speaking
22:08against all the privileges
22:09of the upper caste people?
22:11Why is he speaking
22:12against them?
22:13They also violated
22:15the Marxist theory.
22:17They themselves
22:18are living proof
22:19that the Marxist theory
22:20is flawed.
22:22And this is the reason
22:23that when the election results
22:25come in Bengal,
22:26who will lose,
22:28who will win,
22:28only God knows.
22:30But it is certain
22:31that the Marxists
22:32will not get anything
22:34because there is
22:35something wrong
22:36with your theory
22:37and you are not even
22:38showing the honesty
22:39to acknowledge that flaw.
22:41Instead,
22:42you are patching it up.
22:43You are putting
22:44patches on it.
22:45You are preparing
22:46epicyclic justifications
22:47one after another.
22:51There is no benefit
22:52in that.
22:53It's dishonesty.
22:55These days,
22:56in the name of Marxism,
22:58something else
22:58is allowed
22:59like the so-called
23:00Marxist countries
23:02which are the Russian
23:03administration
23:04and China.
23:05Look at North Korea
23:06as an example.
23:08Look,
23:09understand one thing.
23:11Any theory
23:12that does not look
23:13at the theorizer
23:14is bound to be hollow.
23:19like rationalism.
23:20What does rationalism say?
23:23I will inquire
23:24into everything
23:25except myself.
23:29I will inquire
23:30into everything
23:31about what is happening.
23:32But I will not
23:33look at myself
23:34to see what my intention is.
23:36I will not look at that.
23:37Any theory
23:38that excludes
23:39the theorizer
23:40from its ambit
23:41turns the theorizer
23:43into a god.
23:44It makes the theorizer
23:45an exception,
23:46a glorious exception
23:47and then things go wrong.
23:53Are you understanding
23:54the point?
23:55Is this
23:56a logical error?
23:58Is it just
23:59a logical option
24:00or not?
24:01No,
24:02it is psychological,
24:03not logical.
24:05You are refusing
24:06to understand
24:07the ego.
24:08The right
24:09and responsibility
24:10of choice
24:11inherent
24:12in human consciousness
24:15you are denying it.
24:17We have the greatest
24:18right to choose.
24:19I can choose
24:20my consciousness.
24:22My consciousness
24:23will not be determined
24:25by my class.
24:26Yes,
24:27class influences me.
24:28I completely accept that.
24:29Class has a big impact
24:30on me.
24:31But still,
24:32I have the power
24:32to choose.
24:33I can choose.
24:34So,
24:35this is a psychological error
24:37to think
24:38that a person
24:40will be like
24:41a puppet
24:43behaving according
24:44to where they were born.
24:46A human
24:47is not a puppet.
24:49All classes
24:50have acted
24:51against
24:51the interests
24:52of their own classes.
24:54Now,
24:55those whom you call
24:56the proletariat class,
24:58where did people
25:00like Kabir Sahib,
25:01Raida Sahib
25:02come from?
25:04Were they
25:05from the bourgeois
25:06class?
25:07These were
25:08from the
25:09proletariat.
25:10Lower classes.
25:12Lower classes
25:12but the literature
25:13they created
25:14is taught
25:14in universities.
25:15So,
25:16this became
25:16a bourgeois matter.
25:18Marx then here
25:21collapsed.
25:24That there is
25:25an uneducated
25:26cobbler there,
25:27a weaver there,
25:29a simple shopkeeper.
25:31All these
25:32were saint poets
25:33of the devotional stream
25:34and the literature
25:36they created
25:37later on,
25:39people are doing
25:40PhDs on it
25:41in universities.
25:44So,
25:45this has become
25:46a complete
25:47turnaround again.
25:48So,
25:48in a way,
25:49no theory
25:50can be perfect.
25:52So,
25:52there cannot
25:52really be
25:53a perfect theory
25:54in any way.
25:55Perfect theory
25:56would say
25:57that it's
25:57all up to you.
25:59It's a matter
26:00of intention.
26:03A perfect theory
26:04will never say
26:05that if
26:05X then Y,
26:06it will not
26:07be deterministic.
