Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 hours ago
'Trump needs a better deal than Obama', says former US envoy for Iran

Elliott Abrams, former US Special Representative for Iran, said in an exclusive interview with Europe Today that Benjamin Netanyahu “will follow” whatever US President Donald Trump decides regarding the war with Iran.

READ MORE : http://www.euronews.com/2026/04/15/trump-needs-a-better-deal-than-obama-says-former-us-envoy-for-iran

Subscribe to our channel. Euronews is available on Dailymotion in 12 languages

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Pakistan has proposed, as we mentioned earlier, a second round of talks between the U.S. and Iran
00:06after last weekend's negotiations in Islamabad ended in a standoff.
00:11Yesterday, our EU editor Maria Tadeo spoke to President Donald Trump's former special
00:16representative to Iran, Elliot Abrams, and started by asking him what would constitute
00:21a good deal for the U.S. in those talks.
00:24The president needs to get a better deal than Barack Obama got in 2015 in the JCPOA,
00:32because he has reviled that agreement, the worst agreement in world history. So he's
00:37going to get better than that. That deal put off for maybe 10 years or so the Iranian nuclear program,
00:46but it said nothing about support for proxies, and it said nothing about the ballistic missile
00:53program. So I think Iran has got to be willing to give on those, or else the president will be
01:01forced to do something more. He's got now the blockade. What he has not done, and might be a
01:07next step, would be taking an island in the Persian Gulf. But again, I think for all sorts of obvious
01:15reasons, politics, the U.S. economy, the elections in November, I don't think he wants to do that.
01:23The question, I think, is who's making decisions in Tehran, and how much responsibility do they have?
01:31And that is a good question. So who do you think that person is? And of course,
01:34this is all playing out big time in the energy market.
01:37Yeah, I don't think there is one person. There was in the late Supreme Leader. He could actually
01:44make a decision, one person, and make it stick. His son, who is now Supreme Leader, may even be in
01:51a coma. We don't know. Even if he is not in a coma, he's not able to enforce his rule.
02:01He's too new,
02:02too young. So I think it's probably a ruling group, a group of three or five or seven or 10
02:10people
02:11who sit at a table. Well, maybe they don't sit at a table because they're afraid a table will be
02:16hit
02:16by a bomb, but who talk to each other somehow and figure out how far can we go here. I
02:24think that's
02:24going to be a real problem. Of course, there's talks now between the Israelis and the Lebanese
02:29government, too, when you talk about the proxies. What is the calculus that Israel is making?
02:36The Israeli calculus, I think, is, look, they were attacked by Hezbollah. They were, and the U.S.
02:42was in a war with Iran, not with Lebanon. And Hezbollah, presumably under instructions from Tehran,
02:49attacked Israel. So the Israelis are pushing back. The Lebanese government, the Lebanese army are doing
02:54nothing. So the Israelis are pushing back. On the Iran front, they will follow President Trump.
03:01That is, when he said— If President Trump says that's a good deal, will they accept it?
03:05You believe they will accept it? Absolutely. Yeah. And what makes you believe that?
03:11Pardon? What makes you believe that? There's many who think Israel will still want to continue.
03:17Yeah. They may still want to, but they won't. They have a very close relationship with the United
03:22States under President Trump. Netanyahu and Trump have a close relationship. In the 12-day war last
03:27year, last June, when Trump said stop, they stopped. And I think they will here, too.
03:33We've heard now the U.S. president repeat it multiple times. NATO did not help. NATO countries say this is
03:38a
03:39defensive alliance. He keeps saying NATO, and the Europeans in particular, it's a paper tiger. What
03:44ramifications in the medium term is this going to have? On the medium term, I would take to be three
03:50years, meaning the Trump years. You've got three years to go. The relationship is not going to improve
03:56much. He won't get out of NATO. I don't think he has the ability to get out of NATO legally.
04:01Under U.S.
04:02law, it takes more than a year, and you need Congress. But the relationship is clearly weakened. To me,
04:09the real question is, who is our next president, and will he try to rebuild that relationship?
Comments

Recommended