Skip to playerSkip to main content
A fierce political clash has erupted after Pat Ryan accused Pete Hegseth of failing to adequately protect U.S. troops stationed in Kuwait.

During a heated exchange on Capitol Hill, Ryan claimed that American personnel were deployed in an area with “zero defense” against drone threats, raising serious concerns about force protection and military decision-making. The remarks come in the wake of a deadly incident in which multiple U.S. service members were killed, sparking outrage and demands for accountability.

Hegseth, however, strongly pushed back—stating that “every conceivable measure” was taken to ensure troop safety. The exchange has ignited a wider debate over military preparedness, leadership responsibility, and the growing risks posed by drone warfare in conflict zones.

#PatRyanHegsethKuwaitTroops #ZeroDefenseClaim #USTroopsKuwait #DroneAttackAllegations #HegsethResponse #TroopSafetyDebate #KuwaitIncident #USSoldiersKilled #PentagonDebate #ForceProtection #DroneWarfareRisks #USMilitaryLeadership #KuwaitAttackClaims #Congr

~PR.152~GR.122~ED.194~HT.318~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Internal analysis had said the site was indefensible from aerial attack and should not be used.
00:05Yet you sent our soldiers from the 103rd Sustainment Command there anyway.
00:11Is that true or false?
00:12We took proactive measures from the beginning to ensure force protection and defensive posture were maximized across the theater.
00:19Let's talk about what defenses they had.
00:22Prior to the attack, officers on the ground knew our troops were vulnerable.
00:26In fact, they requested additional force protection.
00:29Did they receive it?
00:30Wherever humanly possible, force protection and counter UAS was always made available.
00:34They did not.
00:35One survivor who's come forward from the unit said, quote, I mean, I would put it in the none category
00:43from a drone defense capability, none.
00:47We were moved closer to Iran to a deeply unsafe area that was a known target.
00:52Your spokesperson, Sean Parnell, in response to that reporting, said it was not true.
00:58Do you agree with that?
01:00He was calling these guys liars?
01:02I'm not calling our troops liars.
01:04They're not.
01:05That's what I asked.
01:05You are disparaging me that I don't care about the passing of our troops.
01:08Nope.
01:08I asked if you thought they're liars, Terry.
01:10That's disparaging and smearing in every way.
01:13Internal analysis had said the site was indefensible from aerial attack and should not be used.
01:18Yet you sent our soldiers from the 103rd sustainment command there anyway.
01:23Is that true or false?
01:25True or false?
01:27Straightforward question.
01:28Are you going to give me a chance to answer or just play gotcha?
01:31Did you send them there or not?
01:33I always, we took proactive measures from the beginning to ensure force protection and defensive
01:39posture were maximized across the theater.
01:41Let's talk about what defenses they had.
01:44Prior to the attack, officers on the ground knew our troops were vulnerable.
01:48In fact, they requested additional force protection.
01:51Did they receive it?
01:54Wherever humanly possible, force protection and counter-UAS was always made available.
01:58They did not.
01:59In fact, when asked to describe the base's defense, one survivor who's come forward from
02:05the unit said, quote, I mean, I would put it in the none category from a drone defense
02:12capability, none.
02:14Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
02:15We all just heard pretty powerful reporting, courtesy of Mr. Ryan, from many of our wounded
02:22troops who were injured in the attack in Kuwait.
02:25Mr. Secretary, you heard direct quotes from some of them.
02:28Uh, via CBS's reporting, they were willing to talk to the press.
02:32Things like they were unprepared providing defense for themselves in the unit.
02:37Things like we were moved closer to Iran to a deeply unsafe area that was a known target.
02:44Your spokesperson, Sean Parnell, in response to that reporting, said it was not true.
02:50Do you agree with that?
02:51He's calling these guys liars?
02:54I'm not calling our troops liars.
02:56And I don't know if what you're representing is correct or not.
02:59I'll take you at your word on that.
03:00But all I know is that we took every effort possible at the commencement of this campaign
03:05to ensure the defense of our troops, to include moving them off of known bases to places that
03:11were not known and we had intel where intel were not known, and then those were fortified
03:15with bunkers and other fortifications with theater air defenses.
03:18Was our concern that something could be true?
03:20I'm going to pause you there.
03:21I'm going to give you a chance.
03:23You're disparaging me that I don't care.
03:25I'm asking you whether you think they're liars or not.
03:27That's what I asked you.