26:09It will never
26:10be deterministic.
26:10It will never
26:11be deterministic.
26:12It will leave
26:13the power
26:13in your hands.
26:15Any theory
26:16that doesn't
26:16leave power
26:17in your hands,
26:17what did it do?
26:19It made the one
26:20giving the theory
26:20into a god,
26:21didn't it?
26:21It declared,
26:22sir,
26:22this is Anupam Chatterjee,
26:23he's a Brahmin.
26:25So,
26:25now he will
26:26practice Brahmanism
26:27his entire life
26:28and he will
26:29exploit all the
26:30other castes
26:30and sudras.
26:32He made you
26:32a puppet,
26:33didn't he?
26:34He took away
26:35your power,
26:35didn't he?
26:36So,
26:37then the one
26:37who gives the theory
26:39becomes the
26:39exploiter himself.
26:41The biggest
26:42bourgeois
26:42became the one
26:43giving the theory
26:44because if the
26:45bourgeois is the
26:46one who exploits,
26:46then the biggest
26:47exploitation
26:48was done
26:49by the one
26:49giving the theory.
26:50This theorist
26:52exploited both
26:53the bourgeois
26:53and the proletariat
26:55because he
26:56confined both
26:57to roles.
26:59What could be
26:59a greater
27:00exploitation
27:01than telling
27:01the bourgeois
27:02that you will
27:02remain limited,
27:03confined to
27:04the bourgeois
27:04role and
27:05if you are
27:06proletariat,
27:07you will remain
27:08confined to
27:08the proletariat
27:09role.
27:10This means
27:10I have
27:11exploited both
27:12at the same
27:13time,
27:13right?
27:14So,
27:14the one
27:15who gave
27:15this theory
27:15became the
27:16master
27:16exploiter.
27:17Any theory
27:18that imprisons
27:20a person
27:20in determinism
27:21is very
27:22dangerous.
27:22It should
27:23not be
27:24accepted.
27:25Our ultimate
27:26concern is
27:27our freedom.
27:29Whoever has
27:29given you
27:30determinism
27:31has taken
27:32away your
27:32freedom.
27:34He took
27:34away your
27:35right to
27:35grow and
27:36change.
27:36Now,
27:37what revolution
27:38will you
27:38make?
27:39The revolution
27:40you make
27:40will be
27:41within your
27:41own
27:41limited scope.
27:43Then you
27:43cannot make
27:44a revolution
27:44at all.
27:46And the
27:46other class
27:47will be
27:47told that
27:48you will
27:49have to
27:49make a
27:49revolution
27:51because that
27:52is your
27:52class
27:52performance.
27:55That is
27:56your class
27:56responsibility.
27:57So,
27:58even if that
27:58revolution
27:58happens,
27:59it is not
27:59a revolution.
28:00It has
28:00become a
28:00duty.
28:02Because,
28:02sir,
28:03who am I?
28:03I am
28:03from the
28:04working class
28:05and according
28:05to Marx,
28:06it is my
28:06responsibility
28:07to make
28:07a revolution.
28:09So,
28:09now I am
28:09not really
28:10doing a
28:10revolution.
28:10I am
28:11fulfilling
28:11a
28:11responsibility.
28:12That is
28:12not even
28:12a revolution.
28:13It is
28:13a deterministic
28:13revolution.
28:15Then that
28:15was not
28:16a revolution
28:16at all.
28:17So,
28:17any
28:17theory
28:18that says
28:19if X
28:20then Y
28:20should be
28:21rejected
28:21because it
28:22is taking
28:23away human
28:23freedom.
28:24It is
28:25taking away
28:26human
28:26consciousness.
28:28It is
28:28taking away
28:29the right
28:29to choose.
28:32The correct
28:32theory will be
28:33the one that
28:33says,
28:34son,
28:34everything
28:35depends on
28:35you.
28:35Everything in
28:36the outside
28:36world is
28:37not in
28:37your hands.
28:38Marx was
28:39absolutely
28:39right.
28:40The outside
28:40world operates
28:42due to
28:42various
28:43reasons
28:43and we
28:44do not
28:44know
28:44them.
28:46Every
28:47kind of
28:47influence
28:47from the
28:48outside
28:48world can
28:49affect
28:49you.
28:50They are
28:50not in
28:50your
28:50control.
28:52Marx
28:52was
28:52absolutely
28:53right.
28:54But
28:54Marx
28:54did not
28:55consider
28:55the
28:55inner
28:55world
28:55at
28:56all.
28:56Marx
28:57did
28:57not
28:57acknowledge
28:57the
28:58inner
28:58world.
29:00I am
29:01telling
29:01you,
29:01the inner
29:02world
29:02is
29:02in
29:02your
29:02hands.
29:03There
29:03you
29:03will
29:03choose.
29:04From
29:05the
29:05outside
29:05you
29:05may
29:06have
29:06been
29:06born
29:06a
29:06brahmin,
29:07a
29:07laborer or
29:08something
29:08else.
29:09Born
29:09into
29:09wealth.
29:10That
29:11was
29:11not
29:11in
29:11your
29:11hands.
29:11Born
29:12black
29:12or
29:12white,
29:13born
29:13male
29:13or
29:13female.
29:14It
29:14was
29:14not
29:14in
29:14your
29:15hands.
29:16But
29:17what
29:17happens
29:17inside
29:18you,
29:18that
29:18is
29:18not
29:19deterministic.
29:20Marx
29:21will
29:21not
29:21determine
29:21that.
29:23No
29:23theory
29:23will
29:23determine
29:24that.
29:24Astrology
29:24will
29:24not
29:25determine
29:25that.
29:25Cast
29:25will
29:26not
29:26determine
29:26that.
29:26The
29:26horoscope
29:27will
29:27not
29:27determine
29:27that.
29:27Money
29:28will
29:28not
29:28determine
29:28that.
29:29You
29:30will
29:30decide
29:30that.
29:32It's
29:33all
29:33up
29:33to
29:33you.
29:33It's
29:34a
29:34game
29:34of
29:34your
29:34intentions.
29:35I
29:36often
29:36tell
29:36you
29:36this.
29:37You
29:37find
29:38the
29:38same
29:38thing
29:38in
29:38the
29:39framework.
29:39This
29:40is
29:40what
29:40they
29:40say
29:40in
29:41the
29:41framework.
29:41Yes.
29:43In
29:44theories,
29:44I
29:44also
29:44see
29:45that
29:45when
29:46such
29:46errors
29:47or
29:48any
29:48fallacy
29:49occurs,
29:50people
29:50do
29:51not
29:51want
29:51to
29:51dismantle
29:52the
29:52theory
29:53immediately.
29:54In
29:55fact,
29:55even
29:55after
29:56so
29:56much
29:56has
29:57happened,
29:58Marxism
29:58continues
29:59in
29:59some
30:00way
30:00despite
30:00internal
30:01and
30:02external
30:02examples
30:03of
30:04failure.
30:04So
30:05why
30:05is
30:05this?
30:07Because
30:07you
30:08have
30:08attached
30:09your
30:09self
30:10interest
30:10to
30:10that
30:11theory.
30:12Now
30:13the
30:13patches
30:14you
30:14are
30:14putting
30:14on
30:15that
30:15theory,
30:15the
30:15patches
30:16you
30:16are
30:16adding,
30:17the
30:17epicyclic
30:18defenses
30:18you
30:18are
30:19giving
30:19it
30:20are
30:21making
30:21that
30:21theory
30:22more
30:22absurd.
30:24But
30:24still
30:24you
30:25are
30:25determined
30:25to
30:26prove
30:26that
30:26the
30:26theory
30:27is
30:27correct,
30:28sir.
30:29This
30:30just
30:31shows
30:32that
30:32when
30:32the
30:32intention
30:33is
30:33corrupted
30:33by
30:34ego,
30:34even
30:35if
30:35the
30:35truth
30:36is
30:36right
30:36in
30:36front,
30:37it
30:37is
30:37not
30:37seen.