03:27You and you are disparaging me that I don't care about the passing of our troops.
03:30Nope.
03:30I asked if you thought they're liars, Terry.
03:32That's disparaging and smearing in every way.
03:35Nobody cares more about the fate of our troops.
03:37Nobody cares about the health of our troops.
03:39Mr. Secretary.
03:39Nobody wants to bring them all hope more than I can.
03:40Mr. Secretary, I understand, but he controls the time.
03:44He controls the time.
03:45You get to control your answer.
03:48And the gentleman's ready.
03:49If we're allowed to answer.
03:50Mr. Chairman, thank you.
03:51Secretary, my question was clear whether you thought they were liars or not.
03:54You don't seem to want to answer it.
03:55We can move on.
03:56The other part of what your spokesman said, and you just reiterated here, was that,
04:01and I'm quoting your spokesman, every possible measure has been taken to safeguard our troops.
04:05End quote.
04:06You're mean to tell us, and I'll give you a chance to clarify,
04:09there is not a single additional thing you could have done to protect those troops who are now wounded,
04:13six of whom are dead.
04:15I'm telling you that as a department, we did every conceivable thing at my level and every echelon down
04:22to ensure the maximum force protection for our troops.
04:25We live in a dangerous world and a dangerous place against a determined enemy that can't have a nuclear weapon,
04:30and that requires sacrifice and risk.
04:32And tragically, in this case, it meant six Americans lost their lives and others were wounded.
04:37And we all know that.
04:39And that's part of the cost.
04:41But it does not mean we didn't care.
04:43It doesn't mean we didn't commit.
04:44I didn't ask you that.
04:45It doesn't mean we didn't do everything possible, which we did.
04:47But let's be clear about what was done.
04:49There were T-walls there, essentially.
04:50There was no overhead protection.
04:52The known threat in that environment, and I think we all here understand it, is overhead drone strike.
04:57There was no protection for overhead drone strike.
04:59So I'm struggling to understand how your answer and your spokesman's answer is that every possible measure was taken.
05:05We can move on.
05:06Mr. Chairman and Chairman Cain, I want to ask you something about a different topic.
05:11Folks at home know you're the senior military officer in our armed services.
05:14They may not have as much of an understanding of your role in the chain of command.
05:18You're outside the operational chain of command.
05:19But you are the president's and the secretary's senior military advisor.
05:24So I want to ask a very basic thing, what you would expect our commanders in the field, our troops
05:30to do,
05:31should the enemy lay down their weapons and try to surrender.
05:34What would you expect commanders in the field to do?
05:38Well, sir, I think I'll go back to something I said earlier with deep respect for your question.
05:45But I think you're trying to take me to a partisan place here, and I can't let you do that.
05:51General, as always, I respect your desire to avoid it.
05:55I'm not trying to put you in a partisan place.
05:56No, no, and I know that.
05:57But, you know, our officers and enlisted service members always follow lawful orders.
06:03There's a checklist for them to do that.
06:05And I just – I'll stay in the middle.
06:10Understood, General.
06:11Secretary, let me give you a chance.
06:12And you've been asked about this earlier.
06:13You said in, I think, your press conference, essentially, and I'll quote you here,
06:17no quarter, no mercy for our enemies.
06:21That's the end of the quote.
06:22Is your guidance that you expect our troops in harm's way if there's a foreign enemy surrendering,
06:29laying down their arms they're supposed to provide no quarter and kill them?
06:34You denied it, but you were indeed trying to take the chairman to a partisan place.
06:38That was General Milley.
06:39That was the previous administration, which played politics.
06:42We don't play that way.
06:43It's a simple question.
06:44I'm asking what you meant.
06:45We go in and we ensure the rules of engagements are such that our troops have every authority possible.
06:50I'll give you another chance.
06:51In saying that, are you trying to tell commanders that that's what you expect?
06:55You're in the chain of command.
06:57It's a simple question.
06:58I understand that.
06:59My commanders know exactly what the guidance is with each and every mission,
07:02and they know every tool –
07:03Secretary, in refusing to answer it, I think you speak volumes.
07:06I think that's a dangerous thing.
07:07We all know the expectations.
07:09We know the law of war.
07:10We know what is lawful.
07:11I'd expect our commanders to understand that as well.
07:14I yield back, Mr. Chairman.
07:17Subscribe to One India and never miss an update.
07:22Download the One India app now.
Comments

Recommended