30:38When
30:38the
30:39eyes
30:39are
30:39filled
30:39with
30:40work,
30:41the
30:41truth
30:41is
30:42not
30:42visible.
30:43You
30:44can
30:44say
30:45when
30:45the
30:45eyes
30:45are
30:45filled
30:46with
30:46theory,
30:47the
30:48truth
30:48is
30:48not
30:48visible.
30:49Once
30:50someone's
30:51eyes
30:51are
30:51filled
30:51with
30:52theory,
30:52no
30:53matter
30:53how
30:53much
30:54empirical
30:54evidence
30:55you
30:55present,
30:56they
30:56will
30:56say
30:57this
30:57is
30:57not
30:57evidence,
30:58this
30:58is
30:58an
30:59aberration,
31:00this
31:00is
31:00not
31:01evidence,
31:01this
31:01is
31:01an
31:01exception.
31:03He
31:04won't
31:04agree.
31:06He'll
31:06say
31:06well
31:06this
31:07happens
31:07sometimes
31:07you
31:08know.
31:09So
31:09to
31:10explain
31:10these
31:10things
31:11we
31:12can
31:12have
31:12separate
31:13branches
31:13of
31:13the
31:13theory.
31:15To
31:15explain
31:16these
31:16things
31:16we
31:17can
31:17refer
31:17to
31:17the
31:17appendix
31:18now.
31:22If
31:23someone
31:23says
31:24that
31:25in
31:25a
31:25way
31:26the
31:26AP
31:27framework
31:27leaves
31:28all
31:28the
31:28burden
31:29on
31:29intention
31:30it
31:30does
31:31not
31:31consider
31:32external
31:32conditions
31:33at
31:34all.
31:34Absolutely
31:35absolutely
31:35absolutely
31:36they do.
31:37They
31:37absolutely
31:37do.
31:38If
31:39there
31:39were
31:39no
31:39external
31:40conditions
31:40where
31:40would
31:41you
31:41and
31:41I
31:41come
31:41from?
31:42This
31:42shirt
31:43of
31:43yours
31:43is
31:43also
31:43made
31:44from
31:44external
31:44conditions.
31:45Your
31:45nose
31:46is
31:46also
31:46made
31:46from
31:47external
31:47conditions.
31:48These
31:48flesh
31:48eyes
31:49of
31:49mine
31:49are
31:49also
31:49made
31:50from
31:50external
31:50conditions.
31:51This
31:51body
31:52itself
31:52is
31:52made
31:52from
31:53external
31:53conditions.
31:54Not
31:54only
31:55that
31:55the
31:55ego
31:55which
31:56sits
31:56at
31:56the
31:56center
31:56of
31:57the
31:57AP
31:57framework
31:57that
31:58ego
31:58is
31:59also
31:59created
31:59by
31:59the
32:00body.
32:00Its
32:00birth
32:01is
32:01biological
32:01right?
32:02So
32:02its
32:02birth
32:02is
32:03also
32:03from
32:03external
32:03conditions.
32:04The
32:05ego
32:05does
32:05not
32:05originate
32:06from
32:06itself
32:06it
32:07comes
32:07from
32:07something
32:08external
32:08called
32:08the
32:09body.
32:10So
32:10external
32:11conditions
32:11certainly
32:11have
32:12an
32:12impact.
32:13It
32:13undoubtedly
32:14has
32:14an
32:14impact.
32:15But
32:16we
32:16are
32:16saying
32:17whether
32:17they
32:18will
32:18have
32:18the
32:18greatest
32:18impact
32:19or
32:19not.
32:20You
32:21know
32:21that.
32:22External
32:23conditions
32:24are
32:24significant.
32:25But
32:25more
32:26significant
32:26is
32:27your
32:28determination.
32:29Your
32:30love.
32:31Love.
32:33It
32:34will
32:34outweigh
32:35any
32:35influence,
32:36any
32:36process.
32:38I
32:38am
32:38saying
32:39this.
32:39You
32:39decide.
32:40It
32:41won't
32:41affect.
32:42I
32:42am
32:42saying
32:43you
32:43decide.
32:46So
32:47within
32:47you,
32:49what
32:49you
32:50wanted
32:50will
32:50happen.
32:51Yes
32:51you
32:51cannot
32:52change
32:52the
32:52external
32:52things.
32:53Or
32:54whether
32:54you
32:54can
32:54change
32:54them
32:54is
32:55uncertain.
32:58Any
32:59kind
32:59of
32:59political
32:59ideology
33:00you
33:00have
33:00spoken
33:01on
33:01other
33:01ideologies
33:02as
33:02well.
33:03So
33:03whatever
33:04is
33:04happening
33:04these
33:05days
33:05the
33:05elections
33:06this
33:07ideology
33:07fight.
33:08Yes
33:09for
33:09example
33:09if
33:10it
33:10is
33:10said
33:10that
33:10you
33:11were
33:11born
33:11in
33:11a
33:11Muslim
33:11household
33:12then
33:12you
33:12have
33:13to
33:13do
33:13this.
33:14Reject
33:14this
33:14theory
33:15this
33:15ideology.
33:15If
33:19it
33:19what
33:20are
33:20all
33:20these
33:20taking
33:21away
33:21from
33:21you?
33:22Think
33:23about
33:23it.
33:24Like
33:24Marxism
33:25what
33:25are
33:25all
33:25these
33:26beliefs
33:26all
33:26these
33:26ideologies
33:27taking
33:27away
33:28from
33:28you?
33:28They
33:29are
33:29taking
33:29away
33:29your
33:29freedom.
33:30They
33:31are
33:31taking
33:31away
33:31your
33:32right
33:32to
33:32choose.
33:33They
33:33are
33:33telling
33:33you
33:34that
33:34you
33:34are
33:34Hindu
33:34you
33:35are
33:35Sikh
33:35you
33:35are
33:35Muslim
33:36so
33:36now
33:37you
33:37have
33:37to
33:37live
33:37and
33:38behave
33:38in
33:38this
33:38way.
33:39Why
33:39do
33:39you
33:39have
33:39to?
33:40You
33:48restrictions
33:48are
33:49being
33:49imposed
33:49on
33:50you
33:50in
33:50the
33:50name
33:50of
33:50beliefs.
33:55Just
33:55download
33:55Dachar Prashant
33:56there
33:56and
33:57there
33:57you
33:58go
33:58to
33:58the
33:58community
33:59section
34:00and
34:00you
34:00have
34:02live
34:03testimonials
34:04streaming
34:04in at
34:05the rate
34:05of
34:05one
34:06every
34:06five
34:06minutes.
34:07I'm
34:07seeing
34:07lives
34:08change
34:08in
34:09thousands
34:10if not
34:10millions
34:10every
34:11day
34:12in front
34:12of my
34:12own
34:12eyes.
34:13We're
34:13doing
34:13it.
34:13We
34:14have
34:14actually
34:14done
34:14it.
34:15Join
34:15the
34:19Acharya
34:19Prashant
34:20app.
34:20Your
34:21first
34:21month
34:21is
34:21completely
34:22free.
34:23You'll
34:23get
34:23full
34:23access
34:24to
34:24Gita
34:24mission.
34:25On
34:25the
34:26app
34:26you
34:26will
34:26get
34:26regular
34:27live
34:27sessions,
34:28daily
34:29exclusive
34:29conversations
34:30with
34:30Acharya
34:31Prashant,
34:32access
34:32to the
34:33vibrant
34:33Gita
34:33community,
34:35wisdom
34:35exams,
34:36curated
34:37news,
34:38audiobooks,
34:39quotes,
34:39and much
34:40more.
34:40Search
34:41Acharya
34:42Prashant
34:42on
34:42Google
34:43Play
34:43Store
34:43or
34:44Apple
34:44App
34:44Store
34:45and
34:45download
34:45now.
34:48Do
34:48Pats
34:52news還有美
34:54beniública。一些
34:54vozarmaを
34:55pitanesこう
34:55eat米米
34:57fairnessさ
Comments